3 Responses

1. 

   1)

   Shari Harris-Dunning said on 11/5/2004 @ 3:45pm PT: [Permalink]

   Have you seen this?

   http://www.house.gov/judiciary_...04ltr11504.pdf

   Do you know whether this is what Atrios was talking about? Do you know if this will have any legs?

   What about the Greg Palast article — will any of the "spoiled" ballots in Ohio be counted?

2. 

   2)

   Brad said on 11/5/2004 @ 6:24pm PT: [Permalink]

   Thanks for the link to that letter, Shari. I’ve included it in an UPDATE to the breaking story about the Request for the GAO Inquiry.

   Don’t know if that’s what Atrios was referring to or not. But I believe it *definitely* has legs. There’s too many reports of too many creepy/odd/anomalous things to be ignored. But, yes, it does require that folks like you keep spreading the word about it! It was that word that finally got to the Dems offices (as the letter you pointed to notes).

   As to the Palast article, I haven’t yet reported on that here because, for the moment, it’s largely speculative and would really only come into play once the margin in Ohio was narrowed to trigger a recount by law. We’re not yet there…But we may be soon if things keep going the way they are.

3. 

   3)

   Shari Harris-Dunning said on 11/6/2004 @ 6:16am PT: [Permalink]

   Brad,
   Here is a link to the House Committee on the Judiciary, Democratic Members, with a link to the .pdf letter. It also has a telephone number.

   http://www.house.gov/judiciary_...ats/index.html

   I had thought about calling them directly, thanking them for their interest in this matter and finding out what we, the people can do to keep this alive and the momentum moving forward.

   I’m having a hard time linking to some of the other forums, can you spread this link around?