READER COMMENTS ON
"COMCAST KILLS EMAIL FROM 'AFTERDOWNINGSTREET' COALITION!"
(122 Responses so far...)
COMMENT #1 [Permalink]
...
~A!
said on 7/15/2005 @ 3:28 pm PT...
Holy shit. I have Comcast email, and I will four about five more seconds.
:O
Is there no end?
~A!
COMMENT #2 [Permalink]
...
True Patriot
said on 7/15/2005 @ 3:34 pm PT...
Hmm. Legal action to follow? Why not? All these bozos understand is the after tax (which ain't much, these days) profit. Start making it expensive for them to try to screw around with us and maybe they'll get the hint: we're smarter than you, we're more technically hip than you, and anything you can do we can do better. Get used to it.
COMMENT #3 [Permalink]
...
Jeff L.
said on 7/15/2005 @ 3:42 pm PT...
Why does this not surprise me? I already killed my cable conenction. I suggest that anyone who doesn't like being censored do the same.
And no, these things are not "automatic". Someone has to access the server and put this information in. If they were automatic you would have to assume that nobody would get mail about free drugs or diplomas anymore.
COMMENT #4 [Permalink]
...
bruce
said on 7/15/2005 @ 3:52 pm PT...
Just another piece of evidence that those who support Bush do NOT respect or have any concern for what the U.S. Constitution says and represents. Just like Bush and all of his cronies whose real g_d is the dollar.
New motto for the Republican Party: 'It isn't fascism when we do it'.
COMMENT #5 [Permalink]
...
Walrus Gumboot
said on 7/15/2005 @ 3:55 pm PT...
I am so sorry to post off-topic but I am so blown away by what I've just seen that I have to get it posted somewhere. I was just watching CNN (Friday 7/15 approx 6:30pm). Lou Dobbs was introducing a piece on Karl Rove. He said [paraphrased] "Rove said that he was NOT the source of Plame's name but that he was given this information by Novak. Betty Soandso has the report:" Then in the silence between the intro and the videotapeed story beginning you can CLEARLY hear a quiet "That's Bullshit"!!!
Hahahahahahah!!! Oh man, I rewound the Tivo 3 times before I could believe it was true. I've got it recorded now on a DVD-R. I've watched it many times now and there is absolutely no doubt that this went out live over CNN!!!!!!! At least, no matter how much CNN is trying to emulate FoxNews lately, someone there is apparently living in the reality-based community.
COMMENT #6 [Permalink]
...
Brad
said on 7/15/2005 @ 4:05 pm PT...
Walrus, please contact via Email so we can see about getting that posted.
COMMENT #7 [Permalink]
...
KestrelBrighteyes
said on 7/15/2005 @ 4:13 pm PT...
COMMENT #8 [Permalink]
...
big dan
said on 7/15/2005 @ 4:14 pm PT...
What Comcast did is illegal. Comcast should be prosecuted, and BRAD BLOG should investigate who made this decision at Comcast, and do a story on that person. And the story should include the reasons this person did this, and BRAD BLOG should link this story to how Corporate America is beholden to the Republicans.
This is big, and it's a huge discovery, and I salute whoever detected this. They think they can get away with anything! Then they tell us not to compare the Bush Administration to Hitler's ministry of propoganda. This Comcast travesty falls under the Bush Administration fake news reports, etc.......which draws a valid comparison to Hitler's & Goebbels ministry of propoganda. Who said we can't make this comparision? It's a valid comparision!
COMMENT #9 [Permalink]
...
a sysadmin
said on 7/15/2005 @ 4:16 pm PT...
Is the email containing the "www.afterdowningstreet.org" string being straight-out deleted by Comcast? or is it just flagged as SPAM and put in the SPAM folder?
COMMENT #10 [Permalink]
...
big dan
said on 7/15/2005 @ 4:17 pm PT...
BRAD: Please post how many customers Comcast has...
COMMENT #11 [Permalink]
...
Vance
said on 7/15/2005 @ 4:20 pm PT...
Just a quick point of order:
"... "company policy" dictated he "can't engage with the press in any manner," but that he would ask the Comcast PR Department to get back to us."
This is true. As a former employee of Comcast, I can confirm that it is absolute corporate policy to refer to that particular market's PR department for all matters involving the press. What you will likely see is the local PR department refer back to the corporate PR department for guidance on how to respond to things. I don't know how responsive the PR department is at Corporate in Philly, but my contacts in Philly were pretty slow at getting back to me.
As for there being political motivation at being added to a spam filter, its plausible, but more likely it is an automatic process. Comcast has wrestled with overprotective spam blocking software before. They've had a few unsuccessful rollouts of Home Spam blocking software.
COMMENT #12 [Permalink]
...
norcalcool
said on 7/15/2005 @ 4:20 pm PT...
Here's the work around until the courts take care of the matter:
Go to dyndns.org
Create a URL reflector with a different name, use one of the dyndns's domain name. (i.e. afterdsm.homedns.dyndns.org) or some name thereabouts.
Change the address on the signature file and resend the emails.
Whaa-laa! A big middle finger at the company that is causing the problems. The filtering company will have a harder time filtering the stuff since dyndns.org is also used by alot of home users. Also if several random reflectors are created one can bypass the software logic.
COMMENT #13 [Permalink]
...
norcalcool
said on 7/15/2005 @ 4:23 pm PT...
P.S. there are several other URL reflectors out there as well and anybody who can get a hold of a DNS server can create a reflector as well.
I'm only suggesting dyndns.org because I use them.
COMMENT #14 [Permalink]
...
pandy
said on 7/15/2005 @ 4:25 pm PT...
I just posted on Americablog but will put here also. I sent three emails from my aol account to my comcast account.
The first email had the full name of the downingstreet website in the body of the email, but with a "d" in street. Spelling error.
The second email had the correct full name of the downingstreet website in the body of the email.
The third email had the ing removed from Downing when I typed the address in the body of the email.
The third email is the only one of the three that I have received. The website was not shown in the header of the email.
COMMENT #15 [Permalink]
...
T
said on 7/15/2005 @ 4:30 pm PT...
Dear Brad Blog,
It appears your site may be a target of this censorship, too. I attemted to send this info directly to my husband from your page, not ADS, and it did not get to him. Only after copying the link by itself, and sending it with a subject that had nothing to do with any of this, did it get to him.
Check it out. This is outrageous. As we speak, I am in the process of canceling my Comcast e-mail. Just want to make sure this gets to you, first.
T
COMMENT #16 [Permalink]
...
Brad
said on 7/15/2005 @ 4:32 pm PT...
SYSADMIN - The email is not reaching recipients at all.
BIG DAN - I don't currently have the number of customers of Comcast, but obviously it's millions.
Unfortunately, must prepare tomorrow's Radio Show right now, so may not be able to dig much more this evening...We will be having David Swanson on the show tomorrow night, however.
COMMENT #17 [Permalink]
...
Bejammin075
said on 7/15/2005 @ 4:47 pm PT...
I have Comcast services. I will threaten cancellation if they don't get their shit together. At the very least, I could switch to DSL for internet services. I'll buy a new fucking modem if I have to. Although I'd have to be pushed pretty hard to get rid of cable TV, I might use that as my "nuclear option".
Anyhow,
Haven't waded through the whole Bradblog article, but this looks like Brad hit one straight out of the park with the frayed husk of the baseball shell lying in a smoking pile somewhere in the outfield.
COMMENT #18 [Permalink]
...
jIM cIRILE
said on 7/15/2005 @ 4:51 pm PT...
Ho-lee crap. This is OUT rageous. I have Comcast cable. Time to switch to satellite.
COMMENT #19 [Permalink]
...
John
said on 7/15/2005 @ 5:06 pm PT...
Take of the tinfoil hats folks..
It's a spam filter and my guess is that too many people have been sending out similar messages to too many people that have reported it as SPAM.
COMMENT #20 [Permalink]
...
peiku69
said on 7/15/2005 @ 5:11 pm PT...
https://BradBlog.com/Images/emoticons/angry.gif
Bright Mail program... Symatec package...
Contract... No control, hmmmm...
Sounds like a 'plausible deniability' backdoor.
Wise guys, eh?
Dump your ComCast account and see how fast they can get 'control' over their contract and the Bright Mail program.
Geeze, bottom line is all these guys ever respond to.
Make it hurt, dear 6 or 7...
COMMENT #21 [Permalink]
...
Dan
said on 7/15/2005 @ 5:13 pm PT...
I just sent myself an email with www.afterdowningstreet.org in the body at my Comcast address and it went through just fine. Am I missing something, am I lucky, have they fixed it, or is there really a problem at all?
COMMENT #22 [Permalink]
...
Mike
said on 7/15/2005 @ 5:13 pm PT...
I just tested it to and from my comcast address after leaving an angry message at the number above. I also wrote to the Brightmail address and threatened a lawsuit for violation of interstate commerce. However, all my emails seemed to go through with no problem.
Maybe someone over there realized the shit was about to hit the fan and stopped their foolishness.
COMMENT #23 [Permalink]
...
Winter Patriot
said on 7/15/2005 @ 5:15 pm PT...
John (#19) should open his eyes and stop making excuses for Comcast ... unless John is doing PR for Comcast in which he should open his eyes and stop making excuses.
COMMENT #24 [Permalink]
...
Dan
said on 7/15/2005 @ 5:21 pm PT...
Winter Patriot, we aren't Republicans here. We don't need to slam someone just because they have a different take on things.
COMMENT #25 [Permalink]
...
Bejammin075
said on 7/15/2005 @ 5:21 pm PT...
Brad, a Suggestion!
Comcast repays A.D.S. with free TV ads! How about when we call Comcast to bitch them out, we urge them to repay AfterDowningStreet with FREE ADVERTISING ON TV.
