WE WELCOME YOUR ANNIVERSARY SUPPORT/DONATIONS HERE!
And here I thought dealing with one President in a single hour on The BradCast was tough. Now we’ve got the previous one on trial after his second impeachment and a new one unveiling an ambitious new agenda to begin cleaning up the other guy’s horrific mess, particularly on climate today…and not a moment too soon! [Audio link to full show is posted below summary.]
First up today, the Department of Homeland Security issues a new warning about ongoing threats of violence by domestic, home-grown terrorists in the U.S., many of whom have been radicalized by Donald Trump’s many lies about the 2020 election having been stolen.
Then, It’s been only three weeks since Trump encouraged his MAGA Mob to march down Pennsylvania Avenue and “fight like hell” to prevent the formal counting of Electoral College votes by the U.S. Congress. The attempted insurrectionists violently broke into the U.S. Capitol, called for the hanging of the Vice President, succeeded in shutting down the tally for several hours and sent lawmakers fleeing for their lives into secured locations. Five people were killed, including a Capitol Police officer, in the ensuing violence. One week later, then President Trump was impeached by the U.S. House for a second time, this time for “Incitement of Insurrection”, though the Senate’s then Majority Leader Mitch McConnell refused to convene a trial. One week after that, Joe Biden was successfully sworn in as President. And today, just three weeks to the day since the Trump-incited mob’s murderous attack on the Capitol, with Democrats now officially in the Senate majority, Trump’s second Impeachment Trial has officially begun.
While the arguments in the trial will not be presented in full for another two weeks, Republican Senator and pretend Constitutionalist Rand Paul forced a vote on Tuesday, just after Senators were sworn in as “impartial jurors”, to try and dismiss the entire matter by falsely claiming that an Impeachment trial after a President is out of office is “unconstitutional”. (Though he repeatedly argued that “private citizens” cannot be impeached and that “If the accused is no longer President – where is the constitutional power to impeach him?”)
Joining us today to answer to the clearly false and almost-certainly disingenuous argument proffered by Paul — and, incredibly, supported by 45 of the Senate’s 50 Republicans who voted in favor of his resolution on Tuesday — is Constitutional law expert RON FEIN of the non-partisan government accountability group Free Speech for People. Fein, with John Bonifaz and Ben Clements, authored the 2018 book, The Constitution Demands It: The Case for the Impeachment of Donald Trump.
“The obvious flaw,” in Paul’s argument, Fein explains, is that Trump WAS impeached while he was President, and then McConnell stalled the process of the Senate trial by refusing to allow it to be held until Trump was already out of office.” But on the broader issue, as he tells us, impeachment trials may absolutely be held after an official is out of office. “Congress has done it before and explicitly considered that exact question.”
“If their argument was allowed to go forth, then what it would say is that any President can do whatever they want in the last couple of weeks of their term, because by the time they would get impeached, and by the time the Senate could convene for a trial, they’d be out of office already,” he persuasively argues. “Disqualification from future office is an important remedy and penalty for impeachment. It is important to have that hanging over the head of a President even in their last couple of weeks in office.”
We also discuss whether the votes of 45 GOP Senators — including McConnell, who just last week conceded that Trump “provoked” the riot at the Capitol — to dismiss the trial, signals that it will be impossible to win over the 17 Republicans needed to win the two-thirds vote necessary for a conviction; whether a vote can be held to prevent Trump from holding future office even without conviction; whether a second failure to win a conviction in a second impeachment would redound to Trump’s benefit; and whether a resolution to censure the disgraced former President would serve as any kind of deterrent for similar behavior in the future (by Trump or other future Presidents), in the event that he is not convicted once again.
Fein also rings in with his thoughts in response to the GOP’s stolen and packed U.S. Supreme Court which, on Monday, dismissed two cases regarding Trump’s alleged violation of the Constitution’s Emoluments Clause as “moot” since he is no longer in office and why it took so long for the cases to even reach the high court. We also discuss whether Fein believes that Trump actually did pardon himself, but is keeping that pardon a secret, somehow, until he’s actually charged with a federal crime.
Finally, in far less maddening news, it was “Climate Day” in Joe Biden’s new White House on Wednesday! And the new President unveiled an historically ambitious climate agenda that will, among many other things, if successful, result in carbon emissions-free power, nationally, by 2035. Declaring that “we can’t wait any longer” to address our worsening climate crisis, Biden detailed his new Executive Orders and Directives to “supercharge” the United States’ efforts to combat global warming by pausing new oil and gas leases on federal lands, ending fossil fuel industry subsidies, and creating millions of new jobs in the electric car market and renewable energy industry, and by capping and closing old, unused mines and wells across the nation. His new Climate Envoy, former Sec. of State John Kerry and new White House National Climate Advisor, former EPA Administrator Gina McCarthy, also responded to media questions (naturally framed by rightwing talking points) during a White House briefing. We share some of their remarks, and the entirety of Biden’s historic announcement during today’s very busy BradCast…
I came across a reference to your blog, so I thought I would check it out. You seemed to be very unbiased in the article I read. I was wondering what changed that caused you to lose your objectivity??
https://m.huffpost.com/us/entry...mpression=true