Now that they’ve made it as difficult as possible for those pesky 90-year-old nuns to cast votes, it’s time to make sure that vets injured and disabled in Iraq and Afghanistan have as difficult a time voting as possible.
The Republican War on Voting, as directed by Commander-in-Chief George W. Bush out of the White House, continues to continue.
The new front: Disallowing registration drives, by non-partisan organizations at Veterans Administration facilities. That, despite an order issued in late April by the Department of Veterans Affairs that they would allow such activity, in compliance with the National Voter Registration Act of 1993.
Apparently someone high up (we don’t yet know who) found out about that, and ordered an about-face on the previous directive, leading the Veterans Health Administration’s Under Secretary for Health, Michael J. Kussman, to announce this week that “Voter registration drives are not permitted” at their facilities, “due to Hatch Act requirements and to avoid disruptions to facility operations.”
“The Department of Veterans Affairs has retreated on a recently announced policy to allow voter registration drives at its facilities where veterans’ groups and others would assist wounded former soldiers to participate in the 2008 presidential election,” writes Steven Rosenfeld over at AlterNet, where he points out that “the Hatch Act restricts political activities by federal employees.”
Non-partisan voter registration drives by groups such as the League of Woman Voters, however, can hardly be considered “political activities by federal employees.”
Senators such as Feinstein and Kerry, and disabled veterans groups, as you may imagine, are none too happy…
Rosenfeld goes on to quote from a statement and letter issued yesterday by the Senators, demanding an explanation for the quickly changed policy, and wondering what “type of disruptions the VA envisions might occur during voter registration drives by…the League of Women Voters or veterans’ organizations.” (Their statement and letter are posted in full at the end of this article.)
As well, Rosenfeld offers comment from disabled vet groups who charge “block[ing] voter registration for our hospitalized veterans is shameful, outrageous, and despicable.”
But since when has shamefulness ever gotten in the way of Republican Party policy to undermine American democracy or show out-and-out contempt for U.S. troops?
Paul Sullivan of Veterans for Common Sense added that his group “finds it unconscionable that VA would reverse position and prohibit voter registration efforts for our wounded, injured, ill, and disabled veterans in VA hospitals and nursing homes as more and more casualties flood home from the Iraq and Afghanistan wars.”
An attorney who has been taking on the VA further points out that the Administration got caught allowing paid campaign workers from the Republican Party to register voters at their facilities while they disallowed nonpartisan groups from the same places.
“They’ve been forced to admit under oath that they told the League of Women Voters that if they took a position on Iraq, they’d lose their access. The court told them they can’t do that anymore, so they are going to ban all voter registration drives,” D.C. attorney Scott Rafferty tells Rosenfeld.
Yeah, it’s that bad.
The complete statement from Feinstein and Kerry follows below [emphasis in original]…
– New VA Directive appears to include blanket prohibition on voter registration drives –
Washington, DC U.S. Senators Dianne Feinstein (D-Calif.) and John Kerry (D-Mass.) today expressed concern about a new directive by the Veterans Health Administration that appears to reverse an earlier proposal to provide greater voter registration access to veterans in the departments care.
- On April 25, the Department of Veterans Affairs issued a directive that required all VA facilities develop comprehensive voter registration plans to assist veterans in voting. It also required the VA to publicly post voter registration information for veteran facility inpatients and required that VA facilities provide absentee voter applications if patients cannot leave the facility.
- Earlier this week, the Department of Veterans Affairs withdrew that directive, and issued a new directive that introduces a broad prohibition against organizations conducting voter registration drives at VA facilities.
- In response, the senators wrote a letter to Veterans Affairs Secretary James B. Peake, saying the new policy could discourage involvement from nonpartisan groups such as veterans service organizations and the League of Women Voters in helping veterans to vote.
We believe that the earlier directive better addressed the need for a consistent voter registration policy for our veterans, the senators wrote to Secretary Peake. While the changes made in the new directive seem small, the impact is large. It appears to us that the Department took one step forward for our veterans and the right to vote by directing that assistance be provided with voter registration and with securing absentee ballots, but then took a large step back by prohibiting voter registration drives.