A.D.S. was a website serving a rapidly growing political movement, and by Comcast's blunder, the website's growth was stunted, and at the worst possible of times, as shit is hitting fans everywhere with the related story of Rovegate. Since Comcast is a huge media company, how about Comcast give A.D.S. some free TV ads to reach new people, so that the stunted growth may be corrected.
I don't know if this is a corny idea or not, but if you like it, and you endorse it, 6 or 7 of us might include that idea in our phone correspondence with Comcast.
COMMENT #26 [Permalink]
...
pleiku69
said on 7/15/2005 @ 5:27 pm PT...
Well, John,
You seem like a bright kid.
But probably more a propeller beenie kind-a-guy.
Let me if I can grasp your spam-angle, kay?
So a bunch of concern citizens sent a bunch of other people email with the ADS url in it - and this second bunch of some 46,000 people registered SPAM complaints cause the first group had pestered them with Downing Street Document information, kicking off the Bright Mail zapper.
That about right?
COMMENT #27 [Permalink]
...
Dan
said on 7/15/2005 @ 5:27 pm PT...
afterdowningstreet has an update thanking Symantec for fixing the problem. And I want to add my thanks to Symantec as well, because without this story I might not have discovered afterdowningstreet's excellent site!:
AfterDowningStreet.org Co-Founder and Democrats.com President Bob Fertik contacted a number of people this evening in the corporate communications office of Symantec, and they fixed the problem. Fertik issued this statement:
"I want to thank the Symantec Corporation for responding in real time upon being notified that their Bright Mail product was the source of the problem."
COMMENT #28 [Permalink]
...
jIM cIRILE
said on 7/15/2005 @ 5:34 pm PT...
Personally, I'm a bit sensitive to the "tinfoil hat" moniker since it is derisive and used as a way of steering people from the truth. Did Bushco rig the election? All facts seem to indicate so. Yet the righties smeared and belittled the truthtellers by labeling them conspiracy theorists.
So if it's a spam filter issue, fine. But we've all seen Bushco wield its axe to squash dissent, so it's not a stretch at all to think it could be deliberate.
In fact, at this point, I am automatically suspicious of every single thing those liars say and do. I'm also starting to doubt the official 9-11 story. Did Bushco stage 9-11 themselves to fulfill the prophecy of the PNAC manifesto, which indicated they needed "new Pearl Harbor"? Or did they simply allow it to unfold by turning an intentional deaf ear? Either way, it's clear these people will stop at nothing.
So the tinfoil hat stays on.
COMMENT #29 [Permalink]
...
HL
said on 7/15/2005 @ 5:51 pm PT...
Wow, I have comcast cable, and email. I wonder what else they are keeping from me. My Website
www.thehollywoodliberal.com gets hundreds of visitors, yet I get virtually NO email at all, (except for a bunch of spam, when I first started I was getting a decent amount of email to the site, despite having only a small fraction of the traffic.
There prices are the highest in town too. Thats it I'm done with those bastards
COMMENT #30 [Permalink]
...
RDW
said on 7/15/2005 @ 6:02 pm PT...
Just a thought... if you switch to satellite... Don't switch to Direct TV. It's owned by Murdock (same as Faux). Also no progressive news. DISH satellite has progressive news/public interest show. I am in the process right now of ridding my self of Direct TV and switchinto to DISH.
COMMENT #31 [Permalink]
...
Andrew Milner
said on 7/15/2005 @ 6:02 pm PT...
Control of the Internet. Guess it wasn't progressing quickly enough. Kiddie porn wasn't sufficient justification, so time to roll out the big guns.
Taking the London bombing story at face value for a moment: It's so difficult to change the system legally and politically, you can understand the frustration and temptation for a more direct approach.
London bombings: Randon thoughts
Doubt if a backpack will be such a hot fashion item for the immediate future.
At least you'll be able to get a seat on the Tube in rush hour.
One of Blair's worries (besides being rumbled and lynched) must be race riots. Because Britain to Muslims is like China to dogs: You've got to watch your back all the time.
"It's got all the hallmarks of al-Qaeda" BBC endlessly tells us. But the type of explosive has changed at least four times. Embarassaing for a network when the spooks can't get their story together. It's had as much to do with al-Qaeda as Whittard's Gunpowder Green Tea has to do with Guy Fawkes.
Can't even get consistency on transliteration spelling of al-Qaeda.
COMMENT #32 [Permalink]
...
bob
said on 7/15/2005 @ 6:03 pm PT...
Comcast fixed the problem in 1 hr and 42 minutes. Looks like we have some clout.
COMMENT #33 [Permalink]
...
veritas
said on 7/15/2005 @ 6:06 pm PT...
Pay no attention to ANYTHING Comcast says about how this thing got filtered. I have Comcast...and I got (till I changed email addresses) dozens of obvious spam every day. I mean, with words like "Sexually explicit" in the subject header! Spelled correctly!
I wrote the them and got an automated reply telling me how to turn the spam filter on (which, of course, it was). I replied back and got the same reply. I did this four or five times until the replies stopped.
Some spam is caught, but LOTS of it isn't, so for ADS to be in the filter, they must have focused on it. Unless they want to claim that ADS sent out more spam than "Sexually Explicit".
COMMENT #34 [Permalink]
...
Babba
said on 7/15/2005 @ 6:07 pm PT...
I just sent 2 emails to a Repub friend. If he doesn't get either one of them, we'll know.
COMMENT #35 [Permalink]
...
RDW
said on 7/15/2005 @ 6:10 pm PT...
to: ...jIM cIRILE..... I'm with you. I've had my foil hat on now for a while. And all evidence does point to bushco. complicity in 911 and much else. So why not comcast. It would only take one person to enter the name into the spam filter. One POS neocon.
COMMENT #36 [Permalink]
...
Sam
said on 7/15/2005 @ 6:12 pm PT...
Just did a test with http://afterdowningstreet.org in subject and the body from & to my multiple email addresses, comcast.net, .mac, yahoo, hotmail and they came in... finally.
Maybe comcast 'got the message'.
COMMENT #37 [Permalink]
...
John
said on 7/15/2005 @ 6:15 pm PT...
Yep that's it.
The VRWC strikes again, another perfect Rovian storm.
The people using media blaster and the blogs are mass mailing (SPAMING) and it's getting reported. Next time think before mailing stuff to a bunch of people who may NOT want to hear about what you're mailing.
Hey did ya hear about that moon landing hoax?
COMMENT #38 [Permalink]
...
Re
said on 7/15/2005 @ 6:27 pm PT...
According to the ADS site, Bright Mail was the source of the problem, and it has now been fixed.
COMMENT #39 [Permalink]
...
Brad
said on 7/15/2005 @ 6:37 pm PT...
That's confirmed RE. Please see the update I just posted to this item.
Thanks to all who made noise!
COMMENT #40 [Permalink]
...
gr8gol4
said on 7/15/2005 @ 6:42 pm PT...
My email to Comcast ;
Dear Sirs,
I understand that your company (Symantec) thinks it is acceptable to block emails to me from afterdowningstreet.org. Unless you are able to prove that they are responsible for spamming in a court of law, I suggest you cease and desist from violating the lawful communications between two private parties. In addition, I am removing the link to your website from our ISPs suggested software page. Such actions are truly despicable and are indicative of a policy that is both abusive and illegal. Needless to say, such actions reflect poorly on your company.
--
Sincerely,
Robert McLendon
robertXXXXXX@comcast.net
VelocityOnline
COMMENT #41 [Permalink]
...
Tim Osman
said on 7/15/2005 @ 6:52 pm PT...
We should be prepared for a total lockdown of the internet. Some other organised method of communication will have to be established. It is apparent(with few exceptions) that the US media is essentially at war with the people and we should be fighting back. How about a 24/7 protest vigil outside of the Fox building in New York?
A while ago, I read how the Carlysle(sp?) Group was buying up as many phone companies as they can. This is a dangerous cabal.
What we saw with Comcast is probably a test. I will be cancelling my Comcast on monday.
COMMENT #42 [Permalink]
...
Mark Wooldridge
said on 7/15/2005 @ 6:54 pm PT...
Since this was a Brightmail problem, then I guess us Earthlink customers would have been affected also. However with Earthlink if it was tagged as spam, the email goes into a "spam" box. Furthermore, I could have whitelisted the offending address and thus when it came to me it would have come straight through as regular email because it wouldn't be flagged as spam.
Doesn't Comcast allow its customers to access their spam box? Just a thought.
btw my email is separate from my internet access, as I have changed the hosts from time to time - but the email always remains the same.
COMMENT #43 [Permalink]
...
Peg C
said on 7/15/2005 @ 7:06 pm PT...
RDW #30 -
Not so, RDW. I have DirecTV and it hosts Link TV, which carries DemocracyNow!, Mosaic, and lots of wonderful progressive programming - all viewer-funded, BTW.
COMMENT #44 [Permalink]
...
Rck
said on 7/15/2005 @ 7:08 pm PT...
If it is true that comcast is blocking emails why don't they move theri company to china where they would better fit in with the censorship there. For myself and my house we will use another email address and be clod=sing service with comcast.
If others boycot the comcast service thats up to them. We feel our constitutional rights to free speech should be defended vigorously. As a Veteran it is my opinion that this sort of thing serves our country badly and the democratic republic we all are loyal to.
I guess since the government wrote the 1946 administrative procedures act making persons(not people as in 'we the people') courts, businesses, churches and schools all vessels in law or corporation entities and not people(as in living souls) - we all became slaves.
The government rules by executive orders because of this
Protecting someone because of business only adds to the u.s.'s world problems.
We will go elsewhere for our internet service.
Rick a loyal American for people
May god bless you all for this site
COMMENT #45 [Permalink]
...
jIM cIRILE
said on 7/15/2005 @ 7:27 pm PT...
