READER COMMENTS ON
"Notes from the San Diego Press Conference on Busby/Bilbray Lawsuit Contesting the Results of the Election..."
(17 Responses so far...)
COMMENT #1 [Permalink]
...
Bluebear2
said on 7/31/2006 @ 2:04 pm PT...
Brad -
Check this out! Flip a switch in Diebold machine - changes everything!
COMMENT #2 [Permalink]
...
Laura
said on 7/31/2006 @ 2:41 pm PT...
BB2, You beat me to it. I was just going to link that same story. Thanks!
COMMENT #3 [Permalink]
...
Bluebear2
said on 7/31/2006 @ 2:45 pm PT...
You usually scoop me - LOL
COMMENT #4 [Permalink]
...
lildoggy
said on 7/31/2006 @ 2:48 pm PT...
I have yet to read or see anything on this within a newspaper or on network/cable TV.
Is this "BLACKOUT" heat related?
Time for another letter to the editor. If only I could tie this into Mel Gibson somehow....
COMMENT #5 [Permalink]
...
Miss Persistent
said on 7/31/2006 @ 3:59 pm PT...
And Yet, the Roveality is to assure voters (recent college graduates - among them republican operatives of the futute), that elections are always "messy" no need to bother your conscience with the particulars...aka move along folks...this is the way we've always done it. And, he says, the outcome is just fine, no matter.
We need to distinguish this fight from anything in the past.
COMMENT #6 [Permalink]
...
big dan
said on 7/31/2006 @ 7:44 pm PT...
You beat me to it, too, BB2. OK...it's good to see lawyers getting involved. Republicans hate lawyers...except the thousands that THEY have. Lawyers are ruining America (according to the Republicans)...except for THEIR crooked lawyers... You know what? I learned a while back, that it is the same reichwing radio shows and followers that want us all to hate lawyers, because they are are only weapons against them. I learned this after I learned about rightwing media...
COMMENT #7 [Permalink]
...
Laura
said on 7/31/2006 @ 8:46 pm PT...
COMMENT #8 [Permalink]
...
Laura
said on 7/31/2006 @ 8:47 pm PT...
COMMENT #9 [Permalink]
...
Bluebear2
said on 7/31/2006 @ 10:03 pm PT...
Laura #7
Photo #6: circuit board - notice grid with "Boot Area Configuration" at the top. This is switch and jumper settings to switch between various boot up devices.
Along the top and to the right of the red "Printer Pwr" connector is one of the switches - SW4. The long black socket with the white clip at the left end is for an SDRAM memory card.
Photo #8: Jumpers JP1-3, 5 & 6 are located to the left of the speaker. (Enlarging photo #5 shows which is which)
Also above the jumpers is another set of instructions based on the jumper settings.
Photo #9: Appears to be half of the case showing posts for 14 or 15 screws which hold the whole thing together.
Photo #20: Another switch - not labled.
The long white socket is for some other form of circuit board.
The other photos are just various views of the motherboard.
The point of their article is that by moving the jumpers and flipping the switches you can completely reconfigure how the machine boots up and the source of its boot instructions. (Programming)
COMMENT #10 [Permalink]
...
Laura
said on 7/31/2006 @ 10:06 pm PT...
Thank You BlueBear2, How significant is this? I get the idea that it can be switched but can it throw the whole election?
COMMENT #11 [Permalink]
...
Laura
said on 7/31/2006 @ 10:08 pm PT...
It seems to me if they can switch this, then they could switch it for a recount to get any results they want. Is that possible?
COMMENT #12 [Permalink]
...
xargaw
said on 7/31/2006 @ 11:21 pm PT...
I read the same story on the Diebold machines in Raw Story. The question I have is "why" is the machine engineered this way, if not to allow specifically for tampering? Someone should be questioning Diebold "under oath" for an explanation. If the machines were designed to be secure, they would be engineered to work one way under one set of conditions that cannot be altered in any way. Building a machine that can be operated with more than one set of instructions, i.e. programs and cannot be detected when a switch is made sounds like criminal intent from the get go.
COMMENT #13 [Permalink]
...
Alan C
said on 7/31/2006 @ 11:55 pm PT...
There is a lot of conflicting information on this issue.
The San Diego Union Tribune just editorialized against this as a partisan scare campaign.
Is this true?
How else do elections officials get machines out without paid, trained poll inspectors taking them home?
What was the result of the manuel recount audit required by state law? Any vote discrepancy?
COMMENT #14 [Permalink]
...
Alan C
said on 7/31/2006 @ 11:58 pm PT...
Also that story referenced above is about the diebold TS - I do not think that is what is ok'd for use in CA
Isn"t it the optical scan or "os"?
COMMENT #15 [Permalink]
...
Brad
said on 8/1/2006 @ 1:12 am PT...
Alan C -
As pointed out in today's press conference in San Diego, Paul Lehto's own county in Washington state serves half a million voters by deploying machines on election day morning with 9 trucks.
Haas already owns a fleet of trucks at the San Diego County Registrar's office. He simply doesn't wish to follow the law.
Yes, now that we've finally gotten *some* of the information on the 1% audit (only days ago) all manners of irregularities are being found. Amongst them, Haas' horrific administration of the 1% audit!
The story referenced at RAW is about the Diebold TS system. San Diego County used a mix of Diebold optical-scan (OS) and touch-screen (TSx, which is the later version of the TS system and includes a so-called "voter verified paper trail" printer)
COMMENT #16 [Permalink]
...
big dan
said on 8/1/2006 @ 4:34 am PT...
Maybe RFK jr can put this in his lawsuit? That the machines were DESIGNED ON PURPOSE with these flaws to make them easily manipulated??? Why would they design these machines to be manipulated at all? Instead of 100% secure? It's not a FLAW...it was on PURPOSE!
COMMENT #17 [Permalink]
...
Dredd
said on 8/1/2006 @ 6:49 am PT...
Miss Persistent #5
Hi!
I like the word "Roveality" you used ... very, very real ... based upon their own description of "reality" ... "something you make with your own press manipulation" ... which is better described by your word Roveality.