READER COMMENTS ON
"Palin Disputes Allegations of Federal Investigation, Plays Victim, Threatens Alaskan Journalist, Mainstream Media Outlets With Defamation Suits"
(130 Responses so far...)
COMMENT #1 [Permalink]
...
Floridiot
said on 7/5/2009 @ 5:32 am PT...
They sure came out quick with the threats tho, somethings up.
I looked this one up again for all of the Obama birfers, it doesn't matter where he was born, only where mom was:
# Any one born outside the United States, if one parent is an alien and as long as the other parent is a citizen of the U.S. who lived in the U.S. for at least five years (with military and diplomatic service included in this time)
...can be President
Link
COMMENT #2 [Permalink]
...
William Teach
said on 7/5/2009 @ 6:24 am PT...
It's interesting to note that President Obama and many in his administration have threatened and got into tiffs with private citizens, too. That said, just because someone is a politician, doesn't mean anyone can say anything they want about them. "Speech" has consequences. You are free to say what you want, but, if it is defamatory, expect consequences.
BTW, Floridiot, if memory serves, what you are referring to is about someone being considered an American citizen, not natural born, which is what is required to be president. I do not want to get into a birther argument, just pointing that out. I do believe Obama is natural born, though there are some strange things out there. But, natural born.
In certain cases, one can be considered natural born if born outside the USA, such as the military base McCain was born on. But, say Obama was born in Canada (just saying), he would not be eligible, though he would be an American citizen.
COMMENT #3 [Permalink]
...
Floridiot
said on 7/5/2009 @ 6:34 am PT...
Nope, if Mom was even in Kenya when O was born, he would be considered natural born according to the link.
COMMENT #4 [Permalink]
...
Floridiot
said on 7/5/2009 @ 6:41 am PT...
oops, missed the quote that follows the bullet point above at the link.
Anyone falling into these categories is considered natural-born, and is eligible to run for President or Vice President. These provisions allow the children of military families to be considered natural-born, for example.
COMMENT #5 [Permalink]
...
Sharon
said on 7/5/2009 @ 7:09 am PT...
So now she's not being indicted or even investigated? so that was all a lie? Nice work. WTF are you doing publishing bs and why is Shannon Moore who I thought was a serious person spreading bs? I actually believed this. That pisses me off. I was wondering why tpm and other outlets weren't going with it. Now I know. Because they knew you aren't a serious person and neither is Moore. Wish I had known, i actually told people yesterday about this.
Idiots.
COMMENT #6 [Permalink]
...
TheGonz
said on 7/5/2009 @ 7:16 am PT...
Sharon,
Bradblog and other sites report complete filth like "federal indictments" and other such lies as fact because their raging cases of Palin Derangement Syndrome make them do so. They're too stupid to think for themselves and too ignorant to get their own facts straight.
I hope Todd and Sarah Palin sue the hell out of all these spineless, lying jackasses. Maybe they can all share a cell together somewhere. I hear Barrow is nice in the winter time.
COMMENT #7 [Permalink]
...
another joe
said on 7/5/2009 @ 7:16 am PT...
oooooooop! "little shop of horrors" is gonna SUE SUE SUE!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Heaven forbid the little people in Alaska ask questions about their government and public spending on financial boondoggles.
COMMENT #8 [Permalink]
...
perseus
said on 7/5/2009 @ 7:26 am PT...
Why would someone so quickly lawyer up? Particularly why would someone who slandered another presidential candidate with baseless claims and allegations find it necessary to lawyer up so quickly?
Where there's smoke....
COMMENT #9 [Permalink]
...
another joe
said on 7/5/2009 @ 7:28 am PT...
Good work, brad, you have transformed your blog into FLYPAPER FOR STOOOOOOOOOOOPID PEOPLE!
Great strategy, let then wingnuts post over HERE for a while so we can have some serious dialog over THERE!
After all, if palin suddenly quits after some convicted contractors had an opportunity to "show and tell" to reduce their sentence and gave no coherent reason for doing so, there are some legitimate issues that people around the country have a right to talk about.
Thank you again for sacrificing some cyberspace so that the trolls aren't posting this crap on some of the other blogs where people want to know the TRUTH!
COMMENT #10 [Permalink]
...
perseus
said on 7/5/2009 @ 7:30 am PT...
The burden of proof is higher on a public official and this is pure nonsense to imagine that intimidation of our free press and/or making threats of lawsuits could be consistent with our free speech rights.
I'd say that her besmerchment of President Obama while on the campaign trail as an elected official of our government at the time would have more legal, legitimate grounds upon which to bring libel/slander suit.
To me this is just another proof positive that this woman is petty, unsophisticated, and certainly proving to be anything BUT ready to hold high public office. If some little blogger in Alaska has her panties in a wad, imagine how she'd self destruct with all of the negative press the WH receives?
Imagine if this woman were actually veep right now and quitting because she can't take the heat.
It makes my brain hurt to even imagine such a scenario.
COMMENT #11 [Permalink]
...
another joe
said on 7/5/2009 @ 7:32 am PT...
Denials by the FBI aside, she had no choice but to lawyer up to deal with the crisis that forced her to step down.
If anyone believes here "quitting is winning" and that "fulfilling responsibilities is quitting" justifications for her sudden departure during the 4th of July news dump - they are BACKWASH.
How did that work, little shop of horrors, to abandon your duties to citizens of Alaska over the weeked celebration of our nation's founding and the courage shown by our founding fathers?
Pretty stoooooooooopid move, huh?
COMMENT #12 [Permalink]
...
perseus
said on 7/5/2009 @ 7:33 am PT...
Right on Floridot. That's precisely what the law states.
But not to digress due to troll droppings here, Van Flein has now attacked an individual's right to free speech by intimidation of the press. He can't be too astute to practice law in this way.
Stirring a boilding cauldron is often a very dangerous proposition. That so-called 'elite press' with whom she wants to have a schoolyard fight is precisely the giant whom you do not want to threaten. They will always have the last word and will skewer you on your way out if you're not intelligent enough to comprehend the game.
COMMENT #13 [Permalink]
...
perseus
said on 7/5/2009 @ 7:36 am PT...
Again, she keeps confirming the fact that she never did comprehend the higher expectations placed on a elected government official in this threat to sue private individuals. Can someone please send this woman a copy of our constitution?
Maybe not. I doubt that she is interested in reading it; certainly no ability to process it.
The backlash of these threats only makes her more of a tabloid freak show.
It also confirms what we all already know.
COMMENT #14 [Permalink]
...
anonymous
said on 7/5/2009 @ 7:38 am PT...
Just because some supposed FBI agent in Ak knows of no probe into the Palins doesn't mean there isn't one ongoing.
Just because it may not involve the FBI doesn't mean that it doesn't involved the IRS (ahem) and/or the DOJ.
Does anyone believe that an official probe is so easily disclosed? If so, I've got some prime swampland in Mississippi to sell ya! You betcha!
COMMENT #15 [Permalink]
...
another joe
said on 7/5/2009 @ 7:38 am PT...
perseus - sorry, but in most of America that kind of press does not exist anymore. The mainstream media is wholly owned and complicit with the repug/neocons that fraudlently hoisted an AWOL abusive alcoholic/cocaine addict idiot into the White House via 2 stolen elections. The same interests tried the same with mclame/palin.
