READER COMMENTS ON
"U.S. Attorney Purge: And Now the GOP's Milwaukee 'Voter Fraud' Connection..."
(18 Responses so far...)
COMMENT #1 [Permalink]
...
Dredd
said on 4/10/2007 @ 5:26 pm PT...
Brad ... you are beginning to sound like a "lefty" ... all I said is that the bushie loyalists are fascists ... for heavens sake.
COMMENT #2 [Permalink]
...
Brad Friedman
said on 4/10/2007 @ 6:05 pm PT...
My apologies, Dredd
COMMENT #3 [Permalink]
...
big dan
said on 4/10/2007 @ 6:10 pm PT...
Brad, one of the hugest stories, the DOJ attorney scandal, is intersecting with you. That's huge, go for it!!!
btw...NONE of the progressive blogs have Anna Nicole's kids father story or Imus. ALL the rightwing corporate blogs have these stories plastered all over, and ANBCBSNNX, Limbaugh, Hannity, etc...
So, we are smart, and we know what's going on now. Keep your eye on the ball!!!!!!!!!!!!!
COMMENT #4 [Permalink]
...
big dan
said on 4/10/2007 @ 6:12 pm PT...
btw??? Limbaugh and Hannity somehow devoted their shows to twisting the Imus thing into a "Sharpton/Jesse Jackson" thing. ESPN and ANBCBSNNX are sticking to the story, even though it's not news.
I think the news is Gonzales subpoena, troops being extended, the attorney scandal, the forged Niger document, health care, and e-vote fraud.
WE KNOW WHAT'S GOING ON IN THE CONTROLLED CORPORATE MAINSTREAM MEDIA!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
COMMENT #5 [Permalink]
...
big dan
said on 4/10/2007 @ 6:16 pm PT...
Oh, and Hannity? Complete with black callers and everything! The non-existent black "conservative" Sean Hannity fans! That don't exist!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
The "infomercial" has begun!
"Quick! Let's bump the important stuff out of the news! Also, let's twist the Imus thing into bashing Sharpton and Jesse Jackson! Quick! Get all the fake black actors to call into the show! You know, the people we hire to sound black? They're great! They are paid to call in and sound like MANY different types of people! WOW! Black conservatives bashing the black Al Sharpton and Jesse Jackson. Our racist braindead idiot fans will LOVE this show today! We'll tell them Imus is a liberal, too!!!!!!!!!!!"
COMMENT #6 [Permalink]
...
EdNSted
said on 4/10/2007 @ 6:32 pm PT...
COMMENT #7 [Permalink]
...
Bluebear2
said on 4/10/2007 @ 8:10 pm PT...
Great news from my old childhood newspaper. It was just the Journal then, the Sentinel was a separate entity.
How much more of this stuff must come out before something, beyond hearings, is done?
.
COMMENT #8 [Permalink]
...
Bluebear2
said on 4/10/2007 @ 8:12 pm PT...
COMMENT #9 [Permalink]
...
Bluebear2
said on 4/10/2007 @ 8:13 pm PT...
Big Dan
This is the NSA. We know where you've been!
.
COMMENT #10 [Permalink]
...
Lindy
said on 4/10/2007 @ 8:31 pm PT...
Perfectly put, Brad! Thanks!
COMMENT #11 [Permalink]
...
Steve Bremner
said on 4/10/2007 @ 10:22 pm PT...
Great reporting as always. You make the blogosphere proud.
COMMENT #12 [Permalink]
...
Tom Maguire
said on 4/11/2007 @ 9:34 am PT...
...a case brought by Biskupic against Georgia Thompson, an aide to Wisconsin's Democratic governor, Jim Doyle. Just in time for the '06 election we might add. (It didn't help; Doyle won anyway.)
"Just in time"? The investigation was announced in Oct 2005 (in cooperation with the Dem State AG and Dem county DA, one might add); the indictment was Jan 2006, and the trial verdict was delivered in June.
What did happen "just in time" for the election was sentencing in Sept 2006.
Well. Gonzalez has brought this upon himself with his dismal handling of the Eight Men Out, but once the facts are in we will see that with Biskupic, the Dems have bupkis.
Just for starters, the theory is what, exactly - that he brought a weak case in January with the idea of risking repudiation and humiliation with a "Not Guilty" verdict in June? If he knew the case was weak, he should have brought it later. Or, if he believed in his case, question his judgment but not his motives.
