Love that photo of O'Really! Looks like he had to eat a few of his own nasty words!!

Who can blame her? O'REILLY is an obnoxious jerk who is not going to give her the time to really respond to his wild and groundless accusations. After all, he does run the show and only the slickest liberals can break even with him.

I wish Cindy would reconsider the interview with Bill, but on the condition that she can have people like the following behind her during the entire interview:

Celeste, Dante and Raphael Zappala, two parents of a son killed in Iraq and his surviving brother arrived in Crawford Tuesday, joined by Tammara Rosenleaf, whose husband is serving in Iraq.

Fourteen other parents and families are scheduled to arrive in the days to come. Information on the families follows from a release.

Celeste, Dante and Raphael Zappala of Philadelphia. Celeste and her son Dante arrived in Crawford on Tuesday Aug. 9; son Raphael will arrive Friday night Aug. 12. Celeste's son Sgt. Sherwood Baker (Dante and Raphael's brother) was the first Pennsylvania National Guardsman to die in combat since World War II. He was killed in action in Baghdad on April 26, 2004 while searching for non-existent WMD's. Celeste is a co-founder of Gold Star Families for Peace.

Tammara Rosenleaf of Belton, Texas arrived in Crawford on Tuesday, Aug. 9. Tammara's husband serves in the Army, stationed at Ft. Hood, and will be deploying to Iraq this fall.

Lietta Ruger of Bay Center, Wash., will be arriving in Crawford Wednesday morning, Aug. 10. Lietta's son-in-law and nephew serve in the 1st Armored Division of the U.S. Army and are currently in Germany. They have both served extended 15-month tours of duty in Iraq; they are both under stop-loss orders and due to re-deploy to Iraq this fall.

Linda and Phil Waste of Hinesville, Ga., will arrive in Crawford Wednesday morning Aug. 10. Linda and Phil have three sons and two grandchildren (a grandson and a granddaughter) who are active-duty military. Together, they have already spent a total of over 57 months on tours of duty in Iraq. Several of these children/grandchildren are currently serving in Iraq, and have served extended and multiple deployments.

Jean Prewitt of Birmingham, Ala., will arrive in Crawford on Wednesday morning, Aug. 10. Jean's son Private Kelly Prewitt was killed in action during the first few weeks of the war in Iraq, on April 6, 2003.

Valarie Fletcher of Seymour, Mo., is driving to Crawford and arriving Wednesday evening, Aug. 10. Valarie's son serves in the Marines and will be deploying to Iraq at the end of this month.

Sherry Bohlen of Scottsdale, Ariz., is driving to Crawford and arriving on Wednesday evening, Aug. 10. Sherry's son serves in the Army and deployed to Iraq on June 10.

Rebecca Bahr of Scottsdale, Ariz.,is driving to Crawford and arriving on Wednesday evening Aug. 10. Rebecca's daughter serves in the Marines and is currently stateside.

Caryn Unsicker of Silvis, Ill., is driving to Crawford and arriving Wednesday evening, Aug. 10. Caryn's son serves in the Marines, currently stateside.

Anne Sapp and her daughters Lydia (age 17) and Mary (age of Billerica, Mass., will be arriving in Crawford on Thursday morning, Aug. 11. Anne's husband/Lydia and Mary's father is a Staff Sergeant in the Massachusetts National Guard and currently serving in Iraq.

Barbara Porchia of Camden, Ark., will be arriving in Crawford on Thursday morning Aug. 11. Barbara's son, Army Reservist Private 1st Class Jonathan Cheatham, was killed in action in Baghdad two years ago, on July 26, 2003.

Sue Niederer of Pennington, N.J., will be arriving in Crawford on Thursday morning Aug. 11. Sue's son, 1st Lieutenant Seth Dvorin, was killed in action near Iskandariyah, Iraq on Feb. 3, 2004. Sue is a co-founder of Gold Star Families for Peace.

Kristin Williams and Matthew Williams of Dallas will be arriving in Crawford this weekend (Aug. 13 - 14). Matthew Williams is an Iraq War Veteran who served as a combat medic for one year in Iraq (2003 - 2004). He was honorably discharged from the Army. Kristin is his sister.

Bill Mitchell of Atascadero, Calif., will be arriving in Crawford in the next several days. Bill's son Sgt. Michael Mitchell was killed in action in Sadr City, Iraq on April 4, 2004, along with Cindy Sheehan's son Spc. Casey Sheehan. Bill is a co-founder of Gold Star Families for Peace.

