READER COMMENTS ON
"Republican Terrorism Rising, Reports Maddow"
(12 Responses so far...)
COMMENT #1 [Permalink]
...
Floridiot
said on 3/24/2010 @ 3:05 pm PT...
COMMENT #2 [Permalink]
...
Lora
said on 3/24/2010 @ 4:51 pm PT...
It's somewhat remarkable that Maddow never uses the word "terrorism" in this report, despite this meeting the very definition of the word.
Actually, she does, about two-thirds of the way through, complete with definition.
COMMENT #3 [Permalink]
...
Lora
said on 3/24/2010 @ 5:04 pm PT...
Where, oh, where, are the responsible GOP leaders who ought to be denouncing what's going on here loudly and clearly?
The answer, my friend, is blowing in the wind....
Scary stuff. Orchestrated. Directed. Flames are being fanned. A military coup is not an impossibility in the US of A. It is becoming less and less unlikely the longer the Democrats and friends of the Dems (Y'know, that "enemy of my enemy" thing) keep their heads stuck firmly in the sand.
Perhaps we need to take a harder look at that 2nd amendment and see how we can apply it to ourselves. We might actually NEED to for self-defense for real.
War is Peace
Freedom is Slavery
Ignorance is Strength
COMMENT #4 [Permalink]
...
MsKitty
said on 3/24/2010 @ 7:48 pm PT...
The Minnesota events were definitely co-ordinated. The other events inspired by kooks, but perhaps more random. This is out of control.
Why can't they wait for the slower more messy process of democracy? Maybe because they are thugs and they really don't believe in it.
COMMENT #5 [Permalink]
...
Nita
said on 3/24/2010 @ 8:34 pm PT...
Rachael, The anger is not really about Health care. Its been brewing since Obama became President. They are saying, how dear that Man....., I will not use the word they are using behind close doors, get something done in this country. We dont want him to be successful at anything. We want him to fail. It is the color of his skin that has them so angry.
COMMENT #6 [Permalink]
...
BlueHawk
said on 3/25/2010 @ 6:59 am PT...
These Gun rights kooks....Seem to miss the obvious point that IF THE GOVERNMENT decided to come against the people; the people's guns won't be a defense....the only thing your gun will defend you against is your neighbor; not the government.
Guns are an effective weapon in a civil war against other citizens...but have zero effectiveness against the government, if that government decided to turn on the people...the government could squash an army of rifle wielding citizens without a troop being on the ground...
I think these racist militia types know that...this guns vs government rhetoric is actually coded language for racial/political civil war.
If they can't beat the libs at the polls...then they'll shoot 'em dead in the streets...it's their answer to civil rights legislation back in the 60s. They've never gotten over that.
silly Elmer Fudds
COMMENT #7 [Permalink]
...
Nancy Tobi
said on 3/25/2010 @ 7:51 am PT...
I am a bit conflicted about the headline here pointing the finger of blame to the GOP. On the one hand, there is nothing that indicates these are GOP-orchestrated events. On the other hand, I keep thinking of the brownshirt tactics used by the GOP - starring Chief Justice Roberts - when Florida tried to actually count the votes in Election 2000. I suppose as long as the GOP refuses to disassociate themselves with these wackjobs then they seem to be implicitly involved. We can look back to the under-reported and under-investigated break-ins of Dem headquarters during past elections as the pre-cursor to this. It's times like these that I long for the relatively simple and innocent abuses of Nixon.
COMMENT #8 [Permalink]
...
Big Dan
said on 3/25/2010 @ 10:17 am PT...
In all their amendments, why aren't Republicans offering amendments to get rid of "death panels" and things they claimed that were in the bill? Because there was no such thing, so they can't amend the things they lied about? Or are Republicans FOR the death panels, because they're not offering an amendment to remove them?
COMMENT #9 [Permalink]
...
Big Dan
said on 3/25/2010 @ 10:22 am PT...
Nancy: if the GOP has nothing to do with it, then why do they feel they are the "spokesmen" to offer up comments on behalf of the violence? IE: "We're against this, BUT....". Always the "but". "...BUT, people are angry". Yeah, because the GOP and rightwing radio are very good at stoking their anger and then saying they had nothing to do with it. Didn't Boehner say someone was a "Dead man", and Palin has crosshairs on her website with Dems names in them? And I can go on and on an on...and then they say they have nothing to do with it! Where's Frank Schaeffer when you need a column by him???
"We're not saying we're FOR the violence against Democrats, BUT............."
COMMENT #10 [Permalink]
...
john
said on 3/26/2010 @ 11:34 pm PT...
If the GOP isn't sanctioning it outright with terms like Reveolution, Armageddon, and Government Take Over, which we have all heard in the last week by the LEADERSHIP of the Republican party, which are all on video tape, then they're doing it indirectly. And by that, they are still responsible. The tiger is lose and this group of militia has a voice. Should be a long summer.
COMMENT #11 [Permalink]
...
Matt Osborne
said on 3/27/2010 @ 1:57 am PT...
The word everyone is looking for is "sedition."
COMMENT #12 [Permalink]
...
squawkinmynah
said on 4/4/2010 @ 9:04 pm PT...
http://www.nytimes.com/2...vuweg&pagewanted=all
instead of violence, use your brains and come back with articles like the above.
"Agencys 04 rule Let banks Pile up new debt"
by Stephen Labaton/Nytimes.com
some people forget, who put the country in this big mess..remember this one brad?