EXCLUSIVE: Ann Coulter’s Felonious Florida Voter Registration Application

State, County Records Show She Lied on Voter Application, Despite Oath Affirming Truthiness of Information

Share article:

“OATH: I do solemnly swear (or affirm) that I will protect and defend the Constitution of the United States and the Constitution of the State of Florida. I am qualified to register as an elector under the Constitution and laws of the State of Florida. I am a U.S. citizen. I am a legal resident of Florida. All information on this form is true. I understand that if it is not true, I can be convicted of a felony of the third degree and fined up to $5,000 and/or imprisoned for up to five years.”

That’s the oath next to the signature of Ann Coulter, who, on 6/15/05 filled out her Florida Voter Registration Application Form — as obtained Exclusively by The BRAD BLOG (posted in full at the bottom of this article) — after purchasing her new $1.8 million house at 242 Seabreeze Ave. in Palm Beach County, Florida in March of 2005. The “Warranty Deed” (also obtained by The BRAD BLOG) for the house was signed over to Coulter on March 30th, 2005 by the previous owners, Eric Stonestrom and his wife, Lucinda Pascale Stonestrom.

In February of this year, Jose Lambiet of the Palm-Beach Post reported that Coulter, the extremist Republican columnist and author, seems to have committed Voter Fraud by registering and then voting in a Palm Beach, Florida precinct in which she does not live. She registered to the vote, for reasons which still remain unclear, at the address of her realtor Suzanne Frisbie.

Coulter has maintained, when asked about the incident during recent public appearances, that the report is a lie and that she doesn’t even live in Palm Beach.

Lambiet has since characterized those denials by Coulter as “absolutely a bold-faced lie.”

Various information obtained by The BRAD BLOG, however, would seem to back up Lambiet’s account which shows that the liar in the matter is, in fact, Coulter.

The radical darling of the GOP speaking/fundraising circuit did, in fact, purchase a house at 242 Seabreeze Dr. in Palm Beach, Florida as reported publicly by the Palm Beach County Property Appraiser’s website and confirmed by several different sources including the “Warranty Deed” signed on March 30th, 2005.

Meanwhile, Coulter’s official Florida Voter Registration Application Form received from the office of the Palm Beach County Election Supervisor confirms that she specified “999 Indian Rd” as her “Legal Residence” — despite never having lived there.

The Indian Road address is that of Coulter’s Real Estate agent and her husband David.

Coulter’s signature on the form is next to an “oath” affirming the information on the form is true, and acknowledging that she understood she could face a third-degree felony conviction, a $5,000 fine and/or five-years imprisonment for providing false information on the form.

“She never lived here,” Lambiet reported Frisbie as confirming about the address Coulter used on her registration form. “I’m Ann’s Realtor, and she used this address to forward mail when she moved from New York,” said Frisbie.

The BRAD BLOG was unable to reach Frisbie for additional comment for this article since obtaining Coulter’s actual Voter Registration form. We were told during a call to Frisbie’s residence (where Ann Coulter does not live) that the real estate agent was on vacation until April 20th.

While Republicans have been going to great efforts since the 2004 Election to suggest there is some sort of Voter Fraud epidemic in this country (as distinct from Election Fraud via electronic machines, registration database purges, corrupt Secretaries of State in Ohio, etc.,) very few such cases of Voter Fraud are actually known or documented. Nonetheless, phony GOP-run front groups, such as the tax-exempt “American Center for Voting Rights”, have been distributing propaganda around the country to suggest such an epidemic in order to force state legislation to require Photo ID at the polls. As well as to smoke-screen from the very real problem of Election Fraud which has succeeded in disenfranchising hundreds of thousands of voters in recent elections. Critics have charged that the type of Photo ID legislation being pushed through statehouses around the country, at the behest of the national GOP, would disproportionately disenfranchise millions of Democratic-leaning voters and — as a two Federal courts and the majority of the U.S. Dept. of Justice’s Voting Rights Act unit have recently affirmed concerning such a law in the state of Georgia — would amount to little more than a modern-day poll tax.