Mimi Evans of Hyannis, Mass., will be arriving in Crawford on Tuesday, Aug. 16. Mimi's son serves in the Marines; he will be deployed to Fallujah, Iraq in the next two weeks.

Eric Blickenstaff of Portland, Ore., will be arriving in Crawford early next week. Eric's brother Spc. Joseph Blickenstaff served in the Army and was killed when his Stryker vehicle rolled into a ditch on Dec. 8, 2003 in Balad, Iraq.

Thanks for #3, SG ... but do you have a link to it? We normally ask that you post a few paragraphs and link to the rest. Thanks.

#4:

Sorry, Winter:

This is from Raw Story, but I can't find that link anymore.

Sorry for making it such a long post, but I think all of these people who lost loved ones during this murderous war and who are making the effort to participate at Camp Casey deserve to have their names posted in full.

No prob, SG ... just trying to do the "concierge" thing while Brad's away!

Well, looks like the president will remain resolute and stay the course for a bit longer. Shame on him. What a disgrace.
I read this morning Cindy was feeling sick, has a fever.
From the rain , I think. I wish her strength and good health.

The Democratic Party could learn a leasson here. Faux news should be avoided like the plague.

I was trying to think of some reason why Bush wouldn't just go out and make an appearance (although now it seems too late). Then it struck me. He doesn't know she's out there! I bet his trainers haven't even told him yet.

Seems like the right decision - to avoid O'Reilly. Really, what would be the point of an interview? Cindy is doing just the right thing - that's the point. She is on the offensive and making the story which is what our side should be doing.

Let O'Reilly et al. stew in their own juices and see how far that gets them.

I'm sure Bill will explain to the faithful how he offered to have Ms. Sheehan on the show but she was too scared to face the music. Happens all the time.

I agree that she made the right call in refusing O'Reilly. Why help his ratings?

I checked out DE's link to the O'Reilly smear campaign:

"First, O’Reilly painted her as a traitor:

I think Mrs. Sheehan bears some responsibility for this [publicity] and also for the responsibility for the other American families who lost sons and daughters in Iraq who feel this kind of behavior borders on treasonous."

Get Past Bush's War Rhetoric to See What Has or Has Not Worked by Coleen Rowley, recent BradShow guest, running as "Democratic-Farmer-Labor" candidate in MI-2.

-----snip

"Ending American/British occupation of Iraq will also remove at least some ideological fuel of the violent extremism that has caused terrorist attacks elsewhere in the world.

"State Department figures have apparently shown the number of terrorist incidents soaring: from 2003's 20-year record of 175 incidents that killed 625 people --- to 651 such attacks that killed 1,907 in 2004.

"Although a change in counting methodology may have accounted for some of the increase, it's impossible to now argue that we are winning the "war" on terrorism."

--------------------

I guess her behavior borders on treasonous too.

O'Reilly is nuts, he is supporting American Traitors. Avoid him like the plague given the level of disinformation he believes.

Doug E.

http://uspolitics.about.com/b/a/115691.htm

Flip flop.or flop flip?

O'Reilly's a joke. He still won't accept David Brock's challenge to debate him on his own show.

Letter from David Brock to Bill O'Reilly

Not just a chickenhawk, but also a chickenshit.

this is linda6or7 reporting in. My plane leaves in the AM. I don't know anyone in the armed forces but I am compelled to go. This war must stop. This administration must be fully exposed, impeached and indicted. GO Cindy!

Hey Linda6or7 - does this mean you're on your way to the Crawford Raunch? If so, give our regards to the one who usually squats on Penn. Ave.

Love and Light to Cindy.

KIRA are ya thinking what I'm thinking? ....live cross to linda6or7 at Crawford TX on The Brad Show!

........and KIRA you're a natural on the radio

Gosh, Bushw@cker --- unless it's from (sorry to bring it up) jail! --- Or is that gaol? Dammit ... what will they do tomorrow? Will they actually throw Cindy in the slammer along with her supporters?

Well, if Linda6or7 is actually going, & wherever they are, I think a phone interview with Brad on Saturday night would be excellent.

Oh, and .... gee ... thank you, Bushw@cker!

Haha! I'm still :laughin: at that picture of O'Really!

Is he, perhaps, choking on his Falafal? Faloofah? Whatever that darn thing is ... ??? aaacckk-kaacckk!! Or maybe a pretzel.

Enquiring minds want to know.

Cindy is right on:

“If you fall on the side that is pro-George, and pro-war, you get your ass over to Iraq, and take the place of somebody who wants to come home. And if you fall on the side that is against this war and against George Bush, stand up and speak out.”

"But whatever side you fall on, quit being on the fence."