Tim #41, trying to get people riled up to protest Fox in NY ain't gonna do jack, sadly. A handful of protestors against a multinational cabal? BUT we do have the 9-24 march on DC organized by ImpeachBush.org, and if we can get a million people to THAT, the media will be forced to cover it. Maybe. Go to www.impeachbush.org.
The reason people aren't taking to the streets? Because there's no draft. That's the difference between now and '68, and the Bushies know it, and that's why they will never reinstitute the draft.
But 571,000 people so far have signed the Downing Street Minutes letter. This is a good rallying point. This along with a slightly reawakened MSM means a possible chink in the neocon armor (until they shut down the internet, as Tim scarily predicts...)
COMMENT #46 [Permalink]
...
mark_twain
said on 7/15/2005 @ 7:37 pm PT...
COMMENT #47 [Permalink]
...
Peggy
said on 7/15/2005 @ 7:38 pm PT...
Does this mean virtually the whole country is tuned in to the "afterdowningstreet" Bush liars' fiasco????
and following the issue???? so much so, the subject was automatically classified as spam?????
Hey, this is good news!!!!!
Now that Comcast has "corrected" itself, it should be monitored so that it remains "corrected"; and, hey, maybe Comcast will come to understand that the whole country is sick to death with the lying, corrupt Bush administration!!!!
COMMENT #48 [Permalink]
...
M.
said on 7/15/2005 @ 8:16 pm PT...
I doubt that this was intentional. For those of you who are skeptical about automatic spam filtering, it's done all the time and frankly works better than most methods of filtering.
See the link on my name for a page on automatic spam filtering. In my experience (system admin), emails which are sent to large numbers of people seem more likely to run into trouble getting marked as spam. This is true of totally apolitical email lists, too. That's true where I work, and both the mail admins are lefties.
Does this mean you shouldn't complain? Of course not. Legitimate emounts of email get tagged as spam all the time--just hopefully very small amounts of it. Totally apolitical mail (especially when it's sent to lots of people) will have trouble, too.
COMMENT #49 [Permalink]
...
Constant
said on 7/15/2005 @ 8:17 pm PT...
I have some thoughts on this. [ More . . . ]
Is this why Congressman Conyers-blog didn't get requests to be added to the blog during registration?
COMMENT #50 [Permalink]
...
brian
said on 7/15/2005 @ 8:19 pm PT...
A good eg of net censorship I think that this should e followed up., perhaps with some legal action, to let the company know their action is objectionable.However, even better is to learn why this censorship was carried out? Who did it> and Does Comcast have any links to the GOP?
Brian
COMMENT #51 [Permalink]
...
Jaime Frontero
said on 7/15/2005 @ 8:38 pm PT...
The most relevant comment so far is #41.
"We should be prepared for a total lockdown of the internet. Some other organised method of communication will have to be established."
Any serious geeks know the answer to that one? Is there a way to establish a peer-to-peer network without needing the U.S. DNS servers? Something like a dial-up network connection to a server with a modem bank, so that instantaneous (and secure) communication could be maintained outside the government's corporate control?
Christ, I hope someone at the DNC is thinking about this...
Tinfoil hat territory? Sure. Better safe than sorry.
"One if by land..."
JF
COMMENT #52 [Permalink]
...
mba
said on 7/15/2005 @ 8:49 pm PT...
Yep.. It's called FidoNet, and we used to use it back in the 1980s with modems and dialup.
you used to be able to upload your message base to other bbs systems so that national conversations could take place at the local level.
All we need is a modem, a hard drive, and a RS232 port...
COMMENT #53 [Permalink]
...
Brad
said on 7/15/2005 @ 8:52 pm PT...
Ah, FidoNet
Look up PowerBBS and you'll learn even more about me, MBA
COMMENT #54 [Permalink]
...
Jaime Frontero
said on 7/15/2005 @ 10:47 pm PT...
Hmmm. Yes. I remember the old BBS systems. Archaic and slow. And who controls the phone lines?
Is there a way to use wireless 802.11x peer-to-peer, and leapfrog/relay over large distances? You'd have to use 192.168.xxx.xxx or 10.xxx.xxx.xxx networks, and figure out some way to resolve DHCP. Is that a do-able proposition?
Oh, and PGP, too. None of this DES crap.
JF
COMMENT #55 [Permalink]
...
The Oracle
said on 7/15/2005 @ 10:57 pm PT...
A different SPAM story.
Last year I made the mistake of sending an e-mail to Ann Coulter's website. Ooops. My bad.
I didn't use any foul words, but just made a few observations...and made a joke...really. I gave my liberal take on the relationship of Jesus Christ to the conservatives of his day, and mentioned that if Playboy magazine ever has a Women of the Republican Party photo spread, that Ann should apply to participate.
Anyway, I got an e-mail back from Tom, her sties' (no typo) webmaster, who told me that I had been reported to Spam Busters, to which Ann and he subscribed. Never heard of them. Thought nothing of it. Until a couple of weeks later when I communicated with one of the reporters at Rocky Mountain News concerning an article he'd written about the Swift Boat Liars' "Rovian" smear campaign last year. He replied. And sent my original e-mail back to me in the process.
Wow. Right there at the beginning of my subject line were the words "Possible Spam" in parentheses. I knew I hadn't put it there, so some shadowy intermediary must have. Spam Busters? One of the internet servers in cahoots with Spam Busters? Anyway, by changing my e-mail address, I think the problem was solved.
And yet, just as in the case of Comcast, how many other people or organizations have been tagged as Spammers when all they are doing is communicating one-to-one with someone else or with their members? Maybe all it takes to be labelled a Spammer nowadays is to send an e-mail with a political message or observation that someone else finds offensive relative to their own political position? So much for the sanctity of the First Amendment.
I agree with the observation of some of the posters above...we are rapidly becoming, by all appearances and practices, a Communist-like or Taliban-like country. I'm certain the enemies of our democracy and our freedom-loving society would be proud of these so-called loyal American citizens who are pulling this nefarious stunt.
Anyway, that is my story about my rude encounter with Ann Coulter, or at least her protective love-bunny Tom.
COMMENT #56 [Permalink]
...
Peg C
said on 7/15/2005 @ 11:09 pm PT...
The Oracle -
Thanks for the story. We are all in dread of its realization.
COMMENT #57 [Permalink]
...
ME
said on 7/15/2005 @ 11:21 pm PT...
On another subject: I used to work in the central offices of U.S. West/Qwest as an equipment installer. (Mostly DSL) You wouldn't believe how easy it is for the employees to listen in on private phone conversations. I seen people doing it all the time. I'm sure it's just as easy to read personal emails. YOU CAN'T TRUST ANYBODY!
COMMENT #58 [Permalink]
...
m3
said on 7/16/2005 @ 1:05 am PT...
Programs like Carnivore and Echelon already have all your emails stores at various sites around the world.
Nearest one to me is Mendip Hill base (where we have part of the US early missile-warning system and other crap)
They keep all phonecalls, emails and any messaging traffic they can obtain... stored for at least 5 years. (unlike the Nazi's who only kept the telephone calls... and I'm sure they only did it to "stop terrorism" too!!)
Laters
COMMENT #59 [Permalink]
...
Fletch
said on 7/16/2005 @ 1:30 am PT...
Isn't the power of BLOGS just amazing? Look how fast BradBlog got this shit discovered and fixed in such a short time!
This should be written up in Time or Wired magazines. Interesting story on how a beowolfe cluster of bloggers can swarm a corporate behemoth like Comcast and get them to JUMP when we scream "JUMP!!!".
I would love to have heard the all the pagers and cell phones going off at the various companies in charge of this shit. I bet the PR person was shitting bricks - the last thing they need are millions of customers worried that Comcast is "big brother".
Ha Ha....going to sleep now with sweet dreams of other people stressing out besides me....
COMMENT #60 [Permalink]
...
D.MICHAEL VAN DE VEER HOST-OUT-OF-THE-BOX KKCR-FM
said on 7/16/2005 @ 1:41 am PT...
Please join us next Thursday, July 22,
12 noon (HST) 6 pm (EDT)on OUT OF THE BOX for an interview with Howard Zinn. We will discuss the Downing-Street-Memo and Iraq..
Call-In Toll Free 1-866-275-1112
LISTEN WORLD WIDE www.kkcr.org
COMMENT #61 [Permalink]
...
Fletch
said on 7/16/2005 @ 1:47 am PT...
Isn't the power of BLOGS just amazing? Look how fast BradBlog got this shit discovered and fixed in such a short time!
This should be written up in Time or Wired magazines. Interesting story on how a beowolfe cluster of bloggers can swarm a corporate behemoth like Comcast and get them to JUMP when we scream "JUMP!!!".
I would love to have heard the all the pagers and cell phones going off at the various companies in charge of this shit. I bet the PR person was shitting bricks - the last thing they need are millions of customers worried that Comcast is "big brother".
Ha Ha....going to sleep now with sweet dreams of other people stressing out besides me....
COMMENT #62 [Permalink]
...
barryg
said on 7/16/2005 @ 4:07 am PT...
I am currently visiting my sister in a small town in northern Tennessee. I tried to connect to what really happened, crooks and liars with no success I tried Canada.com (an excelent test url ) worked fine so I went to add remove programs and removed the google task bar as well as the popup blocker provided by PEOPLE PC ONLINE problem solved I can now surf any where I want. People PC isp is censoring website acess. I disabled the filters before I tried Brad but I assume it would have been included. My sister is pc challenged, she has asked me what I did to speed up her computer since I "fixed it" so I guess they are checking web pages for content then blocking whatever is inapropiate to their point of view.
COMMENT #63 [Permalink]
...
Ray
said on 7/16/2005 @ 6:30 am PT...
