Diebold Continues to Lie About ‘Grave National Security Risk’ of E-Voting as Democratic Party Keeps Head in Sand

While the GOP Prepares to Yell 'Fraud' This Year if Necessary...

Brad Friedman

October 29, 2006, 3:36pm
PT

12 Comments

“The equipment has been tested by independent agencies and federal agencies,” Diebold’s Chief Disinformation Officer, Mark Radke lied to Diane Sawyer in a recent Good Morning America interview on ABC.

Sadly, the only ones there to counter Radke’s knowing and misleading disinformation was a computer scientist from Princeton, and a Republican governor. Not a Democrat in sight.

The National Democratic Party, to their eternal shame, has remained virtually silent about the grave national security threat — as it has been described by almost every computer scientist and security expert with whom the The BRAD BLOG has discussed the matter — which our country now faces vis a vis the nationwide use of inaccurate, uncountable, unaccountable, hackable and, yes, untested electronic voting systems.

To be crystal clear, Radke was simply lying in his statement to Sawyer. He knows damned well that not a single independent body — nobody, none, zero…no computer scientist, security expert or federal, state or local election official or organization — is allowed to test Diebold’s voting systems in full and release their findings publicly. The same is true for the systems of every other voting machine company in America.

The only federal testing of these systems is done by the so-called “Independent Testing Authority” (ITA), a consortium of three private corporations chosen and paid for by the voting machine companies themselves. The ITAs test only what their client Voting Machine Companies tell them to test. They do so in secret and without releasing the results of their limited testing publicly.

Lou Dobbs Tonight filed a very good report on the ITA scam the other day. The video and transcript are here.

ABC’s online coverage of the interview goes on to report that “Approximately 40 percent of Americans will use these machines to vote in November.”

That is wrong. Well over 80% of American voters will use such machines this November. ABC should know better by now.

Most disturbingly, the DNC has said and done literally nothing about the problem, and has let it fall to the Republican governor of Maryland, Robert Ehrlich, to speak about the issue nationally.

Says Ehrlich about the need to scrap these dangerous systems at the end of ABC’s report:

“I don’t care if we paid half a billion dollars or a billion dollars [for these systems],” Ehrlich said. “If it’s going to put the election at risk, there’s no price tag for a phony election.”

Ehrlich is 100% correct. As we reported last August after we were invited to address state party chairs and the DNC’s national attorneys at their Summer convention, the national Democratic party continues to whistle past democracy’s graveyard. As far as we can tell, not a thing has changed since then.

In the meantime, as we’ve reported previously, the Republicans are positioning themselves to be able to scream Democratic fraud via electronic voting machines along with their even more disingenuous claims of “voter fraud.” Here’s a blog item posted today by some wingnut who quotes a couple of our reports from months ago as “proof” that Democrats are preparing to flip votes via Sequoia Voting System electronic machines. The blogger’s supposed basis for the report is the claim that Sequoia was purchased by a consortium tied to Venezuala’s Hugo Chavez.

You’ll also note the anonymous blogger linked the above points only to problems reported on Sequoia systems, ignoring the mountain of reports that voting systems made by Republican-based companies such as Diebold, ES&S and Hart Intercivic are equally, if not more, unfunctional, inaccurate and vulnerable to tampering and fraud.

We don’t see the Dems waking up any time soon, as they have failed so far to challenge any of the outrages already plaguing the system during early voting — from illegally truncated screen displays, to touch-screen votes flipping from one candidate to another, to illegal voting machine “sleepovers” with poll workers as are now occuring in California, Ohio, Florida, and elsewhere. By the time Election Day rolls around, poll workers in San Diego County, for example, will have had more than three weeks to have found the 60 seconds they would need to game a single pre-programmed, election-ready Diebold voting machine — that they’ve been allowed to keep in their houses since SD County Registrar of Voters Mikel Haas has been handing them out like candy since October 16th. (NOTE: We’ll have much more on that tomorrow.)

The Democrats, so far, have failed to do a damned thing about any of it, choosing instead to close their eyes, cross their fingers, and hope for the best. Good luck.

12 Comments

Categories: Diebold/Premier Election 2006 Election Reform

Reader Comments on