READER COMMENTS ON
"CA Sec. of State Candidate Publishes 'Voters Bill of Rights'..."
(13 Responses so far...)
COMMENT #1 [Permalink]
...
Bryan
said on 10/19/2006 @ 7:00 am PT...
I think I found a whopper by his opponent in the early part of her opening statement.
Let's compare notes.
COMMENT #2 [Permalink]
...
KestrelBrighteyes
said on 10/19/2006 @ 9:49 am PT...
OT - sorta kinda not really...
AG: Voter warning linked to GOP campaign
SANTA ANA, Calif. - State investigators have linked a Republican campaign to letters sent to thousands of Orange County Hispanics warning them they could go to jail or be deported if they vote next month, a spokesman for the attorney general said.
Surprise, surprise...
COMMENT #3 [Permalink]
...
nikto
said on 10/19/2006 @ 12:41 pm PT...
Here's a whopper of a LIE:
Rightwing GOPers are decent human beings.
I own up--Saying that makes me a LIAR!
Gotta' get a fire extinguisher for my pants!
COMMENT #4 [Permalink]
...
Bryan
said on 10/19/2006 @ 1:13 pm PT...
I guess Brad's busy, so I'll start.
"Brad Friedman is an Investigative Blogger ..." or so I've heard.
He says he's found Bruce McPherson in a lie, but he hasn't gotten around to saying what it is quite yet.
Once I started listening to the video of the debate, I ran across something from Debra Bowen that raised an orange flag.
“I am, in fact, running because of the crisis in confidence that we have in this country with regard to our voting systems. According to a recent Pew Research Study, 52 percent of Americans do not have confidence that their vote will be counted as it was cast.”
--Bowen, in her introductory comments
Anything in there that catches the attention of Brad the "Investigative Blogger"?
COMMENT #5 [Permalink]
...
Bryan
said on 10/19/2006 @ 1:16 pm PT...
My mistake: Brad mentioned McPherson's alleged lies (I haven't gone over the claims yet) in his latest post.
COMMENT #6 [Permalink]
...
Chris Hooten
said on 10/19/2006 @ 6:46 pm PT...
That's it, Bryan? Sheesh. Golly, I'm convinced. Now I'm going to vote for Mcpherson... NOT
COMMENT #7 [Permalink]
...
Bryan
said on 10/19/2006 @ 7:37 pm PT...
Chris wrote:
That's it, Bryan? Sheesh. Golly, I'm convinced. Now I'm going to vote for Mcpherson… NOT
I've only heard about a dozen sentences from Bowen. Two of them amount to a fairly impressive snow job on her would-be constituents.
There may be more ... and would you even know about this one (let alone discuss it) if it weren't for my post?
Perhaps we can send you to a hypnotherapist and have the memory erased so you can go to the polls thinking, "Man, am I happy to have a great candidate like Bowen to vote for!!"
COMMENT #8 [Permalink]
...
Chris Hooten
said on 10/19/2006 @ 10:31 pm PT...
Bryan, IMHO, you are full of it, and have been nit-picking and and comparing apples with oranges. Bruce Mcpherson is a lying sack of crap, face it. He has been behaving in questionable ways for years now. Your trite complaints just don't compare to rediculous things Mcpherson has done. I mean come on! Mcpherson actually instituted his own security check of the machines, which they failed miserably. Then he went ahead and certified them anyways, apparently unconcerned they should have been permanently *decertified* for their complete lack of security. Yeah, that's the kind of person I want running my elections!
COMMENT #9 [Permalink]
...
Chris Hooten
said on 10/19/2006 @ 10:36 pm PT...
Oh, but keep spinning Bryan! I'm sure no one notices that you are just obfuscating the real issue in this election, that Mcpherson DID NOT DO HIS JOB IN PROTECTING CITIZENS' RIGHT TO VOTE, and should be tossed out immediately. At least Bowen has been interested in real election reform, in contrast to your ethically-challenged horse in this race. Or should I say horses *ss.
COMMENT #10 [Permalink]
...
Bryan
said on 10/20/2006 @ 5:45 am PT...
Oh, but keep spinning Bryan! I'm sure no one notices that you are just obfuscating the real issue in this election, that Mcpherson DID NOT DO HIS JOB IN PROTECTING CITIZENS' RIGHT TO VOTE, and should be tossed out immediately. At least Bowen has been interested in real election reform, in contrast to your ethically-challenged horse in this race.
You're losing it, Chris.
To repeat, I'm from Florida. I don't intend to vote in the California election, and my interest in who wins the SoS job is minimal.
I'm more interested in the reporting on the race. I'm mostly here to check up on Friedman to see how well he does what he says he does ("Investigative Blogging").
The charges he makes against McPherson look trumped-up. I doubt Friedman's ability to reasonably justify making them (a typical accusation that McPherson lied tracks back to another Friedman blog post claiming on the thinnest of evidences that Friedman lied).
If McPherson is really that much of a rat, then maybe you really are better off voting for Bowen even if she repeats a lie as her rationale for running for the job.
There are other candidates for the job, as I understand it. Maybe you should be considering one of them.
COMMENT #11 [Permalink]
...
Send $$$ to BRADBLOG Stop the FRAUD - oldturk
said on 10/20/2006 @ 10:12 am PT...
COMMENT #12 [Permalink]
...
Send $$$ to BRADBLOG Stop the FRAUD - oldturk
said on 10/20/2006 @ 11:08 am PT...
COMMENT #13 [Permalink]
...
Chris Hooten
said on 10/20/2006 @ 9:06 pm PT...
Bryan, when it does freeze over, give me a call and I will gladly vote to dismantle democracy completely by voting for Mcpherson.