Dear Sir or Madam:
After reading that, "....Comcast Corporation has been automatically deleting email sent to Comcast customers with the text "www.afterdowningstreet.org" in the body of the email." ( at https://bradblog.com/archives/00001602.htm ),
I will hereby inform you that I will NEVER knowingly subscribe to your ISP service, nor any of your cable services. I do not believe what your employees supposed calimed - i.e., that the deletions occured "Because it's automatic." It IS automatic that if I feel a company is violating my constitutional right to free expression, that I not enter into any contract with that firm. It is also my right to tell anyone and everyone I know about what apparently happened, and let those people then judge what they wish to do. (It's then their right and responsiblity to protect themselves.)
BTW, Bush & Cheney, etc. DO deserve impeachment and imprisonment, as the Downing Street Memo demonstrates clearly that they 'adjusted' intelligence, to lead our nation into an illegal, immoral war - which has killed over 100,000 innocent Iraqi's. Please learn more about this issue - for your own sake. All of us Americans need to learn what happened in the lead-up to the current war.
Let's do the right thing,
Ray
COMMENT #64 [Permalink]
...
Cossack
said on 7/16/2005 @ 6:34 am PT...
Hmmmm, it also seems Comcast is blocking certain URLs. Last couple of weeks I've found transient (and sometimes not so transient) difficulties in connecting to Counterpunch.org. Comcast is going bye-bye here. :crazy:
COMMENT #65 [Permalink]
...
Specturm Analyzer
said on 7/16/2005 @ 6:37 am PT...
Spam control can be based on a voluminous amount of same-subject/content email. It is also possible that enough people, whether acting in concert or not, could have reported the email as spam and provided the header information to the ISP.
Things are not always a conspiracy; sometimes a cigar is just a freaking cigar.
PS: I see you have the constantly annoying Constant HERE as well. The repetitive promotion of people with lousy blogs is becoming quite an aggravation. They jack the S/N ratio too high for me to stomach.
COMMENT #66 [Permalink]
...
Kitty27
said on 7/16/2005 @ 6:46 am PT...
Re: 30 --- I have DirecTV and they have a channel called LinkTV which is excellent. Not only do they air Democracy Now, but last night, they aired "Hijacking Catastrophe"! (Came across it purely by accident!)
Excellent film, for those of you who haven't had the chance to see it. I believe you can see it on the Internet somewhere for free, or at least you used to be able to, but here's their website:
http://www.hijackingcatastrophe.org/
So good ol' Rupert is letting some progressive stuff to get through...I was really pissed when I heard he bought DirecTV but so far, he hasn't deleted any programming that I know of.
COMMENT #67 [Permalink]
...
bob
said on 7/16/2005 @ 6:47 am PT...
You mean the N/S ratio is too high.
COMMENT #68 [Permalink]
...
anna
said on 7/16/2005 @ 6:54 am PT...
hey brad -
i work for verizon's email group and we use the brightmail spam-filtering solution. i would imagine, although i can't confirm since i have not checked, that the emails were probably filtered from our network as well. pretty much every ISP who deploys brightmail as an anti-spam solution is connected to the same central reporting server, so the same anti-spam rules are pushed automagically to many providers. so since this has been fixed now, verizon customers will be receiving the ADS emails.
being very familiar with the product, i can say with 100% certainty that the explanation symantec gave is absolutely correct. their spam filtering works on partially on algorithms; it's not based on user-generated spam reporting. the more often a certain subject line or content passes through the brightmail filter, the more likely it is to be tagged as spam, because a lot of bulk email contains the same subject line or content. and after it hits a certain threshold, brightmail will automagically add it to the central reporting server.
so, no conspiracy here. hope you will add at least some of my comment to your thread so that folks will know that symantec didn't do this on purpose. they make a great product. it's not perfect, but it works damned well 99% of the time and it really makes my job as an email admin a hella lot easier.
COMMENT #69 [Permalink]
...
Jeffk
said on 7/16/2005 @ 8:05 am PT...
From comment 28
"Either way, it's clear these people will stop at nothing.
So the tinfoil hat stays on."
I'm taking mine out of the closet and putting it back on right now.
COMMENT #70 [Permalink]
...
Anon
said on 7/16/2005 @ 9:20 am PT...
:O :O :O
I didn't see anyone also note that SYMANTEC also uses a filter for the SALON web site....
I have NEVER seen this ANY other web site...If you use a Norton/Symantec product, such as Norton Internet Security, you may see this message when you try to visit Salon's web site:
"If you are ONLY seeing this and the footer of the page, we believe you are running a Norton/Symantec product which is causing this to happen. Please go to this help page and allow our URL (salon.com)"
The connection between Brad's report on e-mail censorship AND this web browsing censorship is more than coincidental...There's a pattern here, and an enterprising reporter needs to pick up on it..
:O :O :O
COMMENT #71 [Permalink]
...
Arliss Hogwasher
said on 7/16/2005 @ 9:49 am PT...
Gee, if only they could successfully block all the Erectile Dysfunction emails as good as they block the www.afterdowningstreet.org emails.
Give me a f'in break, this was completely political!
How f'in stupid do they think we are?
What bullshit!
COMMENT #72 [Permalink]
...
KestrelBrighteyes
said on 7/16/2005 @ 9:54 am PT...
I can hear the big companies now - "Who the hell are these 6 or 7, and how do they mobilize so fast??"
I would like to remind everyone that to make the MOST EFFECTIVE IMPACT on any issue, we not only have to have a starting point for the emails, faxes, and phone calls, but there also has to be a stopping point as soon as the problem is fixed.
Anything beyond that point is harassment and hurts the cause.
I have this mental image of every phone in an office building ringing off the hook, every fax machine spitting out stacks, curses from cubicles and offices as various "you have mail" sounds go off and there are 643 new messages since yesterday, then suddenly - silence.
We are so much stronger now than we were a year ago - feels GOOD!
COMMENT #73 [Permalink]
...
KestrelBrighteyes
said on 7/16/2005 @ 9:56 am PT...
Oh, one more thing - when someone responds favorably to our suggestions and concerns, it's always a good idea to send a simple "thank you"
Trust me, they do remember...
COMMENT #74 [Permalink]
...
PetGoat
said on 7/16/2005 @ 10:21 am PT...
re: #28 and #69 and tin-foil hats:
I've stuck a feather in mine; I call it macaroni.
COMMENT #75 [Permalink]
...
RAY MEDLEY
said on 7/16/2005 @ 10:44 am PT...
STOP FILTERING EMAILS FOR POLITICAL REASONS. BUSH HAS ALL THE MEDIA WHORES HE NEEDS, NO NEED TO EXPAND ON HIS CAMPAIGN AGAINST FREEDOM OF SPEECH
COMMENT #76 [Permalink]
...
Robert Lockwood Mills
said on 7/16/2005 @ 12:17 pm PT...
Maybe Comcast was only blocking political e-mails because of complaints about spam.
But ask yourself, "If those e-mails had been predominantly pro-Bush, would they have done so?"
Next question.
COMMENT #77 [Permalink]
...
Richard 23
said on 7/16/2005 @ 1:02 pm PT...
re #62 #64 domain blocking
domain blocking can be caused by your provider or by your host file (Windows)
C:\WINDOWS\system32\drivers\etc\hosts
Over a year ago a modified hosts file was slipped into my System (by an unidentified piece of spyware).
It mapped localhost and a long list of adware, spyware and security websites to sequential ip addresses starting at 127.0.0.0.
example:
127.0.0.0 localhost
127.0.0.93 www.spybot.info
These addresses are unused. A browser reports either "the operation timed out" or "The connection was refused" "...when attempting to contact ."
Spybot 3.1 silently fails, reporting "no newer updates available." Unfortunately there is no way to manually enter a mirror url into Spybot...it tries to retrieve a list of mirrors from a blocked domain. Oh, well.
The effect of the inserted hosts file was that I was unable to view spyware removal related websites and I was unable to update Spybot's spyware file.
The solution was to remove the offending hosts file.
** PROXY SERVERS **
Another way around domain blocking is to use a proxy server. It's actually really simple to set up. Here's a couple of sites:
http://www.publicproxyservers.com/index.html
http://www.proxy4free.com/page1.html
Just pick one of the free proxy servers and enter the the ip and port addresses into your web browser's manual proxy settings.
As long as the proxy address isn't blocked, you should be able to go anywhere you want, even addresses blocked by your provider!
example:
host: n2h154.loop.as
port: 80
HTTP Proxy: n2h154.loop.as:80
No proxy for: localhost, 127.0.0.1
Hope this wasn't too geeky for y'all.
COMMENT #78 [Permalink]
...
Remote Exploit
said on 7/16/2005 @ 2:51 pm PT...
This all brings up an interesting point. Because alternative media is gaining acceptance and popularity, those that would like to control the message need to find a way to control this medium. TV is easy - give Rush and Hannity the RNC talking points and access to high-level nutcases for interview and everyone's happy.
There are a lot of companies that provide products and services that are "automated" like spam control, and make the Internet work. Seems to me that, in terms of information warfare, these are the best to co-opt for control.
Think if VeriSign was controllable. No DNS means no Internet. Selective deletion of A(ddress) records during critical times could effectively stifle dissent.
COMMENT #79 [Permalink]
...
John Machado
said on 7/16/2005 @ 5:04 pm PT...
What else is new? One would expect the cable provider to provide for the political hacks who provided for it. And what do these friends need right now...??? Why, cover up .. of course...
Fox News...when you really don't want to know.
Comcast...when you want to support Fascism.
Limbaugh...when your brain is fried.
--
I'm doing my part...no Comcast here...no Wal-Mart and no Home Depot either...and, soon, no MBNA.
COMMENT #80 [Permalink]
...
Hephaestion
said on 7/16/2005 @ 5:04 pm PT...
I am wondering what OTHER things are being blocked by COMCAST?
We happened to find out about the After Downing Street group being blocked. I would be surprised if that is the ONLY group being blocked by them.
