Well she DID know Coulter was a snake when she picked on the drag queen. And true to form Coulter bit. We have to stop expecting people like Coulter to act appropriately or professionally...or honestly...or legally.

hey, can't lydia sue annthrax for that?

{ed note: Private info suggested to be Ann Coulter's home address and phone numbers removed}

{abusive comment removed by WP}

anncright@aol.com

http://www.columbia.edu/...-list/2001/12/00011.html
http://shows.airamericar.../alfrankenshow/node/3161
http://www.aliraqi.org/f...e/index.php/t-48307.html

ann@anncoulter.org
tom@anncoulter.org

She is part of the Culture of Hate, what else could you expect. I do hope Lydia takes legal action. Also remember telephone harrassment is a federal offense that carries prison time. Caller ID and answering machines are good proof in court.

Another pathetic cry for attention.
What a bitch.

Why'd you vote for Reagan?

OK, so I had to go and look at the Hate Queen's website. I've never been there before. For all her trashing of Lydia, I think she knows she's not a patch on her...I mean check out the head shot in the upper left - looks like she's trying to cop lydia's hairstyle.

But how about this in the first paragraph - "As we now know, Saddam Hussein was working with al-Qaida"....come again? Hussein had two meetings, by my understanding, with al-Qaida, at which point he determined that he wanted nothing to do with them, that they were dangerous to his secular dictatorship. Come on Coulter, we know you're evil, but you're not stupid....are you?

to #8 Re voting for Reagan --- I was unconscious in the 80's. Just like Arianna, as I became more enlightened, I became more liberal. But had to gain a lot of humility first.

Well, rest assured that in 5 to 10 years, Ann won't be any more significant than a bug's asshole on my windshield.. she'll be as withered and useless, and thought about as much, too..

I just find it mind boggling that someone like Ann can say "Democrats are Anti-American" in one breath, then the ignorant bitch says "I'm not a fan of the 1st Amendment" in the next? What can be MORE Anit-American that that? And, she's using her 1st Amendment rights to say it.. Don't people understand that that's a psychosis?

What's worse is, we seem to be a nation with near 1/3 of our population running around as functional psychotics.. Or perhaps it's more akin to Retardation? Either way, it's mind boggling..

Though, Doug.. as you pointed out, the things Ann (and the rest of the nut-jobs of her [not]thinking) is calling for have been done in repressive nations around the world at all kinds of times in history. Every time, the oppressors get killed and the people get their freedom (well, perhaps not every time, but every time in OUR history). Let her push her insanity on the masses.. we'll just rise up and revolt.. again.. No big deal (well, other than the massive loss of life and destruction of wealth and destabilization of various economies.. but.. no biggy, right?)

If Bradblog were not making an enormous difference, Ann Coulter wouldn't bother responding to criticism. She doesn't like "talking to liberals," remember.

What clearer proof could there be that blogs have replaced the mainstream media as the primary news sources of influence? Take a bow, Brad

Not just his, Robert, but in actuality all blogs. And the good blogs far outweigh the bad, hence their approach to now replacing corporate media outlets as news sources.

I'm sure the climactic shift is just the beginning of that enterprise.

Doug E.

So?
What you can dish it out but you cannot take it?
LOL
Bloggers are such big babies
You make fun of the lady, she gives it back and you cannot take it
Now you cry to mommy
:laugh:

:)When I look at a picture of Ann Cuntler the only thing I think about is a bet I have with a buddy of mine as to how long of a penis can Cuntler swallow. That long neck, that big mouth, there's no telling, she might be the blowjob queen of the western hemisphere. But then again, who would want to have her that close to you.

She will help remove neoCons in the '06 election, and replace them with sane folk, so let her babble on in Babylon.

Nevertheless, someone give her what she needs and wants most, a spanking.

Re: #15 above . . .

Um, criticizing mAnn Coulter is not the same thing as pre-emptively publishing her personal contact information.

God DAMN, are you stupid.

Lydia, you are a FOX
Ann is a skank

nuff said about that

A tip for Lydia: Ann Coulter (A-C, same initials as the Anti-Christ) might be able to understand your questions if you speak in tongues!

Plans for a prison for Demcrats?

Better move fast Ann there are more of us being locked up every day. Fortunately, are numbers are growing faster than neo-cons can think up new reasons we went to Iraq.

Coulter would have made a great Nazi stormtrooper --- obedience to authority, fascist belief system, following the orders of the propaganda meisters, no critical thinking involved ... yep, a perfect fascist/nazi like limbaugh, falwell, robertson, bush, cheney, rumsfeld, and all the mental midgets in the repug party

Any Canadian Liberals here? SO LONG SUCKERS! HAHAHAHAHAH

Um, the cons won't last long up there,
the Canucks are smarter than most in this country

The trouble with Ann Coulter is that the peroxide in her hair does not mix well with the water on her brain.

The trouble with Ann Coulter is that the peroxide in her hair does not mix well with the water on her brain.

Where did Ann Coulter come from? I know she says Connecticut, but who really knows? Didn't anyone go to high school with her/him? Did she have them all murdered? Why haven't we ever heard anything about the early life of Andrew/Ann Coulter?

That's what I want to know.

.
.
.
This is still one of my favourites of Anne "I'll get back to you on that (LOL!)" Coulter.

.
.
.

She's a pea-brained threat monger:

"I think a baseball bat is the most effective way [to talk to liberals] these days."

I'd be glad to have that discussion with her. I hit .450 last time out.

Ann lives next to the zoo?????

There are so many jokes here.....

Someone should nab a glass or a utensil that AC has used and do a DNA test to see if she's really female. I have my doubts.

Ann Coulter and Rush Limbaugh must have had a hand in the neoCon strategy of late.

Their war views, along with other neoCons, has led to what one Historian has called the worst military misadventure since 9 BC. This is said about the professor:

To describe Iraq as the most foolish war of the last 2,014 years is a sweeping statement, but the writer is well qualified to know.

"He is Martin van Creveld, a professor at the Hebrew University in Jerusalem and one of the world's foremost military historians. Several of his books have influenced modern military theory and he is the only non-American author on the US Army's list of required reading for officers. (link here, bold added).

Don't Ann Coulter and Rush Limbaugh yet understand that rank stupidity is harmful to America?

"Another pathetic cry for attention.
What a bitch."

Don't be so hard on Lydia. It's hard to get a job in this town ya know!

Liberals are a bunch of whiners and now are faced to actually produce evidence rather than make hysterical accusastions and expect people to believe them.

The big difference between Ann and these airheads is that ANN IS SUCCESSFUL! You guys need a new gimmick, really.

Won't SOMEONE find Ann Coulter a husband? Even a boyfriend might do. If that is possible.

Is Ann on some sort of GOP drug? look at this quote
"As we now know, Saddam Hussein was working with al-Qaida and was trying to acquire long-range missiles from North Korea and enriched uranium from Niger."
on the front page of her web site. what a complete IDIOT!!

She must have forgotten that

Scott Ritter's team
Hans Blix's team
David Kay's team
James Conway's team (Military inspection team)
The 75th exploitation taskforce (team of military experts comprised of biologists,chemists, nuclear specialists, treaty enforcers, and computer/document specialists)
Charles Douffer's team

ALL SAY NO WMD, NUKES, OR LINKS

But they all must be flag burning liberal Freedom haters. DUH!!!

If you losers can't play with the big dogs, then quit trying to get their attention!

Because of you, Ann's next book is going to skyrocket in sales.

A DNA test would show that not only is she not a female, it would show that she is not really human. When did she show up on this earth? Was it around the time of the UFO landing in Roswell?

I don't read Ann Coulter for the same reason I don't read the National Enquirer.

There are more intelligent and much more entertaining forms of fiction available.

Ann and Rush should learn from the Snottie McClelland debacle.

Anyone notice that in the court of public opinion he is a neoConvict, guilty of outright falshoods concerning what he said about Scooter and Karl.

Either they lied to him and he is a nincompoop, or he jumped in and lied too.

He has not been seen since he said Murtha was aiding and abetting terrorists. He has not been seen for 19 days (link here).

He hasn't been believed since Jeffie Gannon fled town.