"The opposite of good is not evil, it’s apathy. And we have to get this country off their butts, and we have to get the choir singing."

Unfortunately I can't just jump on a plane here in Prague, but I really wish I had the funds, because I'd be with Cindy and all the other heroes in a flash. I fervidly hope that everyone of a similar persuasion who can scrape up the means join the festival for truth. While our eyes have been on TreasonGate and Downing Street the straw that just might break the camel's back has slipped past, not fully noticed until very recently. We need a large and growing crowd at that node of evil, right now! This is a perfect issue for the public to be outraged about, and you can bet KKKarl wouldn't let such an opportunity slip by. Let's go for the jugular, immediately, and not let go until the beast is downed for good and bleeding its last! Please, if you can go there, do! And if you can't, please find some way of contributing. This just could be IT! Let us not shy away from the tipping point...

Welcome aboard, Linda and all the rest who are just now waking up.

This whole thing is absolutely, the Douglas Feith Feith based intelligence operation.

Feith based INTELLIGENCE

Doug E.

It's sad that that woman is such an ass. What the hell does she really want to say to Bush? "Bring them home now!"??? How stupid is that?! Let's just abandon Iraq and allow al-Qaeda to take over the place just like the practically did in Afghanistan with the Taliban's blessing. Yes, Cindy Sheehan, let's allow al Qaeda to have a new country where they can set up training camps to train more terrorists. What a fan-fucking-tastic idea, eh?

I'm terribly sorry about your son but you're an Idiot.

So Cindy Sheehan gets sick from sitting out in the rain making an ass of herself and it's the President's fault? How fucking trendy is this line of thinking....."I get sick making a dick out of myself and it's NOT MY FAULT!!!"
Welcome to the New Millenium, everbody!!!
Jane Fonda rides again!!!!

Looks like Cindy has stirred up the trolls.
Thanks, Horkus, for that link to David Brock's letter to o'reilly. Just read it, and I can't help myself, I feel compelled to re-post my o'reilly limerick...

bill o'reilly surpasses the rest
When it comes to abusing a guest;
Unaquainted with tact,
He's dismissive of fact,
And some gals, I hear, find him a pest.

If you visit his set, be aware
His routine's neither balanced nor fair;
Like a dervish he'll spin,
You will need a thick skin
To survive in this fox's dank lair.

Any teller of truth he'll detest,
To discredit & smear is his quest.
I'd suggest gear protective
against vile invective--
Best put on your bullet-proof vest.

Yes our billy, a crass little slime,
makes excuses for every bush crime.
He's so loyal, the punk!
Hope they save him a bunk
When the bushies are all doing time.

That's for smearing Cindy, bill.

Somebody might wanna start checking some facts ...Lietta Ruger's son-in-law is no longer stationed in Germany and is on his way to his new station of Hawaii which means he was NOT in fact stop-lossed and has no orders whatsoever to return to Iraq anytime soon. :confused:

I think anyone who truly believes that what they are doing is right and just will and would NOT refuse an interview to ANYONE! Isn't the whole point to get her views out there to the public to get more people on her side???

Who the hell is Lietta Ruger? That has absolutely nothing to do with this, your comments add nothing to the Cindy Sheehan discussion. They're talking about Cindy, not someone named Ruger.

Doug E.

I see a great contrast between her first comments about her meeting with Bush in her interview on June 24, 2004, that was just several months after her son was killed, and the latest comments she is making about that same meeting with Bush. Cindy Sheehan first said after her meeting with Bush, that she " now knows that Bush is sincere about wanting freedom for the Iraqi's." Then she went on to say and I quote, " I know he's sorry and feels pain for our loss." She used two descriptions to describe her impressions of Bush after,Bush's meeting with her, "Sincere" and " He's sorry and feels pain for our loss." Now its quite the opposite description of Bush, if you were to listen to her new interpretation of that same meeting with Bush, you would think it was two seperate meetings. Cindy Sheehan now says about that meeting with Bush that " Every time we tried to talk about Casey and how much we missed him, he would change the subject,and he acted like it was a party." That statement indicates just the opposite of what she originally said about Bush, in that she even used the word "sincere" in describing Bush's demeanor. So I'm to take it that she felt that "acting like it was a party" was sincere, and sincere was as she described Bush in her first interview? The question that now remains concerning her two completely different versions of that meeting with Bush, is, which one is the true story and which one is the lie? In her first interview with David Henson she stated that Bush felt "sorry" about the loss of her son,then Cindy Sheehan turns around and says just the opposite in her interview with Blitzer and I quote " Yes, he came in very jovial, and like we should be happy that he, our son, died." Excuse me but "sorry" and "happy" are not synonyms Mrs.Sheehan. Cindy Sheehan's versions of that meeting with President Bush just don't match, they are not remotely similar.

