2 Responses

1. 

   1)

   Matt Froelich said on 9/24/2019 @ 5:52pm PT: [Permalink]

   Now that Trump is pushing evidence that Biden is as dirty as is claimed about Trump, who are the voters Pelosi sought to win over going to believe? Trump is going to beat Biden to a pulp over the details of the Biden family involvement in the Ukraine while not giving a damn what Pelosi does. The Senate and the Supremecist Court will see to it that nothing happens to Trump while he coasts to an easy victory in 2020, provided by the cowardice and mistakes of Nancy Pelosi in not acting as soon as Trump was inaugurated. Think of all the damage she could have prevented.

2. 

   2)

   Dredd said on 9/25/2019 @ 5:16am PT: [Permalink]

   Matt @ #1,

   Don’t conflate an investigation into corruption that took place several years ago with the one that just started:

   “What it does not need is underinformed dinosaurs wading into its sensitive political ecosystem to make points for domestic American consumption. Unfortunately, this is precisely what is now happening “” thanks to President Trump’s personal lawyer, Rudy Giuliani [Rudy Poot].

   The trouble began when right-wing bloggers sought to meld these two points into a single conspiracy in which Joe Biden had the prosecutor sacked to protect his son’s business interests. I may be an outsider to the bewildering mess that is Ukrainian politics, but, on this particular issue, I have a genuine insight into what happened, having written extensively about Hunter Biden’s ex-employer, Mykola Zlochevsky.

   As a result, when journalists seek the fire behind the smoke in the Biden-Ukraine tale, they often call to ask my opinion. Many are eager to flesh out what seems a satisfyingly simple conspiracy, but I have to tell them: It isn’t true. The timeline doesn’t work. The investigation into Burisma, Hunter Biden’s employer, had ground to a halt long before the prosecutor was sacked. A subsequent probe into the company’s owner was opened because of a request from Ukrainian legislators, not because of prosecutorial initiative. There is, in short, no there there; the bloggers are putting two and two together “” and coming up with 22.”

   (Whistleblowers According To The Early Americans – 3).