White House political operative Karl Rove played along with the misleading meme of a Voter Fraud epidemic over the weekend by lauding Republican attorneys for their “work on clean elections” in 2000, 2002 and 2004. He charged that “We have…an enormous and growing problem with elections in certain parts of America today,” in reference to “ballot integrity” — a code word used to suggest a problem with Voter Fraud in the country.

We certainly do have “an enormous and growing problem” with our elections, but, as John Gideon discussed in a must-read BRAD BLOG Guest Editorial on Sunday, it’s not due to Voter Fraud. Nonetheless, that hasn’t apparently stopped Coulter from committing same, or anti-democracy GOP operatives across the country from reportedly running Voter Registration schemes where Democratic voter registrations are changed to Republican or destroyed all together or simply never turned in to county officials. The state of California announced one such investigation into GOP Voter Registration Fraud late last week. Also, three GOP officials have been indicted so far in a “phone-jamming scandal” to hamper DNC get-out-the-vote efforts in 2002, and that investigation now seems to be reaching into the White House as reported by AP yesterday.

But back to Coulter who was recently given 30 days by the Palm Beach County Supervisor of Elections, Arthur Anderson, to explain her reasons for committing an apparent third-degree Vote Fraud felony. If a satisfactory explanation is not given, Anderson has said the case will be referred to the state attorney for possible prosecution.

Clint Curtis, a Democratic candidate for the U.S. Congress in Florida’s 24th District is no stranger to the matter of Voting Fraud in the Sunshine State. As originally reported by The BRAD BLOG in December of 2004, Curtis has alleged his opponent, Rep. Tom Feeney (R-FL), asked him to create vote-rigging software in 2000 when they both worked for a software firm in Oviedo, Florida while Feeney was also speaker of the Florida House.

In a statement released recently, Curtis commended Supervisor Anderson for taking action in the Coulter matter. Curtis noted the irony of the situation that “many Floridians…still recall Ms. Coulter calling our elderly voters ‘hapless’ and our statutory recount process ‘a subterfuge for fraud, error and outright theft’ during the aftermath of the 2000 presidential election.”

The Palm Beach County appraiser’s record shows that Coulter purchased her swanky Palm Beach crib in March of 2005 and then filled out her Florida Voter Registration Application shortly thereafter. The form is dated “6/15/05” next to the signature and is stamped as having been “RECEIVED JUN 23 2005.”

It should also be noted that according to the Connecticut Voter Registration records available via Lexis/Nexis, Coulter’s voter registration in that state, where she has previously lived, is still listed as “Active”. The “Voting History” section of that listing, however, shows that she last voted in CT in 1996. Both the CT and FL voter registrations list her birthdate as 12/8/1961.

Here is Ann Coulter’s complete Florida Voter Registration Application Form in full, along with her Palm Beach County “Voter History” record, as received from the office of Palm Beach County Election Supervisor Arthur Anderson via a public records request…

(Hat tip to Daniel Borchers of Citizens for Principled Conservatism and to several BRAD BLOG readers for their various tips and information provided and used while researching for this article.)

Please help support The BRAD BLOG! Unlike Ann Coulter, we don’t receive $30,000 per speaking engagement. We rely almost solely on the generosity and support of our readers.

UPDATE 3/10/06: Coulter fails to respond to Election Supervisor’s letter! May be thrown off voter rolls, incident report, letter to Coulter posted in full…

Share article:

Reader Comments on

EXCLUSIVE: Ann Coulter’s Felonious Florida Voter Registration Application

147 Comments

(Comments are now closed.)


147 Responses

  1. 1)
    Ross said on 4/11/2006 @ 9:17am PT: [Permalink]

    If you live in Florida, you don’t have to pay state income tax …. if you live in New York, you pay some of the highest state income taxes in the country. What would you do if you could choose?

  2. 5)
    Mark said on 4/11/2006 @ 9:49am PT: [Permalink]

    Nice friggin’ WORK!!!!