Amazing, WL. As time has passed we have all understood better that bu$h plays the compassionate person role but proves by his actions the opposite.

As time passed for Cindy (and remember how the grief & shock process plays out --- she was in the initial stages then) she was able to sort out the truth from deception. Just like the rest of us who can see through the lies.

Yes, there is a contrast. When you turn on the light in a room, it looks much different than it does in the dark.

Cindy Sheehan has responded to President Bush's comments concerning meeting her and has posted her response in The huffington Post. The first statement Cindy Sheehan makes that comes off as anti-democratic is this one and I quote Cindy Sheehan- " Does anyone else know what "democratic" means? It simply means majority rule. Not some high-minded, free-floating, pie in the sky ideal. It means 50 percent plus one." Cindy Sheehen in that particular statement actually attacks 51 % majority rule as a bad form of government and if you can read anything else into that, defending that statement, please make your comment at the end of this post. I would like to say to Cindy Sheehan that 50 plus one is much better then Saddam's 1 % plus brutal totalitarian rule in which the 1% Saddam, rules 99 % of the entire population. Maybe Sheehan has met with some socialist organizations that oppose democratic forms of government. I did notice that a socialist website called 'Socialist Worker Online' is running a rather large article advocating Sheehans position. Cindy Sheehan actually gave an interview to the Socialist Worker Online, she spoke to Socialist Worker’s ERIC RUDER which is mentioned at the beginning of the article. In her interview with the Socialist Worker Online she says and I quote " Some people may think that we’re fighting terrorism over there. But when is that job ever going to be complete? Terrorism is just a new “ism.” It was “communism” when I was growing up." Here Cindy Sheehan is discounting the validity of the threat of communism in the past as just a made up " ism." I believe history taught us that communism brutally oppressed and killed millions of innocent people and is still somewhat of a threat today in places like North Korea where millions have died from starvation due to KimYong II, brutal rule. Cindy Sheehan later went on to say and I quote " I DEFINITELY think that we should support war resisters in the military". I will leave that statement up to the readers interpretation, but it sounds to me to border on subversion and treason. Here is Cindy Sheehan's interview with the Socialist Workers Online in its entirety http://www.socialistwork...49_06_CindySheehan.shtml .
The next statement Cindy Sheehan makes is both inaccurate and untruthful and I quote
"This is the biggest smokescreen from him yet. I didn't ask him to withdraw the troops, I asked him what Noble Cause did Casey die for." Actually Cindy Sheehen didn't ask Bush, she demanded that he "bring the troops home now", here is a quote from her statement made on August 18 2005 and carried by ABC News ""If George Bush comes out here today or if we leave here at the end of August, this is only the beginning, and we're not going to stop until our troops are brought home", I would suggest that means a withdrawal what would you think it means? Also in this ABC article written by Eric Noe it is stated " In addition to requesting a meeting with Bush, Sheehan is now calling for an immediate withdrawal of U.S. troops from Iraq. She promised to send a similar message if the president agrees to meet with her." Here is the complete article you be the judge http://abcnews.go.com/GM...amp;CMP=OTC-RSSFeeds0312 . Is ABC lying, did they just make that up? I have myself watched Cindy Sheehan on national television say time and time again "bring our troops home now" but she has stated that she has never intended to ask Bush that question. I smell another lie. Whats really strange is in Cindys own article she just released today she says this and I quote " Then bring our troops home. The status quo in Iraq is awful", if you ask me she cant even get through one article without contradicting herself. She goes on to imply that America is spreading "imperialism " by what she says is 14 permanent bases being set up in Iraq the size of Sacramento, California. I dont know if there is any United States military bases on the entire planet Earth the size of a large U.S. city,if there is please let me know ok. By the way the interview Cindy Sheehan gave to the Socialist Worker is the same Socialist worker who ran this article entitled " The Meaning of Marxism" in which they praise Marxism to no end. Here is the link to that garbage http://www.socialistwork...d/MeaningOfMarxism.shtml

cindy has a point im a vet i support owr troops i don't support the rich people running this country and there reasons for being there.first the government should take care of home first then worry about the rest of the world. the war in iraq is like the war on drugs it can't be won with guns and bombs alone. do you think may be there just sick of haveing shit cramed down there throats and ain't going to take no more. as an american im sick of this government sticking it down my throat. bush is loseing his support because there is no real plane for iraq and on top of that he's not dealing with the problems at home. we need real people to make the changes for the good of the world not kenedeys or bushes rich and faimus doing what it takes to keep there pockets full if i was running things i garenty you they would not spend 10 million dollars to get a 100thousand dollar a year job there robbing us blind and laughing all the way to the bank better get real and get real solutions to the porblems or the more they try to crack down the worst it's going to get this is just my oppinion.

