I’m not sure I’ve ever declared a “winner” or “loser” in any Presidential debate, after covering them here for twenty years. They generally just don’t work like that. But, as discussed on today’s BradCast special coverage of last night’s showdown in Philadelphia, there was one clear winner and one very clear loser. [Audio link to full show follows this summary.]
Kamala Harris absolutely dominated her, perhaps one and only, face-off with Donald Trump from the moment she knocked him back on his heels by invading his space to reach out to shake his hand at the top, until she scraped up his lifeless husk of a soul off the debate stage at the very end.
Am I overstating the murder that some 67 million Americans witnessed with their own eyes during the ABC News debate on Tuesday night moderated by David Muir and Linsey Davis? CNN’s post-debate flash poll of those who watched it said Harris outperformed him by 63% to 37%. Other snap polls found similar. We’ll see what the broader polling finds in the coming days. And, of course, none of that ultimately means anything. Only votes do. But I can’t think of anything that Harris could have done better, particularly given Trump’s years-long record of surprise successes at these things. Finally, someone figured out how to get under his skin and stayed there for 90 minutes, as we all got to enjoy his, at times hilarious, meltdown in the bargain.
Our roundtablers today — two of our favorite fellow old school bloggers, HEATHER DIGBY PARTON of Salon and Hullabaloo, and ‘DRIFTGLASS’ of his eponymous blog and the weekly Pro Left Podcast — seemed to concur with the bulk of my assessment.
“This was a really great debate for those of us who care about the future of this country, because she absolutely decimated him. And it was beautiful,” observed Digby. “All she was doing was telling him facts to his face, and calling him what no one in his circle will ever call him, which is a disgrace, a criminal, and creepy and old. He doesn’t know how to deal with that.”
“She rolled in there prepped to be a prosecutor of a person who is morally and legally unfit to hold any office in this country, and she prosecuted her case brilliantly,” echoed Driftglass. She used “all the keywords that will trigger this lunatic into making dumb mistakes, because we know he can been provoked. Every time, he didn’t just take the bait, he swallowed the hook.”
I’d share more, but it might take some of the joy out of listening to today’s special coverage. Among some of the many specific points we focused on:
- Was Trump catfished by Team Harris’ “unsuccessful” pre-debate ploy to keep the microphones open all night?
- Does he actually even know how the Affordable Care Act (Obamacare) works?!
- Are undocumented immigrants in Ohio really eating American pets? (Someone said they were “on television” after all.)
- Are those immigrants getting government-funded sex change operations in prison?
- Does Donald Trump know anything about either fracking or solar energy?
- What does that “late great Hannibal Lecter” rally joke actually mean?
- Is Trump being catfished yet again by Team Harris’ immediate post-debate call for a second debate?
All of that and much, much, MUCH more on today’s BradCast…
(Comments are now closed.)