We need to see their ENTIRE LIST of blocked sites.
COMMENT #81 [Permalink]
...
Hephaestion
said on 7/16/2005 @ 5:10 pm PT...
I am wondering what OTHER things are being blocked by COMCAST?
We happened to find out about the After Downing Street group being blocked. I would be surprised if that is the ONLY group being blocked by them.
We need to see their ENTIRE LIST of blocked sites.
COMMENT #82 [Permalink]
...
Hephaestion
said on 7/16/2005 @ 5:12 pm PT...
I am wondering what OTHER things are being blocked by COMCAST?
We happened to find out about the After Downing Street group being blocked. I would be surprised if that is the ONLY group being blocked by them.
We need to see their ENTIRE LIST of blocked sites.
COMMENT #83 [Permalink]
...
Hephaestion
said on 7/16/2005 @ 5:14 pm PT...
I am wondering what OTHER things are being blocked by COMCAST?
We happened to find out about the After Downing Street group being blocked. I would be surprised if that is the ONLY group being blocked by them.
We need to see their ENTIRE LIST of blocked sites.
COMMENT #84 [Permalink]
...
Hephaestion
said on 7/16/2005 @ 5:19 pm PT...
I am wondering what OTHER things are being blocked by COMCAST?
We happened to find out about the After Downing Street group being blocked. I would be surprised if that is the ONLY group being blocked by them.
We need to see their ENTIRE LIST of blocked sites.
COMMENT #85 [Permalink]
...
Bejammin075
said on 7/16/2005 @ 7:38 pm PT...
The above point made above several times is interesting: if Comcast and friends is legit, and didn't intentionally put A.D.S. on the list, then they could sort-of prove it by providing their current list of banned sites. We could read the list to see if there were any similar sites that should not have been banned. We would be more likely to recognize those sites.
Furthermore, if Comcast and friends is legit, we would actually be doing a free service for them: we would be donating free people-hours to inspect a list for wrongly listed sites, which we would show them so that they could correct the problem for increased customer satisfaction. If they give us the list, we can help Comcast help its customers.
Comcast, will you give us the list of currently banned sites?
COMMENT #86 [Permalink]
...
barryg
said on 7/16/2005 @ 7:50 pm PT...
re #57 I worked for a dial up isp tech support. The only reason we ask for your login password is to verify your id, all I need is your phone number. I could log into your acount, copy and paste your email password to notepad,change your email password to abc12345, read your mail then paste your password back in so you can use it. I had your name,address,phone#,mothers maiden name, If you paid by credit card that # also.We were told to tell people we could not read their mail only see how big a message was so we could delete it to unjam their inbox of large messages. It can take hours to download large messages to outlook,etc. Aren't you glad they offshored my job to India.
COMMENT #87 [Permalink]
...
Bejammin075
said on 7/16/2005 @ 8:22 pm PT...
On the subject of cancellation of services:
I'd hold off on canceling everything right at this moment. It appears that a problem has been corrected, but we don't know what caused it. Comcast should be forthcomming about how the problem occured. They should be able to provide some detail. I also think they should be willing to give something to ADS (like free ad time or ad space), since ADS was adversly affected by the blunder.
One thing we don't know is whether we can blame Comcast. Perhaps there are reporting mechanisms for spam sites, and maybe Comcast was manipulated. A neocon taking an interest with ADS might report ADS as spam, and then Comcast unwittingly adds ADS to the filter. I just wanted to make the point that there might be a variety of ways that Comcast was manipulated. It could be the other way too, they are "in on it". I don't think we've seen enough to know yet.
That brings me to another quick point: if Comcast was manipulated, they should be able to help us figure out who manipulated them. They should have some kind of record of who reported the spam. If you could report spam annonomously, it seems like web buisinesses would always be reporting other web buisiness competitors, to mess them up. So, Comcast, if ADS was reported as spam, who reported them?
Let's see what Comcasts next moves are. Mainly we're looking for some transparency of the process that took place with the list, and their current list, if they will provide it. I would call Comcast now and let them know our concers, and say that we will be monitoring the situation, and possibly canceling services depending on how the situation is resolved. If it turns out they look like they are hiding someting, or their current list of banned sites has only the liberal and progressive end of the political spectrum banned, we will be forced to take action.
If/When Comcast has definitively done something malicious, we can figure out how to get an alternative and get it. Then call Comcast back and tell them we're cancelling services, tell them why, and move on. I can switch my cable to a competitor. I can get a DSL modem. I think this soon after the story broke, it's too soon to go nu-kyu-ler on Comcast, but lets keep a close eye on the situation.
If there was something malicious done by someone to ADS (and why not? Wilson's wife was fair game, and ADS is basically the same kind of threat to the Lie-Us-Into-Iraq Administration, so...) we should be prepared to learn as much as we can from this situation because the same tactics will likely be used again, and we'll just have to fix it, like cleaning up grafitti. It sucks, but we can likely solve the problem by just being aware of what to look for and what types of people to call to get it fixed, and then have 6 or 7 of us get it done. There are more of us than them.
COMMENT #88 [Permalink]
...
Bejammin075
said on 7/16/2005 @ 8:33 pm PT...
Some commenters above were talking about what if the whole internet is shut down. I have a question for the compu-geeks: Would it be a good idea for us to learn how to archive other people's websites? If the internet was shut down, would it be good for lots of people to have local copies of their political websites of interest? In other words, is it a worthwile skill to learn (archiving websites) and to take the time to do?
COMMENT #89 [Permalink]
...
Vince Novak
said on 7/16/2005 @ 8:52 pm PT...
As someone who is very framiliar with the workings of spam bots. One properly configured / or misconfigured as it were could easily do this without anyones knowlage or intent.
As it is. I do find it suspicious that this one site was blocked when there are lots of politicly active websites that go up like this and DON'T get blocked.
As for internet archives. There is an internet website archiveing service called the "Wayback Machine". Search google and you'll find it.
COMMENT #90 [Permalink]
...
Winter Patriot
said on 7/16/2005 @ 9:39 pm PT...
Vince: the wayback machine is cool but it's not the answer to the question. If the internet goes down the wayback machine goes away too.
I do think we should be archiving websites --- but by this I mean we should be making local copies of important pages --- or entire sites --- on our hard disks ... so that even if the internet disappears we will still have the goods ... I'll have more on this later, if possible ... but in the meantime if anyone has any good tools for doing something like this, please let us know.
COMMENT #91 [Permalink]
...
Bejammin075
said on 7/16/2005 @ 9:50 pm PT...
WP #90
You said it well. Perhaps someone reading this blog knows how to archive sites and can enlighten us?
COMMENT #92 [Permalink]
...
jimmy
said on 7/17/2005 @ 6:06 am PT...
.Winter Patriot said :
>>I do think we should be archiving websites --- but by this I mean we should be making local copies of important pages --- or entire sites --- on our hard disks ...
http://www.httrack.com/
HTTrack is a free (GPL, libre/free software) and easy-to-use offline browser utility.
It allows you to download a World Wide Web site from the Internet to a local directory, building recursively all directories, getting HTML, images, and other files from the server to your computer. HTTrack arranges the original site's relative link-structure.
Source code is available for Windows and Linux/Unix/BSD.
COMMENT #93 [Permalink]
...
MysticalStar
said on 7/17/2005 @ 11:10 am PT...
Anyone had "strange" problems with COX internet or email? I have.
Awhile back I had a very strange thing happen to me. I was using COX.net internet email at the time. I was suddenly dropped from two yahoo groups that I subscribe to. One is an anti-war peace and justice group. The other is a local Democrat group- not the state or national Demo party, but instead just local people that are interested in helping change the direction this country is headed and want a way to keep in touch and get the word out when volunteers are needed to help with something.
I would also like to point out that I am on several other yahoo groups and none of these was affected- only just the two political ones.
The group moderators could never find out why I was dropped. Yahoo could never give me an answer, but I don't think the problem was with them since it was not just a glitch in a group, nor was it all of my yahoo groups, plus no one else had this problem. I had trouble re-signing up for one, and the group moderator could not figure out why.
Occasionally I would not receive an email that someone would later mention to me. One specifically that I remember was to a local political event that I would have attended had I known about it.
There are problems with COX internet and especially their email- sometimes minor and brief but sometimes a big problem. I've always figured that the problems were due to the many problems that COX has and the poor tech dept. However, I have always thought that problem with those two groups was no "accodent". Now I am more sure that it wasn't. I have had way more problems with them than any of my friends who use them. Coincidence? Now I think not, after hearing about Comcast. So now I use another email provider.
If you are use COX, watch it carefully for "problems". Anyone else had problems with them?
COMMENT #94 [Permalink]
...
MysticalStar
said on 7/17/2005 @ 12:06 pm PT...
One more thing...
I looked on Cox support to see what spam filter they use, and it is Brightmail also.
This is from their website:
Ongoing Efforts in the War Against Spam-
Cox works everyday to stem the tide of spam.
* Server-Based Spam Filtering - Brightmail , the global anti-spam market leader, provides server-side spam-filtering.
COMMENT #95 [Permalink]
...
janet fulmer
said on 7/17/2005 @ 1:52 pm PT...
I'm 72 years old, so I've lived through a number of witch hunts and early fascist behavior of our government. I've seen nothing like this, however. Granted the feds are not directly implicated, but as a card carring believer in the monied powers of the US working together to support and protect their own and each other's finances and other power, I am convnced that this behavior on the part of Comcast is part of the fascist efforts to limit free speech to what they believe --- they being the puppet string pullers behind the White House. They know who they are, and so do you.
:angry:
COMMENT #96 [Permalink]
...
BrunoNYC
said on 7/17/2005 @ 4:53 pm PT...
Consider it karma for being a moonbat.
COMMENT #97 [Permalink]
...
onyx
said on 7/18/2005 @ 6:55 am PT...