It is not likely that the media will take any sort of principle stand to support those that want to hold repug/neocon darlings accountable.
COMMENT #16 [Permalink]
...
anonymous
said on 7/5/2009 @ 7:40 am PT...
Booya! Rovespeak all over again. Everything is opposite in this world of delusion and deceit.
Up is down; clean air is actually pollution; ensuring safety of our elections is actually hacking our voting machines....
and now "quitting is not quitting".
This is Moron Speak and the spokesperson (and Palin) need to be ashamed of themselves for trying to pull the wool over people's eyes and confuse the issue.
Quitting is always quitting - no other way to spin it. Quitting is failure - end of discussion.
COMMENT #17 [Permalink]
...
Sharon
said on 7/5/2009 @ 7:43 am PT...
Shut up Gonzo. I fucking hate Sarah Palin. She's a dangerous, power hungry sick disturbed person who if she ever seized any real power, would destroy this country.
Just because I'm pissed at this blog and at Moore for not verifying their facts doesn't mean I'm on your side.
And there is no way this sick woman pulled this stunt without there being something behind it.
From now on I'll wait till TPM goes with it. That's when I'll know it's true. This blog appears to be the left version of Glenn Beck. I'll bet you're a big fan of his huh???????
COMMENT #18 [Permalink]
...
anonymous
said on 7/5/2009 @ 7:44 am PT...
another joe: Yes, that 'librul press' is actually a wholly owned subsidiary and propaganda megaphone of the reich despite how these conjobs attempt to paint it. We all KNOW what they are doing.
As for the press standing up for their rights of free speech, perhaps the conjobs need look no further than their own little bouncey-bouncey. He slanders Obama every day of the week and calls it entertainment.
Palin calling Obama a terrorist and a socialist would qualify for the higher level of expectation we place upon our public officials and would constitute a case for slander.
Time will tell if the spineless media actually know our constitution. Time will tell, yes it will.
In the interim, the celebration goes on in Ak with much to celebrate this weekend.
COMMENT #19 [Permalink]
...
another joe
said on 7/5/2009 @ 7:45 am PT...
anonymous - and just because rag-sheet LA times says they confirmed via FBI blah blah blah...
But did they check with IRS and DOJ? Perhaps they even needed to make several contacts to FBI before someone was stooooooooopid enough to give them a quotable statement that they could portray as the "official" state of the matter?
It is curious that TIMES seems to feel talking to a "special agent" and proclaiming there is "no wiggle" definitively proves that THERE ARE NO CONCERNS, INVESTIGATIONS, OR POTENTIAL ACTIONS pending or in progress.
Only a moron would read la times statement as vindicating palin.
COMMENT #20 [Permalink]
...
anonymous
said on 7/5/2009 @ 7:46 am PT...
Digest this -the background of a quitter from Wikipedia directly.
1982 - Hawaii Pacific College - 1 semester
1983 - N. Idaho Community College - 2 semesters
1984 - Univ. of Idaho - 2 semesters
1985 Motanusko-Susitna Community College - 1 term
1986 - Univ. of Idaho - 3 semesters
This pattern of being a quitter has been years in the making.
Add to that quitting her job as Mayor of Wasilla to campaign for Lt. Gov. And to that resigning from her post on the Petro Board....and now resigning as Gov after 2+ years.
This is the larger issue.
COMMENT #21 [Permalink]
...
perseus
said on 7/5/2009 @ 7:47 am PT...
Agreed: The perfect day for a toxic news dump is the Friday afternoon (late) prior to a holiday.
pretty telling.
COMMENT #22 [Permalink]
...
another joe
said on 7/5/2009 @ 7:50 am PT...
palin and the repugs are now waying "quitting is winning" - a "shrewed move" and that it might actually catapult her into the white house!
That's some pretty good doublespeak, even by repug standards - ABANDON THE ONLY REAL POLITICAL RESPONSIBILITIES YOU HAVE EVER HAD IS SUCCESSFULLY FULFILLING THEM!
And it makes her an even "better" candidate for the White House!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
"Losing is WINNING" and "ONLY WINNERS QUIT!!!!!!!"
And doing over a long holiday weekend that celebrates the tenacious battles that others have made to create our nation - SHEER BRILLIANCE!!!!!!!
I only wish it was dur chimpfuhrer that "catapulted the propaganda" that "quitting is for WINNERS"!
COMMENT #23 [Permalink]
...
perseus
said on 7/5/2009 @ 7:52 am PT...
It's time to look to the LA Times for their verification of their "source" at the FBI?? What qualified source would disclose details of an ongoing investigation? This sounds very bogus to me - especially on a holiday weekend where contact with credibal sources is non-existent.
I think this is further damage control by the Palin machine. I don't buy a word of it, frankly.
The qualification I would make if one is to presume that this so-called 'verification' by the FBI exists is that it could not include unknown investigations by separate and individual branches of law enforcement - the DOJ and the IRS.
We know they were forced to repay $10,000 for trying to sneak the travel of their tribe onto the taxpayers so why would anyone NOT think there's more?
Once one's rep is toast due to ethical violations and/or violation federal law (expensing family travel and being found guilty with repayment) it's not a stretch to imagine just about anything with this gang.
COMMENT #24 [Permalink]
...
perseus
said on 7/5/2009 @ 7:54 am PT...
Once a quitter - always a quitter.
If you can't stand the heat, get the hell out of the kitchen!
Happy 4th weekend!
COMMENT #25 [Permalink]
...
perseus
said on 7/5/2009 @ 7:57 am PT...
The look on Anderson Cooper's face told it all when Meg Stapleton ran this 'quitting is not quitting joke' by him on friday. These people don't even understand basic logic.
COMMENT #26 [Permalink]
...
Timbeer
said on 7/5/2009 @ 7:58 am PT...
Heaven forbid the little people in Alaska ask questions about their government and public spending on financial boondoggles.
Yeah, publishing as fact impending indictment and FBI investigations is just asking questions. In stoopid world I guess.
It's like were on Jason Leopolds site or something.
COMMENT #27 [Permalink]
...
Timbeer
said on 7/5/2009 @ 7:59 am PT...
perseus
Go take some meds.
COMMENT #28 [Permalink]
...
TheGonz
said on 7/5/2009 @ 8:05 am PT...
Sharon,
Wow. . .you "hate" Sarah Palin.
I guess that means you're much, much dumber than I thought. And for someone suffering from such a (now) clear case of Palin Derangement Syndrome, that's really saying something.
Anyway, happy "left wing blogs getting sued for lying and being stupid" day. Hopefully this place will be nothing more than a virtual smoking crater before too much longer. People like the pieces of garbage who run this site and the pieces of garbage who support them don't deserve anything more.
COMMENT #29 [Permalink]
...
Mark in VA
said on 7/5/2009 @ 8:08 am PT...
Sharon pretty much sums things up for me. There is no doubt in my mind that Gov. Winky was up in the quiet of Wasilla using her power for various pleasures while mayor, but all this jumping the shark crap by the left-leaning journalists is creating confusion under which she can keep things hidden.
Try finding the story first, and then printing it, before you lose so much credibility that it won't matter what you find.
COMMENT #30 [Permalink]
...
Axey
said on 7/5/2009 @ 8:15 am PT...
