On today’s BradCast: Dozens of top, bi-partisan experts in government, national security and media predicted this moment last Summer, as they gamed out the various scenarios that might occur after Election Day. At the same time today, it’s wildly amusing to watch Republicans continue to pick up on so many of our reports on election integrity at The BRAD BLOG over the years and suddenly pretend to be concerned about it, after years of scoffing at such “libtard, sore loser conspiracy theories” regarding the dangers of computerized vote tallies and private voting system vendors in control of our public elections. [Audio link to today’s show is posted below summary.]
First up, the experts who predicted this moment. Most of the scenarios that the Transition Integrity Project (TIP) gamed out, they feared, would result in at least some level of violence and a potential Constitutional crisis. Donald Trump is largely proceeding as they’d predicted. But the co-founder of TIP, which organized the exercises to examine what Trump might do in the wake of a Joe Biden victory, tells me today that while “it’s like poison into the veins of the body politic…they’re not going to be able to get away with actually stealing the election.”
Dr. NILS GILMAN is an historian, Vice President of Programs at the Berggruen Institute and TIP co-founder and joins me again on today’s show. Earlier this year, in table-top exercises he helped to organize, the TIP group gamed out the various ways that Election 2020 might play out [PDF]. When we spoke with Gilman in August he cautioned that “all signs appeared to be flashing red,” as the experts found that all potential scenarios other than a “Biden landslide” could result in “both street-level violence and political impasse”.
So, with Trump’s continuing unwillingness to concede the election two weeks later; his false claims of massive “voter fraud” in at least half a dozen states failing to include any actual evidence; at least two dozen lawsuits challenging the election being tossed out of court or withdrawn by plaintiffs; along with the Administration’s refusal to work with the Biden Transition team, it seemed a good time to check back in with Gilman to see if the current scenario was predicted and, if so, how experts believed it would play out from here.
“We looked at four different scenarios” last summer, Gilman explains. But now, he says, “the world we ended up in was somewhere between the ‘Biden landslide’ and the ‘Biden clear-but-close-victory’. So you see the moves that Trump is trying to do that we anticipated when we ran these exercises last Summer. They are very similar to the ones we saw. He’s trying to convince people that there was cheating going on in the election, that there was electoral fraud. He’s trying to get state legislatures to potentially consider throwing out the results of the popular vote and instead putting in place a slate of Republican electors even though the people voted for Democratic electors.”
“I don’t think any of that is going to end up working,” says Gilman. “We’re not quite in ‘Biden landslide’ territory, but we’re not in a close election either. That’s why I don’t think Trump is going to be able to pull off what he was probably scheming to do.”
While he says “there’s a lot of crazy stuff happening in the fever swamps” and, indeed, there was some violence after Trump supporters and counter-protesters clashed over the weekend, Gilman believes that the conditions that would lead to worst of the scenarios examined have yet to materialize. And that’s a very good thing. So far. He explains why that is and what is, so far, missing from one of those worst case scenarios examined by his project.
Also today, Republicans — yes, even Sean Hannity! — is suddenly very troubled by secret software made by private voting system vendors like Dominion Voting, a company that we’ve been reporting on (along with all of the other equally shitty vendors) for years. In the past, the folks at Fox “News” like Hannity and now dead Breitbart “News” founder Andrew Breitbart, scoffed at our reporting. Breitbart took particular glee in attacking me personally over my reporting on the now defunct Diebold Elections Systems, Inc. (It seems unlikely that Breitbart “News”, with their “reporting” on Dominion today, even realize that the company now owns many of Diebold’s assets!)
But, over the past week or two, our traffic here has gone through the roof as the Rightwingers have suddenly become concerned about these issues for some odd reason, after years of dismissing them. Thanks, Rightwingers! (Yes, for example, if you are hearing misleading murmurs from the fever swamps — including from Hannity and Trump himself — tying Dominion to Venezuela in order to claim the company secretly stole the election for Biden, it’s due to this exclusive BRAD BLOG story that we broke more then 10 year ago! Glad ya’ll have finally decided to notice and become alarmed about our reporting! Just wait until you hear what George W. Bush did in Iraq!)
Then, we open up the phone lines to answer some more questions about all of this, including one caller who wonders what’s up with what she’s been seeing all over YouTube about Venezuela and Dominion?! And another who picked up on part of my conversation with Gilman about whether the Biden Administration intends to hold the criminal Trumpers accountable or whether, like the Obama Administration with the Bushies, they will make the mistake of “looking forward, not back.”
“People have to look close at what created the mess we’re in now,” says our wise caller Kelwin. “Trump is a bed sore on a sick, cancer-ridden political body of the United States. And getting rid of Trump is going to be like fixing a bed sore on a dying body. I like to say that charging and going after these people, that IS looking forward. It’s looking at stopping the pattern.”
All of that and much much more on today’s BradCast!…
So you think electronic voting machines and tabulators are completely ripe for fraud, that such election fraud has happened in the past in this country, and that it could (very likely) happen again in the future, but it 100% didn’t happen in this election at all? Or do you think it might have happened but on a very small scale? Or is it that there is only election fraud if it favors right wing candidate?
Eric @ 1:
Um…where did I say, or even indicate, or suggest that “it 100% didn’t happen in this election at all”?
(By the way, I’m not sure where I said that “such election fraud has happened in the past in this country” either, but you may need me to take this one slow for ya.)
Me thinks Eric@1 doesn’t recognized the difference between e-voting system vulnerabilities and an allegation that election fraud in-fact occurred in a given election.