Annie and Rushie take note ... stop quoting Snottie.

"There are more intelligent and much more entertaining forms of fiction available."

Which is why you read the Bradblog.

I read Ricky posts for fiction. Keep it up Ricky, you will make the bu$hit library down in Crawford.

So will the ramblings of George Bush Democrat Joe Lieberman (link here) and Zel Miller.

Wow, imagine a neoCon library with Zel, Ann, Joe, Snottie, Jeffie, and the supreme Lie-on King hissself. Talk about fiction ...

For Helen Handbasket (love that name): I have an answer to your questions about Ann Coulter.

She grew up in New Canaan, Connecticut. She was two years ahead of my oldest daughter at New Canaan H.S. (Marnie didn't remember her from school, so she wasn't exactly a student leader). Ann graduated from N.C.H.S. in the Class of 1980.

I lived in New Canaan from 1973 to 2000, but never knew her parents, nor anyone who did know them.

I don't think she ever married. If Ricky is single, I hope they get together. It would be an ideal match.

I'm sorry - who's this "Ann" person? Someone important?

"Re: #15 above . . .
"Um, criticizing mAnn Coulter is not the same thing as pre-emptively publishing her personal contact information.
"God DAMN, are you stupid. "

OK. you are sexist and homophobic (mAnn Coulter) and profane. But you don't seem to have a cogent response. Just thin skin
This "personal contact information" is also known as an E-Mail!

:laugh: :laugh: :laugh:

She's that Lydia Cornell? I watched every episode of that dumb show because I couldn't take my eyes off her. A supernaturally gorgeous babe. Satann Coulter is just doing this because the thrill gives him an erection. Steer clear of such sickos.

These characters like Ann the Arthur Coltrane Coulter are akin to those crazed mendacious washerwomen stuck in a Washhouse all alone, and no one to talk to, so they talk to themselves (she has to while away the time, washing dirty nappies, and making those good for re use again). In the echo chamber of the Washhouse, the echo of their own harangues soon convinces these washerwomen of the righteous soul that they are, and the oh so righteous drivel they spouse (now, it should be noted that anyone earning their living through washing is not denigrated at all, however, being a washerwoman, somehow does not form the basis for a political leader, talking head, and or opinion former!)

In effect the Protocols of the Washhouse, are a singularity of time and space that has no relevance or bearing on any other reality, hence this chestnut of Saddam al Qaeda relationship. Now as we know the trouble with the Main Stream Media is; its open loop nature, that is the drivel that gets spewed at any moment, is not certain to have found any buyers among its target audience, for that matter, all propaganda suffer from the same malaise. Hence, this is reflected in the propensity for increasing volume, frequency, and absurdity of the claims to the extent of the sublime, as evident in the attempts of most of those subscribing to the Protocols of the Washhouse.

Now these Washhouse workers are reliant on the ignorance of their target audience, and the inevitable lack of sophistication thereof, in keeping up with the developments around the globe. Further, since the absurd claims that they make, needs a particularly disingenuous character or to put it plainly a particular kind of fraudulent sociopath. Hence, the recruits invariably suffer from various ailments of the mind, manifested through deviant behaviour of these sociopaths, which is often covered up, not all that well.

The validation of this deviant behaviour can be found in the manifestly displayed criminal conduct (in a serial fashion) of the various elders of the Washhouse. This point needs no further elaboration, as the daily developing diet of the unfolding stories in any numbers of the media would suffice. However, upon outing these charlatans, their response borders vindictive, insane, and almost animalistic. This too, can be explained away through their inane inability to reason, and maintain a coherent discourse. Therefore it should come as no surprise witnessing the current course of conduct of Ann the Arthur Coltrane coulter.

I hope it was mine! She's a man, baby! Todd Rundgren look-alike!

Can someone post a pic of her sans the blonde hair? Bald? Please? Some of you are good at that...

N.B.

Protocols of the elders of the Washhouse are our trademark, in compliance with GNU.

She is one of others that are rude and big mouth .All Republician seem to out in on the Democrates while they are speaking .

Who are these crazy women anyway? I read some articles on this Coulter womans website.Woah! She`s a basket case that woman! Supporting Tim McVeigh,hating europeans more than she hates Bin Laden,calling veterans traitors,calling Clinton a rapist...
That other chick can be described with one word:booooooooooooooring.

Good lord, Don (Surber) - I just clicked the link to see what your site had to offer, and I have to say, I was shocked when I saw your picture. Given the tone of your posts on this site, I would have expected - at best - a high school grad photo.

Aren't you a little long in the tooth for all this "nananaNAna" stuff?

And by the way Ricky, Floridiot is most likely right: the Federal Conservative party in Canada is not going to be taking the reins anytime soon. They're just too socially conservative for most Canadians.

Here you are Big Dan #48:

(with William Shatner's hair)

Here you are Big Dan #48:

(with William Shatner's hair)

(by the way, Here's the Anne "I'll get back to you on that" Coulter link again --- mislinked above)

.
.
.

Arrgh!

Haven't done that in awhile here.
.
.
.

.
.
.
Hello Kitty:

Speaking of Canada --- Despite what CNN says, Quebec is still a part of Canada. Sheesh! Try to be a little more sensitive CNN!

.
.
.

I hope that Lydia sues the hell out of that bitch. It is illegal to post private information on the internet. It's time mAnn Coulter got what's coming to her.

She's a piece of shit.

I hope they find her penis and reattach it.

America will eventually turn on KKKoulter and rest of their ilk, and it won't be pretty.

The gradualness of America's coming back to its senses will be exceeded only by the viciousness of the backlash of middle America against ALL things rightwing and coulter-like.

I predict a period of schadenfrude for liberals and moderates that will be unprecedented in its ferocity against all things conservative.

The fact that it is so long in coming (due largely to constantly enabling and protective coverage of rightwing crimes by the MSM), will just make it that much more intense when it gets here.

For all things rightwing/GOP...

Pain delayed is pain INCREASED.

And the MSM will be a BIG target of the
backlash too.

You can count on that.

Can I just say? I am a hetero married woman and I would do Cornell over Coulter anyday. Coulter is so SPENT. Can this used dishrag of a RIGHT WING mouthpiece just retire already?

Not that I would EVER suggest such a thing . . . but what if readers were to flood Ann's email address with bestiality photos and scat photos and all kinds of nasty perverted and illegal sexual images . . . and then the FBI were alerted to the presence of this material on Ann's computer? My goodness . . . that would be terrible!

Leave it to good old Coultergeist to sink to new levels.

Brad,

Since I know your hot on the Diebold subject, I just posted a story on my blog about Diebold trying to hide stuff in their coding. You might be interested in it.

Article Link

Jamie
IntoxiNation

Ann Coulter is a political hag. I wouldn't touch her with Bill Maher's stick.

Ricky - re: #41 - Sorry, but no - I don't come here to read your posts. Besides, I said INTELLIGENT and ENTERTAINING.

Pay attention boy!

Feel sorry for Ann; everone's had her, yet no one will marry her.
I guess it's a good thing really; could anyone picture what her spawn would look like? Half harpy, half lizard, living in the sewers because it can't stand sunlight. A small Don Surber, if you will; feeding on roadkill, and smearing its feces on the walls in an attempt to communicate its wretchedness to the world.

.
.
.
My apologies to William Shatner's hairpiece, btw.
.
.
.

Next I suppose Ann Coulter will just come out and advocate killing liberals. She has come close to that in the past. This is from a recent column:

"The Democrats are giving aid and comfort to the enemy for no purpose other than giving aid and comfort to the enemy. There is no plausible explanation for the Democrats' behavior other than that they long to see U.S. troops shot, humiliated, and driven from the field of battle.

They fill the airwaves with treason, but when called to vote on withdrawing troops, disavow their own public statements. These people are not only traitors, they are gutless traitors."

www.humaneventsonline.com/article.php?id=10514

Lydia! Go, Lydia!
You encyclopydia!

I wouldn't take a hundred mAnn Coulters for one Lydia (come to think of it, in a Weekends With mAnn contest the first prize would be one weekend, second prize would be three weekends, and the booby prize would be five weekends). Lydia - I watched many otherwise fine people sleep through the 80s - who was the lucky Prince Charming who got to wake you up?