I wish someone would sue Palin over her remarks about Obama during the campaign. I would truly love to see the evidence that he didn't pal around with terrorists, etc. The discovery would be awesome to behold.
COMMENT #31 [Permalink]
...
karen
said on 7/5/2009 @ 8:25 am PT...
Totally agree with anonymous #20, she had no good reason for switching colleges and frankly I'm surpirsed she could graduate in apparently 9 semesters with all the transferring, just one more than a normal 8 semesters for four yr degree, because in my experience, students generally get really screwed out of credits when transferring just once, especailly when ont carefully planned (like a planned start at a community college to move unto another school for last two years in major, which her moves are not consistent with), not to mention the time it takes to move, apply elsewhere etc. The college thing seemed strange to me and was an early indication of Palin's strangeness/desire to move on.
Really, it seems quitting, keep moving has been learned behavior, as it has worked for her...she moved on from Wasilla Mayor job just when dissatisification with her was mounting into into a possible recall. She got real lucky quitting energy board as she seemed she just wanted out of job she didn't like but got chance to cast herself as anti-corruption and then got lucky with scandal that helped her get Gov job. She wasn't doing much with Gov job other avoiding being in Juneau and being a bit too Dem friendly (hard to believe now) for old-boy Repub network, then she got tapped as VP candidate. Someone who gets over on initial impressions but does not have substance to back-it up is best to keep moving. Also, she is the "get-over" type in that she doesn't move on stragetically, she literal does not want to stick around for the hard work of getting evaluating over the long-term and producing consistently. Not that she doesn't work hard, just not at the day to day grind-it-out working class way of producign something. She swoops in, does some things to make herself look good and then moves on, mastering how to look good to the next group of suckers.
She reminds me of handsome young sales guy that comes in with great kudos, sales records, and gets great sales numbers first few quarters. But once you're around him, realize he does things that aren't in long-term interest of your business, cheats, does things to get numbers now but that hurt his sales later, alienates some long-time clients who eventually move away from him. He also alienates co-workers cause he doesn't do all the other things they are told to do like sales meetings, sales reports, helping other sales guys even when they themselves won't get commision etc...and yet this is tolerated initially by sales manager because numbers are good. And just when everybody is figuring this wunder-kid ain't all that, he announces he just got a better job at a different company, that is so impressed with his sales figures. Good riddance you say.
Palin is not a quitter in that she works hard and persists, but she is a job quitter and rolling stone in that she does not want to evaluated on a long-term basis by people who really know her, she would rather like to get over on her initial appearance to folks
COMMENT #32 [Permalink]
...
UncleZeb
said on 7/5/2009 @ 8:25 am PT...
LOL, looks like Brad got caught spreading Bullsh*t. Hope he has a good lawyer.
COMMENT #33 [Permalink]
...
karen
said on 7/5/2009 @ 8:37 am PT...
What is with the trolls going on about Brad reporting the rumors of a Fed investigation??? Even if this was the crazy grave offense you seem to thinking, do you not read blogs of all types? Conservative blogs have never be caught in reporting innaccurate rumors, Libertarians haven't ever done it??? I have seen much worse inaccurate rumors, factual errors on Fox News and CNN and NYTimes than this, let along, bloggers. What I think is funny, is the really controversial stuff he reports like Sible Edmonds allegations, don't even get mentioned, hardly commented on, and not refuted with any facts denying his claims...hmmmmm. Palin rumor about somethign that will soon be publically confirmed or denied, only after, mind you, she has quit her current job and expressed no immediately run for new office brings out the trolls but factual reporting on election fraud, treason with govt security agencies never get theatened lawsuits or trolls....go figure.
COMMENT #34 [Permalink]
...
Sharon
said on 7/5/2009 @ 8:41 am PT...
Gonzo you really are dumb. I guess since you are a Palin supporter that's a preresiquite. Of course you are dumb. But you are redefining dumb here if you actually believe that Palin is suing anyone. She'd have to answer questions you dumb shit and she is in no position to do that.
She's finished in national politics but you right wing fanboys can still dream about her red high heels when you're alone at night. You know, every night.
COMMENT #35 [Permalink]
...
jelous
said on 7/5/2009 @ 8:41 am PT...
obama so far has screwed this country royally with his "community activism" at best with no real presidential decisions, yet he is seen as god. Well, obama wants to be god, god doesn't want to be obama. Why in the hell would a white man want to be a low-life, welfare recipient, hood-rat who can't even speak for himself without pre-written speeches?
Palin, FBI says she's cool, yet obama can't even produce a friggin birth certificate. Remember when you filthy liberals scrutinized mccains health report? Where is his birth certificate and legal rights? Produce them. You aren't afraid of anything. R U?
COMMENT #36 [Permalink]
...
another joe
said on 7/5/2009 @ 8:51 am PT...
LOL
palin is not a quitter - she works hard, it's hard work, really HARD WORK quittin' and showing girls and young women around the nation that to really be a winner, you have to quit!
Meeting challenges and responsibilities? That is for losers!
What if our founding fathers had persevered in founding this nation and saw the commitments they made through?
Appropriate that "little shop of horrors" (mclame camp's words for her, not mine) chose to redifine "quitting" and "winning" over the long 4th of July Holiday.
What if our founding fathers had not demonstated "success" by quitting!!!!!!
COMMENT #37 [Permalink]
...
perseus
said on 7/5/2009 @ 8:54 am PT...
Ask yourself: what 'credible' FBI agent would rebut a covert probe to a meainstream media outlet? Not a real one, that's certain.
Besides, who's going to be available on a holiday weekend to do this rebutting?
This smells like those dead fish Palin analogized in her speech. It smells pretty rotten to me.
*I didn't know that the LA Times was a "rag" much like National Enq. Good to know that even the rag isn't credible.
COMMENT #38 [Permalink]
...
perseus
said on 7/5/2009 @ 8:57 am PT...
another joe: Regardless of how you dice it, she's a quitter by the rules of the game.
I'm surprised if the Ak legislature doesn't pursue charges against her for violation of her oath of office myself. I guess they just want to be rid of her?
You're going to have to do much better than pulling a Rove DARVO on us - we're much too intelligent for your brand of twisting truth.
Troll detritus.....
COMMENT #39 [Permalink]
...
cal
said on 7/5/2009 @ 9:00 am PT...
If we, as americans, have any faith in our intelligence community, we know beyond a doubt that a legitimate agent would never disclose details (pro or con) during an ongoing case.
If we think our intel agencies are that pedestrian, then it's time for those who are so easily led (sheeple) into believing that an agent would go on record over a holiday weekend to rebut internet rumors is the biggest moron of all.
COMMENT #40 [Permalink]
...
cal
said on 7/5/2009 @ 9:02 am PT...
In your dreams #36. The only thing Palin defined for us is the perfect image of a total loser and quitter aka failure. She's become a national joke.
COMMENT #41 [Permalink]
...
Big Dan
said on 7/5/2009 @ 9:02 am PT...
The biggest thing of all, is that NO ONE just quits being governor of a state for no reason.
Another observation, though, is that she's shown for quite a while that she's too sensitive to the media. She does not have the thick skin that politicians must possess who aspire to the highest offices in the land.
If she was VP, would she be wasting her time fighting with the media all the time?
COMMENT #42 [Permalink]
...