I'm on Adephia. It will reportedly bought soon by Comcast so I decided to send a test meassge to myself with ADS in mesage body. It went through fine but that was the last e-mail I have been able to send or recieve!!!
Since then I can't send or recieve ANY e-mail through their pop server. I can only connect through their wemail sight. I've got a call into them to see why or if my IP adress has been blocked!!!
BTW Adelphia's spam filter is almost completely ineffective. My personal spam filter works great, but when I logged onto their webmails site the were 10 spam-mails to every one legitimate one. I usually get only one two a day that get through to my computer.
I'll let you all know.
COMMENT #98 [Permalink]
...
G
said on 7/18/2005 @ 11:25 am PT...
Absolutely scary!! Who's to say they are not blocking other emails/links as we speak!!
To those contiplating a switch to DSL:
When I moved, I had a choice between COMCAST and DSL. Because of the multitudes of problems of COMCAST and the fact that they put many "hooks" into your PC when you load their software, I chose to go with DSL.
GREAT NEWS...I know at least 7 people who have COMCAST and have slower (YES, SLOWER) connections speeds that I have with DSL, some being very significant!
So, please don't hesitate to switch to DSL based on speed...we need to send a CLEAR MESSAGE to companies like COMCAST that we won't do business with companies that do business based on politics!!!
COMMENT #99 [Permalink]
...
Michael
said on 7/18/2005 @ 1:17 pm PT...
I have comcast and I have noticed that Buzzflash page takes forever to load- I don't have this problem at work. All other pages come in fast. I am wondering if this is connected. This started about a week ago.
COMMENT #100 [Permalink]
...
MysticalStar
said on 7/18/2005 @ 4:14 pm PT...
# 98:
After I had cox (and a new computer) for 8 months and the internet and especially the email had always had constant major problems (which cox blamed on anything and everything but their service), the owner of a small local computer repair shop told me to NEVER put their software on my computer, that it is not needed anyway.
He removed the cox software and showed me how to configure the computer to work on cox internet (it takes less time than installing their software that is supposedly needeed to configure the computer). Suddenly my internet and email worked properly, which they never did until he worked on my computer.
I don't know if this is coincidence or not, that my problem was suddenly gone. However, the shop owner also explained that their software contains other things by other companies that cox uses, but he considers them to be a big security threat and would never have them on his computers.
Since this was several years ago I think they may have made some changes to their installation software, but I am not sure about this. And I still will never trust them after my bad experiences with them.
COMMENT #101 [Permalink]
...
Fascismo
said on 7/18/2005 @ 9:52 pm PT...
In a Feb 2002 article on Yahoo that I just googled, Comcast announced that it would not collect information about the web usage of its members. I'm just wondering, under the Patriot Act, do they not have no obligation to be truthful about their practices of web logging?
COMMENT #102 [Permalink]
...
onyx
said on 7/19/2005 @ 10:00 am PT...
I took Richard 23's advice (#77)
------
domain blocking can be caused by your provider or by your host file (Windows)
C:\WINDOWS\system32\drivers\etc\hosts
Over a year ago a modified hosts file was slipped into my System (by an unidentified piece of spyware).
It mapped localhost and a long list of adware, spyware and security websites to sequential ip addresses starting at 127.0.0.0.
example:
127.0.0.0 localhost
127.0.0.93 www.spybot.info
-----
I found "127.0.0.0 localhost" where he described it might be. I commented the line in the file so it could not be executed, re-booted and my e-mail software is now able to connect Adelphia's pop server. Problem fixed.
Does anybody (richard 23) know what this means?
COMMENT #103 [Permalink]
...
J Wilson
said on 7/19/2005 @ 10:08 am PT...
I am a comcast customer and as of this morning 7/19/05 I am still unable to receive emails with www.afterdowningstreet.org in the message.
COMMENT #104 [Permalink]
...
MysticalStar
said on 7/19/2005 @ 6:18 pm PT...
follow-up from #93, 94, 100...
COX COMMUNICATIONS is censoring their email also. They use the BrightMail spam filter.
Here is my experience with this email and cox:
THE EMAIL IN QUESTION:
From: "Congressman John Conyers, Jr."
To: "MysticalStar
Subject: New House Party Locations
Date: Mon, 18 Jul 2005 19:03:52 -0400
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
I FORWARDED FROM MY YAHOO TO MY COX ACCT:
----- Original Message -----
From: MysticalStar
To: xxx @ cox.net
Sent: Tuesday, July 19, 2005 6:31 PM
Subject: Fwd: New House Party Locations
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
COX LABELED IT AS SPAM, EVERY TIME. I FORWARDED IT BACK TO YAHOO AND A G-MAIL ACCT BUT NEITHER RECEIVED IT. SO I REPORTED IT BY EMAIL TO COX:
----- Original Message -----
From: xxx @ cox.net
To: ThisIsNotSpam@cox.net ; Postmaster@cox.net ; abuse@cox.net ; *Cox eCare Baton Rouge
Cc: xxx @ cox.net
Sent: Tuesday, July 19, 2005 6:46 PM
Subject: THIS IS NOT SPAM!!! Fw: --- Spam --- Fwd: New House Party Locations- THIS IS NOT SPAM!!!
THIS IS NOT SPAM, but TWICE you have labeled it as such. This is something that I subscribe to using my yahoo email address (because I know that they do NOT censor their customer's email- as you are doing!) When I forward it to my cox account you label it as spam. When I send it back to my yahoo acct and my son's google email account they do not receive it in either of these email accounts.
When I send it to someone who has asked for it and they do not receive it, OBVIOUSLY YOU (COX) ARE DELETING IT and not allowing it to be sent.
THIS IS CENSORSHIP.
Comcast has been doing something similar, which is what alerted me to the possibility of WHY I occasionally do not receive an email. (I have called COX in the past to complain about this and was told nothing but excuses!)
I will report this to the John Conyers organization that sent it, and I will also report it to the people who alerted me about the Comcast problem. They may want to post it on their various message boards on the internet so that other COX customers will be warned that their email is or could be censored by COX as you are doing to mine.
I pay a lot for your service and you should NOT be deciding which of my private emails that you will allow or not allow me to read or send. This is Censorship, and the public needs to know that you are doing this.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
I DID NOT RECEIVE THE AUTO-REPLY THAT COX SENDS. So they didn't receive it either, so I called.
The cust svc person refused to believe me, even though I've called already several times over several months about occasionally not receiving an email.
I spoke to a supervisor and explained the details about about Comcast and my experiences with Cox. Unlike the cust rep, she seemed to believe me and said it needs to be investigated.
When I sent the questionable email to the SUPERVISOR at COX from my COX acct (cc to myself at cox), neither of us received it. When I sent it from my yahoo acct she received it immediately and admitted there is definitely a problem. She said she'd call me tomorrow after she checks on it...
MY EMAIL TO HER:
----- Original Message -----
From: xxx @ cox.net
To: xxx @ cox.com
Cc: xxx @ cox.net
Sent: Tuesday, July 19, 2005 7:02 PM
Subject: Fw: THIS IS NOT SPAM!!! Fw: --- Spam --- Fwd: New House Party Locations- THIS IS NOT SPAM!!!
TO: conyers.event@gmail.com
You need to know this. Comcast is not the only one who is censoring their email. COX COMMUNICATIONS is doing it also. Please read this below.
NO automatic reply received from COX, so therefore I assume that when I sent it they deleted it and did not receive it.
... (the rest of this email is above)
I wonder how many other email providers are doing this, that we haven't discovered yet...
COMMENT #105 [Permalink]
...
Peter Hollings
said on 7/20/2005 @ 8:30 am PT...
It's possible that it's all a mistake, but that doesn't seem likely. The issue, it seems, is whether After Downing Street actually sent emails to people who complained. I have received a number of emails from After Downing Street and they all seemed very responsible. I doubt that they were sending unsolicited email, but in any event it was not commercial and thus did not meet the definition of spam as being commercial (spam = "UCE," unsolicited commercial email).
Here is what I suspect happened: There are a number of public "blacklists" on the Internet that purportedly list known sources of spam. Companies providing spam filtering services frequently update their filters based on these blacklists. What someone like Karl Rove could have done is have AfterDowningStreet.org submitted as a spam source to one or more of these blacklists. If progressive organizations are to protect themselves against this tactic, they should consider subscribing to one of the blacklist monitoring services like http://www.listshield.com/ (free, I believe, to non-profits). These services monitor the blacklists and report back to you when your Internet domain has been named so that it can be cleared up.
Peter Hollings
COMMENT #106 [Permalink]
...
Mycos
said on 7/21/2005 @ 11:50 pm PT...
Upon investigation of this claim, I recieved the following:
Mycos,
I called Comcast yesterday, as I was looking for a Downing Street meeting in my area (Western Missouri). I was perplexed because I knew my Congressman had signed the Conyers letter, but no meeting was showing up. I am on the elist of my Congressman, as well as the dot.org that "Comcast must not let pass".
Prior to the reference made at the web site that can't be mentioned, I received a notification from Conyers office of the trouble, but not the cause. Other lists had made posts as to the reason prior to my
receiving the post from "the Bright Mail fingered web site".
After receiving the email from "ADS.org", I called Comcast locally, going through the unfriendly telephone tree. I spoke to a customer
service representative because no one would answer a call directed to "public affairs" as I asked. Stopped cold, I told my story to the guy at he customer service desk. Sounding like a guy who handles collections and flaky complaints all day, he was skeptical at first, and asked for details of my complaint with Comcast. In short, I gave them to him, particularly the "AxxxxDxxxxxxSxxxxx.org" web site, telling him I thought that Comcast was interfering with my First Amendment rights and asking who the Bloody Hell Comcast thought they were to do that. I told the rep to Google the name of the site and "Comcast", which he did. When the Googled list came
up, his skepticism disappeared. He even began to ask questions as he began to read the memoranda.
