Guest blogged by Winter Patriot
Further to yesterday's post about Open Voting Consortium and Raging Grannies working together to resist Hart InterCivic machines on behalf of the voters of San Mateo County, we have bad news and good news.
The bad news is that their effort to postpone an immediate decision in favor of Hart InterCivic has failed. The good news is that the Grannies will keep on Raging. We have a note from the Grannies and a press release describing the meeting.
Here's a photo from our dramatization for the press in front of the Hall of Justice building where the Supervisors met. Several newspaper photographers were on hand to document this event.
Our play: Debbie Does Democracy is as follows:
Debbie (in red t-shirt) is suffering from Loss of Voter Confidence and Lack of Civil Rights. Here she is seen being treated by Dr. Jane Q Public with injections of Robust Audits and Software Transparency. All roles played by Raging Grannies.
The press release follows.
The San Mateo County Board of Supervisors broke their tradition today by voting to contract with Austin, Texas based Hart InterCivic for Hart to provide the County with electronic voting machines. The decision was met with jeers from an audience comprised predominately of members of various election protection groups.
"We are greatly saddened, to say the least," stated community activist Brent Turner. "We apprised them of the pending legislation and potential litigation but they did it anyway --- we showed the supervisors the scientific conclusions regarding a general lack of security as well as evidence regarding direct partnerships held by Hart that inappropriately connect them with the Republican Party. The supes ignored the scientists and the activists and the appearance of impropriety." One such activist, Ruth R of the activist group The Raging Grannies, was visibly dismayed by the decision. "When you’re in San Mateo County you are in Raging Granny territory," said Ruth R. "This is not the last they’ll hear from us".
Activists and computer scientists from all over the country, including notables Alan Dechert and David Dil, converged on San Mateo early last week as County official Warren Slocum moved to present the contract to the Board of Supervisors. Slocum had previously been considered an ally to the Voter Rights community. The purchase of the machines was opposed by all groups unanimously throughout California. Key issues cited were security and voter confidence.
The crowd at the Tuesday morning meeting bristled as an obviously nervous Slocum touted an ethics award the Texas based company received in 2002. The award has been greeted with skepticism as an attempt to conjure up a warm psychology in San Mateo and elsewhere. "We are not impressed by a meaningless plaque," responded Turner.
"We want transparency and disclosure of the systems and the political connections."
Conversations brewed around the courtyards after the ruling regarding the filings of civil rights lawsuits and preliminary injunctions. Many vocally dismissed the proceeding as shameful and some citizens broke into tears as the decision was made.
-- Reported by Wallace Mckenzie