Love and Peace from Prague, Bob

ROtFLOL!! Click Donny Surber's site for a great laugh!! Bwaahahahah!! whatta douchebag - nice hair BTW. Don Jaun 'the Gerbil' Shurber fer sure. Bwahhahahah!! This is the kinda needle dick that begs Ann to put the doggie collar back on stud side down.

I don't understand how Ann Coulter thinks, I mean I guess she probably doesn't at a very high level. Somehow she earned a law degree and is able to write these vitriolic tracts. A lot of what is said to her seems to not register in her mind at all, and she just continues on with her myopic ideology and hate. Most of these rightwing pundits aren't much different, so maybe i've happened upon a large scale unexplained phenomenon.

I was going to say, "HEY! Enough with the puerile, hateful, homophobic name-calling!" but the whole mess is so funny --- libs and cons calling each other poo-poo names, and William Shatner's hairpiece, and all --- I am laughing hard enough to pee on myself. Keep this up and I'm gonna hafta do Kegel exercises before I can continue reading!!!!

Please, for our own souls, let us be a little kinder to bony little Ann, that hate-filled, shrieking, completely co-opted waste of skin.

Ann Coulter is a rightwing neocon whore that is pure, unabashed evil.

How touching.....So Mrs. Coulter not only acts like a witch on the air to her surrogates and rabid opponents, she plays one in real life too and openly calls for their detainment in torture camps.....

How's the medicine treating you Coulter? Lately you seem a little on edge. You've just publically called for the enslavement or prison camp of an entire society of people.

Are you on Zanax yet, or anything else I should be openly aware of? Or I'm sure "Herr Norquist" has his own line of idea for the heiress of this fascist Zionist regime, aka Ann Coulter....

What's the payoff do you think? Maybe a book deal...? Be one of the first to "interrogate" the prisoners or spew your rancid bullshit while actively torturing someone?

Say....I heard that happened in Russia too. It led to the death of the first ammendment....that's not a fun road to go down Coulter, especially when it ends up taking you for all you're worth also....

I heard thousands died during that time. Personally I'd be more relieved and better occupied with my time if I saw you thrown into a prison cell in one of those mental wards.....

That's exactly where you belong and you know it, nice talking to you again Ann. I can't imagine what is going to come out of your mouth tomorrow or after!!!!

When Diebold is thrown into the depths of history, propaganda mouthpieces like you will wither away and die and not ever be forgotten in history......there will certainly be a tale to tell there and I have no doubt that you've already taken that medicine to heart..

No doubt either that you, Ann, are a selfish coward in the end who only focuses on her own self-exaltation. Bitter and jealous of those who don't share your view.

Doug Eldritch

Far be it from me to support the annthrax culture (nods to skippy!), but I think focusing on merely insulting her femininity is sinking to the level of our opposition, in their irrelevent attacks on Hillary. (Not that these two women deserve mention in the same breath, but...)

Isn't there enough terrorific and brain-putrifying commentary issuing forth from annthrax's mouth to suit all and sundry pundits without resorting to lobbing attacks at her adam's apple? After all, shouldn't the Democratic party be more inclusive and accepting of transgendered people?

Let's focus on that part of her that's of much more intense interest, the cavity in her skull where the brain should be, but where, instead, an overgrown gallbladder has taken root, and is manufacturing gall stones right and le...er, far right....

Maybe if Coulter and Cheney got together (you know...like "got together") there would be so much evil in one place and time that the laws of morality and physics would bend and they would collapse in on each other and become a black hole...a special kind of black hole that would only suck in more evil...WHOOOSH!...there went Bush.. Rice.. Rummy.. Zell Miller.. Karl Ro (*cough* - nope, the universe can't handle that much evil in one place)

Wishful thinking, I know

Hey anyone else notice how all of Ann Coulter's "official" photographs remove her gigantic Adam's Apple? Not really important in the big scheme of things but its really telling of her character. Hey Ann! Its 2005! You can come out of the closet now and tell us about that night you and Matt Drudge went through 3 dozen eggs!
http://archive.salon.com...0/03/08/npwed/print.html

In an interesting "google fight" for webpage results, pitting Ann Coulter against all three Lydia Cornell, Brad Friedman, and Dan Borcher, Ann Coulter wins hands down almost doubling the web page contents of all three ranters combined.

Results:

Ann Coulter: 3,920,000 results
Brad Friedman, Lydia Cornell, and Dan Borcher total combined: 1,996,440 results

Checking other liberal heavyweights like Michael Moore, Alan Colmes, Phil Donahue, Katie Couric, Bill Maher....who have attemtped to defeat Coulter and have not done so (not to mention Al Franken), it makes me wonder. What new information do these three have that the big wigs missed?

And more importantly....WHO'S GOING TO CARE?

She's just a petty, vain jokester.

She'll say anything, just like Malkin, to stay on people's radar. And, the louder she is, the dumber she makes her "side" look.

Conservative female pundits are a lot like the women on the Girls Gone Wild videos... they will subject themselves to any indignity for a moment of attention.

I feel kind of sorry for her because this sort of self-demeaning behavior tends to wear a person out in the minds of their consumers. So they have to try harder and harder to "sparkle" for the simians that they rely on for attention.

She should just concentrate on being a good person... then she would have a little more longevity and dignity.

You know what I've noticed? The people who come here and crap on liberals are simply changing the subject, reframing, and then attacking with the new subject. They have studied their Rovian playbooks very well.

It goes something like this:

Us: Posting someone's home phone number and other personal information on the internet is wrong. (Opinion based on the universal rules of netiquette)

Them: You people are so fucking pathetic, learn to play with the big dogs and bring proof with you next time! (red herrings, ad hominum attacks, obfuscation, etc.)

Once you see a pattern, it's easier to call it out.

re: Comment #24 from Ricky:
(Any Canadian Liberals here? SO LONG SUCKERS! HAHAHAHAHAH)
Yes, there is a liberal Canadian here, and he's already laughing his ass off at Stephen Harper's political ineptitude.
You see, we are just 17 short months removed from Harper blowing a sure-fire Conservative Party majority by allowing the rightwing nuts in his party (cult?) to spout off about abortion, same-sex marriage, the Rapture, etc. in the final week of a campaign HE WAS ACTUALLY WINNING. In less than ten days, he went from being the next Prime Minister to Opposition Leader (again) and barely holding off a Liberal majority.
Do you think he learned his lesson? Hmmm...let's see...today he promised to roll back same-sex marriage laws (you know, the ones recently passed by the Supreme Court and Parliament) if elected.
At least he didn't wait until he had a lead this time to shoot himself in the ass...today is the VERY FIRST DAY of the campaign, and already he just pissed off the 75% of us that consider this matter settled. Great strategy to take in a liberal country.

OK. you are sexist and homophobic (mAnn Coulter) and profane.

Um, nope.

At least, not sexist nor homophobic. Just because I suspect Coulter is a post-op transsexual does not mean that I think there's anything wrong with that. There is, however, something wrong with pretending to be something you're not, or being ashamed of who and what you really are. And that's why I use "mAnn Coulter" as an insult.

But profane? Hell fuck yeah. And proud of it, goddamnit.

Re: #77: Exactly. In this world of stalkers and crazies, posting such info can be downright dangerous.

Coulter gets hate mail and death threats, and probably has a higher than average number of stalkers for a woman of her looks and notoriety; surely she knows the potential consequences of her post. So why won't she remove that part from her site?

Rebecca Shaeffer should not have died in vain. There's a reason for these rules of netiquette.

I seem to recall an SNL skit (in political matters, SNL imitates life) where Darrell Hammond playing Chris Matthews was saying to Ann Coulter, "My GOD, Ann! I'd call you a media whore, but I was afraid that would insult the real whores!"

Liberals are a bunch of whiners and now are faced to actually produce evidence rather than make hysterical accusastions and expect people to believe them.

Yes, I noticed that Ms. Coulter's exhaustive response was replete with evidence and devoid of any of the kind of nasty ad hominem and whiny hysteria of Ms. Cornell's initial letter.

Poor, desperate Ann.