    Gawd is this how we have to do it? ARREST them one at a time and then just take their chairs when we slam the cell door shut?

  3. 7)
    Ken Thomas said on 4/11/2006 @ 9:54am PT: [Permalink]

    Ann Coulter needs to be doing 5 years. She earned it and she needs to be given her just sentence. 🙁

  4. 8)
    CATHY said on 4/11/2006 @ 9:55am PT: [Permalink]

    I love how Repubs see no harm when it is their own who break the law, but if it was a Dem, they would be calling for his/her head.

    REPUBLICAN HYPOCRITES AS USUAL!!!!!!!!!!

  5. 10)
    me said on 4/11/2006 @ 9:57am PT: [Permalink]

    Fry her. Although she’ll probably get the same treatment Limbaugh’s getting on his illegal-drugs charge: They’ll stretch it out for years, until Bush pardons them both right before leaving office.

  6. 11)
    mlaw said on 4/11/2006 @ 9:58am PT: [Permalink]

    I am no Ann Coulter fan but this is silly. Owning a piece of real estate doesn’t make you a resident nor does the number of nights you spend somewhere. My guess is she was using the RE Agents address to establish legal residency for tax reasons.

    She goes down to register and does so probably without even knowing its in a different voting disrict and uses the same address she has on her drivers license or some other form of ID, with which she established residency in the first place. She was probably just being lazy.

    Have fun with this, she certainly deserves it, but as long as she only voted once its probably closer to tax fraud than voter fraud.

  7. 12)
    TaterSalad said on 4/11/2006 @ 10:02am PT: [Permalink]

    Waste of time? Maybe. But, it’s really more about the principal. She flaps her big loud obnoxious and foul mouth continuously over the Democrats … lying and twisting her words to make anyone who disagrees with her as a "bad" person. Takes one to know one … she needs to shut the f*ck up.

  8. 14)
    Cptnaction said on 4/11/2006 @ 10:28am PT: [Permalink]

    Did anyone else notice that she didn’t even vote in the last two Presidential elections? Could she have been registered and voted somewhere else or did she just not bother to vote?

  9. 15)
    BinNY said on 4/11/2006 @ 10:29am PT: [Permalink]

    …Ross said on 4/11/2006 @ 12:17pm PT…

    If you live in Florida, you don’t have to pay state income tax …. if you live in New York, you pay some of the highest state income taxes in the country. What would you do if you could choose?

    I’d pick New York anyday – but what does this have to do with anything?

  10. 17)
    Jay said on 4/11/2006 @ 10:35am PT: [Permalink]

    Hey dude!
    Ever try to read light gold text on a black background. Nice colors – but almost illegibe! If you actually want people TO READ this stuff, how about correcting the visual readability factor. I read two sentences and then just click outa here!

  11. 19)
    Anonymous said on 4/11/2006 @ 10:41am PT: [Permalink]

    I understand that Ms. Coulter is a lawyer (she claims to be…. whatever that’s worth). If so, then someone should file a complaint against her in Florida and in all the states where she is admitted to practice law. She is unlikely to be prosecuted for this fraud, but she could be sanctioned or lose her license to practice law (this happened to Bill Clinton re: Lewinsky/Jones, etc.) At minimum, she would have to respond and it would draw more attention to her misdoings.

  12. 20)
    texaslady said on 4/11/2006 @ 10:48am PT: [Permalink]

    XYZ – I was just wondering about ole Karl and if the DA down in his cabin town ever followed up.

    Karl’s history would point that he would vote from every state he has a home. Probably taking a homestead exemption on each home as well.

    Sure would be refreshing to know there is an honest Republican somewhere.

  13. 21)
    Bob Wilson said on 4/11/2006 @ 10:52am PT: [Permalink]

    I have to admit I’ve been mildly (and probably morbidly) interested in this story which has been kicking around the Blogosphere for a couple of months.