The Senators requested clarification about why the new directive was issued, who retracted the initial policy directive and whether Secretary Peake sees the change as a complete bar on external, nonpartisan voter registration drives.
Background
The VAs April 25 directive came in the wake of a letter exchange between Senators Feinstein and Kerry and Veterans Affairs Secretary James B. Peake over whether VA facilities should be designated as voter registration agencies within the definition of the National Voter Registration Act of 1993. The Act requires states to offer voter registration opportunities at all offices that provide public assistance, services to the disabled and at all motor vehicle offices.
Many veterans live at VA facilities and some, especially those who are disabled, find it difficult to travel off-campus for services including voter registration. However, a federal appeals court recently ruled that voter registration groups do not have the right to register veterans on the grounds of VA facilities.
In light of the court decision, Senators Feinstein and Kerry wrote a letter in March to Secretary Peake to find ways to ensure that all veterans have access to voter registration materials and identify the policies they have in place to support voter registration.
Following is the text of the letter by Senators Feinstein and Kerry:
May 6, 2008
The Honorable James B. Peake
Secretary
U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs
810 Vermont Avenue NW
Washington, DC 20420Dear Secretary Peake:
On April 25, 2008, the Department of Veterans Affairs responded to our request for a consistent voter registration policy by issuing Directive 2008-23.While we do not believe it went far enough, we commend the changes made by the Directive which provided that veterans would be required to receive voter information and assistance in registering and applying for an absentee ballot.We were pleased that you took action to ensure that our nations veterans can easily register to vote and apply for an absentee ballot.
However, in the few days following the issuance of the first directive, the Department apparently withdrew it.Without explaining the rationale for this change, the Department today released a new policy, Directive 2008-25.While the new directive retains many positive provisions found in the earlier directive, it appears that a new and broad prohibition was included against third-party organizations conducting voter registration drives, even with the approval of the Department of Veterans Affairs.This would have the impact of discouraging involvement from nonpartisan groups for civic support for veterans.
We request that some clarification be provided on why the new directive was issued, who specifically retracted the initial policy directive, and whether you consider this change a complete bar on external, nonpartisan voter registration drives.The new directive references Hatch Act requirements, but the Office of Special Counsel has made clear that federal employees, even those who are considered to be in sensitive positions, may assist in voter registration drives. It is also clear from numerous policy statements issued by the Office of Special Counsel that federal employees can participate in nonpartisan voter registration drives on federal property and on official time. Moreover, the veterans the VA should support are not subject to any restrictions under the Hatch Actbecause they are not federal employees.
Directive 2008-25 further states that the policy changes are designed to avoid disruptions to facility operations. We would appreciate knowing the type of disruptions the VA envisions might occur during voter registration drives by nonpartisan organizations, such as the League of Women Voters or veteransorganizations, and why any potential disruption could not be addressed by less restrictive means.
We believe that the earlier directive better addressed the need for a consistent voter registration policy for our veterans.While the changes made in the new directive seem small, the impact is large. It appears to us that the Department took one step forward for veterans and the right to vote by directing that assistance be provided with voter registration and with securing absentee ballots, but then took a large step back by prohibiting voter registration drives.
We hope to continue to work with your office to ensure that the VA has a strong and consistent policy to support voter registration for our veterans.
Sincerely,
U.S. Senator Dianne Feinstein
U.S. Senator John Kerry
In the 2000 election Gore did everything in his power to ensure the men and women serving overseas had there votes disenfranchised! There was no outcry then, just like his action will be defended in this forum today.
Is that one of those “intelligent people” Jen was talking about on the other thread?
Yeah, must be 😛
YourKidding #1
No “you’re kidding” is the proper english, but have your poetic liscense. The gummit does why shouldn’t you?
Where ya from dood? Do I have to bring up your ancestor’s famous saying: “It is a damn poor mind that can only figure out one way to spell a word”? … That was the president of the Amurkan Rebellion (no dumb shit, not preznit blush, it was andrew jackson, a dwarf of cognition).
Brad sedd:
Yep, how about the 90 year old woman who died takeing a shit, and the rest of the folk in the house were somewhat disingenuous when the sheriff found her a month or so later?
(Hard Core Freakin Reality).