She is failing at her mission. Her attempts at normalizing her psychopathic and paranoid view of the world are failing.

The desperation of the last throes of the neo-Con insurgency. It ain't pretty.

Once again... the real Ann Coulter....
IS HERE

She's such a neurotic basket case. Why is anyone paying any real attention to her? She thrives on the notoriety.....

Unfortunately, the only reason Coulter's book is selling at all is because of the shock factor it has on the sickos and trans-gendered mental cases of the world.........Who are ALL like coulter, and most of them spouting their nonsense here!

And unfortunately for her, that doesn't translate to notoriety....She's famous alright...famous enough to be hated nearly EVERYWHERE....And that is the LAST kind of attention you want or need when/if you are famous......

Lydia Cornell on the other side of a coin, is a beautiful girl, sweet and endearing as well as caring for others. She has shrines most likely dedicated to her all over the world. Powerful messages come from her and she has an outstanding intellectual side....

She has no fear of speaking her mind, so her notoriety is far far greater and widespread than some attention-magnet like Coulter.......

Yet she gets attacked by the Nazis, only because she is of course far above them and a good, light-hearted individual. Something that none of the Nazis are interested in, love or selflessness are all foreign words to them

So here's three cheers to Cornell....She has exposed the vileness of Coulter to everybody for good.

Doug E.

Ann is, like Rush and Bill, interested in 'Show biz'.

Yes, the personal information was going too far, going over the line. That being said, what amazes me is that the majority of Americans still don't get it - Ann Coulter is not a pundit, a right-winger or even a Republican. She is a PERFORMANCE ARTIST! She is one of the most extraordinary performance artists of all time, and history is going to judge her as a genius, certainly not a political genius, but an artistic genius. She is doing post-modern political shtick for the express purpose of exposing the right wing of this country as the joke they are by being their most extreme and supposedly hateful "mouthpiece." The right is too stupid to see when they're being had, but the sad part is that the left doesn't seem to get it. Start getting it, people - of course she isn't who she seems. Think of it this way; if you understand she's a performance artist, laugh with her genius. If you still don't get the joke, laugh anyway, because it's the quickest way to scare away a demon.

Why does Ann hang out with Tammy Bruce, Lesbian Conservative activist at the Palm bar located on "little Santa Monica blvd....just west of La Cienega in West Hollywood?
The Palm is a woman's bar now and always has been. Why does Ann Coulter want to stay in the closet? Tammy Bruce, author of a few Right Wing books used to be the NOW chapter in Los Angeles and a talk show host on KFI-AM. This was in 97or 96. She used to brag on her show that she had a 38 special and would shot the balls off any male intruder. I would guess that Ann has a Kar98k bolt action German rifle from the third Reich that she keeps under her bed.

I personally despise Ann Coulter. She's loud, screechy, and obnoxious and it's only a matter of time before she becomes the skinny, old bitter hag living alone in a big house on a hill with 39 cats.
She does kinda appeal to my dark side, though, and I told her so in an email once.
I don't remember exactly what I told her my fantasy was, but maybe if I google "anal" and "duct tape", I can track it down.

If the shoe fits, wear it yourself. Why are you concerned about her opinion? And if you are for free speech, and she is against it, then why are you against her exercising her free speech rights to be against free speech. If you are confused then consider... How can someone vocalize their opposition to free speech unless they have the freedom of speech to do so? Can you not recognize an obvious pun? Your hatered blinds you to the truth. Those that are not offended hear your retorts and laugh at your failure to recognize the obvious humour of such a statement. Stop being a puppet.

"The big difference between Ann and these airheads is that ANN IS SUCCESSFUL"!

I wonder why?

Maybe a better market for fools!

Someone on Kos called her "Courtney Love Coulter" and there isn't a more apt description available. Coulter would set herself on fire and lick Bill Clinton's balls if she got publicity for it.

At a party last year, when Ed Koch said he didn't know who she was, she threw a hissy fit and almost stormed out of the event. To Ann, the worst indignity to inflict on her is to ignore her or laugh at her. That's why she spews the bile that she does - that's the only way anyone will pay attention to her.

Imagine, a 44-year-old woman who basically has to throw feces at people in order to be noticed and paid attention to - sad, really. Most of us outgrow that in our pre-teens, it will be quite awful to see Miss Coulter when she hits 50 and is still acting like a screaming infant.

Maybe she doesn't take any of it seriously and is simply an attention whore. Nevertheless spreading such propaganda gives people the wrong idea and it is truly known as "hate speech" just by endorsing it publically...

And this is where racism, division and segregation come from. Hate-speech in all its forms needs to be curtailed when it comes to these things.

It is not ethical never the mind possibly legal to call for the extermination/ethnic cleansing/detaining in camps of a whole entire group of people---no matter who pays you to say it.

Doug E.

Wow, i just called (XXX) XXX-XXXX {ed note: number removed} at 3 am and asked for Susan. I think it was Ann, cause she said "You're calling my home" I guess I'll call again.

It's hardly surprising that Ann Ghoulter© finds death sexier than humans - Ann herself is either genderless or of a gender all of its necrophagic own. Ann Ghoulter© thinks she's beautiful, but her inner ugliness rules.

:hehe: Just to let y'all know, as of 6:56am EST, the phone number is back up on coulter's website. What a sorry disgrace she is.

Served in 00' and again in 04'. You guys still pissed about it? Just let it go man.

I've never seen so much hate on a blog. I guess all time Cornell dedicated to her piece written about Coulter and the Liberal ideology was all "for not".

I will pray for you all.

Potatoperson,

Skip me from your prayers never did have much time for satanic blessings.

"I've never seen so much hate on a blog."

OK Mr. Potatohead, guess this is the first time you've ever looked at a blog. So go check out Coulter blackhearted ranting and then get back to us. Really, though - Coulter is so unflaggingly pathetic she's not worth hating. Kimberly at #87 was so right - she says outrageous shit purely to get a rise. I laugh at it for what it is (idiocy), for the fact that it gets airtime (how is that possible??), and because so many morons in this country actually believe she is some kind of genius. I mean it's so fucking hilarious when you stop and think about it.

And I'm all for letting her spew hate. It attracts people with little minds unfortunately, but the rest of us are smart enough to negotiate around it. I've said before, I always prefer to know exactly how people feel - it's information that allows me to avoid them in my daily life if need be (or gives me an opportunity to *attempt* to show them reason and rationality.)

People are starting to seriously wise up to Ann's game. People will look back on her in time and say "that was a weird." In the greater scheme of things, she will be like a bout of gas - a little painful for a short while, makes you uncomfortable and embarrassed, but eventually you fart it out and feel much better. And then you laugh a little.

What folks on the left don't seem to recognize, as they write in articles and comments, about how they hate... "hate", in no uncertain terms, is that they have been the purveyors of hate for the past 4 decades. It is completely acceptable and routine for liberals to discuss how much they hate Republicans. It's their normal, standard method of daily self expression. The universal hatred of a group that is different from them, is part of how they define their identity. I used to be a liberal, for 35 years. I was an insider. I know the truth. Don't try to dance around it. You hate Republicans, because you're a hate poisoned person to begin with.

One thing you never see, is conservative writings in which a statement of hate is accepted without rebuff, such as the commentary that sparked this discussion. The author actually stated that she hates so much she starts twitching! Who are the sick among us?

... Sorry the neocon sycophants just can't get it through their Faux-bound brains how truly NASTY this woman(?) is ! mAnn posted this information of Lydias DELIBERATELY , in the hopes of something VILE HAPPENING TO Lydia ! Coulter is a BITTER , BARREN , BLONDE(?) BITCH ! If a network wants to lose THIS viewer IMMEDIATELY , just say she-mAnn is about to appear - CLICK , GOOD-BYEEEE !!! ...

Hey Libbies,
Waaaaaaa Waaaaaaa, Bush Lied, Waaaaaa Waaaaaaa,

Stop crying, the election is over.

Meow- If that is true you better have a caller ID blocker or somesuch....

Ann can legally file a complaint against you for misconduct and harassment. Nobody is allowed to call anybody they don't like/don't know at 3AM in the morning just to opine them....or berate them, or talk to them or anything.