I told him "You probably deal with screwy calls all day. This is not one of them. You're using Bright Mail filters, no? This is quashing of dissent. The Town Hall meetings are scheduled for Saturday. Currently,
eight are scheduled. Without this communication gap, the intent was to have eighty".
Then he asked more questions as he continued to read, spending about five minutes on his browser. He then sent himself an email through the Comcast office system. He waited, then waited some more. Finally, e
asked for the spelling again and sent another email. about that time, the first one came back to him as a CC: and he told me.
I asked, "Was it longer than it should have been?"
He replied, "Seemed like it."
At that point, I was left to read his inflection, which had changed.
Hoping he had just had an epiphany, I said, "Well, you should look into this. But it might be better to do so on your own time, from another machine. But, I think you understand the implications. The better informed citizens are, the better protected they are. Good Luck!"
And we then parted telephonic company. Though I don't expect Comcast will come clean to the average citizen calling and complaining on the phone, hopefully they take note. If it was not, indeed, happening, I think this guy's job was to set me straight on anything that was cockamamie. The fact that he did not "correct" my allegations, asking questions instead, confirmed for me that the email from AxxxxDxxxxxSxxxxx.org is accurate.
All of that, in a FWIW.
COMMENT #107 [Permalink]
...
Mycos
said on 7/22/2005 @ 12:24 pm PT...
So what's the deal here? My source says that as of the 20th, he (and possibly a Comcast service-tech himself) was unable to receive email with the "offending" URL contained therein.
Here you have dated with the problem as fixed with the last date represented as the 15th. Both cannot be correct. When was the problem declared fixed by BradBlog?
Mycos
COMMENT #108 [Permalink]
...
Susan Klopfer
said on 7/25/2005 @ 7:54 am PT...
(After being booted out of your blog six times this morning while trying to write a response, I'm beginning to wonder if Brad has been Comcasted?) We should all be well to remember good words from the 1960s - capitalist pigs! Still works for me. :O
COMMENT #109 [Permalink]
...
DaveK
said on 7/29/2005 @ 10:13 am PT...
People-link are liars. Their claims about how spamblocks work are utterly untrue.
"Most spam blocking measures focus on the email address or the IP address of the suspected spammer."
Absolutely not. Most spam comes from huge networks of zombie machines. As soon as one is blocked, the spammer has others to use. And the software they use forges random "From" lines as well. How can anyone pretend that spammers send out email with real addresses on it?
" While there are anti-spam measures directed at the body of the email, these usually target attachments that could contain virus programs."
Again, utter fiction. These things examine the entire body of the email, they don't distinguish between the body and attachments. And think about it, for just one second: spammers send out spam from a huge number of IP addresses. They use forged From: lines. You can't block spam based on the IP address or the email address involved. But what's the one thing that absolutely _has_ to be the same in every spam, or there wouldn't be any point in sending it? Yep, that's right. It's the link to the spammer's website. That's the one and only feature that all the individual spams have in common. OF COURSE spam filters look for URLs in the body. It's by far the commonest technique and for people-link to try and pretend it's something that was done specially just to target ADS is utterly dishonest.
COMMENT #110 [Permalink]
...
Lurking
said on 7/29/2005 @ 5:16 pm PT...
I am certainly not a republican but reading this makes me wonder if I want to become a Democrat. If anyone with any sense checks this list they can shoot holes in any valid arguement from here on out against Bush.
I've never seen so much paranoid ramblings in my life. I have a certain interest in this matter due to my employment with Comcast and I can say there was never a point that so many people could be so wrong as to motive. They would not knowingly block political content, that's utterly ridiculous.
There a few here that seemed to have tried with limited luck to address the spam issues. Filters filter, they are machines designed to look for trends this machine did it's job and the emails were blocked. By the response time to resolve (someone quoted an hour and 20 mins) that's important, the issue was brought to their attention and through the process the issue was expedited and resolved. Emails began to flow again. No hidden agendas, no political motivations.
Think about it doesnt matter if a dem or republican is in office the cable companies still have an inherent customer base who will continue to pay their cable bills and make the company money. That simple.
Focus on the issue, Bush needs to go he doesnt have his hand in the Comcast upper management pockets, get a grip, refocus and address the issue here, the current administration isnt living up to their elected responsibilities.
COMMENT #111 [Permalink]
...
eoj
said on 8/4/2005 @ 3:44 pm PT...
i have never seen a more,parinoid group of people and blog host in my life.anything that happens in any of your lives,is a conspericy,it is Bush,doing it.it rains,and you swear bush knew you just washed your car,Your kid gets a F in school and the teacher was on Bush"s payroll.Your wife or husband looses their job,Bush,you slip aqnd fall Bush.A plane crashes in England, Bush did it again.This is what mass hysteria is.
LOL Comcast is on Bush's payroll,and the proof for that is,a friend of a friend of the BROTHER,WHO'S MOTHER WAS MARRIED TO A MAN NAMED BOB,AND BOB HAD A AQUAINTANCE,WHO HE BOUGHT A DOG FROM,THAT WORKED IN A CIRCLE K,THE DOG BIT A WOMAN WHO WORKED IN A INSURANCE COMPANY,THAT WOMAN WENT TO A DOCTOR TO GET A RABI SHOT,THE RABI SHOT WAS MADE BY A COMPANY OWNED BY ,,THE THIRD COUSIN OF THE SECOND BROTHER,WHO'S NAME WAS TOM,AND TOM WENT TO SCHOOL WITH GEORGE BUSH'S WIFE LAURA,AND THEY WERE BOTH IN THE SECOND GRADE TOGATHER,SO WE KNOW THERE IS A CONNECTION WITH BUSH AND COMCAST
SIMPLE SOULITION,GO TO MSN.COM
COMMENT #112 [Permalink]
...
JOHN
said on 8/4/2005 @ 4:06 pm PT...
BRAD I CALLED COMCAST ADMINISTRATION,AND RISK MANNAGMENT,THEY ARE VERY INTERESTED IN WHAT YOU SAID,AND WILL INVESTIGATE THIS MATTER,AND WILL GET BACK TO YOU
COMMENT #113 [Permalink]
...
Joseph M Berry
said on 8/8/2005 @ 12:30 pm PT...
:angry: Say what you will. Comcast and the entire Internet now has a block on Afterdownstreet.org as of 8/8/05. What is this? We all should look into who has done or put this complete block on the afterdowningstreet. With the way this administration express power, this is very scary. There has always been a part of me that would not put passed this President to try a complete illegal take over of this country. If you think about it what is Tony Blair saying when he talks about censoring and kicking "those" who disagree with him out of the country.
Joseph
COMMENT #114 [Permalink]
...
Carlene
said on 8/11/2005 @ 12:53 pm PT...
Well Comcast high speed internet has done it again...all services went down one day and then two days later they went down again right along with my hard drive. A 160gig hard drive to be exact. Actually, it was my entire system that was the victim of electromagnetic spark. So I am on my laptop once again with no access to any of my e-books. And this will be the second router I have lost as well.
When the internet services went down, somehow the configuration in my modem got misconfigured, I was locked out of my own router and the motherboard wouldn't even see the hard drive that is now rendered useless.
Upon finally hacking into my own router, I found that MY computer was set in DMZ mode. Which is something that I would never do.
So the spike that was sent through the modem went straight through to my computer.
Why are they after me?
Well I know that there is a lot of corporate greed going on within Comcast's walls in Fresno and I have enough information to take them to court and win.
They would like to think that they could shut me up by disabling my systems...but the more damage they do to me the more I will make it public and the more I will talk.
Comcast is a multibillion dollar company that bought out AT&T lines and started offering cable services without even checking the stability of the lines and charging way too much for a service that would become problematic.
Comcast is literally paying one city money because the entire city took them to court for bad services due to line problems.
Now you know how hideous these people are...here's my story...
I used to work for a company that was a contractor company for Comcast...I was there to help with the installations of the high speed internet. None of the installers there knew anything about computers and my job description was to train the installers and do high level troubleshooting to the customers computers that did not pass and did not want to load the HSI.
For part of this was good because for the most part, the troublesome systems that some of the customers owned was out of the realm of what Comcast or any contractor could do and I went on my off hours and was paid quite sweetly independently for resolving their issues and getting them online.
It was a win win situation.
This went on for four months and then someone started to complain that I was no longer an asset to the company even though I had saved a lot of HSI jobs and created money for them, so they changed my job description.
Dispatcher.
I reluctantly took the position under the promise from the president of the company that I would have the HSI back and that I would be running that entity in less than three months.
I was there for over 6 months dispatching the installers.
Well this job took me out of my field, and the longer I was out of the loop, I knew that I would have a harder time getting back in.
Meanwhile there was a few new hires
Mark Demler: president
Tom Forse: supervisor of half of installers as well as sales division.
Now keep in mind, this is not Comcast, but rather a contracting company that does work for Comcast.
Not only did this company add some employees, but they also changed the name from Aesthetic Installations to CSI.
All of these changes were done in less than a month.
Now Mark Demler went up against Comcast in an effort to gain more money from the company and lost his efforts. CSI hurt financially for his mistakes and bad business ethics.
Tom Forse has an interesting job history himself.
This individual was once a employee of Comcast and was caught stealing equipment and was fired. Comcast again rehired this idiot and he once again was caught stealing and altering documents. He was fired again. But still remained friends with Brad Logan who is in charge of the contractors.
Now you would think that this person would be banned from ever working in the cable industry again but this person always seems to make his way back in.
He after being fired from Comcast twice, was hired by a different contracting company called Prince Telecom that works directly under Comcast.
He was not there too long until the owner came from out of state to relieve Tom Forse of his duties. Again he was fired.
CSI hired him on after all of this and gave him a supervisor position.
Why?
