READER COMMENTS ON
"Some Good News on Voting Rights, Some Concerns About NY's Presidential Primary: 'BradCast' 4/18/2016"
(9 Responses so far...)
COMMENT #1 [Permalink]
...
Jay Smith
said on 4/18/2016 @ 10:50 pm PT...
Dear Brad,
I listened to the 4/18 Bradcast and was getting really interested in the details of the Wisconsin voting rights case(s). I skipped around a bit and was getting the gist of it but finally had to turn it off, because, Brad, you couldn't let your guest, Ernest Canning, finish a sentence. I know the case is complicated, and I appreciate that you wish to cut through the legalese a bit and get to the core implications of these proceedings, but in fact interrupting is not helping. I need to hear the story from the person who's telling the story, and that's Mr. Canning.
COMMENT #2 [Permalink]
...
karenfromillinois
said on 4/19/2016 @ 10:54 am PT...
COMMENT #3 [Permalink]
...
Alex
said on 4/19/2016 @ 4:26 pm PT...
Brad:
I am surprised no one has said this yet. If Bernie doesn't get the nomination , people may not want to vote for Hilary not because they don't like her or don't trust her, but because her incremental thinking toward any national or international problem is not what is needed now. The best example is Climate Change. Signing more Fracking, and other fossil fuel leases, will mean 40 more years of extraction of carbon and methane that needs to stay in the ground. The climate predictions of 5, 10, and 20 years ago are showing to be too conservative and things are happening faster and more intensely than were predicted. Our planet (and country) can't afford incremental thinking that babies the fossil fuel interests. We need big change yesterday for developing renewable and getting off fossil fuels,
COMMENT #4 [Permalink]
...
Arlene Montemarano
said on 4/19/2016 @ 5:42 pm PT...
Love your show, but I wish you had transcripts available of individual stories for those who wish to read and to more easily post such stories to social media.
COMMENT #5 [Permalink]
...
Brad Friedman
said on 4/19/2016 @ 7:19 pm PT...
Jay Smith @ 1:
Always difficult to make sure we both tell the story so listeners can understand it and stay within the unforgivable constraints of the radio clock! So, apologies if you feel I made thing more difficult to make sense of. Obviously, that was not my hope.
Here's Ernie's full published report on the WI case.
COMMENT #6 [Permalink]
...
Brad Friedman
said on 4/19/2016 @ 7:22 pm PT...
Karen From Illinois @ 2 said:
machines are down,no voting going on but don't worry
That wasn't exactly true, Karen. (Your link when to a Tweet of Mimi Kennedy that didn't say that either.) Because NY does NOT use touch-screens, when op-scan systems went down, voters will still always able to continue casting votes on hand-marked paper ballots throughout. (Presuming the polling place was open, and voters were on the rolls, in any event.)
COMMENT #7 [Permalink]
...
Brad Friedman
said on 4/19/2016 @ 7:27 pm PT...
Alex said @ 3:
I am surprised no one has said this yet. If Bernie doesn't get the nomination , people may not want to vote for Hilary not because they don't like her or don't trust her, but because her incremental thinking toward any national or international problem is not what is needed now.
We have discussed that on the program on several occassions. That said...
The best example is Climate Change. Signing more Fracking, and other fossil fuel leases, will mean 40 more years of extraction of carbon and methane that needs to stay in the ground.
True, though Clinton has said she would set requirements too onerous to be approved. (Whether she means that, is another thing.) That said...
The climate predictions of 5, 10, and 20 years ago are showing to be too conservative and things are happening faster and more intensely than were predicted. Our planet (and country) can't afford incremental thinking that babies the fossil fuel interests. We need big change yesterday for developing renewable and getting off fossil fuels,
Of course, I agree. But if your argument is, if Bernie doesn't get the nomination, that the things you are concerned about above will be less likely under a Republican administration which will want more fracking, drilling and burning, I still don't see that as a persuasive argument to either not vote at all or not vote for Clinton if she is the nominee.
COMMENT #8 [Permalink]
...
Brad Friedman
said on 4/19/2016 @ 7:30 pm PT...
Arlene Montemarano said @ 4:
Love your show, but I wish you had transcripts available of individual stories for those who wish to read and to more easily post such stories to social media.
Thanks, Arlene. I hear ya, and wish I could provide those as well! I simply don't have the resources (time and/or money) to be able to do that. I wish I did! I'd be delighted to have transcripts available every day! So who's buying?
COMMENT #9 [Permalink]
...
karenfromillinois
said on 4/20/2016 @ 11:58 am PT...
brad,
my post went to a tweet that contained a short video where voters were saying the opt scan machine was down and the people did not want to vote because they did not trust that their vote would be "run thru" the machine later
the opt scans are not much better than the dre...they both can be manipulated