    The question that fascinates me is, "Why bother?" I don’t care what Ann Coulter’s real address is, she’s not on my Holiday Card list.

    I had to look. 242 Seabreeze Avenue is nicely nestled between Breakers and Everglades golf courses (closer to Breakers) about six miles south of 999 Indian Road which is across from Peanut Island.

    Mail forwarding? What a pain. Why ask your real estate agent to do that when there are professional services that someone who can afford a $1.8 million house could certainly use.

    Now committing a felony, even a third-degree one, is a serious matter, but I’d also ask this question: "If Ann Coulter last voted in Connecticut in 1996, and registered in Florida in 2005, where did she vote, say in 2000 and 2004?" Is it possible that the "Harlot of Hate" isn’t quite gung-ho American enough to perform her civic duty?

    And just to show a little stain of elitism, I’ve seen two Republican voter registrations, Coulter’s and Bill O’Reilly’s. (The one that debunked his claim to be an independent.) These people have terrible handwriting. It speaks of a very undiciplined grammar school experience.

    Now if Ms. Coulter were a Black Democrat, she might be facing hard time; but that’s not the case, so we can look forward to a slap on the wrist, if anything. But the point is made: People like Coulter and those she supports and simpers about simply have a real disdain for rules and laws. It appears that laws only apply to other people, not the annointed Bushevics that pollute our media and the political arena.

    Or perhaps Coulter will wind up behind bars like so many in and around the current administration. (Look for that trend to accelerate in 2007.) Perhaps it might even be for contempt – such an apt and appropriate descriptor.

  14. 22)
    BIA said on 4/11/2006 @ 11:13am PT: [Permalink]

    I agree with Jay!

    PLEASE for the LUV of baby Jeezuz, make your site more readable. Change the background and font colors. Your design decision makes it difficult to read what it is you are so passionate about. Which is more important, to look cool, or to get your point across?

  15. 24)
    Jack Frost said on 4/11/2006 @ 11:31am PT: [Permalink]

    Maybe it’s just me, but I get the feeling that the only reason Rove’s conceding that there was any fraud in 2004 is to lay the groundwork for being able to challenge the 2006 outcome (which you can tell he’s terrified about if you read between the lines), which many are predicting will be a landslide for the Dems.

    If the predictions bear out, Rove’s gonna have his work cut out for him even if the electronic voting machines are still in place.

    You can only fudge the numbers so much in so many places.

    But wouldn’t it be a classic Rove tactic to use data from the fraudulant 2004 election to ‘prove’ that tampering is easily done and that the results of the 2006 election must be challenged because of possible manipulation?

    Like a snake eating it’s own tail…

  16. 26)
    Greg M said on 4/11/2006 @ 11:52am PT: [Permalink]

    Other interesting fact: the Palm Beach Property Appraiser’s listing for Ms Coulter’s property on Seabreeze indicates that she has a homestead exemption on the property. The homestead exemption in Flroida means the owner does not have to pay taxes on the first $25,000 of the property’s value. The only way you can get a homestead exemption is by swearing that the property is your primary residence.

  17. 27)
    olecraftyliberals said on 4/11/2006 @ 12:26pm PT: [Permalink]

    Wow! Still talking about this, huh?

    Ann Coulter absolutely is not going to be handed down any charges. When you sign up for voting (I did recently) you have to provide a piece of mail and a picture ID with an address. That’s what this is contingent on.

    I could understand the probability of intent if she mislead to vote in two precincts instead of one, but this is not the case.

    Someone on here made the point of this floating around the "blogosphere". That is all it is floating around. CNN, MSNBC, even the New York Times isn’t making mention of it.

    At this point, a few select liberals I think can probably be charged with stalking. Following Ann around to her college speeches, engaging in silly invective and whatnot.

    I can’t wait until liberals start blogging on her new book: "Godless". It’s coming out June 6th.

  18. 28)
    Truth Seeker said on 4/11/2006 @ 12:43pm PT: [Permalink]

    This is a disturbed, pathetic person. I have not and will not read her books.

