Our friend Mark Levine of Radio Inside Scoop gets Prop 8 fever and calls the Leftists out! No more marriage for those perverts! (Why don’t we ever get such good callers when we’re hosting on the radio?)…
RELATED…Princeton University moves to ban freshmen from the sidewalks: “The Princeton Proposition 8 campaign aims to secure the definition of Princeton University sidewalks as a means of pedestrian transit for sophomores, juniors, seniors, graduate students, faculty, staff, and other members of the university community, but supports the elimination of the right of freshmen to walk on sidewalks.”
The majority supporters of the measure note that “they are not ‘froshophobic’ and that some of their best friends are freshmen, but they maintain that freshmen on the sidewalk degrade the sacred institution of sidewalks.”
We concur with both of the above efforts. Details and video on the latter here. Minorities have gotten away with too much for too long in this country, under the guise of “rights”! We say that all must change now!
“Princeton University moves to ban freshmen from the sidewalks:…”
My deep concern is for the freshmen “bride and groom” and “husband and wife.”
When you look at the words (which Helldigger in another thread was fixated on/obsessed with):
“Bride and groom”
and
“Husband and wife”
Well, in these two examples the word “bride” and “husband” are on the left side. So they should be immediately banned. Then we are just left with the words:
“groom and wife.”
But in that case “groom” is on the left side. So that must be banned.
So what remains is:
“wife.”
And wife is on the left side. So we are left with nobody.
About time! No “special sidewalk rights” for freshmen! Next thing you know, we’ll have freshman & their dogs on the sidewalk, and three or four freshmen on the sidewalk at once.
I propose a separate but equal sidewalk for freshmen.
Control, we have a spam outbreak on sublevel 3…
[ed note: Thanks, Agent Zap, I’d gotten into bed and must have missed it by “that much”…. –99]
I wonder if there is enough cohesion in the gay community and enough support by friends and family of the gay community in California to initiate a proposition and get it on the ballot.
Imagine California having the exact wording on Prop 8, with the exception of gay marriage reference changed to reflect straight (man and woman) marriages. To include the retro denial of a similar time frame of straight marriges.
Imagine the solidarity of fifty states uniting and drafting individual proposition banning straight marriage and succeeding getting them on the ballot for a vote. Imagine if only one state won.
The intent would not be to succeed in banning marriage; but rather, to instill empathy. To impart the pain, the fear, the saddness, the helplessness and the unconstitutionality of it all.
Ban On Opposite Marriage. The BOOM Propositions.
Where do I sign?
Brad,
I didn’t pick up on “leftists” as left handed. INstead, I thought that he was referring to leftwing liberals/gays, instead of lefthanded folks.
I had to call the 888 number to find out that this is complete satire. sorry to be so dumb, but fyi.
here in SF, we’re sort of just a little depressed about prop 8 losing.
Ya shouldn’t have called it “Marriage” in the first place, it infringes on the religious nutz turf.
Just call it “Civil Unions” and be done with it, IMO
Oh, and this at the 1(hr):27(min)+ mark
Hank Johnson seems sincere, but very uncomfortable (funny)…Link