IreneNY
said on 7/5/2009 @ 9:03 am PT...
I am utterly disgusted that more people believe rumors and conjecture rather then facts. This woman with her conservative values is raked over the coals for her beliefs. The hounding that she and her family has had to endure only leaves me to believe she is FEARED by the Liberal (very liberal)Democrat party. I am a free thinker and I make my own decisions about people, and Sarah Palin is an Outstanding American and person. She sticks to her values and doesn't let the opposing view discourage her. What really makes me mad is that she is the beacon and role model for females today and that Women's Organizations don't support her more. Until women can unite together and accept each other regardless of their own "personal agendas" we will continue to be our own worst enemies. She is family oriented, a wife, mother and a career woman with goals and aspirations but that isn't recognized as valuable to "Liberal Women" because of her moral ethics. You Ms. Moore are a disgrace to Women because you are an instigator and feed the negativity that feeds the continued disarray of women as a whole.
COMMENT #43 [Permalink]
...
cal
said on 7/5/2009 @ 9:04 am PT...
Brad Hanson - I rest my case.
COMMENT #44 [Permalink]
...
Big Dan
said on 7/5/2009 @ 9:04 am PT...
Everyone's losing sight that SHE QUIT BEING F*CKING GOVERNOR! Who does that? Unless there's some scandal brewing or there was some behind the scenes agreement reached or they're heading off being in the spotlight when the hammer comes down.
COMMENT #45 [Permalink]
...
another joe
said on 7/5/2009 @ 9:05 am PT...
Too funny! LOL
Must see from palin's legal defense fund Website:
"Halfway through her first term as Alaska's Governor, Sarah Palin has done so much for her state and her nation ... Still, there is much left to be done, so let's help Governor Palin continue the job she was elected to do without all these petty distractions."
Couldn't make this crap up: http://www.thealaskafundtrust.com/about/
COMMENT #46 [Permalink]
...
cal
said on 7/5/2009 @ 9:05 am PT...
Picture the scenario of palin as veep and pitching a hissy fit about how unfair the media is to her as veep. Good gawd!
COMMENT #47 [Permalink]
...
Big Dan
said on 7/5/2009 @ 9:06 am PT...
IreneNY: Why did she quit being governor???????
Will you wingnuts please answer that question????
Because she herself never did!!!!!!!!!!
COMMENT #48 [Permalink]
...
sis
said on 7/5/2009 @ 9:07 am PT...
As we've all said, she's a quitter from way, way back. Nothing new here. It's just confirmation of a quitter's MO.
COMMENT #49 [Permalink]
...
Big Dan
said on 7/5/2009 @ 9:08 am PT...
Every wingnut who posts anything, Brad should make them answer the question: "WHY DID SHE QUIT BEING GOVERNOR?????"
COMMENT #50 [Permalink]
...
sis
said on 7/5/2009 @ 9:08 am PT...
IreneNY - then you must be pretty disgusted with the likes of known liars like RushOxy, Hannity, Beck and O'Leily. Bet you're glued to the station of lies every day.
COMMENT #51 [Permalink]
...
another joe
said on 7/5/2009 @ 9:09 am PT...
perseus
No, REALLY!!!!!
QUITTING IS WINNING
ONLY LOSERS SHOW RESOLVE AND KEEP COMMITMENTS!!!!!
billy kristol said so - and he even said it was "shrewd"!
Didn't you hear all the pundits proclaiming how this enhances her standing within the repug party for 2012
COMMENT #52 [Permalink]
...
Bob In Pacifica
said on 7/5/2009 @ 9:09 am PT...
Does this mean that Obama can sue Palin for saying he palled around with terrorists? I sure hope so. He could use that house up in Wasilla. Looks mighty fine.
COMMENT #53 [Permalink]
...
Big Dan
said on 7/5/2009 @ 9:09 am PT...
It's almost like the entire conversation has shifted from "Why did she quit being governor", to "The media's picking on her"!!!!!!
That's not the important thing, it's "Why did she quit being governor???"
Shift the topic to: "The media's picking on her"!!!
COMMENT #54 [Permalink]
...
TheGonz
said on 7/5/2009 @ 9:10 am PT...
{Ed Note: Comment deleted. 'TheGonz', as per our very few rules for commenting at The BRAD BLOG, you are free to attack public figures here, and even me, all you like. You are not, however, allowed to personally attack other commenters. Your respect for those guidelines is appreciated. Please take personal responsibility when posting, so 99 and myself don't have to police every comment on every thread. We'd rather keep this place an open forum for discussion. Thanks! - BF}
COMMENT #55 [Permalink]
...
sis
said on 7/5/2009 @ 9:10 am PT...
Let's see with a show of hands here - how many of you are on the federal 'dole' via medicare, medicaid, SSI, etc.?
How many of you can afford health insurance?
I think that would disqualify about 90% of the obama naysayers on this thread. Happy 4th!
COMMENT #56 [Permalink]
...
Big Dan
said on 7/5/2009 @ 9:11 am PT...
Everyone here should do like I did, put the wingnut's name, copy their comment, and say: "Why did she quit being governor???"
COMMENT #57 [Permalink]
...
Bob In Pacifica
said on 7/5/2009 @ 9:13 am PT...
By the way, is Special Agent Eric Gonzalez speaking for the entire FBI or the entire federal government? I'd like to know the extent of his lack of wiggle room and the girth of his authority and knowledge within the federal government.
COMMENT #58 [Permalink]
...
Big Dan
said on 7/5/2009 @ 9:13 am PT...
Who quits an office that high, for no reason?
So, we're expected to believe, that if Joe Biden, today, said: "I'm resigning, I'm 'passing the ball for victory'", that there wasn't something funny going on?
COME ON!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Do you think we're all idiots????????????????
And then the media would just say: "OK, c'ya Joe"???
COME ON!!!!!!!!!!
There's something funny going on here!!!!!!
COMMENT #59 [Permalink]
...
sis
said on 7/5/2009 @ 9:13 am PT...
Let's begin a counter thread for the troll detritus today entitled "WHY DID SARAH REALLY QUIT?".
If one supporter can provide a real reason then we can move beyond that question.
WHY DID SARAH REALLY QUIT?
COMMENT #60 [Permalink]
...
TheGonz
said on 7/5/2009 @ 9:14 am PT...
Does this mean that Obama can sue Palin for saying he palled around with terrorists? I sure hope so. He could use that house up in Wasilla. Looks mighty fine.
Oh please, please, PLEASE let Obama try to sue Palin over anything she said during the campaign. As someone noted above, the discovery phase of the trial would be so incredible that a Congress with any morals or scruples would have impeachment hearings started before the end of the year.
Obama's terrorist pal. . .his hate-spewing preacher. . .all his other lies. . .all fair game in a court of law without the mainstream media to bail his ass out of the fire.
I'm sure Sarah Palin would welcome a lawsuit from ol' Barry O. And she'd destroy him. . .just like she will in 2012 if she chooses to run for PotUS.
COMMENT #61 [Permalink]
...
anonymous
said on 7/5/2009 @ 9:18 am PT...
anyone who knows this driven woman knows that she wouldn't just up and quit what would be her pinnacle according to the Peter Principle without cause and reason. Her almost-hyperventilated statement and obvious paranoia during her swansong tells us that there's something afoot.
