READER COMMENTS ON
"Open Thread for January 29 : Iraqi Election Weekend"
(23 Responses so far...)
COMMENT #1 [Permalink]
...
Peg C
said on 1/28/2005 @ 11:55 pm PT...
Winter Patriot -
With all due respect, I'd be bombing the bejeezus out of the occupying army, with faith that full life would follow. Someone comes into my town and holds a gun to my head and tells me to vote or be damned (or blown up), I'm going to try to kill him. I'm not stupid. Nor am I a hypocrite like the hypocrites and thugs and sell-outs on the "ballot."
COMMENT #2 [Permalink]
...
Da Wookie
said on 1/29/2005 @ 1:59 am PT...
A common sense perspective (ie what I would probably think as an Iraqi in Iraq right now):
If you vote:
A good chance that you or someone close to you will die.
You get an american puppet administration, the insurgents have something to fight against and the bombings continue.
If you don't vote:
You get an american puppet administration, the insurgents have something to fight against and the bombings continue.
Having performed a very quick cost/benefit analysis, I figure my interests are best served by staying home and hoping that the bombing campaign against the polling stations doesn't hit my house.
COMMENT #3 [Permalink]
...
Teresa
said on 1/29/2005 @ 2:54 am PT...
The big problem is..... I heard that the Iraqis are being threatened if they don't vote. This happened last week. They were being forced to register.
All this and they are voting for American rulership.
COMMENT #4 [Permalink]
...
Josh
said on 1/29/2005 @ 8:57 am PT...
Teresa:
Regardless of what you've heard, and I wouldn't doubt it for a second, it is important to note the nature of resilience. I was one of the biggest opponents of the Iraq War; I still think it was wrong, I don't have high hopes for our occupation over there, and I think it was very wrong to go about deconstructing the patriachy/theocracy over there via military force. This could have only been accomplished multilaterally, with the full support of the UN. If you are right in that people are being threatened if they don't vote, I believe they will show their resilience by not leaving their homes. I do not believe that is the case with the Shiite majority in Iraq... I think they will vote, and if they REALLY wanted to collaborate against us, they would be voting for a candidate which wasn't US-backed... Of course that can't happen either, since the majority of Iraqis don't know who else is running until the days before. Regardless, I think people will turn up to vote, to show that they want peace in Iraq, and that they want to stay united as a country. I don't believe that militant Islam, or even violence in general, is what the Iraqi people want. I would vote to have my country back, if I was an Iraqi... even if that meant having to deal with the Americans a while longer until the country could be secured.
On the other hand, I don't believe that "security" can or will be acheived.
COMMENT #5 [Permalink]
...
Robert Lockwood Mills
said on 1/29/2005 @ 10:36 am PT...
If I lived in Baghdad or Mosul, would I vote in the election?
First I'd have to know whom and what I was voting for. Other than the incumbent Allawi (who was placed in his job by the United States), every other candidate is anonymous. There's nothing to go on.
What are the issues? The predominant wish of most Iraqis is that the United States should leave their country. But if any candidate advocates this, there's no way for an Iraqi voter to know who it is.
What will change after the election, and does it matter who wins? There's no way of knowing, if we don't know the candidates. It's a lottery game.
Anonymous candidates. Indeterminate issues. Unknown prospects for change. What's it all about, Alfie?
Bush wants to be able to say, "Look. I got rid of Saddam, and now the Iraqis are voting." The fact that the vote is essentially meaningless makes no difference. It's called "freedom on the march."
It's a march all right. It's like the Bataan Death March. Nowhere to go, nothing ahead but brutality.
COMMENT #6 [Permalink]
...
cheryl
said on 1/29/2005 @ 10:49 am PT...
Sorry, I don't vote for someone if I don't know who they are or what their platform is. And I certainly don't vote if someone breaks down the door of my house and says, "Vote, or else". I'm with Peg C.
COMMENT #7 [Permalink]
...
cheryl
said on 1/29/2005 @ 11:26 am PT...
COMMENT #8 [Permalink]
...
Torqued
said on 1/29/2005 @ 12:24 pm PT...
Diebold or die bold? Deja vu all over again...
COMMENT #9 [Permalink]
...
Dredd
said on 1/29/2005 @ 1:33 pm PT...
You guys must not watch much boob tube. Your responses are those of a skeptical awareness.
My stance which is in agreement with the above comments is based on the history of Iraq, and especially on the modern history.
Iraq has been puppeted by the western world for decades. We should be ashamed to use the term democracy for what we are regurgitating upon them, and instead face the reality that it is plain old demockracy.
If I were an Iraqi I would tend not to vote there until the US and the Coalition of the Killing left, the Iraqi people were left alone, and they themselves put together a government election themselves.
I thought we had learned in Vietnam that democracy (like in Ukrainia) is a product of the actions of the citizenry. They must be more serious than for instance US citizens for it to work.