Home phone calls are especially binding under this law. Be careful of what any of you guys do, just a warning. I would not be either Ann or the phone caller at 3AM in the morning!

Doug E.

"There is no plausible explanation for the President's behavior other than that he longs to see U.S. troops shot, humiliated, and driven from the field of battle." --- Ann Coulter

For the neoconvicts, obviously they don't hate all republicans and you made a profound exaggeration----based soley on the level of corruption in your OWN party!

Jack in the House

So I wouldn't be talking at all if I were you! Obviously there's too many skeletons in your closet to count, if they hate you and if people are sick of you, its for a reason.

Doug E.

JUst remember Ann is another GOP extremist making money radically indifferent to the common sense and logic of human dignity.. she will at any cost try to desimate the messenger ... at whatever cost.
She deserves the woman of the year award by the GOP Right Regime ...

For the same reasons I don't ingest junk food, I make a point of ignoring the venomous viper and her unresolved sibling rivalry. Maybe Daddy didn't pay enough attention to her Ann-tics?

Waaa waaa, the election may be over but there's still plenty of time to color Busholini and Darth Cheney IMPEACHED. We'll bring it on, allright.

W stands for WUSS. He's so fucking chicken he can't even be in the same room with anyone with a brain.

Ann Coulter....really David Duke in drag. She looks like, talks like, walks like, is built like, and smells like David Duke.

Ann Coulter is welcome to post my Bio it is on web sites.

I do not lie(intend to deceive).

Several years ago I searched her LIES and came up with 117.

She had 62 pages posted on JWR. I found a lie on 61 of 62 pages.

The balance I found in her book "Hi Slimes".

At least she does not exceed Mush Dimbaugh's 10,400 Lies from extrapolated edit of 4,000 hours of his transcripts

clarence swinney

SteveYoung and all Democratic candidates need to get Positive and list great record of achievements.

Here a few to be followed by 84.
-------------------- SHOCK & AWE------------------------
----------DEMOCRATS CREATE WEALTH AND JOBS-----------
1.From Harding In 1921 to Bush in 2003
2.Democrats held White House for 40 years and Republicans for 42.5 years.
3.Democrats created 75,820,000 net new jobs --- Republicans 36,440,000.
4.Per Year Average—Democrats 1,825,200---Republicans 856,400.
5.Republicans had 9 presidents during the period and 6 had depression or recession.
6.Republicans had a recession/depression in 177 months and Democrats in 32 months.
7.DOW—grew by 52% more under Democrats.
8.GDP—grew by 43% more under Democrats.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Comparing Democrat’s hero-CLINTON—versus Republican’s hero--REAGAN
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

1.JOBS—grew by 43% more under Clinton.
2.GDP---grew by 57% more under Clinton.
3.DOW—grew by 700% more under Clinton..
4.NASDAQ-grew by 18 times as much under Clinton.
4.SPENDING--grew by 28% under Clinton---80% under Reagan.
5.DEBT—grew by 43% under Clinton—187% under Reagan.
6. DEFICITS—Clinton got a large surplus--grew by 112% under Reagan.
7.NATIONAL INCOME—grew by100% more under Clinton.
8.PERSONAL INCOME—Grew by 110% more under Clinton.
SOURCES—Bureau of Labor Statistics (www.BLS.Gov)--Economic Policy Institute (EPI.org)—Global & World Almanacs from 1980 to 2003 (annual issues)
www.the-hamster.com (chart taken from NY Times)
National Archives History on Presidents. www.nara.gov
Clarence Swinney-Political Historian
Please submit comments to cwswinney@netzero.net or P.O. Box 3411-Burlington NC-27216

84 Great things by Democrats. Why do not they Promote successes. People are tired of negatives and attacks.

Democrats Create--Republicans Destroy.-----------84 good things done by Democrats-----------------

Can anyone name ten for Republicans

Credit for this information goes my friend, a great mind, and his terrific site

Ray Dubuque—www.liberalslike Christ.org-----------------

1.civilian conservation corps
2.public works adm.--works progress adm
3.unemployment relief act
4.national industrial recovery act
5.national housing act
6.federal communications act
7.national labor relations act-wagner act of 1935
8.fair labor standards act (min wage & max hours laws)
9.GI bill of rights
10.social security act
11.Tennessee valley (power) authority
12.rural electrification act
13.full employment act
14.permanent school lunch program
15.integration of armed forces
16.veterans emergency housing act
17.public health service act
18.national housing act
19.marshall plan
20.peace corps
21.aid to dependent children program
22.small business investment act
23.establishment of arms control and disarmament agency
24.consumer drug protection laws
25.equal pay act
26.manpower development and retraining act
27.clean air act
28.mental health and mental retardation act
29.college and vocational education act
30.civil rights act
31.voting rights act
32.mass transportation act
33.omnibus poverty act (office of economic opportunity, vista, job corps and public assistance programs)
34.war on poverty
35.head start (for pre-school children)
36.land conservation fund
37.permanent food stamp program
38.appalachia regional development act
39.elementary and secondary education act
40.higher education act
41.older Americans act (medicare and medicaid)
42.law enforcement assistance act
43.immigration reform act
44.freedom of information act
45.fair housing act
46.housing and urban development (low income housing )
47.clean water restoration act
48.coal mine health and safety act
49.child protection
50.federal ethics code
51.civil service reform
52.creation of superfund (cleanup of toxic waste)
53.secretary of health joseph califano(fight tobacco health threat)
54.votings rights act extension
55.highway and mass transit funding bill
56.civil rights restoration act
57.head start expansion
58.Americans with disabilities act
59.major tax increase on the wealthy to fight deficits created by Reagan and Bush
60.family medical leave act
61.attempted to extend/or improve health insurance coverage for millions of Americans
62.restoration of democracy to haiti
63.restoration of peace to bosnia
64.promotion of peace in south Africa
65.promotion of peace in northern Ireland
66.promotion of peace in Israel and Palestine
67.increases in minimum wage
68.promotion of spending on inner-city schools
69.opposition to abolition of safety net for the poor
70.protection of social security and medicare
71.promotion of justice for victims of racism
72.protection of children from cancer inducing tobacco industry
73.constantly frustrated efforts to enact thorough campaign finance
74.appointment of many minorities and women to cabinet positions
75.resolution of long-standing black farmers discrimination issues
76.leadership role in nato’s campaign to stop ethnic cleansing in kosovo.
77.major efforts to challenge the dangerous proliferation of guns in America
78.ameri-corps
79. pay their way party—1960 to 1980—National Income grew 418%--Debt grew 210%
1980 to 1992National Income grew 102%--Debt grew 300%.
Democrats pay their way-Republicans party of spend and borrow-our kids pay
Tomorrow.

80. party for strong defense—carter increased defense spending by 50%--Clinton spent 273 Billion per year to Reagan’s 249 Billion per year.
Nixon-Ford cut Army troops by 41% and Reagan-Bush cut by 11%
81. Party of Integrity---Reagan had more(137) charged with crimes than cumulative total for all presidents of 20th century.
82. vacation with pay
83.trade union schools—forerunner to community colleges
84.worker retirement pensions
Clarence Swinney—Political Historian—Burlington nc—www.cwswinney@netzero.net

Please call me a Tax & Spend Liberal.
I pay my way like a good citizen.
TAX & SPEND LIBERAL WHO PAYS HIS WAY

From G. Washington to Reagan we ended with a 917 Billion Debt.

The next 12 years of Spend & Borrow Conservatism added on over 3,000 Billion.

Bush 2006 Budget—Five Year Forecast—Historical Tables—Pages 116-117 reveals that he will add on 3759 Billion.

This is Gang who screamed—

CUT GOVERNMENT--BALANCE THE BUDGET—TAX CUTS PAY THEIR WAY

Swinney Fact Check-----

CUT GOVERNMENT---

Reagan yelled this more than any President.—His record—He INCREASED the size of government more than any predecessor.

He INCREASED spending by 80%

p.s. He increased California spending by 112%. This is a Conservative?

TAX CUTS PAY THEIRWAY.----

Reagan cut Income taxes by 750 Billion. He borrowed 1700 Billion to pay for it.

He increased Income Tax Revenues by 140 Billion. Wee bit short of 750 Billion.