Baracudas never quit.
COMMENT #62 [Permalink]
...
Big Dan
said on 7/5/2009 @ 9:18 am PT...
Only in this day and aga, of this media we have that's supposedly "liberal", can a Republican governor QUIT...and NOT give a reason...and the topic immediately shifts from "Why did she quit?" to "The media's picking on her"!
Wake up! The media is owned by 5 "liberal" (huh???) corporations...
COMMENT #63 [Permalink]
...
anonymous
said on 7/5/2009 @ 9:19 am PT...
#60 Please read the Patriot Act if you know what that means.
It clearly outlines "incitement to violence" which occurred in her Florida rallies (violence that is) as an offense.
You seem to have a hefty dose of Obama envy, dude.
COMMENT #64 [Permalink]
...
anonymous
said on 7/5/2009 @ 9:21 am PT...
Time to post some truth here beginning with the Patriot Act and the reports from the Palin Terror rallies.
The trolls are so deluded that they believe that the rest of americans have memory loss.
COMMENT #65 [Permalink]
...
Big Dan
said on 7/5/2009 @ 9:22 am PT...
Just wait until Monday, when the Republican Noise Machine gets cranking, blaming the media: Limbaugh, Hannity, O'Reilly, Coulter, FOX "news", the whole gang, and the scared shitless "liberal media", instead of digging deeper, starts printing retractions and dropping the ball (as usual). NEVER answering the question: "Why did she resign?"
Sarah Palin is going to get away with resigning as governor and not giving a reason. Now I've seen everything!
COMMENT #66 [Permalink]
...
Big Dan
said on 7/5/2009 @ 9:24 am PT...
I watched her concession speech several times, and astoundingly, she gave no reason for quitting. I just find that mind-boggling.
COMMENT #67 [Permalink]
...
TheGonz
said on 7/5/2009 @ 9:27 am PT...
It clearly outlines "incitement to violence" which occurred in her Florida rallies (violence that is) as an offense.
Oh, you mean that "incitement to violence" that nobody actually heard take place and was completely made up? The one that's been thoroughly debunked by every imaginable source?
Yeah. . .feel free to just kneel down, open your mouth real wide, and accept whatever your Messiah feels like dumping in there.
You, like every other Obama supporter, are a sheep that's not capable of thinking for themselves. Must be a sad, sad existence.
COMMENT #68 [Permalink]
...
David
said on 7/5/2009 @ 9:31 am PT...
Sarah Palin obviously did the right thing by resigning. She is completely unequipped to be in the public spotlight. John McCain did her no favor by choosing her as his VP candidate. She was undoubtedly much happier as the governor of America's most isolated state. She is much too thin-skinned to run for a major national office. Scurrilous attacks? You mean like, "Hussein" Obama is a Muslim terrorist lover? Michelle Obama hates America, etc., etc...it goes with the territory. As Harry Truman said, "If you can't stand the heat, get out of the kitchen!"
COMMENT #69 [Permalink]
...
Bob In Pacifica
said on 7/5/2009 @ 9:35 am PT...
TheGonz at #60. That's my point exactly and yet while you were able to see how impossible it would be for Obama to sue Palin, you seem incapable of seeing the reverse. That's because you think that your brand of reality somehow supercedes the principle of law. That is, "Oh, she can say that Obama pals around with terrorists because he pals around with terrorists, but a reporter can't say she's under investigation for her house because her lawyer says she isn't."
Why does your logic work one way? It's almost impossible for public figure, especially a politician, to sue ANYBODY for defamation. That was the point of the article and this thread. Your comprehension skills are blindered by your political beliefs. I guess that means that there's no point in discussing this with you.
COMMENT #70 [Permalink]
...
Mustafa
said on 7/5/2009 @ 9:59 am PT...
Dennis Zaki should be taking the credit for this one, it was his site that originated this rumor.
It's been echoing back and forth in the libtard blogosphere for a couple of months now, but there isn't a shred of truth to it.
Zaki is a two bit hack who drives around the trailer parks of Wasilla waving wads of Jackson's to anybody who will talk to him.
COMMENT #71 [Permalink]
...
Anthony Look
said on 7/5/2009 @ 10:06 am PT...
I remember several politicians basically daring the media to find dirt on them and it coming back to haunt them. Palin may indeed be innocent of any crime; however, her ethical misgivings history and the abrupt and as of yet not fully explainable departure, does make her suspect. This threat of a law suit only furthers the curiosity and elevates the drama into a showdown of will and power. I suspect that heels are being dug in at both camps and seat belts need to be tightened, here comes the ride.
COMMENT #72 [Permalink]
...
tjproudamerican
said on 7/5/2009 @ 11:32 am PT...
On top of everything else bad about this pathetic woman, she is apparently a fascist who is trying to eliminate Free Speech.
If she sues there will be hundreds of thousands of us who will support you and you will win.
Don't let these Alaskan Hillbillies silence you!
The Plains of this world are cheap demagogues, who feel sorry for themselves even as they promote themselves exhibionistically, and even as they trample on one of the greatest rights Americans have which is Free Speech.
Palin is an idiot who can answer anyone anytime.
If you look at the impotent supporters of Ms. Palin, you see them crawling all over their shacks licking their lips hoping "Sarah" will silence all critics, get Letterman fired, close down blogs, enrich herself at the price of one of our most cherished liberties.
The woman is a disease on our American Soul.
COMMENT #73 [Permalink]
...
David Lasagna
said on 7/5/2009 @ 11:41 am PT...
Man, this site sure got crazy as soon as the subject was Sarah Palin possibly in trouble.
COMMENT #74 [Permalink]
...
christine craft
said on 7/5/2009 @ 12:06 pm PT...
awww.don't be so cruel to caribous barbie..she meant to study the constitution..including the first amendment...but she had an appointment for lip tattooing.
COMMENT #75 [Permalink]
...
Big Dan
said on 7/5/2009 @ 12:33 pm PT...
Right now, Limbaugh & the rightwing media are brainstorming on how to handle this for Monday.
COMMENT #76 [Permalink]
...
Duyen Ky
said on 7/5/2009 @ 12:44 pm PT...
That little bit of slander of Governor Palin just might cost you a whole lot of money. Hope you've got a good lawyer.
COMMENT #77 [Permalink]
...
Agent 99
said on 7/5/2009 @ 1:01 pm PT...
COMMENT #78 [Permalink]
...
Heydo
said on 7/5/2009 @ 1:29 pm PT...
Has the evidence of corruption Moore claims to have been publised somewhere? Since that's the stated reason Palin may sue her, I'd like to read it for myself if it's available. Thank you,
COMMENT #79 [Permalink]
...
Another Joe
said on 7/5/2009 @ 1:55 pm PT...
COMMENT #80 [Permalink]
...
karen
said on 7/5/2009 @ 1:59 pm PT...
If Hillary suddenly quit her Sec of State job without any plausible reason, the media wouldn't go similarly nuts???
Why is Palin victim when the media is treating her the same as they would any public servant that behaves oddly? Was the media sexist towards Sanford because they asked about him being AWOL? Was Bill Clinton a victim of media because they spread rumors of affairs?
