On today’s BradCast, it was (another) very bad day for Donald Trump, but a good day for Hillary Clinton, if anybody was able to notice, thanks to another shameful weekend by the mainstream corporate media. [Audio link to show follows below.]
Our stable genius President didn’t make it any easier on himself by beginning his day with a grotesquely offensively comparison of his ongoing Constitutional impeachment inquiry to “a lynching”. But it got far worse for Trump (if nowhere near as bad as an actual lynching), when his top diplomat in Ukraine, Bill Taylor, testified before impeachment investigators in the U.S. House. The veteran diplomat and foreign policy elder statesman spelled out, in no uncertain terms — based on copious, contemporaneous notes — that Trump had personally tied the release of nearly $400 million in military assistance for Ukraine to a quid pro quo requirement that Ukraine’s President publicly commit to investigating Trump’s 2020 political rival Joe Biden.
The testimony, according to House impeachment investigators, directly contradicts Trump, numerous top White House officials, and a number of Trump-appointees who offered earlier testimony. It also included a 15-page opening statement from Taylor, accurately described as “damning” by a number of Democrats.
Then, while you may or may not have heard about the news which was buried deep inside weekend papers on Saturday, the State Department — Trump’s OWN State Department — concluded its years-long probe of emails sent to and from Hillary Clinton’s private email server. The report, sent to Congress with little or no fanfare from either the media or the Trump Administration, found “no persuasive evidence of systemic, deliberate mishandling of classified information” by Clinton or anybody else in the Department.
The faux “scandal” that Trump, his campaign and his party disingenuously used to help propel him to office in 2016 has officially ended with a barely imperceptible whimper. That, even as top White House officials from daughter Ivanka Trump to son-in-law Jared Kushner to Steve Bannon to Stephen Miller to Executive Agency heads like Education Secretary Betsy DeVos have all since been found to have carried out government business on private email servers and have even reportedly shared classified information on private texting apps.
We’re joined today by longtime media analyst ERIC BOEHLERT to discuss not only the phony “BUT HER EMAILS!” scandal that Trump falsely described during his campaign as “worse than Watergate” — and which even today results in “Lock her up!” chants at his unhinged campaign rallies — but the corporate mainstream media’s dreadful failure and stunning “whitewash” of its own role in colluding with the Trump Campaign by constantly over-hyping the baseless charges in the run up to the fateful 2016 Presidential election.
“The email story does not exist without the Beltway press,” Boehlert tells me, noting their coverage of the end of State Department’s probe on page 16 (NYT) and 6 (WaPo) on Saturday. “Most of the network newscasts never even reported on the story over the weekend.
“This email story ran from March 2015 to November 2016,” he rails. “This story rolled for months and months. If you take one peek, in September 2015, on average, if you look at the Washington Post — print and online — they were publishing two Clinton email stories every day for the month of September 2015. We forget how bad it was. Pick your adjective. Mind-boggling. Numbing. Irresponsible. Reckless. And what’s important [is] to not let this happen again.”
But, of course, it will, especially given the lack of contrition for this failure evidenced by the story’s coverage this weekend. “These are smart people,” he says. “They play dumb on an epic scale.” Boehlert aptly compares the media’s failure in becoming “hugely investigated in this story from the get to” to their similarly reckless coverage of the Bush Administration’s claim that Iraq had WMD in the run-up to our disastrous war there beginning in 2003. He also goes on to offer warnings about the Administration’s schemes to use the very same playbook in 2020.
“If you’re concerned that we’re going to have a repeat because the press not only refuses to learn any lessons from 2016, but doesn’t even admit there are any lessons to be learned — look at Joe Biden and the Ukraine. It’s happening again. Not as bad as the other, because Trump has inadvertently impeached himself by publicly confessing to colluding with a foreign power. But we saw it in the beginning of this story, a lot of headlines, “Trump and Biden both tainted by Ukraine’. No, they’re not. Let’s not do that,” he pleads.
We discuss why this seems to happen over and over (remember how the media fell for the John Kerry “Swiftboat scandal” in the 2004 campaign?) when it comes to the media’s coverage of Democrats, what the media should have done both in 2016 and today, and what Americans can do to help avoid being taken for another predictable ride in 2020.
Finally, were joined by Desi Doyen for our latest Green News Report as Trump’s Energy Secretary calls it quits, Arizona looks toward a future without water, and ExxonMobil goes on trial for climate fraud. All while the GNR creeps toward our 1000th episode and we gently ask for your support of unabashedly independent, fearless and accurate news over your public airwaves via BradBlog.com/Donate.
Think this will help?
https://www.elmovotes.org
In tribute to Jimmy Carter, whose Foundation produced this open-source software, and uses it to monitor elections around the world (curiously, except for in the U.S.).
Richard asked @1:
It couldn’t hurt! Probably. Hard to tell from the website who they are, and what sort of resources they have behind them. It looks like a smart program in theory. But that’s a long way from implementation I’m guessing, based on the sparse info available at the site.
I suspect the success of such a program would depend in no small part on how widespread it is.
As to why the Carter Center doesn’t monitor US elections, it’s my understanding that they do not because US elections do not meet the Carter Center’s minimum standards for democratic elections.