U.S. House Judiciary Committee staff informs us that October 30th will be the day for hearings with John Tanner, the DoJ Civil Rights Division’s Voting Section chief. Tanner has caused a bit of a stir of late by suggesting that minorities needn’t worry about being disenfranchised at the polls by restrictive Photo ID laws because they “die first” before become elderly (the original twisted BRAD BLOG video exclusive of Tanner’s comments here). As well, Tanner’s previous bizarre and unprecedented justifications on behalf of the DoJ, for why minorities have only themselves to blame for not being able to vote in Ohio in the 2004 Presidential Election have once again attracted the attention of John Conyers and his staff.
Though the hearing where Tanner will testify is currently planned for the 30th, we’re told it won’t be “official” until it appears on the official schedule for the Subcommittee on the Constitution, Civil Rights, and Civil Liberties — usually a week or so prior to the hearing.
In the meantime, however, democracy and accountability fans in the Northern California area may get their Tanner fix this Thursday, as he’s schedule to appear for a talk at UC Berkley’s Institute of Governmental Studies. The talk is scheduled for 3:30p-5:00p at the Institute’s Library, 109 Moses Hall, as sponsored by the UC Berkeley Center for Latino Policy Research and the Election Administration Research Center (EARC). More details here.
Tanner’s recent unbelievable comments to the National Latino Congresso — “It’s probably true that among those who don’t [have Photo ID], it’s primarily elderly persons. And that’s a shame. Of course…our society is such that minorities don’t become elderly. The way that white people do. They die first.” — made their way to both the Washington Post and the U.S. House Judiciary Committee.
So who knows what he’ll say next?!
We hope a few BRAD BLOG readers who may be concerned with some of Tanner’s statements and behavior at the DoJ might find their way to showing up at his UC Berkeley event this week to video tape and/or ask a few tough questions of the man who oversees voting rights on behalf of the federal government.
If so, we hope you’ll share any notable comments (hopefully on video or audio) with us!
Hey. For fun I’ll say that it sounds like an insider letting slip some facts known and counted on by the administration concerning what seems to be the current version of eugenics. Everything from lack of universal health care up to various manipulations of voting rules tend to keep minorities from becoming equal voices, while providing a supply of labour/soldiers who do live long enough to give birth to the next ‘crop’ of the same. Unrelated directly, but I’ll say that folks like Sharpton and Jackson and their latino counterparts who gain power and eat well while stirring up biased-troublemaking makes whites feel defensive and cause seperations to come,not reparations. Almost illuminati-like in it’s insidiousness, ah well, let’s see what the DOJ dude says…
Have you talked to anyone over at Firedoglake.com about this? They may live-blog it.
Haven’t, Brantl. But if you know someone over there who is up in Berkeley, by all means, give ’em the heads up!
I’m not a doctor, and don’t play one on tv, but I know an asshole when I see one.
Someone wrote a song about him and his boss.