Palin did something very odd, odd behavior draws attention whether left or right. If Hill quit, wouldn't media guess, among other thing, there must be a scandal coming? Fox News, CNN, and MSNBC for that matter would obviously spend a lot of air time trying to figure out why Hill quit in middle of term and some would call her a quitter and give her a hard time for it.
And then, any previoiusly fairly underground rumor about Hill would suddenly become more believable, seem like a possibility. And given Hill had quit and said she was out of politics for good and thus was not longer a sitting executive and was not running for anything, wouldn't it be more likely to seem ethical to mention the rumor mill, especially if it was something Hill would be able to publically clear her name on if the rumor was false, such as a Fed investigation.
Be honest trolls, Hill would be treated no differently, Palin is not subject to special persecution, just typical media circus when something unusual happens.
The rumors of a Fed investigation were hardly known by anyone until Palin quit, only after she did this odd thing, leaving no obvious reason and only she was on way out of office, out of politics, did these rumors become highligthed.
As said above, Palin quit, that is what got the rumor mill going. Or did the liberals slip her a drug and cause her to quit, I'm sure some how its liberal's fault
COMMENT #81 [Permalink]
...
Heydo
said on 7/5/2009 @ 2:14 pm PT...
Palin 2008: Clinton Whining About Media Criticism "Does Herself A Disservice To Even Mention It"
Includes video!
Clinton was criticized, among other things, for getting weepy when that's the LAST thing Americans want to see from a potential Commander in Chief.
Being accused of federal investigation for corruption in office is quite something else, and is actionable in court.
COMMENT #82 [Permalink]
...
Another Joe
said on 7/5/2009 @ 2:16 pm PT...
Good thing she isn't gonna sue me for saying she was probably boofin' "first dude's" business partner again.
OH WAIT
DOES THAT MEAN ITS TRUE!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
COMMENT #83 [Permalink]
...
Heydo
said on 7/5/2009 @ 2:16 pm PT...
I ask again: has Moore's evidence been made public? If so, please direct me to it. Thanks,
COMMENT #84 [Permalink]
...
Another Joe
said on 7/5/2009 @ 2:18 pm PT...
HEYDO - I would just love to see someone put her lying liars ass under oath in these procedings and have her squirm her way through a deposition!
I HOPE SHE DOES SUE!
Let the DISCOVERY process begin. Anyone that is saying she will or should is just plain STOOOOOOOOOOOOOPID!!!!
Does anyone know, can the PLAINTIFF of a civil suit TAKE THE FIFTH during testimony/cross examination.
BRING IT ON BIMBO!
COMMENT #85 [Permalink]
...
Heydo
said on 7/5/2009 @ 2:22 pm PT...
Don't know about you but I'm old enough to recall when Bill Clinton denied "having sex with that woman." Lots of leftists called in to various radio shows saying that he should sue everyone who accused him of it.
Later, when he fessed up to it, they suddenly got quiet (at least on the lawsuit point).
If you want the right wingers to shut up about this, tell Moore to put out the evidence she claims she has on Palin. Otherwise, let it go to court (if Palin decides to sue). Until then, Moore is the one who looks worse here: she made the claim, Palin's side is saying "prove it in court." The longer Moore waits to put this info out, the worse she'll look...as well as everyone who sided with her without actually seeing the proof.
COMMENT #86 [Permalink]
...
Another Joe
said on 7/5/2009 @ 2:29 pm PT...
heydo - why don't you "put out" that little rubber ball that rattles in your noggin' and quit trollin garbage here.
1. When elected officials up and quit without giving a reason, we have a right to speculate.
2. The facts that this speculation is based on was all public knowledge last fall and was reported by some. I have posted link in other threads but will not accomodate your obnoxious demands.
3. She cannot sue without putting herself in a position where she would have to be put under oath - something that she will never do because she would get nailed - either purjoring herself or being forced to admit to the truth of facts this is all based on.
4. Basing "proof" that the "rumors" are wrong on the statement of a "special agent" is propaganda by la times
COMMENT #87 [Permalink]
...
Brad Friedman
said on 7/5/2009 @ 2:37 pm PT...
Heydo @ 78:
As linked in the article above, as well as in our coverage from Friday, the original, and/or most detailed reporting on the House/Sports Complex scandal was originally filed in the Village Voice in October '08.
COMMENT #88 [Permalink]
...
Big Dan
said on 7/5/2009 @ 2:46 pm PT...
Notice that thing that this person posted:
COMMENT #76 [Permalink]
... Duyen Ky said on 7/5/2009 @ 12:44 pm PT...
That little bit of slander of Governor Palin just might cost you a whole lot of money. Hope you've got a good lawyer.
...still doesn't say why Palin resigned!
It says: "On July 3rd, 2009, Governor Sarah Palin announced her intent to resign her gubernatorial duties
and transfer the powers of Governor to Lt. Governor Sean Parnell.
Almost immediately afterwards, several unscrupulous people have asserted false and defamatory
allegations that the “real” reasons for Governor Palin’s resignation stem from an alleged
criminal investigation pertaining to the construction of the Wasilla Sports Complex."
How come they won't say why she resigned???
They keep saying that other people are defaming her by claiming reasons she resigned, by Palin herself has not said why. She just keeps saying that others are wrong for at least putting forth a reason for her resigning.
Is this like a game show? A governor resigns and everyone else has to guess why?
Why didn't she resign before? Why now???
This doesn't look good for her, looking back on her possibly being the vice-president of the United States.
Keep to the issue: why did Palin resign?
Because the media was picking on her?
COMMENT #89 [Permalink]
...
Big Dan
said on 7/5/2009 @ 2:47 pm PT...
Why don't they say: "Here's the reason she resigned"...and then say: "These other reasons people are giving, are wrong, because HERE is her official reason".
COMMENT #90 [Permalink]
...
Big Dan
said on 7/5/2009 @ 2:49 pm PT...
I say, she's not going to sue anyone...BECAUSE...it would invite even MORE scrutiny of the Palin shenanigans!!! Be careful what you wish for.....
COMMENT #91 [Permalink]
...
Heydo
said on 7/5/2009 @ 2:51 pm PT...
COMMENT #92 [Permalink]
...
Big Dan
said on 7/5/2009 @ 2:52 pm PT...
People often threaten lawsuits just to shut people up. A lot of times, a lawsuit is really the worst thing they could do, when they think it through. The last thing the GOP needs, is for a Palin lawsuit covered 24×7 on CNN. Yeah, right! It would be on the news more than Michael Jackson.
COMMENT #93 [Permalink]
...
Big Dan
said on 7/5/2009 @ 2:53 pm PT...
Shannyn Moore would become an instant star, if Palin brought a lawsuit.
COMMENT #94 [Permalink]
...
Another Joe
said on 7/5/2009 @ 3:00 pm PT...
our troll heydo has spent much time posting crap here that she SHOULD SUE and and proclaims OF COURSE SHE WONT!
Well, truth be known - SHE CAN'T.
No one in the FBI is in a position categorically DENY that there is NO INVESTIGATION and most certainly can't state on the public record whether VECO (convicted of fraud and embezzlement in Alaska) has provided useful evidence in exchange for a lighter sentence as of the deadline of June 30, 2009.
When a well-known rag sheet that is known for publishing distortions and outright lies provides cover for this - IT IS BY DEFINITION PROPAGANDA!
