We have a number of encouraging items on today’s BradCast, believe it or not, regarding elections and campaign finance for a change.
But first today, after an emotional debate in South Carolina, the Confederate flag will finally come down at the state capitol on Friday – clearing the way for debate on stuff that may actually reduce gun violence, racism and terrorism. But in the U.S. House, it’s business as usual as the GOP fails on a Confederate flag-related amendment.
After that, another reminder why Internet Voting would be a disaster, and a bit of Trump news (which I know you crave every single moment — don’t lie!), some very good news today from the Florida Supreme Court on redistricting and even more good news from the U.S. Court of Appeals in D.C. on campaign finance.
Hamline University professor of political science and law David Schultz — author of last year’s Election Law and Democratic Theory
Among those steps, the FCC, for example, could immediately require free airtime for candidates over our public airwaves. “About 60-70% of all the money that will be spent in Presidential elections will be spent on media advertising predominantly on television,” Schultz explains. “Forty years ago, the average time that a candidate got on the national news to describe his or her position was about a minute. Now it’s down to about ten seconds.”
“Requiring that free air time would be perfectly Constitutional” in exchange for licenses granted by the FCC. “If the FCC can move on Net Neutrality, it can move on this.” But that’s just one of several executive agencies which the President could instruct to take action without the need for Congress or amendments to the U.S. Constitution.
Plus: Desi Doyen joins us for the latest Green News Report on the terrible climate position of the latest Democrat to enter the 2016 Presidential race and much more…
Corporations are like the young adult still living in your basement. They want all the amenities that come from living at home, without having to pay for them. All the money they earn, they feel goes only to them and not to be contributed to the good of the family dwelling. All family benefts must go to everyone including the basement dweller. They also want to control what happens in the house that directly affect them, even though they do little to contribute to the family financial situation. All in all, many corporation are slackers. They are worse then the proverbial “welfare moms” because welfare moms’ expenses are relatively limited, while corporations costs to society are ever increasing.