Cindy Sheehan has responded to President Bush's comments concerning meeting her and has posted her response in The huffington Post. The first statement Cindy Sheehan makes that comes off as anti-democratic is this one and I quote Cindy Sheehan- " Does anyone else know what "democratic" means? It simply means majority rule. Not some high-minded, free-floating, pie in the sky ideal. It means 50 percent plus one." Cindy Sheehen in that particular statement actually attacks 51 % majority rule as a bad form of government and if you can read anything else into that, defending that statement, please make your comment at the end of this post. I would like to say to Cindy Sheehan that 50 plus one is much better then Saddam's 1 % plus brutal totalitarian rule in which the 1% Saddam, rules 99 % of the entire population. Maybe Sheehan has met with some socialist organizations that oppose democratic forms of government. I did notice that a socialist website called 'Socialist Worker Online' is running a rather large article advocating Sheehans position. Cindy Sheehan actually gave an interview to the Socialist Worker Online, she spoke to Socialist Worker’s ERIC RUDER which is mentioned at the beginning of the article. In her interview with the Socialist Worker Online she says and I quote " Some people may think that we’re fighting terrorism over there. But when is that job ever going to be complete? Terrorism is just a new “ism.” It was “communism” when I was growing up." Here Cindy Sheehan is discounting the validity of the threat of communism in the past as just a made up " ism." I believe history taught us that communism brutally oppressed and killed millions of innocent people and is still somewhat of a threat today in places like North Korea where millions have died from starvation due to KimYong II, brutal rule. Cindy Sheehan later went on to say and I quote " I DEFINITELY think that we should support war resisters in the military". I will leave that statement up to the readers interpretation, but it sounds to me to border on subversion and treason. Here is Cindy Sheehan's interview with the Socialist Workers Online in its entirety http://www.socialistwork...49_06_CindySheehan.shtml .
The next statement Cindy Sheehan makes is both inaccurate and untruthful and I quote
"This is the biggest smokescreen from him yet. I didn't ask him to withdraw the troops, I asked him what Noble Cause did Casey die for." Actually Cindy Sheehen didn't ask Bush, she demanded that he "bring the troops home now", here is a quote from her statement made on August 18 2005 and carried by ABC News ""If George Bush comes out here today or if we leave here at the end of August, this is only the beginning, and we're not going to stop until our troops are brought home", I would suggest that means a withdrawal what would you think it means? Also in this ABC article written by Eric Noe it is stated " In addition to requesting a meeting with Bush, Sheehan is now calling for an immediate withdrawal of U.S. troops from Iraq. She promised to send a similar message if the president agrees to meet with her." Here is the complete article you be the judge http://abcnews.go.com/GM...amp;CMP=OTC-RSSFeeds0312 . Is ABC lying, did they just make that up? I have myself watched Cindy Sheehan on national television say time and time again "bring our troops home now" but she has stated that she has never intended to ask Bush that question. I smell another lie. Whats really strange is in Cindys own article she just released today she says this and I quote " Then bring our troops home. The status quo in Iraq is awful", if you ask me she cant even get through one article without contradicting herself. She goes on to imply that America is spreading "imperialism " by what she says is 14 permanent bases being set up in Iraq the size of Sacramento, California. I dont know if there is any United States military bases on the entire planet Earth the size of a large U.S. city,if there is please let me know ok. By the way the interview Cindy Sheehan gave to the Socialist Worker is the same Socialist worker who ran this article entitled " The Meaning of Marxism" in which they praise Marxism to no end. Here is the link to that garbage http://www.socialistwork...d/MeaningOfMarxism.shtml

Cindy Sheehan is a dense crackpot. I feel sorry for her that her son died, but there are a lot of grieving parents who lost their sons and daughter in this war. Unfortunately, she's being used by groups to promote their own self-interests. Perhaps she thinks they are really interested in her plight. She met with Bush already...sounds like she needs to go home, take care of her mother and try to fix her marriage instead of trying to be the poster mom/mouthpiece for groups that truly don't give a sh*t about her or her loss.

I have been discussing this OBCENITY lately on other blogs and of course you people won't love me to give you links, would you?