Let's get that slimy-@ss palin under oath! PLEASE PLEASE PRETTY PLEASE SUE!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
COMMENT #95 [Permalink]
...
Brad Friedman
said on 7/5/2009 @ 3:11 pm PT...
Heydo @ 81 said:
Being accused of federal investigation for corruption in office is quite something else, and is actionable in court.
How about if she had been accused of "paling around with terrorists". Would that also be actionable as you see it?
Serious question.
[And I have now, several times, posted liks to the information that Moore was talking about for you. Most recently in comment 87.]
COMMENT #96 [Permalink]
...
Another Joe
said on 7/5/2009 @ 3:12 pm PT...
Is sarah palin a corrupt embezzeler, and adulterer? I just don't know, but I will defend the rights of citizens to discuss the conduct of their elected officials and other public officials.
Her rabid evanglical base, would probably prefer all of the above to having her produce child porn, but does she?
I do not know if palin produces pornography with children or perhaps some animals. But if she did make videos of sex acts between consenting adult humans and mammals out on the farm or wilderness, I'm OK with that - I really am.
Now that she has shown us that taking the "high road" means "quitting", that "only winners quit", and that the real losers are the folks that take responsibilities to others seriously and work diligently to fulfill them, she will have a lot of time to do some corruptin', adulterin', porn producin', and even more slander and libel of her own.
And I am OK with that, because, if she used her political influences to enrich her family and embezzle directly or indirectly from the public coffers, that is obviously much more acceptable than all of this pornography even if it did feature animals that have given the most meaningful consent that is possible for said species.
COMMENT #97 [Permalink]
...
Nunyabiz
said on 7/5/2009 @ 3:14 pm PT...
Well one thing IS an absolute "FACT".
Palin is a stark raving lunatic, a young earth creationist that fully believes the earth is 6000 years old.
She is a religious zealot and Alaska is much better off without her as governor.
COMMENT #98 [Permalink]
...
Heydo
said on 7/5/2009 @ 3:16 pm PT...
Heydo @ 81 said:
How about if she had been accused of "paling around with terrorists". Would that also be actionable as you see it?
Serious question.
Depends. Did she pal around with terrorists? If so, then no, it isn't because it's true.
COMMENT #99 [Permalink]
...
Heydo
said on 7/5/2009 @ 3:18 pm PT...
Thanks for the link, too.
COMMENT #100 [Permalink]
...
Brad Friedman
said on 7/5/2009 @ 3:25 pm PT...
HeyDo @ 98 said:
Depends. Did she pal around with terrorists? If so, then no, it isn't because it's true.
Okay. Thanks for the answer. So if it's also true that there are rumors of a "federal investigation for corruption in office", how is that different and/or actionable as you assert above?
COMMENT #101 [Permalink]
...
Michael g
said on 7/5/2009 @ 3:30 pm PT...
Threatening a singular blogger and other (unnamed) parties with a lawsuit for statements they made regarding a public entity is a classic SLAPP (Strategic Lawsuit Against Public Participation)-like strategy. Go after the most knowledgable, most vocal, most public voices- thus most dangerous to your credibility- against you to scare aware others from doing the same. Wont' have much affect and will be a waste of time in court. One reason we need a national SLAPP statute.
COMMENT #102 [Permalink]
...
William Teach
said on 7/5/2009 @ 3:36 pm PT...
Re: way back at the top of the comments, here is something to consider: those are all terms of citizenship, not necessarily considered to be "natural born." Many legal scholars and challenges have determined that, for instance, a child born of two American citizens born in another country makes the child a citizen, but not natural born. But, a child born to two foreigners (excepting diplomatic personnel) in certain places would be natural born. That is why many illegals have their babies here.
Fine distinctions of the law, many of which are challangable and vague.
Regardless, Obama was born in Hawaii and is eligible until someone provides hard, physical proof to the contrary.
COMMENT #103 [Permalink]
...
Another Joe
said on 7/5/2009 @ 3:41 pm PT...
We should all thank the trolls that have stopped by over the holiday weekend, opened up their little bladders, and dumped on us with golden showers of wisdom!
Just be grateful they didn't bring fudge.
COMMENT #104 [Permalink]
...
anonymous
said on 7/5/2009 @ 3:41 pm PT...
Why is all of this sounding vaguely familiar with what the Palin Crime Gang did to their BIL, the Trooper?
Do they really not "get" the constitution and one's right to free speech at all?
All they have to do is listen to Limpballs, Hannity the Manatee, O'Liely and Beck to know that they're quite comfortable making ad hominem, baseless attacks on a sitting president as well as spreading disinformation and lies as truth EVERY DAY of the week. Fox News is a sham - it's a cover for a wholly owned subsidiary of the GOP and they lie their asses off every hour of every day.
Maybe it's time for citizens to bring suits against all of these frauds and charlatans and accuse them of slander?
Give me an effin' break here. The Palins are so juvenile and get down in the dirt with everyone who crosses their path. How pedestrian and low brow can these Hillbillies get?
All I can say is "imagine what if" and this fraud would have been elected veep? It makes my mind hurt to even formulate that sick thought.
COMMENT #105 [Permalink]
...
anonymous
said on 7/5/2009 @ 3:43 pm PT...
I hope Palin does bring suit so she will totally melt down in the courtroom having to deny the ethical allegations once and for all.
As her mentor (Palin with a penis) would say: Bring it on, dudes! Bring it on!
First witness to attest to Palin's character: Brad Hanson! Yes, bring it on.
COMMENT #106 [Permalink]
...
anonymous
said on 7/5/2009 @ 3:45 pm PT...
google brad hanson if you want more fodder on this freak.
COMMENT #107 [Permalink]
...
anonymous
said on 7/5/2009 @ 3:50 pm PT...
What sheer irony - Palin on the stump at her terror rallies nationwide insinuating (slanderously, I might add) that Obama palled around with terrorists and was a socialist AS A SITTING GOVERNOR AND ELECTED 'PUBLIC' OFFICIAL is in no way protected as free speech; in fact, it's a violation of the Patriot Act, plain and simple.
To now get her panties in a wad because of rumors flying around about her integrity (wait, she already has none of that as we've all seen ad nauseum) she threatens a lawsuit. Boo effin' hoo.
She quit because she couldn't get her way as she did when Mayor of Wasilla and her popularity was circling the toilet - now as her numbers plummet due to her childish, illiterate rants and self-created "dramas", she quits as governor.
With or without any further scandals, this woman is in need of psychiatric counseling which is becoming increasingly clearer with each tweet and facebook entry. Delusionally narcissistic would be my best guess.
I'm switching back to Michael Jackson since pathetically juvenile sarah has become a human cypher now. (yawn).
[ed note: This is your fifth screen name in two days. Please read our rules for commenting and the next name you use will be the one you keep. Thank you. --99]
COMMENT #108 [Permalink]
...
Big Dan
said on 7/5/2009 @ 4:41 pm PT...
Everyone's forgetting the recent David Letterman flap, too. Obviously, Sarah Palin threatens people when they criticize her. Ala O'Reilly: "SHUT UP!!!"
The right(wrong)'s response to criticism is "SHUT UP, OR I'LL SUE YOU!!!" That's what they think of free speech. They can say anything they want about others, though, that's "OK". Just don't say anything about them, or they'll say: "SHUT UP! OR I'LL SUE YOU!!!"