And if the case was so weak, why did a jury convict? Why did the State AG (a Dem on her way to a fall primary defeat) release this:
The verdict in this case reflects the work of investigators and prosecutors whose only interest in this matter was to obtain and present evidence of corrupt conduct in our government. I am satisfied that the jury based its verdict on the strength of the evidence. Now that the jury has done its duty, it is the duty of the legislature to do its job and enact laws that will remove the influence of money on politics and decision-making at all levels of government.
Not exactly a howl of outrage from someone whose office had been involved in the investigation.
That said, I can't explain the gap in perception between, on one hand, the four senior attorneys who advanced this case, the trial judge, and the jury versus the Appeals Court judges. One guess I read - Chicago judges see much more ghastly corruption cases every day.
Regardless - IMHO, on this one, the Reps will walk.
COMMENT #13 [Permalink]
...
Nick Kasoff
said on 4/11/2007 @ 5:33 pm PT...
If serious accountability is not brought (and we mean more than simply pushing out a pawn like Gonzales) the bar will have been forever lowered as far as what sort of outrageous, un-American Executive Branch overreach is tolerable in this country.
Have you forgotten the pile of FBI files found in the Clinton White House? Have you forgotten the use of the IRS to harass non-profits which the Clintons viewed as unfriendly? If this is all true, it is nasty, to be sure. But I don't think the bar has moved much here.
Nick Kasoff
The Thug Report
COMMENT #14 [Permalink]
...
Larry Bergan
said on 4/13/2007 @ 12:48 am PT...
Remember Mark Crispin Miller on C-span talking about the connections between the voting fraud and the Christian organizations. Well I think this is going to result in a "trifecta" of sorts.
That woman who is "taking the fifth" before ever seeing a courtroom is connected with a school for Christian lawyers run by Pat Robertson.
Is "Attorneygate" going to connect voting fraud, attorney purges, and the Christian Dominionist movement?
I'm reading Chris Hedges, "American Fascists", and it includes much about this incredibly creepy movement. He covers some things about our friend Blackwell and the voting fraud in Ohio. Don't read this book unless you're willing to lose sleep!
COMMENT #15 [Permalink]
...
calipendence
said on 4/13/2007 @ 8:57 am PT...
Brad,
I'm having trouble with the link to the Leahy letter page. Is there another link we can go to to get what was in it?
Hoping that I helped you and Dredd both find Bice's column earlier when I posted a link to it in the comments of the earlier thread here.
It really does seem to be that each day this attorney scandal is getting more and more linked with election integrity issues! I remember speculating that might be the case in a letter I sent to you back on January 13th after news of Carol Lam's firing first broke.
I'm with you that I think the more things start to unravel here, it is looking like the articles of impeachment need to be dealt! Just the violating of the rules on maintaining records of mails and communications being defied should be good enough to yank these guys out!
COMMENT #16 [Permalink]
...
calipendence
said on 4/13/2007 @ 9:18 am PT...
Cancel that. The letter from Leahy link is now working. They must have been shutting down their email server to do "backups", eh?
COMMENT #17 [Permalink]
...
oldturk
said on 4/14/2007 @ 4:21 pm PT...
When Fascists hijack the United States Department of Justice,...
Now, I wonder if this has anything to do with the USApurgegate? Nah, I really know that it has everything to do with USApurgegate. It also has to do with what the “Loyal Bushies,” such as U.S. Attorney Steven Biskupic, were doing and why some of them are being retained. You know, not exactly “Voter Fraud,” but possibly “Election Fraud.” Because for this Administration it is all about “Voter Fraud (read: voting while black),” as apposed to “Election Fraud (read: rigging elections),” which they are not so opposed to (see Florida, Ohio, New Hampshire and now Wisconsin).
http://tulitalks.blogspo...007/04/unbelievable.html
COMMENT #18 [Permalink]
...
Dolphyn
said on 4/18/2007 @ 10:51 am PT...
Here is a VERY interesting New York Times editorial about the Georgia Thompson case, suggesting that Mr. Biskupic threw Ms. Thompson into jail in order to preserve his own job by influencing the election:
http://www.truthout.org/docs_2006/041807K.shtml
The editorial also debunks the claim, repeated in the blog entry above, that Thompson was a "Doyle aide."