Bush cut income taxes by 1700 Billion and will borrow 3759 Billion top pay for it.

Anyone care to wager it will not be 5,000 Billion?

Democrats use sensible fiscal polices which SPEND but TAX to Pay Their Way.

Republicans use selfish fiscal policies which SPEND but BORROW to let the kids pay for them.

Which party do you want handling your money?

Clarence swinney-political historian-burlington nc-www.cwswinney@netzero.net

Please spread this information to get Democrats using it.

Man Cuntler is a perfect example of what hapens if one is addicted to tina/speed/crystal meth. Yeah, you lose weight. But you end up spilling out so much hate & stupidity, just like the Nazis.

Re: COMMENT #111 [link]
...clarence swinney: 84 Great things by Democrats.

Your list is very comprehensive. It's the accomplishments of our party over the decades that has always made me proud to be a Democrat.
Two quick observations:
Fact - Congress passed the Clinton budget in the mid-90's without a SINGLE Republican vote. Almost to a person the Republicans said it would be a disaster. Yeah, right. I personally remember Bob Dole warning that interest rates would begin rising, probably the day after passage! Of course, when the economy exploded they shifted their stance, as only they can do, and began pontificating that what we were experiencing was "Reaganomics still steaming right along". They've got to be a miserable lot.
Fact - When the creation of the Food and Drug Administration was proposed many years ago by Democrats (in the interest of protecting Americans, obviously) there was one Senator in particular who fought tooth and nail against its passage: Prescot Bush...GW's grandpappy.

One thing Anne Coulter has to realize, there will be a day when she is the old, shriveled up political hack with varicose-veined legs and a bondo-ed face life. There will come a time when she needs compassion and understanding. That is when she will realize that her hate and her life was wasted. But I actually suspect that this is what she wants; she wants to be the center of attention, the center of controversy. Then comes along someone who is far cuter than she, who is well spoken and cares about other people than herself. This is the antithesis of Anne M.O. Ms. Cornell, you are a class act. Anne, you could learn from this. Anne, that’s me calling this moment! You reap what you sow!

You know repubs just can't NOT use a weapon if they have it. Bush couldn't wait to try out his new "GI Joes" and Frau Brau,,er,, I mean Frau Coulter, when she got Lydia's phone number, she saw it as a weapon.

She knew that by posting it, she would do real damage to Lydia's life, if only temporary, and since she could not stand the fact that Lydia is twice the beauty, and twice the human being, that she will ever be, so she just couldn't help using that weapon, that Lydia, accidently presented her with.

It shows what type of person Coulter is. And if you like that kind of thing, then your part of the problem.

I can just picture lil Georgy now, sitting in the situation room arguing with the Joint Chiefs,

"but what good are all the NUKES if we can't USE them???"

#115

What do you mean "there will be a day"? There *was* a day! (I think it was yesterday...)

NOW NOW I can't believe anyone with a half a brain

is the least bit surprised at ann coulters vindictiveness

Remember she is just following the conservative M.O.

I hope ann coulter gets untreatable cervical & clitoral

Cancer and dies a long slow undignified death.

JOJ - you're way out of line, my friend...

#109 to #112 Thank you for posting this information. M4

its too bad that Ann is so incredibly mis informed, wait Republican, Bitch, I suppose it fits. if only we could stop the republicans like her from reproducing

It's a real shame when the ugly girls try to make up for it beating up on the pretty ones...

What's really the point? Are her minions going to converge in BH now?

Dave
Crackpot Press
LA CA

I think it is wonderful that you hate Ann, because in so doing you are giving her more publisity.

I dare any of you to sit down with Ann Coulter on a talk show and go head to head with her on any point of historical or political issues and to dispute anything she has said with information that actually verifiably corrects her. Got to be careful you have to be informed!

You throw around the McCartiism like a true Liberal.
You have no knowledge about the McCarthy era. It's such a catch word for liberals everytime they(you) come up against someone who tells things as they really occured and not like you think.

First of all McCarthy was right, there were scores of individuals who were Communist Agents or sympothizers in the U.S. government. Have you heard of the Verona Tapes? You might check it out to see what the Soviets themselves told about all of them. Also, McCarthy had nothing to do with the Actors Guild which had Communist, that was Robert Kennedy in the House Committe on Un-American Activities.

While you are looking up things you might check the definition of Pundit. That's what Ann Coulter is .

It's great to see that Liberals are afraid of her.

You might try reading her books also before you comment on her.

Liberals never want to argue the metits of an issue you just want to abuse the other side- kind of childish I think.

Liberals are just too un-informed to gather a rational thought and come up with a plan. Smear is all you know.

It's time to start building Coulter's coffin and gathering the nails to bury her. First, investigate her private life - is she gay, a nyphomaniac, promiscuous, married without straying, or a virgin. No doubt that she is psychotic. Next, we must analyze her books for a) false statements, b) proof her statements are false, and c) state what the truth is. By showing her to be a psychotic liar --- and the "satire" argument doesn't wash, she'll be hoisted on her own petard, to wither in the wind. Why she get so much TV face time is beyond me. She is essentially an ignorant, psychiotic liar, in my view.

I think we need to have a fund to hire PI's to really investigate the Right-wingnuts. Many in the RNC are closeted Gay men or sexually repressed alleged heterosexuals. These self hating closet queens and people afraid of their sexuality need to be outed along with any other political foes who claim to travel on the moral high ground. Let's just see if these people who claim to have "christian morals" are true to their public statements. I think it is only fair that a public figure be held to his or her word. They are the political celebrities and the paparazzi should follow them with the same intensity that they do Britney and Brangelina!

Bill Blanton Re: #123

Brad DID try debating Coulter.

She left before the end of the show.

Here's the link, go listen for yourself:

https://bradblog.com/archives/00001884.htm

Bill Blayton~

Ms. Coulter is in the smear business. We're in the truth business.

As for "I dare any of you to sit down with Ann Coulter on a talk show and go head to head with her on any point of historical or political issues and to dispute anything she has said with information that actually verifiably corrects her. Got to be careful you have to be informed!"

That is because she does not allow anyone to get a word in otherwise. How can one rationally debate someone who will not even allow the other person a point of view? Brad Friedman DID debate her, but she ducked out after the first half hour (of an hour long schedule.).

As for you lame defense of McCarthyism, I would only like to point you to this: http://cannonfire.blogsp...lying-about-history.html
Read it and Learn. Do not just accept what rose tinted world history you think you know. Real people know that American History is not perfect.

Ann Coulder shall be known as Godawful Screech. I'll say this, she's embedded even when she's by herself.

Sick fuck indeed....

This has been bugging me for a while. Do conservatives really find Coulter attractive and articulate, or do they realize that she is hideously deformed, and either a) joking, b) a complete sociopath, or c) both.

I must say that Lydia Cornell appears to be far more attractive (and yes, Ann, FAR sexier) than Coulter. Why that is relevant, I am really not sure, however, if some (very strange) people are attracted to Coulter, and that makes her "message" more palatable to them, I would suggest that Mrs. Cornell should follow her around and rebut her hate speech at every opportunity. Perhaps these conservatives are completely mesmerized by her masculine appearance, so this may not work with the more feminine beauty of Mrs. Cornell (there may be some truth to the theories about self-loathing closeted homosexuality that is clearly rampant among Republicans, "log cabin" and otherwise--they clearly have a thing for "man dates".)

When I have had the misfortune of catching anything that Coulter says on television, I am completely disgusted by her. She shies away from any semblance of intelligent debate, and resorts to hyperbole and childish name-calling. I would absolutely love to debate her anytime or anywhere, regardless of whether she had a baseball bat or not. She can barely put two sentences together. If that is what passes for intellect among conservatives, it is no wonder that you all bought BushCo's rationale for the Iraq war, and the Republicans laughable attempts at budget cutting while hiding more tax cuts for the uberwealthy behind their backs.

In short, if Ann Coulter is your hero (note how I refrain from using the word "heroine") and/or you find her attractive in ANY WAY, you should certainly consider some type of therapy. This woman is malicious and spiteful, and looks like somebody placed a dead horse's head (who died while swallowing a HUGE apple) on top of a few misshapen sticks stuffed in a black dress.