To get this point across, ironically, Palin and the rightwing gang use the media!
COMMENT #109 [Permalink]
...
Big Dan
said on 7/5/2009 @ 4:55 pm PT...
"I'm resigning...and if you try and figure out why, I'll sue you"
COMMENT #110 [Permalink]
...
nikto
said on 7/5/2009 @ 5:05 pm PT...
I love the occasional "BUTTERCUPPER=TROLL" on this site, who wuthout fail, humiliate themselves and their righty "politics" without realizing it.
They do it every time.
lololol
COMMENT #111 [Permalink]
...
Damail
said on 7/5/2009 @ 5:16 pm PT...
Shannon Moore = Jason Leopold.
COMMENT #112 [Permalink]
...
Stupid is as stupid does
said on 7/5/2009 @ 6:34 pm PT...
BRAD BLOG
equals
PWNT
Sill moonbats. How many months running were we gonna see Karl Rove frog-marched out of the White House?
COMMENT #113 [Permalink]
...
blubonnet
said on 7/5/2009 @ 6:44 pm PT...
I'm expecting "nyah-nyah-nyah-nyah" to next come from these pathetic Right wingers. Not much actual intelligence comes out of them.
The David Letterman incident by the way was just an opportunity for Palin to milk for all it was worth.
COMMENT #114 [Permalink]
...
Mustafa
said on 7/5/2009 @ 6:47 pm PT...
Shannyn Moore is getting way too much credit for all of this nonsense.
The original source of the "iceberg" story is this website.
And then here was this posting at Firedoglake:
Update: This just in my inbox, from a source connected sometimes to CNN:
"Here's a quote I got from law enforcement here in Alaska yesterday afternoon regarding Palin "a criminal indictment is pending authorization."
So there you have it.
This story bounced around the Alaska blogs until this weekend when the story went viral.
Who can blame the Palins for swinging back ?
Zaki and Moore claim to be journalists when it's convenient for them, but use the First Amendment when their lies are exposed for what they are.
Zaki is a sometimes freelancer for CNN, Moore a radio host and commentator, certainly NOT a journalist by any stretch of the imagination.
No professional journalist would have ever did what Zaki and Moore et al have done and maintained any semblance of integrity.
And they're proud of what they did.
COMMENT #115 [Permalink]
...
Big Dan
said on 7/5/2009 @ 7:20 pm PT...
COMMENT #112 [Permalink]
... Stupid is as stupid does said on 7/5/2009 @ 6:34 pm PT...
Hey! At least they're starting to use accurate monikers: "STUPID"
COMMENT #116 [Permalink]
...
Big Dan
said on 7/5/2009 @ 7:21 pm PT...
Did 99 start a new rule: "Wingnuts can post here...as long as they have accurate monikers"???
COMMENT #117 [Permalink]
...
Agent 99
said on 7/5/2009 @ 7:51 pm PT...
No! That's an old rule, Danny! The new ones aren't out yet. I'm thinking maybe about no wingnuts until they've had their controller chips removed... or until certain pathetic pieces of work have been shipped off world. I haven't got the wording down quite right yet, though....
COMMENT #118 [Permalink]
...
Another Joe
said on 7/5/2009 @ 8:18 pm PT...
I am sure when the dust settle and, like after more came out about sanford and his "Appalachian trail" sex-apades became impossible to deny, the wingnuts and the trolls here will quietly disappear back into the woodwork until the next repug/neocon meltdown.
And the way things have been going, that will be NEXT WEEK!
COMMENT #119 [Permalink]
...
Another Joe
said on 7/5/2009 @ 8:48 pm PT...
MUST SEE VIDEO!!! MUST SEE VIDEO!!! MUST SEE VIDEO!!! MUST SEE VIDEO!!! MUST SEE VIDEO!!! MUST SEE VIDEO!!! MUST SEE VIDEO!!! MUST SEE VIDEO!!! MUST SEE VIDEO!!! MUST SEE VIDEO!!! MUST SEE VIDEO!!! MUST SEE VIDEO!!
This explains the perspectives of all the trolls here:
The Republican Tub of Shit
MUST SEE VIDEO!!! MUST SEE VIDEO!!! MUST SEE VIDEO!!! MUST SEE VIDEO!!! MUST SEE VIDEO!!! MUST SEE VIDEO!!! MUST SEE VIDEO!!! MUST SEE VIDEO!!! MUST SEE VIDEO!!! MUST SEE VIDEO!!! MUST SEE VIDEO!!! MUST SEE VIDEO!!
COMMENT #120 [Permalink]
...
Agent 99
said on 7/5/2009 @ 10:21 pm PT...
COMMENT #121 [Permalink]
...
Brad Friedman
said on 7/5/2009 @ 11:49 pm PT...
HeyDo? Paging HeyDo!
What happened? You were so active around here until comment #100. Was it something I said?
COMMENT #122 [Permalink]
...
FreedomOfInformationAct
said on 7/6/2009 @ 1:25 am PT...
COMMENT #123 [Permalink]
...
David O'Brian
said on 7/6/2009 @ 2:54 am PT...
I once enjoyed this site. Now that it has been duped by a fake journalist with a political agenda, an apology is in order to Palin and your readers. If I don't see such, displayed prominently, I'll have to conclude you have no conscience, and I won't be back. Dan Rather, remember him? At least he had the testicular fortitude to admit he made a serious mistake.
COMMENT #124 [Permalink]
...
another joe
said on 7/6/2009 @ 6:01 am PT...
I'll have to conclude you have no conscience, and I won't be back.
THANKS FOR THE GREAT NEWS, no one will miss your troll-@ass anyhow
Oh - and you are referring to dan rathers lawsuit against CBS?????
He DID NOT say that there was anything wrong with FACTS reported - CHIMPY WAS AWOL
COMMENT #125 [Permalink]
...
Nunyabiz
said on 7/6/2009 @ 6:17 am PT...
Yeah I remember Dan Rather, the "Journalist" that dared speak the well documented truth about that treasonous war criminal Dubya.
Then was systematically demonized by the reich wing mainstream media for being the only one that told the truth.
Rather has filed a suit against CBS because of it and I hope he wins every dime he sues for.
http://www.salon.com/opi...7/09/27/dan_rather_suit/
COMMENT #126 [Permalink]
...
BlueHawk
said on 7/6/2009 @ 9:31 am PT...
Rush Limbaugh accuesed Bill Clinton of murder (Vince Foster)
Where was the outrage ?
Now Sarah(my crap don't stink)Palin gets called out for her hypocracy and everyone is up in arms...
COMMENT #127 [Permalink]
...
FreedomOfInformationAct
said on 7/6/2009 @ 10:34 am PT...
COMMENT #128 [Permalink]
...
i won the iditarod
said on 7/6/2009 @ 8:12 pm PT...
That is one ugly house, for sure!
COMMENT #129 [Permalink]
...
Big Dan
said on 7/7/2009 @ 5:29 am PT...
COMMENT #123 [Permalink]
... David O'Brian said on 7/6/2009 @ 2:54 am PT...
I once enjoyed this site.
Bullshit! You're a troll who never liked this site!
COMMENT #130 [Permalink]
...
Damail
said on 7/7/2009 @ 1:03 pm PT...
"Chimpy was AWOL..." - some Joe
Lie.