  19. 29)
    Darrin said on 4/11/2006 @ 12:54pm PT: [Permalink]

    Anne is a lawyer… it is her job to know better. As to all of those saying "it’s no big deal", let me ask you this: What would you be screaming if Hillary Clinton did it? Yeah. See, boys and girls, that’s called hypocricy, and that what the repugnicant party is founded on.

    She advocates hitting people with a 2X4 for voicing their opinions when they differ from hers. I advocate simply enforcing the law, on her and on everyone, fairly and equally. But I guess that makes me a Liberal.

  20. 30)
    agent99 said on 4/11/2006 @ 1:02pm PT: [Permalink]

    Brad, your colors are great. Your page spares the eyes. These people who say it’s too hard to read must not spend much time getting their eyeballs blasted by bright white backgrounds on their screens. If you are thinking of making it more readable, maybe just a new font…?

  21. 31)
    Tim King said on 4/11/2006 @ 1:07pm PT: [Permalink]

    In fact three Republican operatives were CONVICTED of the phone-jamming scandal in New Hampshire. The Republic National Committe paid most or all the legal fees of the chief culprit. Hush money?

  22. 32)
    Egypt Steve said on 4/11/2006 @ 1:08pm PT: [Permalink]

    There is an obvious treasonous, terrorist conspiracy afoot here. I don’t know exactly what it is, so the best thing would be to render A.C. to Guantanamo and give her the waterboard. Then we’ll find out what’s what.

  23. 33)
    Ken said on 4/11/2006 @ 1:20pm PT: [Permalink]

    Take a few moments to send copies of your documents to the Palm Beach County District Attorney. Probably, nothing will happen, but at least the prosecutor won’t be able to say they know nothing about the matter. And, if they fail to at least investigate Coulter, they will have a harder time prosecuting anyone else for a similar transgression.

  24. 34)
    WickyWoo said on 4/11/2006 @ 1:20pm PT: [Permalink]

    Now that we have proof, federal marshels should be showing up at the beast’s door, she should be clapped in irons and experience all she’s ever wished on others

    I think a year of weekends in the stocks should be sufficient for voter fraud in her case. Think of all the good money for liberal causes that could be raised selling travel packages to egg her.

  25. 36)
    Jim said on 4/11/2006 @ 1:38pm PT: [Permalink]

    Actually, the Florida tax situation is the more interesting part of this puzzle. If she used a Florida address to try and establish residency in Florida, yet never really lived there, she probably is committing tax fraud in New York. Between that and the voter fraud this awful person could be in prison long enough to make several women in prison sexploitation films.

  26. 37)
    Brent Bushong said on 4/11/2006 @ 1:47pm PT: [Permalink]

    I remember something from the old cop series "Hill Street Blues", where one of the characters was complaining about an old woman who sniffed each chicken before she bought one "No, no good. No, no good. No, no good."

    Belker says, "Lady, could you pass that test?"

    All I am saying is that you have spent so much time documenting something so unimportant, that have probably done a similar thing yourself. (BTW, one vote? WTF??!!) And don’t give in to the knee-jerk reaction and say "But I’m not a [fill in blank here] like Coulter is."

    She never claimed to be able to change the result of an election by voting in one county instead of another. If you believe that, well, then maybe we should apply the chicken test to you.

    Cast the first stone, bitch.

  27. 38)
    big dan said on 4/11/2006 @ 1:58pm PT: [Permalink]

    Where is BVAC’s picture of Ann "Mr. Freeze" Coulter? BVAC? I don’t ask for much……it is REQUIRED that you post that picture on ALL Ann Coulter articles on brad’s blog!

  28. 39)
    ed lazarus said on 4/11/2006 @ 3:03pm PT: [Permalink]

    Ann coulter is a loud mouthed, slimy, ugly, f^%$ing worthless bag of donkey shit.

  29. 40)
    DW said on 4/11/2006 @ 3:40pm PT: [Permalink]

    funny how ‘law and order’ Republicans are so strict about *everybody else* following said laws, however, as we are seeing time and again, they think the laws only apply to ‘little people!’