WOW that felt great--maybe Ann really is on to something! I should write a book and make millions!

Thank you, thank you Clarence Swinny #112! I've been posting some of that same information for the last year on this blog, but the mesmerized/hypnotized Republicans of today would argue with a fence post. Thanks for the list in #111, as well.

What a great thread (minus the hateful remarks) for great information, suggestions and humor! I had a few good laughs reading over the comments!

Bill Blanton - Coulter is certainly not someone you should trust to tell the truth. I mean, really, you don't believe most of what she says, do you? If so, I do feel sorry for you. I remember this incident (just one of many) that shows her ignorance and arrogance:

Ann Coulter Sticks Her Entire Leg in Her Mouth
by Doug Ireland

[snip] Ann Coulter is a loudmouth ignoramus who spouts her outrageous nationalist inaccuracies on American television with little challenge from the empty talking heads who interview her. But she finally found someone to stand up to her, in Canada--and she was exposed for the arrogant fool she is.

Interviewed by the Canadian Broadcasting Company's Bob McKeown for the investigative TV broadcast "The Fifth Estate," which devoted an hour-long January 26 special to how U.S. media have been highjacked by conservative bullies, Coulter was berating Canada for not sending troops to Iraq when she displayed her empty-headedness in the following exchange:

Coulter: "Canada used to be one of our most loyal friends and vice-versa. I mean Canada sent troops to Vietnam - was Vietnam less containable and more of a threat than Saddam Hussein?"

McKeown interrupts: "Canada didn't send troops to Vietnam."

Coulter: "I don't think that's right."

McKeown: "Canada did not send troops to Vietnam."

Coulter (looking desperate): "Indochina?"

McKeown: "Uh no. Canada ...second World War of course. Korea. Yes. Vietnam No."

Coulter: "I think you're wrong."

McKeown: "No, took a pass on Vietnam."

Coulter: "I think you're wrong."

McKeown: "No, Australia was there, not Canada."

Coulter: "I think Canada sent troops."

McKeown: "No."

Coulter: "Well. I'll get back to you on that."

McKeown tags out in script:

"Coulter never got back to us --- but for the record, like Iraq, Canada sent no troops to Vietnam."

You can see the entire exchange [snip] --- **MORE AT LINK**

Anyway --- that one was certainly fun.

BTW, Bill Blanton, you do what the Gingrich Republicans do so well ... whatever you accuse Liberals or Democrats of is exactly what you are doing yourself. It's just so obvious.

I love watching the beehive of liberal stupidity...
Buzz on, you cute little misinformed things...buzz on

Sparks (comment #132)~
Dance you little necon monkey, dance.

Man, I just saw Lydia's pic and Ann Coulter was right.. death is sexier. hehe.

Kira just loves that exchange between Coulter and McKeown, but the fact is, political pundits just get it wrong sometimes. For example, Al Franken gets a lot wrong in his book, Lying Liars as you can see at www.frankenlies.com.

Truth be told, though, Ann was probably more right than was McKeown about Canada and Vietnam. While they didn't send "troops", they provided technical assistance, spying and espionage and actively worked to tilt negotiations in favor of the United States. In addition, Canada sold to the United States weapons systems that were used in Vietname. And lets not forget the thousands of Canadians that crossed the border and volunteer in the US military.

More reading on that at:

http://www.geocities.com/Athens/Rhodes/1588/

and

http://www.partnersinmot...on.com/HEM/docs/viet.htm

and

http://www.answers.com/t...nada-and-the-vietnam-war

Canada, by the way, did participate in the Korean War.

Go ez on ac. The woman needs help.

Man, you neocon apologists are completely amazing!

What a fantastic example supplied by "NOMOREHYPOCRISY" (well you clearly must not be a fan of the Bush admin. with a moniker like that--Bush and Cheney's flip-flopping and attempts at revisionist history over why we are in Iraq would be almost humorous if the stakes were not so high and disturbing).

Coulter: "Canada used to be one of our most loyal friends and vice-versa. I mean Canada sent troops to Vietnam - was Vietnam less containable and more of a threat than Saddam Hussein?"

McKeown interrupts: "Canada didn't send troops to Vietnam."

Yet, LOADSMOREHYPCRISY states: "Truth be told, though, Ann was probably more right than was McKeown about Canada and Vietnam."

You, sir, should be working for the Bush Administration. I hear from a very reliable and tenacious Republican prosecutor that a job will be opening very soon--head propagandist Herr Rove will be taking an extended leave of absence due to a strange lapse in his photographic memory.

By the way, I have some aluminum tubes for sale at a heavy discount...interested?

Owen --- don't you just love it when they say "probably" and then insist their "probably" is absolute truth. These are blind, blind people who are deeply afraid of the truth.

Gee, could you not actually address the issue of Canada's proactivity for us in Vietnam, or was throwing out insults that had nothing to do with the post easier for you to accomplish.

Coulter has been accused of being a liar. Do you have no comments on Franken and his half-baked books?

I think that Franken is slightly amusing, but mostly annoying. However, I do NOT think he is nearly as deranged or dangerous as Ann "not a big fan of the First Amendment" Coulter. I also happen to know that he does quite a bit of USO touring in Iraq. Does Ann?

The issue was whether Canada "sent troops to Vietnam" as I recall. They did not. Therefore Ann Coulter was definitely wrong, and so are you. Your attempts at spin and changing the subject are amusing--not quite as amusing as Franken, but close.

Al Franken is HONEST but not assertive and confrontational as I'd like him to be. Ann Coulter lies.

Al Franken researches his work to make sure he reports facts.

If you don't like that answer Mr. Hypocrisy, tuff.

Sorry, but time constraints are keeping me from answering you in depth. Maybe after this weekend I will be able to look at your comments in depth, until then --- Kira.

Personally, while I think its fair to say that Ann Coulter seemed to mean "Canada sent troops to Vietnam" instead of "Canada provided indirect aid towards US war efforts in Vietnam", ..nomorehypocrisy is right that it's an oversimplification to say that Ann Coulter was entirly wrong in her statement.

Plus, that particular bullet has been fired so many times it's more blood than lead. I say drop the issue and come up with some new batshit thing she's done. How hard can that be, huh?

The very fact that you keep referring to AC as "dangerous" means that she is effective. You are afraid of her becuaser she is popular --- people like what she has to say.

And Jesus, for a bunch of liberals, you sure are doing a lot of anti-GLBT bashing and superficial judging. Why does physical appearance or sexual orientation have anything to do with ideology in this case?

The plain truth is that you can't actually rebutt most of what she says. She may misspeak from time to time but by and large she hits the nail on the head. And that's why she's so funny (all humor has an element of truth, after all) and why y'all are so afraid of her.

But you might want to be careful with all the hatred you're displaying. Your true colors are showing.

I agree that attacks on ann coulter do nothing to undermine or provide thoughtful debate on her vitriol....

but please... if we're talking about hatred, disrespect and factual incorrectness we are discussing ann coulter who has no problem in posting other people's personal information, or calling members of the party she overwhelmingly supports as 'gutless'.

I dislike anyone of any political persuasion who resorts to personal, hateful attacks on people to get their point across. the most intelligent people (in media, academics or otherwise) are able to make their point without name calling.

You rant about Ann Coulter and her hatred. Well, out of the 143 comments posted here...nearly all of them are filled with hatred. How about the "baseball bat" comment? Nobody feels like repudiating that one? or is hatred acceptable only when coming from a liberal?

By the way, did anybody count the number of references Lydia made to hate (referencing herself)?

The lack of standards here is embarassing. The hypocricy is stupifying. No wonder you guys cannot win an election. Of course, as long as you talk among yourselves, you'll never recognize it. Try this kind of venom on the mainstream and you'll find out you don't look any more sympathetic than Ann Coulter.

People just don't like this kind of barbarianism. Or is this simply catharsis?

And for all you enlightened Christians? scripture tells us that "with the same measure that you judge others, you will be judged." While the truth applies to Ann Coulter, why would you want to jump into the same lake of fire?

Lee Thompson,

Some of us are just trying out Coulter's brand of hatespeak just to see how it feels when the tables are turned.