This election is pure bushit coverup of the real reasons for going there in the first place:
Domination of oil resources because the western world is too intellectually lazy to move toward ecologically sound energy resources.
All that being said, and in support of those who decided to vote there, I would demand an exit poll mechanism there so it could be shown that the gig was rigged like it was here.
COMMENT #10 [Permalink]
...
KestrelBrighteyes
said on 1/29/2005 @ 8:37 pm PT...
With the Sunni boycott, Shias will most likely take power. So what happens then? Bush says our troops will leave if asked - anybody buying that one?
I have this image of al Jazeera showing video of banners and signs with "AMERICANS GO HOME!" plastered on the bombed out shell of every building, while CNN and FAUX news assure us that "Democracy has come to Iraq, and President Bush says American troops will stay to support President Allawi's mandate as long as they are needed"
Then we have the absurdity of trying to pretend there's a choice - Allawi promising to hold off on food rations for Iraqis who don't vote for him, vs 100+ unknown candidates - gee I wonder who will get the most votes?
Okay, I'd better stop, I'm pegging out the needle on the "cynical" meter here.
Would I try to vote? No. As much as I believe in fighting the good fight, survival takes precedence, especially when choice is only an illusion. In all honesty, I'd have taken my child before the military on either side could find him, and headed deep into a cave somewhere far away long before now.
COMMENT #11 [Permalink]
...
Peggy
said on 1/29/2005 @ 10:01 pm PT...
Option A - I would have left the country a long time ago.
Option B - Run away from the cities and hide somewhere far away from any entity interested in holding office or wanting power. Pray for peace for Iraq.
COMMENT #12 [Permalink]
...
Teresa
said on 1/29/2005 @ 11:08 pm PT...
Krestal B,
Bush said last week there are no plans to leave.
Peggy said, 'Run away from the cities and hide somewhere far away from any entity interested in holding office or wanting power':
Sound like something I should do.
COMMENT #13 [Permalink]
...
Teresa
said on 1/29/2005 @ 11:10 pm PT...
Oh, Krestel, would you please replace that 'a' in your name above with this 'e'.
Thanks.
COMMENT #14 [Permalink]
...
Robert Lockwood Mills
said on 1/30/2005 @ 7:07 am PT...
Today the New York Times published the names of all the candidates. By the time anyone read these names, the voting in Iraq was pretty much over on account of the 8-hour time difference.
This was no accident. The Times could have published the names a month ago. But "security" prevented it. It just so happens that security concerns coincided with the interests of the Bush administration, i.e., to make sure no candidate's platform was based on ridding Iraq of our occupying forces. That candidate would have drawn heavily from Iraq's "silent majority," who hated Saddam Hussein but hated our invasion more.
But Allawi, our own puppet, has to win. The election is about as honest as ours was, and less honest than the Ukraine's.
COMMENT #15 [Permalink]
...
Winter Patriot
said on 1/30/2005 @ 8:19 am PT...
re #10-12-13: KB you can move the "r" around, too, if you like!
COMMENT #16 [Permalink]
...
Teresa
said on 1/30/2005 @ 11:08 am PT...
COMMENT #17 [Permalink]
...
KestrelBrighteyes
said on 1/30/2005 @ 2:17 pm PT...
Spelling only counts during the week.
I'm off on weekends
BTW, "Kes" works too.
COMMENT #18 [Permalink]
...
Teresa
said on 1/30/2005 @ 3:07 pm PT...
COMMENT #19 [Permalink]
...
Winter Patriot
said on 1/30/2005 @ 7:35 pm PT...
re : .... & #18
"Kes it is"
Hi Kes.
Mind if I call you "Kres"?
Or maybe "Kers"??
;-)
LOL (with, not at) Teresa!
COMMENT #20 [Permalink]
...
Teresa
said on 1/30/2005 @ 7:46 pm PT...
I'm tellin' ya! I am not doing well. All that screaming, all that unbridled, hysterical joy coming from Iraq today has got my head in a spin. Demockracy is hard to take.
COMMENT #21 [Permalink]
...
pushcat
said on 1/30/2005 @ 10:40 pm PT...
Teresa, Its hard work!!! Remeber the debates. Our fearless leader said so.
COMMENT #22 [Permalink]
...
Teresa
said on 2/1/2005 @ 2:17 am PT...
Oh how I remember the debates, Pushcat.
The hardest work of all was watching our fearless leader try to talk. A freaked out electrocuted space cadet fidgeting around the podium and trying to string together a few words to make a sentence. Awfully hard work.
"Don't forget Poland"!!
COMMENT #23 [Permalink]
...
towen
said on 5/21/2006 @ 5:48 pm PT...
would you please replace that 'a' in your name above with this 'e'.
Thanks.