READER COMMENTS ON
"NYTimes Corrects One Error in Breitbart Story, But Not the Ones Regarding ACORN ... Yet"
(17 Responses so far...)
COMMENT #1 [Permalink]
...
Davey Crocket
said on 6/30/2011 @ 9:17 pm PT...
I like the stuff Andrew puts out. After I read your blurbs on O'keefe, I did sme research and donated $ to project verities. I believe in opposing forces forcing truth to emerge. Any way, O'keefe is an Eagle Scout and that earns points with me.
COMMENT #2 [Permalink]
...
Bill Michtom
said on 6/30/2011 @ 11:01 pm PT...
Brisbane is, unfortunately, a member of the club, not an independent voice for the public.
COMMENT #3 [Permalink]
...
gus w
said on 7/1/2011 @ 6:49 am PT...
There seems to be another NYT reporter following the Weinergate saga who is communicating in the comments section of blogs with Breitbart pals. A strange way to do research.
COMMENT #4 [Permalink]
...
Ernest A. Canning
said on 7/1/2011 @ 8:40 am PT...
Wow! So our Davey Crocket thinks of convicted federal criminal James O'Keefe as an "Eagle Scout" and believes that by having a serial liar and shameless propagandist like Andrew Breitbart as an "opposing force" to someone like Brad Friedman who tirelessly strives to speak truth to power will somehow "force the truth to emerge."
It appears that Davey has been so taken in by the Fox "News" dissembling that he actually buys into what Bill Moyers refers to in Moyers on America as the charade of "fair and balanced."
"The charade of ‘fair and balanced’ --- by which two opposing people offer competing opinions with a host who assumes the viewer will arrive at the truth by splitting the difference --- to substitute for independent analysis….Objective journalism means describing the object being reported on, including the malfeasance, deceits, hypocrisy and lies of powerful people."
Talk about being Blinded by the Right.
COMMENT #5 [Permalink]
...
Dredd
said on 7/1/2011 @ 9:39 am PT...
COMMENT #6 [Permalink]
...
karenfromillinois
said on 7/1/2011 @ 9:45 am PT...
everything breitbart "reports" is just to harm and distract
todays real headlines should be...
ohio police beat,pepper spray and repeatedly taser a handicapped teen for not being polite enough to them
doj announces that while they believe prosecuting medical mj is a waste of money,they will do it anyway
omaha nuc plant has a fire from refueling accident because they dont have a back up windmill for cooling power
wisconsin sc justice grabs a reporters mic because their are no womens necks close by
minnosota govt shuts down and some peops might die so peops making ovr a mill a year are not inconveinced with a tax raise
and finally the big one
eric cantor has bet against the us goverment and stands to profit from a goverment shut down
COMMENT #7 [Permalink]
...
Chris Hooten
said on 7/1/2011 @ 10:20 am PT...
Breitbart is a lying, manipulative, narcissistic jackass. O'Keefe isn't much better, considering his sex-toy love-boat sting failure. Eagle scout? Give me a break.
COMMENT #8 [Permalink]
...
Davey Crocket
said on 7/1/2011 @ 11:12 am PT...
Ernest, Chris,
Desperate times call for desperate measures. In the battle of good vs. evil...my money is on O'Keefe et al.
:-)
COMMENT #9 [Permalink]
...
Brad Friedman
said on 7/1/2011 @ 1:30 pm PT...
Ernie Canning said @4:
Davey Crocket thinks of convicted federal criminal James O'Keefe as an "Eagle Scout" and believes that by having a serial liar and shameless propagandist like Andrew Breitbart as an "opposing force" to someone like Brad Friedman who tirelessly strives to speak truth to power will somehow "force the truth to emerge."
I'll simply take this opportunity to amend that statement by adding "...someone like Brad Friedman who tirelessly strives to speak [INDEPENDENTLY VERIFIABLE] truth to power..."
In other words, as I have always told folks who question why they should believe me, "just a blogger", about anything that, in fact, they shouldn't! They should make me prove my case. But they should also make the NYTimes, AP, WaPo, and everyone else --- including liars like Breitbart and O'Keefe --- prove their cases as well.
We strive to report only information that is independently verifiable here, since I don't think anybody should have to simply choose sides in a he-said/she-said debate, or just "believe" me because I reported something.
As usual, in the matter reported above concerning the NYTimes inaccurate reporting on ACORN, the issue of who has the story right is independently verifiable. Nobody has to simply believe me.
