Exit Polls versus Final Results

Only Bush's Counts Improved

Share article:

As Raw Story originally reported on Wednesday, the Exit Polling on the day of the Election showed Kerry ahead by robust margins in many states. By the time the day had ended Kerry’s margin had been eclipsed by Bush’s. But, notably, that only happened in states that do not have fully voter-verifiable paper trails (e.g. E-Voting machines that don’t offer printed/verifiable paper receipts for the voter to confirm that their vote was recorded correctly).

Here are a couple of rudimentary graphics now to show the difference.

In the 10 states polled where there were voter-verifiable paper trails, the Final Results barely differed from the Exit Polls (which, until this year, have been widely regarded as highly accurate since they are taken as folks actually leave the polling place). The average change from Exit Poll to Final Results in these states was a tiny .8% gain for Bush. (Exit Numbers displayed in BLUE, Final Numbers in RED):

And now look at the data from states where there are no paper trails. Note the huge difference in Final Results that changed radically from the Exit Polling results. The average gain for Bush — in these states only — was 6.25% over the Exit Polling numbers!

What could possibly account for the huge differences there between the Exit Polls and the Final Results? And only in the Non-Paper Ballot States?

The numbers shown in these graphs seem to be taken from the “4pm Exit Polls” as shown on this chart. That chart is not particular user-friendly, but with a bit of close study, it makes sense.

Those “4pm Exit Poll” numbers however, match up with the “Final 6pm Exit Polls” as reported by Raw Story on the day of. So I’m not sure if the person who compiled the chart and the above graphics was in a different time-zone to account for the 4pm/6pm discrepancy. It doesn’t really matter to be frank, as long as the numbers were correctly reported. Which they seem to have been.

It’s my understanding that a major news organization is investigating this part of the story now. So we’ll see what can be learned in the days ahead.

UPDATE: 11/9/04 Raw Story asked a former MIT “Associate Professor of Mathmatics” to look at these results, and his conclusion was that the probabilities of the Exit Polls all closing for Bush the way they did was approximately “1 in 50,000 or .002 percent”. Nonetheless, that same Professor has looked closely at the available Exit Polling data and has “ruled out any significance of a variance between electronic balloting and paper ballot states” in the matter. That story is here.

I have spoken to Raw Story editor, John Byrne about this, and he stands by the report though he adds that to get any conclusive information on the matter we’d have to now take a look at the Exit Polling data on a county-by-county level. At this time, that information has not been released to the public, though apparently it is for sale somewhere. Not sure at this time how much it would cost to purchase for further analysis (and not sure why, at this point, it isn’t simply made available to the public given all the troubling reports about this election!)

Share article:

Reader Comments on

Exit Polls versus Final Results

51 Comments

(Comments are now closed.)


51 Responses

  1. 1)
    Lewis Grove said on 11/8/2004 @ 8:27am PT: [Permalink]

    I encourage readers to support blackboxvoting.org’s efforts to obtain the computer code in the no-paper-trail states.

    Also, write and harangue your Democratic leadership to grow some balls and (1) bitch that the election was stolen and (2) aggresively work to frustrate Bush in Congress

  2. 2)
    Ron said on 11/8/2004 @ 11:41am PT: [Permalink]

    Dude, get over it. The election is over and Bush won. Get back to saving the spotted owl or whales or whatever people like you do in a non-election year. The election is over and Bush won! Now move on with your life.

  3. 4)
    Tony Page said on 11/8/2004 @ 2:28pm PT: [Permalink]

    We all knew that Kerry needed a landslide to win a fixed election. The first inkling was when DeLay and Frist kept bills requiring a paper trail stuck in committee. No, that was the second inkling, the first was Florida four short years ago.

    All in all, the Kerry campaign sucked hind tit. If I have to hear that line on "outsourcing" the hunt for bin-Laden one more time I will just puke in my Cheerios.

    "I voted for the war before I voted against it?"

    Sorry, doesn’t resonate well, or build trust in the man. Did he do this on purpose?

  4. 5)
    Steve Fisher said on 11/8/2004 @ 3:26pm PT: [Permalink]

    This paints the picture of the game of the cheating,
    anti-American bastards as well as any wordsmith
    could verbalize. That is, if you have half a brain, which
    is apparently too high a standard for many Americans.
    This result was predicted by many people who were
    paying attention but considered a long shot by some
    Americans like myself who are victums of an eternal hope for the pursuis of fairness and justice from our citizens.
    Are we wise enough to force our "fair and balnced"media pursue this critical issue of the attempt to end of free and fair elections in our country. The media engagement is esential but to date, missing. The goal is possible, keep up the good work.

  5. 6)
    Ruth Cohen said on 11/8/2004 @ 6:09pm PT: [Permalink]

    You are absolutely correct. Bush stole the election for the second time. The Democratic party needs to offer a huge reward for someone from Diebold to come forward with proof that their machines were rigged with votes for Bush and some Republican senators prior to the machines being placed in operation. The exit polls have always been correct, so why did Bush win in Ohio and Bunning win when the exit polls said the opposite? Ruth Cohen

  6. 7)
    Bryan said on 11/9/2004 @ 2:53am PT: [Permalink]

    I am as concerned about election fraud as any Democrat (or any thoughtful American, for that matter), but this allegation is ridiculous. It assumes that all states have adopted uniform voting technology standards when, in fact, a variety of technologies are in use in almost every state. For example, Ohio is grouped with "non-paper-ballot states." The person who came up with this allegation is apparently unaware that more than two-thirds of Ohio’s precincts still use old-fashioned punch-card voting systems — which, as you recall from the 2000 election, can indeed be recounted.

