Accountability still matters. Even for apparent Presidential misdeeds from more than 40 years ago, as discussed on today’s BradCast. [Audio link to full show follows this summary.]
Last week, New York Times‘ Peter Baker had quite a scoop. Ben Barnes, an 85-year old, longtime Democratic operative from Texas, detailed his claim that he and former Democratic Texas Governor turned Republican Presidential candidate John Connally took a trip through Middle Eastern capitals in the summer of 1980 to help convince Iran to not release the 52 Americans being held hostage until after that year’s election.
His claim was that Connally, eyeing a cabinet role in the Reagan Administration, was hoping to send the message to Iran that they would get a better deal with Reagan than with Carter. Barnes said the pair were debriefed upon returning stateside by Reagan campaign manager and, later, CIA Director, William Casey. The campaign was reportedly terrified that Carter would win the release of the hostages that year in what would become known as the “October Surprise”.
Instead, the hostages were ultimately released within an hour after Reagan being sworn in in January of 1981.
Our guest today, RUSS BAKER, (no relation to the Times’ Peter Baker), is a longtime investigative journalist, author and now Editor-in-Chief of WhoWhatWhy.org. He has personally known Barnes for years and tells us that he isn’t buying his story in the Times, said to have been revealed now by Barnes because the 98-year old Carter, who recently began hospice care, deserves to know the truth about what really happened.
Baker has been investigating the claim for decades that Casey himself engineered the “traitorous” deal on behalf of the Reagan camp and finds that explanation far more plausible than the Barnes/Connally scheme. Baker wrote his own response to Peter Baker’s exclusive in a detailed newsletter article over the weekend headlined “The Iran Hostages, Carter, Reagan, and Bush: What the NY Times ‘Scoop’ Missed.”
But whether it happened as Barnes claims or in some other way, Russ Baker, author of the 2009 best seller, FAMILY OF SECRETS: The Bush Dynasty, America’s Invisible Government, and the Hidden History of the Last Fifty Years explains why all of this still matters 43 years later; how the corporate media has largely ignored what would have been an extraordinary scandal by the Reagan campaign, George Bush Sr.’s role in all of this, and how different the world would likely be today if not for Reagan’s defeat — by hook or by crook — of Carter.
“If Reagan had not been elected, I think it’s safe to say that George HW Bush would not have been elected President himself,” Baker tells me. “Then we wouldn’t have had the Gulf War. His son wouldn’t have become President and we wouldn’t have had the Iraq War. You might not even have had 9/11, frankly, because a lot of the anger that generated these activities that led to 9/11 [which] had to do with policies that were carried out by these presidencies. Maybe even more importantly, there are huge differences between Democratic and Republican Administrations around climate change. Think of what would have happened if Al Gore had been President. You can be pretty sure we would have had a very different policy years ago about climate change. So our very ability to continue to live on Earth may have been affected by all of these things.”
“I don’t think they would have changed the media ownership laws. I think there would have been a lot more regulation. I don’t think you would have even had a Rupert Murdoch and a Fox News. I don’t think you would have had the current composition of the Supreme Court and all of their rulings for business and the wealthy. I think campaign contributions would have been restricted, and that would have changed Congress itself,” He continues. “So whatever you want to pick, I think it basically was a coup, by making sure Carter didn’t get re-elected. And all of these regimes since then were extensions of that coup government. With some partial breaks, I would say — people like Clinton and Obama, very very limited in their ability to do much. I think their hands were largely tied. So a very profound change to everything as a result of this October Surprise situation.”
As to the corporate media’s failure in all of this, it’s not that they won’t hold Presidents and candidates accountable, says Baker, as he lists a bunch of Democratic candidates and Presidents whose “scandals” have been covered in great detail by the media, “but they seem to go hard only on certain people, and not always for the right reasons.”
There is much more to tune in for in today’s conversation that it’d be impossible to summarize here.
Finally, we close with some news of the day, including the huge, deadly tornado that ravaged parts of rural Mississippi over the weekend, and the connection to climate change, as Desi Doyen joins to explain.
Also, we have the latest on today’s mass shooting at a private Christian elementary school in Nashville, Tennessee, where three 9-year old and three adults were murdered by an assault weapon-wielding 28-year old woman. It was the 129th mass shooting of the year in the U.S., according to CNN and the Gun Violence Archive.
As the breaking news of the shooting was being broadcast live today on Fox “News”, a woman whose family was victim to another recent school shooting in a different state happened to be visiting Nashville. She briefly took over the cameras to explain how tired she was of all of this. Fox, after breaking away and then returning to the woman several times, finally cut her off, with anchor John Roberts concurring that he and his colleagues are, in fact, also becoming tired of the carnage. But are they really? You certainly wouldn’t know it from all the activism that Fox “News” does in favor of elected officials who continue to block any and all rational gun safety legislation.
We have a few words for Roberts and Fox in response at the end of today’s program…
I think hate radio and Faux still exist, but with a Fairness Doctrine, they would have to be balanced out. Faux would have to be “Fair and Balanced.”
One more thing, assault weapons would still be banned, and hundreds of people would still be alive.
Brian –
To be fair, the Fairness Doctrine only applied (when it did), to *broadcast* media. Over the air, in other words. It never applied to cable. Whether it would have been somehow applied to cable, if not for Reagan, etc. etc. is another matter.
(There is a good Constitutional argument *against* it applying to cable…but that’s another convo for a different day.)