3 Responses

1. 

   1)

   O.P. said on 9/7/2004 @ 5:42pm PT: [Permalink]

   Bush is right about one thing, Iraq had nothing to do with the attacks of Spetember 11, 2001.

   I sometimes wish that instead of Iraq, Bush had sent us in to topple the government of Vietnam.

   It would have made just as much sense, and a grief stricken people, eager to strike back at people who resemble their attackers would have seen the war for the lie that it is.

   And I read where some experts believe that Osama bin Laden is now just a symbol, not a strategist in al Qaeda. Hmm, since Bush is determined to never, ever confront anyone who is an actual threat to the U.S., maybe he’ll finally go after Osama.

2. 

   2)

   jaime said on 9/8/2004 @ 5:32pm PT: [Permalink]

   Conservatives would say, "1000? That’s nothing. In Vietnam…l" They forget that there have been 8000 American casualties overall. If that rate happened over a 10 year plus period, as Vietnam did, we’d have 80000 injuries.

3. 

   3)

   caryvalentine said on 5/30/2006 @ 3:13pm PT: [Permalink]

   Investors hit the ground running early in 2006, casting indus buyaah com with the blue-chip averages rising for six out of the first seven sessions of the year, and the tech-fueled Nasdaq making it seven in a row caryvalentine http://caryvalentine.com/cvs_link_page.htm