    There ARE legitimate reasons to think that election irregularities may have occurred — but we undermine our credibility by making baseless allegations such as this one.

    Now, if someone really wants to do some WORK on this (perish the thought – it’s so much easier to sit back and develop conspiracy theories), here’s how to do it:

    * Identify the election districts within these states that used electronic voting (without a verified paper trail) vs. the districts that used auditable technologies (i.e., punch cards and optical scan). You can get the voting machine data from verifiedvoting.org.

    * Obtain the NEP exit poll data for specific districts, if available (NEP hasn’t published the detailed data yet, but presumably this will be forthcoming)

    * THEN see whether the exit poll discrepancy exceeds a reasonable statistical margin of error…

    * AND come up with a persuasive explanation of why you think the exit polling was accurate (most election experts agree with NEP that it was deeply flawed).

    If someone decides to tackle this, please let me know…

    Cheers
    Bryan

  7. 11)
    liberalBastard said on 11/9/2004 @ 12:20pm PT: [Permalink]

    I’m not sure the electronic voting was rigged. Exit polls aren’t accurate.

    What is more scarey is the religious right came out in droves to fight Gay marriage and abortion. Now they want to extend their win to include the birth control pills. It feels like Nazi Germany in this mutha.

  8. 12)
    Brad said on 11/9/2004 @ 4:45pm PT: [Permalink]

    "Exit polls aren’t accurate."

    Where do you get that impression, liberalBastard?

    They are exceedingly accurate and as such, are regularly used in 3rd World Countries to detect fraud. Even Dick Morris agrees!

    These are not samples where we’re guessing if folks will show up or not (as with the pre-election polls). These are folks asked right when they left the booth "Who did you vote for?".

    Finally, if the exit polls are so inaccurate, where do you get your assumption that "the religious right came out in droves to fight Gay marriage and abortion"?

    I’m guessing that would be the *exit polls* that you’ve heard reported. That part of them, apparently, was accurate, but not who the folks actually voted for.

  9. 13)
    Carol Conway-Long said on 11/11/2004 @ 7:35am PT: [Permalink]

    :angry: How can we all band together and demand an investigation of this gigantic fraud?

  10. 15)
    Floyd Massey said on 11/12/2004 @ 9:36am PT: [Permalink]

    After the sUPREME court gave the office to gEORGE bUSH IN 200 I swore i would not participate in another election. So much for that. After a few weeks of feeling sorry for my country and myself , I set about getting as many people as I could to register and vote. Alas, it seems I was wrong again. Ohhh well, I will give myself a couple of weeks to roll in misery and get out again and start talking to people.

  11. 16)
    ED THE CONSERVATIVE said on 11/15/2004 @ 2:32pm PT: [Permalink]

    FACE IT, " polls-smolls",,,,, all you babykillin-unatural freaks lost . STOP WHINNNNNING,
    GOD loves you,but you don’t have enough brains
    to realize it, nor the moral understanding to live
    your life like you even respect him. liberals are a
    pitiful lot. That is why they lost.

  12. 17)
    SUE COHEN said on 11/21/2004 @ 7:26am PT: [Permalink]

    This election was hijacked-again. The amount of fraud, voter suppression, intimidation and clear violations of both The Voting Rigths Act and the 15th Amendment are too numerous and compelling to ignore. Keep spreading the owrd, write your reps and support http://www.helpamericarecount.org The values issue is a red herring foisted as a smokescreen to deflect away from this massive fraud.
    SUE COHEN
    ROCKVILLE MD

  13. 18)
    SUE COHEN said on 11/21/2004 @ 7:28am PT: [Permalink]

    This election was hijacked-again. The amount of fraud, voter suppression, intimidation and clear violations of both The Voting Rigths Act and the 15th Amendment are too numerous and compelling to ignore. Keep spreading the owrd, write your reps and support http://www.helpamericarecount.org The values issue is a red herring foisted as a smokescreen to deflect away from this massive fraud.
    SUE COHEN
    ROCKVILLE MD

  14. 23)

    End and goal.-Not every end is the goal. The end of a melody is not its goal; and yet as long as the melody has not reached its end, it also hasn’t reached its goal. A parable. ......

  15. 25)

    Being deep and appearing deep.-Whoever knows he is deep, strives for clarity; whoever would like to appear deep to the crowd, strives for obscurity. For the crowd considers anything deep if only it cannot see to the bottom: the crown is so timid and afraid of going into the water. ......

  16. 27)

    The profound.- Men of profound thought appear to themselves in intercourse with others like comedians, for in order to be understood they must always simulate superficiality. ......

