Earlier this month, Donald Trump issued an Executive Order calling for the “Immediate Expansion of American Timber Production”. As discussed with our guest on today’s BradCast, it’s difficult to see that separately from his buddy Elon Musk’s recent declaration that “logically we should privatize anything that can reasonably be privatized.” [Audio link to full show follows this summary.]
BUT FIRST… A few items of note…
- It was amusing watching corporate media outlets tip-toe in their reporting around the facts of Tuesday’s successful return to Earth by astronauts Suni Williams and Butch Wilmore after being stranded on the International Space Station for 9 months following what was supposed to have been an 8 day mission. The pair were safely brought home in a SpaceX capsule that splashed down in the Gulf of Mexico. Can you see the dilemma for the nation’s major news outlets yet? We discuss. And laugh. (And also point out that the mission was tasked to Elon Musk‘s SpaceX by NASA last August, under President Joe Biden. No, Donald Trump did not “rescue the astronauts”, as his Administration seems to want you to believe.)
- In more important news, after covering a string of losses in federal court for Trump on yesterday’s program, a few more came in after we got off air. One was a major ruling that blocked his Order banning transgender people from serving in our nation’s military. (Try not to laugh at Trump’s straight-faced assertion in his EO that service by transgender people, many of whom have received top military honors, “conflicts with a soldier’s commitment to an honorable, truthful, and disciplined lifestyle, even in one’s personal life.” Cuz if anyone knows about living an honorable, truthful, and disciplined lifestyle, even in one’s personal life, it would be the Commander-in-Chief who was found liable for nearly $100 million for sexually abusing and defaming writer E. Jean Caroll and found guilty of 34 criminal felony counts related to hush-money payments to porn star Stormy Daniels to help him cheat to win an election and other honorable, truthful and disciplined living by Corporal Bonespurs.)
- In response to yesterday’s program focused, in part, on the lower courts holding firm, for now, against Trump and Musk’s rampant lawlessness, we received some interesting feedback from a number of listeners who seemed to view those victories for the Constitution and Rule of Law — short-term or otherwise — as hardly worth celebrating, given that all hope is now lost and, in short, America is all but over. While understanding the sentiment, I disagree with that thinking for several reasons, a number of which we discuss today.
THEN… Following news of yet another court loss for Trump late on Tuesday, in which a D.C. U.S. District Court Judge Tanya Chutkan blocked the Administration’s attempt to claw back some $20 billion authorized by Congress and allocated by President Biden as part of his landmark climate initiatives before leaving office, we discuss a recent Executive Order signed by Trump that would massively expand logging and clear-cutting of our national forests and other public lands.
MATT SEDLAR, climate analyst at the Center for Economic and Policy Research, is here to discuss what this scheme is really about; how it relates to Trump’s trade war with Canada; the various dangers it poses to both the economy and climate; and how it has little to do with improving forest management or wildfire protection, as Trump’s EO falsely claims.
Sedlar explains how the Order appears to directly contradict pretty much everything else that Trump has been doing at the very same time.
“Laying off Forest Service workers, National Park Service workers, and putting out this Executive Order expanding logging, canceling leases for various offices and visitor centers for national parks across the United States,” Sedlar tells me, “all point to the privatization of the public lands. Eliminating what we know of as national forests and national parks, and opening it up to making it into a revenue stream.”
“It leans more towards that and less towards what he is saying, that this is forest management. Because the science simply does not support what he’s saying. It didn’t support it in the ’80s when you had researchers and scientists warning against it, and it’s definitely not going to support it now.”
“These are all moves to generate revenue without a look at how this affecting long-term sustainable development. It’s all short-term gain for long-term losses,” he argues, citing both the costs to the fight against climate change and the bipartisan popularity of our National Parks and Forests.
Tune in, of course, for much more!…
(Comments are now closed.)