That some would choose to simply believe in verifiably repeated liars --- who can and have been independently verified as such again and again --- speaks a great deal to the credibility and character, or lack thereof, of our courageously pseudonymous friend, Davey.
His future comments should and will be viewed in this light.
COMMENT #10 [Permalink]
...
jt
said on 7/2/2011 @ 2:04 am PT...
I know I shouldn't be amazed, but I am! A reporter and his editors at the New York Times, who know everyone in the country interested in Breitbart and his doings will read the profile, don't even look at the notorious ACORN videos and the Sherrod material central to the piece and its thesis, nor clearly even do a basic web search on the related topics, before going to print. Peters is no independent actor, no lone wolf, like so many reporters are forced by economics to be today-- made to dig up stories, report them and write them without any research team or editing. On the contrary, there are still layers of staff at the Times, and yet, this piece-- an intended puff piece, perhaps, but still an undeniably and predictably politically charged piece on a deeply controversial person whose calling card has been exaggerated partisan hackery if not outright lying-- this thing comes out riddled with obvious errors. Who is in charge? Someone should be fired, or at least assigned to the Queens police beat for a couple years. Hopeless.
Brad Blog, yay! NYTs, boo!
COMMENT #11 [Permalink]
...
Jeannie Dean
said on 7/2/2011 @ 4:31 am PT...
Davey Crocket - you just CROCKED yerself. You are now EXTREMELY transparent, ans you no longer have any street cred w /me after your comments in this thread. Too bad. I had hope for you...
"EAGLE SCOUT"?! Really? You have made yourself a bad joke. And I know jokes...you are the most unfunny kind, impho (= "in my humble PROFESSIONAL opinion - as I'm a PAID, PROFESSIONAL Stand-up comedian.) Thanks for doing my writing FOR me; can't make up your kind of hysterical bullshit without your help.
Thanks for being my bread and butter, buddy!
For comics like me, you are the gift that keeps on giving! http://www.jeanniedean.com/
COMMENT #12 [Permalink]
...
Jeannie Dean
said on 7/2/2011 @ 4:34 am PT...
...GREAT post from my partner / buddy / hero-pal Karen from Illinois. I second her recommended headlines.
COMMENT #13 [Permalink]
...
Jeannie Dean
said on 7/2/2011 @ 4:41 am PT...
Check THIS one out, Davey "Crockety" - your favorite Eagle Scout not lookin' so EAGLE SCOUT-ish:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=N9mdGeysga8
Then again, facts don't seem to make your radar.
You should consider another handle, maybe "DAVEY full o' CROCK" after your posts in this thread.
We "see you". (Hate to quote AVATAR, cuz it was a silly cartoon, but now it seems apropo - so are you, to my mind.) Good luck with your disinfo campaign! We're onto you...
COMMENT #14 [Permalink]
...
Ernest A. Canning
said on 7/2/2011 @ 1:32 pm PT...
Sure, Brad: I can go along with the revised: "...someone like Brad Friedman who tirelessly strives to speak [INDEPENDENTLY VERIFIABLE] truth to power..."
But, then you, I, Bill Moyers, Amy Goodman, and countless others who strive to speak independently verifiable truth to power have to concede that we are 21st Century "revolutionaries" --- at least as described by George Orwell:
"In a time of universal deceit --- telling the truth is a revolutionary act."
COMMENT #15 [Permalink]
...
David Lasagna
said on 7/3/2011 @ 2:02 am PT...
Davey Crocket,
For what it's worth you just lost me. I can no longer think of you as a credible person with a different point of view with whom I might reasonably discuss and argue various issues. If you endorse Breitbart you forfeit all credibility. He is a serial liar. You now fail to meet my required minimum standards necessary for reasoned debate.
Building bridges with people of different viewpoints is one thing. Wasting time arguing with someone who believes the earth is flat or that black is white while the world goes down the tubes is something else. No time for nonsense on stilts that high. Good luck with the guitar.
COMMENT #16 [Permalink]
...
Adam
said on 7/7/2011 @ 1:23 pm PT...
Did the New York Times Lie again with this statement?
This is going to take us a few days to look into, so realistically we won't have a response until later next week. Hope this is understandable.
It already is "later next week".
COMMENT #17 [Permalink]
...
Adam
said on 7/7/2011 @ 1:33 pm PT...
You wont find this article in Google News search results. Why? Google News has de-indexed bradblog.com. I wonder who is behind this censorship. I wouldn't be surprised if New York Times and their beloved racist cult-hero Andrew Breitbart had something to do with it.