  17. 33)

    Doors.- In everything that is learnt or experienced, the child, just like the man, sees doors; but for the former they are places to go to, for the latter to go through. ......

  18. 37)

    Readers of aphorisms. The worst readers of aphorisms are the author’s friends if they are intent on guessing back from the general to the particular instance to which the aphorism owes its origin; for with such pot-peeking they reduce the author’s whole effort to nothing; so that they deservedly gain, not a philosophic outlook or instruction, but-at best, or at worst-nothing more than the satisfaction of vulgar curiosity. promotion brochure moving fatigue power supply

  19. 38)

    The profound.- Men of profound thought appear to themselves in intercourse with others like comedians, for in order to be understood they must always simulate superficiality. lasix fosamax atenolol doxycycline levaquin

(Comments are now closed.)


Thanks to you, The BRAD BLOG has been trouble-making and muckraking for … 22 YEARS!!!

Please help The BRAD BLOG, BradCast and Green News Report remain independent and 100% reader and listener supported in our 23rd YEAR!!!

ONE TIME
any amount...

MONTHLY
any amount...

OR VIA SNAIL MAIL
Make check out to...
Brad Friedman / BRAD BLOG
7095 Hollywood Blvd., #594
Los Angeles, CA 90028

RECENT POSTS

The BRAD BLOG Reborn…

And it only took 20 years or so...

‘Green News Report’ – April 30, 2026

With Brad Friedman and Desi Doyen

Corrupt SCOTUS Undermines U.S. Constitution, Guts Last Remaining Protections of Voting Rights Act: ‘BradCast’ 4/29/2026

Guest: Redistricting expert Dan Vicuña of Common Cause; Also: Comey's dumb new indictment; E. Jean Carroll wins again; More new lows for Trump approval...

Trump’s Activist Rightwing ‘Originalist’ Judges Strike Again in Texas: ‘BradCast’ 4/28/2026

Guest: Jay Willis of Balls and Strikes; Also: Dem takes polling lead for U.S. Senate in TX as Repubs brace for 'sour, ugly, bad, bleak' midterm elections...

‘Green News Report’ – April 28, 2026

With Brad Friedman and Desi Doyen

Trump, Repubs Exploit Failed Assassination Plot to Advance Ballroom Blitz: ‘BradCast’ 4/27/2026

What we know about the alleged shooter, Trump's opportunist response, corrupt contracting for the ballroom, fury at being described as a 'pedophile'; Also: Callers ring in!...

Sunday ‘So Much Winning’ Toons

THIS WEEK: Punch Drunk ... Kash Poor ... Forever War ... The Shadow Docket Knows! ...

So Much Losing: ‘BradCast’ 4/23/2026

In Iran, in public opinion, at the ballot box, in the courtroom...

‘Green News Report’ – April 23, 2026

With Brad Friedman & Desi Doyen...

‘A Scammer’s Treasure Trove’: DOGE Bros Stole Your Social Security Data: ‘BradCast’ 4/22/2026

Guest: Nancy Altman of Social Security Works; Also: 'Yes', Virginia, there is a new U.S. House map! (For now)...

Insiders Making a Killing Betting on Trump’s War: ‘BradCast’ 4/21/2026

Guest: Craig Holman of Public Citizen; Also: Judge blocks Admin scheme to prevent wind, solar development; Another TACO Tuesday for Iran...

‘Green News Report’ – April 21, 2026

With Brad Friedman & Desi Doyen...

Week 8: Iran War Lies Continue from Sundowning Gaslighter-in-Chief: ‘BradCast’ 4/20/2026

Also: Approval rating plummets; More Dem overperformance in NJ; VA voters voting; CA primary election chaos; Callers ring in...

Sunday ‘WWJD?’ Toons

THIS WEEK: Paging Dr. Jesus ... Strait Outta Hormuz ... It's What's for Dinner ...

U.S. Middle Eastern ‘War Crimes’ Then and Now: ‘BradCast’ 4/16/2026

Guest: Attorney, former U.S. Army Captain Keith Barber; Also: Eastman disbarred; ICE official charged in MN...

About Brad Friedman...

Brad is an independent investigative journalist, blogger and broadcaster. Full Bio & Testimonials… Media Appearance Archive… Articles & Editorials Elsewhere… Contact…

He has contributed chapters to these books…
…And is featured in these documentary films…

BRAD BLOG ON THE AIR!

THE BRADCAST on KPFK/Pacifica Radio Network (90.7FM Los Angeles, 98.7FM Santa Barbara, 93.7FM N. San Diego and nationally on many other affiliate stations! ALSO VIA PODCAST: RSS/XML feed | Pandora | TuneInApple Podcasts/iTunesiHeartAmazon Music

GREEN NEWS REPORT, nationally syndicated, with new episodes on Tuesday and Thursday. ALSO VIA PODCAST: RSS/XML feed | Pandora | TuneInApple Podcasts/iTunesiHeartAmazon Music

Media Appearance Archives…

AD
CONTENT

ADDITIONAL STUFF

Brad Friedman/
The BRAD BLOG Named...

Buzz Flash's 'Wings of Justice' Honoree
Project Censored 2010 Award Recipient
The 2008 Weblog Awards