I am not sure what you mean by the "baseball bat" comment, but you may be unaware that this is likely a reference to something that Coulter said herself when being interviewed about her book "How to Speak to Liberals...". She said (an by the way, I witnessed this exchange myself--this is absolutely true) that she felt that the best way to speak to liberals was "with a baseball bat".

So, you see, that bit of hatred came right from the horse's mouth, and was merely an example of her "barbarianism" directed towards liberals. Personally, I was totally offended by this call to violence against fellow Americans. In an earlier post I referred to this, but only to say that I would be happy to debate Coulter regardless of whether SHE had a baseball bat or not because I do not fear her physically or intellectually.

Hope that clears things up for you a bit. I'm not sure if you have had the misfortune of hearing any of the vitriol that escapes Coulter's mouth on a daily basis, but she continually advocates hatespeech and violence against anyone that does not agree with her. To me that is not satire, and does not qualify her as a "pundit", but rather as a sociopath.

Notice that nobody here is defending Ann. She can handle that herself.

I just enjoy the fact that you folks are attacking Ann for her "hatespeech" using profane and childish hateful attacks of your own. And the best par is that you then justify your words by saying "Ann does the same thing!"

It's an illogical, childish emotional circle. But then, as Lydia herself admits, she, a good liberal, uses her heart more than her mind anyway.

ROYALWOLF, liberals not only can rebut most of the swill that comes out of the cesspool Ann Coulter calls a mouth, but they have done so. Many times over. Debunking her ridiculous books and columns is practically a cottage industry.

And it's not just liberals. Bona fide conservatives have also exposed her as the liar, bigot, hypocrite, and hatemonger that she is.

She is "popular"? Really? Most people seem to think she's a sewer-mouthed whackjob bimbo.

Ann Coulter misspeaks occasionally but for the most part she hits the nail on the head?

You've got it backwards there, ROYALWOLF. She hits the nail on the head occasionally but for the most part she not only misspeaks, she lies out her scrawny ass. When she doesn't make stuff up out of whole cloth, she takes something with a germ of truth and builds some deranged fantasy around it, then acts like her pages of endnotes (not footnotes) prove it, when most of the endnotes are fraudulent and/or irrelevant.

Apparently you've adopted her attitude of "bluster and talk big, and accuse your opponents of doing what you are doing." And you think she's funny? What kind of a sick sense of humor do you have?

Ann Coulter can defend herself? Actually, she doesn't defend herself --- what she does is pile on more misinformation and try and shout her opponent down in that unpleasant, mannish voice of hers, substituting volume for reason. She can't back up her statements, so she doesn't.

She looks like a prime fool whenever someone actually stands up to her. Well, she looks like a prime fool regardless, but especially so when someone refuses to let her yammer on and demands that she back up her ridiculous statements. I recall one time when Alan Colmes refused to let her sleaze her way out of answering a simple question; all she could do was to try and talk over him, then she did some bizarre marionette thing at the end. It would've been amusing if it hadn't been so totally, completely pathetic.

Who is Lydia Cornell? Why should I even care?

Yet here you are on her blog.

who is this Coulter person, and why is he dressed like a woman?

#3 - please chadsteal@yahoo.com - i need her # bad!

Let's face it..people like Coulter, O'reilly, Limbaugh, et al...only have audiences because the american public are an apathetic, over indulged,over medicated, ill educated lot....welcome to Rome, and Caesar has provided Bread and Circuses for the plebians.

What is needed is a true, red-blooded, fists to the face and balls out liberal to make the chickenhawks and closet cases in DC scatter like roaches.

Clinton was a winner because he could play the neo-cons dirty games better than them. Sometimes, it is the role of angels to crush evil with equal force and fire.

BTW, I wonder if Larry flynt still has those incriminating photos and documents he claimed to make the republicans fall apart during the impeachment proceedings? now would be a good time for them...

I read the whole thing. I could not understand it. Does this mean I am stupid? oh well. Do you not like Ann Coulter? or are you stupid?

Is that a real picture of yourself because you are nice looking guy are you getting a sex change. Oh well. I wonder if you have sent a pair of your underwear to the RIAA yet.

Sincerely

"what she does is pile on more misinformation and try and shout her opponent down in that unpleasant, mannish voice of hers, substituting volume for reason."
-SAR, comment 149
You HAVE to be kidding! Shouting people down is entirely an ignorant liberal thing to do. Lefty's are the ONLY ones to try to outyell people. Coulter's the one that got shouted out at a recent college meeting. I've seen it happen, conservatives never try to disrupt speeches and meetings (I can't think of any exceptions, but there may be one or two, but there's no number comparison).

Typical right-wing idiotic response --- "I know you are but what am I?" --- from Sparks.

If shouting people down is entirely an ignorant liberal thing to do, then I guess Coulter is an ignorant liberal, because that's all "she" does. As for "her" getting shouted out at a recent college meeting --- the dumb skank was the one who cut it short because "she" can't handle dissent --- like her fellow hatemongers, she needs a pre-screened audience packed with fawning acolytes. Conservatives never try to disrupt speeches and meetings? Like hell! How about the pro-war bullies who harassed Cindy Sheehan and even vandalized the crosses erected to commemorate fallen soldiers in Bush's war on Iraq?

By the way, Sparks, learn how to spell.

This is all a little disturbing. I've read this blog for the last twenty minutes, and have retained the following pertinent information:
Ann Coulter is really a man
You hope Ann dies of cervical cancer
Shes about to become a withered lonely hag living alone with her 39 cats
Shes a closet lesbian
Shes probably an alien
She never tells the truth
She has a big adams apple
Shes a skinny bi**h
Shes a neo-con
Shes a fan of the nazi regime...

etc...etc...etc..

And Republicans are the small-minded hate mongerers?
Geez!!

No, Bill Hawkins, all Republicans are not small-minded hatemongers. Just Republicans like Ann Coulter. And if you're so offended by people directing insults and ill will her way, I wonder why you are such a fan of Coulter herself, because spewing hate and insults is all she does --- only her targets are liberals.

If one is confused about the difference between Coulter's "good" insults and liberals' "bad" insults, I'll explain, based on the reasoning I've seen from various fans of Coulter and other right-wing hatemongers. Coulter isn't literally being insulting. The poor misunderstood dear is simply trying to break the icon that the left has formed around itself.

Just like she was just trying to break the icon that liberals have formed around Justice Stevens when she said someone should poison his creme brulee. And it was a joke, anyway. Ha ha. Where's your sense of humor?

Ann Coulter is a sick, twisted f**k. Not to mention, she, as a lawyer, ought to know that it's AGAINST THE LAW to threaten a Supreme Court Justice, "jokingly" or not.

I still want to know when Ann Coulter had her sex change operation!

She has an Adam's Apple the size of a coconut. There is no way in heaven or hell this Screaming Medusa was born with a vagina!

She is in her late to mid 40s (depending which driver's license you examine, another of her great lies), admits she is dateless, has never married and is childless!

Enquiring Minds Want to Know!!!

I remain,

Sincerely,

Beverly S. Hill

Is Ann Coulter a woman? The first thing I thought when I saw her picture besides that she was one skinny slime bag is that surely she really is a man! U-U-U-GLY!!! This thing, Ann "The Man" Coulter should be strung up by his, excuse me, I mean her nipples! If I were her/him I would be extremely concerned that there isn't someone out there that would put her out of her misery not just for being the insensitive, ignorant troll that she is but also for being ugly inside and out. I can't imagine anyone having the audacity to say or even think that of the widows of 9-11. One of the most tragic terrorist events in history. Hopefully one day Ann "The Man" will meet her/his Waterloo! Steve Tyler was right, Dude look like a lady!!

Regards,
Pam W. [Franklin, WI]

http://satanncoulter666.cf.huffingtonpost.com/

Spread this link around and expose this evil cranky skank for who she really is...

So she posted Lydia's (who, by the way is MUCH sexier than Coulter)phone number and email. Big deal, I can get that information (unless the phone number is unlisted) with a quick search on the Internet.

Coulter's disregard for the 1st Amendment is the thing that really burns me.

smudge thereabouts oiling divorcee coppers milkmaids