On today’s BradCast, we continue to focus on the critical November 8 midterms as we will most likely be doing between now and then and — given how important and close many key races are expected to be — probably well beyond Election Day. [Audio link to full show follows this summary.]
We’re joined today by EDDIE PEREZ, who has spent more than 20 years focused on elections in various capacities. He spent some 15 years at the Austin, Texas-based Hart-Intercivic, one of the big three private voting system vendors in the U.S. He moved on to become Global Director of Technology and Standards at the nonpartisan, nonprofit Open Source Election Technology (OSET) Institute before, last year, becoming Twitter’s Director of Product Management for Societal Health, where he played a role in fighting against mis- and disinformation at the beleaguered social media site. He left the company recently (before Elon Musk’s takeover) and remains a Board Member at OSET.
Perez has been writing, blogging and tweeting of late on what he sees as “manufactured chaos” by Republicans in advance of the 2022 midterms, calling the threat they pose a “a knife at democracy’s throat” and charging that the chaos is now “on a collision course” with next week’s elections.
He worries and warns, both in his writing and on today’s program, of “coordinated attempts to interfere with or potentially overwhelm what can broadly be regarded as normal election administration processes.”
As usual, when Perez is kind enough to join us, he (a former voting system vendor) and I (a long time Election Integrity journalist and critic of vulnerable, difficult-to-oversee voting systems) both tussle and find common ground on many of these topics. We also discuss concerns about “manufactured chaos” on Twitter as well, now that Musk has reportedly withdrawn access to content moderation tools previously used by staffers to help curb toxic disinformation.
“It’s genuinely not really clear whether Elon Musk fully appreciates the harm that can come from a social media platform, particularly in the realm of elections,” Perez frets, adding that “we have seen this spin off in to political violence.” He notes “the concerns are very real,” but believes the “wheels haven’t fallen off Twitter”, at least not yet, assuring that there are “still good people there.”
He warns, however, “it’s a fragile time” and says it’s good to have “conversations like this so that we can talk to your listeners about what they should be paying attention to and what they can maybe do to cut through some of the noise.”
We discuss examples of chaos that most worry him and how no small part of the lack of confidence Americans now have in our election system may actually be due to the way voting system vendors and election officials have spent years preventing oversight by the public. Of course, much of it is due to Donald Trump’s lies about the 2020 election. But Perez concedes that insiders, in fact, now pose a unique threat to democracy, as demonstrated by GOP officials facilitating the breach of voting system hardware and software in several different states and releasing its proprietary software to potentially nefarious individuals. Can that previously secret code now be used to undermine those systems next week? If so, how so?
“It has certainly not helped public trust in the machinery of democracy that voting technology is limited to as few companies as it is,” Perez concedes, citing the proprietary software now used to run elections and tally votes in almost every jurisdiction in the country. “There is no doubt that having that whole ecosystem — that can fairly be called a ‘black box’ — is not helping. It is a kind of tinder box and has turned into a vacuum of information that a lot of conspiracy theorists have been happy to fill.”
“On something as essential as the legitimacy of the outcomes in our public elections — which, again, involves process and involves voting technology — we can never ever discount the importance of transparency and accountability,” he tells me, citing some of my own advocacy and criticism of voting systems and vendors over the years. “In that sense, I don’t think it’s unreasonable for some people to say that was a collective failure and, yes, that has contributed to us having a lot of the challenges that we’re in today.”
Of course, we also discuss what Americans can do now — from voters to election officials to journalists — to gird for the chaos that is almost certain to come and how best to defend against it.
Also today, several recent legal rulings in response to an explosion of election law challenges manufacturing more chaos around the 2022 elections…
- Our corrupt U.S. Supreme Court, along with the unexpected death of the Pennsylvania Supreme Court’s Chief Justice, allows Republicans to obtain a ruling that may allow them to reject thousands of completely legitimate absentee ballots across the Keystone State, due to missing or incorrect dates written on their outer envelopes.
- A Trump-appointed federal judge in Arizona issues a ruling [PDF] to block voter intimidation near absentee ballot drop boxes, where masked rightwingers, toting guns and clad in tactical gear, have been menacing and photographing voters dropping of their ballots.
- Nevada‘s Sec. of State shuts down a slapdash, nascent rightwing effort in Nye County to hand-count early and absentee ballots after the hand-counters were said to be revealing results to the public during their tally in defiance of a state Supreme Court order. Thankfully, given the very few ballots they were able to count before being shut down (just 50 on their first day, in a County with some 30,000 voters), the damage was contained. But expect more such “manufactured chaos” between now and next Tuesday and, almost certainly, well beyond…
(Comments are now closed.)