Being a poet and an artist, I can’t evade the obvious microcosm, macrocosm, cousin, etc. Can You cousin?
Yourkidding #1
I have to say that is an outright lie. If you don’t know it as such, you should look into it enough, or post some links to back up such an outrageous assertion. Knowingly spreading disinformation is against our commenting rules, and abusing them can get you put on the moderation queue or banned.
Yourkidding incorrectly stated:
Actually, I outcried. I outcried that it was ridiculous he was bullied into accepting overseas military ballots that were post-marked days and weeks after the election in Florida!
Gore did nothing to disenfranchise overseas military voters, and ended up allowing in loads of ballots which should never have been counted at all.
Unless you have hard evidence to indicate otherwise, please consider this your warning that posting knowing disinfo will lose your posting privileges here. And now you know, that’s disinfo.
You have been warned. I’d hate to see you go. So watch it. Thanks!
Yourkidding, hopefully you’ve gone back to do some research to refresh your faulty memory, and now realize that you are thoroughly wrong about the facts in the 2000 debacle in FL.
But your initial response is stunning. If you truly care so much about ensuring the right to vote for our military personnel, then where is your outrage at the VA for shirking their duty to assist our wounded vets in voting?
Don’t you think your attitude is rather inconsistent?
VA’s voter registration ban raises questions
By William R. Levesque, St Petersburg Times Staff Writer
In print: Saturday, May 10, 2008
Just this week, the VA imposed a policy prohibiting all voter registration drives on its property by anyone, partisan or not, a rule that critics say may violate the constitutional rights of veterans.
________________________________________
{Ed Note: Please don’t post whole articles when you can link them. –99}
Lol,
As is the norm here, those who wish tell the truth get banned and opposing views are squashed. Oh no, Brads gonna ban me from his little pack of lies.
Keep begging for donations loser.
You gotta be kiddin #8
I gave DreddsGirlFriend a plaque for her 14th birthday (that is a typo you fucking gummit spy bastards who are AT&Ting us) which says:
Be nice kiddin … it is better for your heart.
BTW Bradblog is the most free speech blog in the blogosphere. Better than kos, huffpo, dem undershorts, n e u f n e u f (who destroyed JoJ’s presence here), drudge, and on and on!!
Bradblog is the number ONE in free speech. He can’t tolerate lies from the wrongwing, but other than that, he got game.
Dredd, I have yet to ban anyone from my blog, and I wish you’d stop drinking.
AND JoJ’s presence is still here as regularly as ever. He DID change his screen name to align more with his thing for Mr. Ed, and he comments on my blog sometimes.
So…., -these- are some of those so-called freedoms the US military went to Iraq to defend, right? A free democracy, American values? Very good, very good indeed. Actually, it’s nothing short of astounding, someone is in for a Nobel Peace Prize over this little caper.
After all that ‘Hooah!’ and the right for the American military to intervene wherever the fuck it pleases them because the US owns the world [Noam Chomsky] it has come down to the simple fact that the US military is denied the vote.
Because, really, what pussy wants to vote, right?
Expect a certain drop off in the ability to pay the bills very soon now, Helicopter Ben can’t play magic tricks forever.
Agent 99 #10
“What problem? move along I didn’t delete no stinking embarassing posts from JOJ … he changed his handle” (which is against the rules unless the plastic rulers say otherwise) … you are becoming a kosack … quit lying …
“quit drinking”???? … fuck you bitch … you stop getting drunk on bullshit … that is what is needed here … wannabe kos lamer … does the delete button make you wet or do you just drool the tool???
WHERE IS JOJ?
I will not stand for him being mistreated. And I saw the posts where he was saying here on Bradblog that 99 and him were having a “thing” over some Palestinian issue, and that she or he had banned him.
He posted that here. Then she or he said why are you bringing that up here. The his posts about it disappeared. Then JoJ disappeared.
WHAT IS THE TRUTH??? Can you handle the truth?
Do bradbloggers care about how other bradbloggers are treated or mistreated?
STOP the kossification of bradblog!!!!
PROTEST!!!
DRINK!!!! THINK!!!! Fight hypocracy!!!!
Until we know expect nighmares 99 … Brad … you got staff infection bro …