Well because he is such an expert at altering documents, they figured that they could benefit from his wrong doings is all I can figure.
Now while I was in dispatching, I was called by several of the installers informing me of a meeting that was held without my presence. The reason for this was that Tom Forse was trying to take over the sales of the HSI on the business level.
The entire HSI entity was promised to me and all the installers knew of this and like me couldn't wait till I was back in the office running it because I knew what I was doing and was a real asset to the installers.
Well I was livid about this and on my lunch break I left the Comcast dispatching building and went over to CSI to confront Tom Forse
Keep in mind that I worked with other employees that were Comcast dispatchers as well as the contractor dispatchers. All dispatching was done from one building, so I had the opportunity to get to know a lot about what went on behind the scenes. I was warned about Tom Forse.
OK back to confronting him....he insistently denied what he said but I then confirmed it by contacting the president.
I asked Tom Forse pretty simple technical questions that he could not answer...I then told him that selling HSI demanded that a person have some technical background just in case the customers had questions.
I knew that my dream of getting out of dispatching was just that...a dream.
I informed the president that I was searching for work geared more towards what I was trained for because dispatching was not a part of what I wanted to do and the job itself was dead end.
I gave him a heads up on this so the company could have time to replace me.
The president of the company was not pleased about this at all and shortly afterwards I received a call from Tom Forse while I was at work in dispatching inquiring about "how to alter a document that was scanned". I was floored at his request and was at a loss for words because all I could think about were the warnings about him and his criminal ways.So I decided to tell him that I didn't know what the extension was thinking that he would just give up...he told me the extension...I then asked him what it was that he was wanting to copy and he told me that it was none of my business. He then asked me if I had software that would allow him to make changes to documents and I said that I did but the EULA would not allow me to install it on his computer. Besides that I bought this software for my use not his and it is registered to me and I knew that I would be the blame for any wrong doing. I informed Tom Forse that he could buy this software at Office Depot and that someone there would help him find the right software that he needed. I did not want to be a part of this scandal. I felt it my responsibility to let the president know what was going on.
I called Mark Demlers cell phone and he instantly turned things around stating that he had complaints about me from Comcast dispatching. I talked to everyone over there and nobody had problems with me It was just made up to cover their tracks about the scandal that was unfolding.
Meanwhile things seemingly got worse at work. Tom Forse and Gerald Pena were constantly calling me and trying to establish a lunch date with Tom Forse.
I was put in a very uncomfortable position and was nervous about why he wanted to take me out to lunch when I had nothing to do with sales.
Gerald Pena who was my manager at the time and from the beginning was the one trying to orchestrate the luncheon. I told Gerald of my uneasiness of the situation and refused to go alone with Tom Forse. I informed him that HE had to go as well or I would not go. They persisted and I was troubled by this and took it to the lead dispatcher Troy Jenkins who was one of many that informed me to be cautious of Tom Forse. He even said that it was a good idea to not go and that he believed he was up to something.
That issue did die down and eventually go away because I did not comply due to lack of trust.
And rightfully so.
There was a day that I had to go to the office and take care of the network there because Tom Forse screwed it up trying to connect his computer to it.
I was left there unattended and there was some paperwork on his desk that was changed, copied, changed, copied and changed and copied again.
The paperwork was part of the weekly work done by an installer that he was lessening the work that was done by the installer and making it look like he was doing the work.I also found paperwork on installers that were not bonded and was out on jobs.
Everyone that warned me about Tom Forse was so right on the money about how he was.
I started searching for another job even harder than I did before as I just didn't want to be any part of this company.
Work got harder and harder due to lack of communication on the radios. This was intentional I believe because Nextel never had issues hooking up the radios when I worked in the office but now there were issues? For 4 months.
I could not have proper communication with the installers and some did not meet time frames or was in a bind and I could not contact them on the radios to help resolve it.
I had to play phone tag with the customers that the installers had lined up to see where they were so I could put in the computer that they had completed their jobs...but sometimes the installers could not be reached so I could not close out the job till I knew for a fact that it was done.
I was blamed for this and was yelled at.
This put a lot of pressure on me and then I also found out that I was the lowest paid dispatcher.
I said that I would stay (only because I couldn't seem to find work in the IT field) but I had worked there for almost a year and asked for a 25 cent raise.
I was denied this but some of the installers were getting bonuses.
I then had to start putting in overtime because after my shift there was nobody to replace me and nobody else at Comcast wanted to take over the routes and taking care of the installers because of the problems that entailed it.
I had tried getting in touch with the manager to tell him about this problem because I was told not to accumulate any overtime but he could not be reached.
it was an issue that was never resolved
So I started writing down the over time because I believed that I needed to be compensated for the time that was put in.
I also had other dispatchers that will testify me trying to get in touch with the manager and not being able to reach him.
I never got compensated for the overtime, rather I was written up for it.
I was also written up for calling the new supervisor shamu. It was a joke between me and the installers and never left us but Tom Forse overheard the installers talking about him and the fact that they did not like him and referred to him as shamu. He was called a lot worse by the other installers and I was the one that tamed it down to shamu. We were in a small circle when we were talking and there were no customers around.
I admitted to it but wanted Tom Forse to admit that he was bad mouthing the installers by saying that they were paranoid scitzos when I went to talk to him about taking over the HSI. He never did.
One day before labor day was set on a Monday when converter control was closed.
All equipment for the following day had to be gotten that day ahead of time.
Tom Forse AND Gerald Pena came into dispatching demanding that I take care of this by letting all of the techs know they needed to get their equipment for tomorrow today before 3pm.
I was at that point on the phone per Comcast resolving an issue with a customer and was almost done with the call but Gerald informed me that I needed to hang up with the customer and listen to them.
They both Comcast and csi put me in the middle of stress leaving me no option but to mess up one or the other. Catch 22.
Gerald cornered me in the cubicle, getting up in my face like they do in the military and I told him that he was in my personal space and to please back off, he did not comply and I had to threaten to quit to make him leave. He scared me as he had talked about killing women and children while in the military (Marines) when we were going to accounts together while I was training him for the HSI.
My father was a marine but he NEVER talked candidly or openly about his time in war. And my father was in no way a threat so I do not believe that this killer instinct should be brought out in civilian life.
My father NEVER bragged about the lives he had to take during war time but Gerald Pena did.
Plus he was an erratic driver running red lights and turning into oncoming traffic.
I hated riding with him when I was training with him. He is a danger on the road.
And because of all that has occurred, I lost my job.
All over their lies.
I went on with my life and looked to find employment but Tom Forse put a crease in that whenever an employer called he bashed me, making it seem like I was the worst employee stating that I arrived late when I never did and that I was lazy which I was not. I know that there is a law against this and I do have witnesses.
Now that I have decided to come forward I have lost a TV, a VCR, a DVD player and now a high dollar computer...all rendered useless.
Comcast has also lost equipment as well...a lot of equipment. I have the paper to prove it.
What they are doing is sending spikes through the lines and killing our equipment...I have since the day of the internet going down have lost rights to my router 5 times...someone keeps changing my settings and putting a computer in DMZ mode. I called tech support and was told that my modem was misconfigured but nobody has been out to replace it. I had to hack my own router just to get to the settings and found out then. The logs were intentionally wiped to cover any traces. I have had to reset my router 5 times so far. This is nonsense and I want a full investigation on Comcast and CSI done.
I also want my computer replaced with one of equal value...same parts, same hard drive, etc.
I dont think I am asking for much.
Until these issues are resolved, I am dropping Comcast all together and going DSL. At least their lines are dedicated and they do care about their customers.
I will miss the line speed but it is always condusive to DSL speeds, and I am sure there is nobody there that will sabotage my equipment and if something did happen, they would resolve the problem with quickness.
A happy customer is a customer that will remain one.
Sincerely, Carlene
COMMENT #115 [Permalink]
...
Carlene
said on 8/11/2005 @ 3:27 pm PT...
Just got off the phone with Scott Marbie and he stated that there was no way that Comcast could tap into your services and destroy anything...he said anything...well we um know better.
He went as far as to say that he didnt want me as a customer and the feeling is quite mutual...SBC here I come! I will not stop now though! with a court case...I want to find more people that have had their equipment destroyed and file a class action lawsuit. I have been black listed and the idiot that had me fired Tom Forse is buddies with ol Scotty boy.
What a riot
COMMENT #116 [Permalink]
...
kebbs
said on 10/12/2005 @ 5:00 am PT...
:angry:Comcast !!! Dreadful ISP ... they have now taken to blocking ALL my email from pals who use "tesco.net" .... because of "abuse".
And what do those 'wonderful' Techies at Comcast tell me? "You need to reboot your computer." This dispite a detailed ERROR/blacklist email message from my Tesco ISP user send via someone else who can email me.
Odd now isn't it ??? Tesco is a British company.
Comcast "reeks" !!!
COMMENT #117 [Permalink]
...
m dizzle
said on 11/21/2005 @ 10:21 am PT...
COMMENT #118 [Permalink]
...
Andrea Jasperson
said on 2/8/2006 @ 8:51 am PT...
COMMENT #119 [Permalink]
...
pralki
said on 5/1/2006 @ 6:34 pm PT...
In a Feb 2002 article on Yahoo that I just googled, Comcast announced that it would not collect information about the web usage of its members. I'm just wondering, under the Patriot Act, do they not have no obligation to be truthful about their practices of web logging?
COMMENT #120 [Permalink]
...
andrew
said on 5/8/2006 @ 9:48 pm PT...
COMMENT #121 [Permalink]
...
Isaac Marowitz
said on 5/11/2006 @ 5:01 am PT...
COMMENT #122 [Permalink]
...
claire
said on 5/28/2006 @ 8:28 am PT...
i cannot get onto my msn because it says that my email adress afta @ is a domain email and when i try to sign in it changes my password!!!