    (who said that, was it Leona Helmsley or Imelda Marcos?)

  30. 41)
    bvac said on 4/11/2006 @ 3:40pm PT: [Permalink]

    Now, to those who think this is not worthy of covering but generally support the cause of transparent, accountable elections i say this: there is a concerted effort by the top republican leadership to create an atmosphere of distrust of elections among their base by exaggerating claims of individual voter fraud (multiple votes, dead people voting, illegal aliens voting, et c.) and heralding electronic voting and photo ID/voter ID card as the solution.

    As we here are aware, photo ID is a jim crow-like scheme to disenfranchise or discourage a large section of voters that do not typically support republicans, and electronic voting machines are deeply flawed devices that can be easily hacked to change results, or simply malfunction and throw an entire election away. Meanwhile, the fraud that they exaggerate is being perpetrated by high level operatives of their own party.

    So when James Tobin is convicted of jamming a phone bank for a get-out-the-vote operation, or Ann Coulter is alleged to commit a felonious vote after ridiculing the citizens of Florida for not being able to follow the rules in the 2000 election, that is something to build on and reinforce the REAL election reform cause.

  31. 44)
    Koshei said on 4/11/2006 @ 3:53pm PT: [Permalink]

    Coulter’s misvoting parallels father Bush’s little scam from his Presidency, when he lived in Kennebunkport, ME, but maintained a residency in Texas to avoid Maine’s taxes. That was quickly forgotten.
    If I understand correctly, if Coulter wins this one, then anybody can vote anywhere.

  32. 46)
    Bluebear2 said on 4/11/2006 @ 3:56pm PT: [Permalink]

    des #35

    actualy the color scheme here is somewhat of a mystery. It seems to have something to do with each computers video card or some settings. I have 2 computers at work and three at home – all show a black background. When I pulled up the site on a friends computer it had a green background. All of these computers were running netscape, but if I use IE they still come up black so it doesn’t seem to be a browser issue.

    Anyway I agree with Agent99 and I like it the way it is.

  33. 47)
    frankyboi said on 4/11/2006 @ 4:09pm PT: [Permalink]

    What say we all send Ann a letter to her residence on Seabreeze Ave. and tell her what we think of her. (Ever try to find a way to send her an email from her website? Impossible.)
    This way we can at least fill her mailbox with some ‘fan’ mail.

  34. 48)
    Ick of the East said on 4/11/2006 @ 4:20pm PT: [Permalink]

    In both IE and Firefox I get a green background with yellow letters.
    It is absolutely a pain in the eyes to read.

  35. 49)
    bvac said on 4/11/2006 @ 4:21pm PT: [Permalink]

    How about you send a letter to your secretary of state and demand fully transparent and accountable elections instead?

  36. 51)
    BillyJack said on 4/11/2006 @ 4:28pm PT: [Permalink]

    Well yes that’s the obvious answer but by God Frankyboi’s idea sure does sound fun.

  37. 52)
    Bluebear2 said on 4/11/2006 @ 4:29pm PT: [Permalink]

    bvac said:

    "How about you send a letter to your secretary of state and demand fully transparent and accountable elections instead?"

    Well with Bruce McPherson as my S.O.S. it seems like a waste of a stamp.

    First he gave us hope when he wouldn’t certify Diebold, but then he slipped them in late one friday afternoon when no one was watching!

    I’m throwing my support and hopes to Senator Debra Bowen. She has my vote this fall to replace McPherson!

  38. 54)
    big dan said on 4/11/2006 @ 4:37pm PT: [Permalink]

    I blew the left/right thingy…sorry…

    Why can’t the MSM news, like Jon Stewart, play a clip of Rove saying "elections are clean", and then play a clip of this GOP operative in N.H. being jailed for phone-jamming and having calls traced back to the White House???

    Again, I apologize. I get excited when I see that picture of Ann Coulter sans hair avec jail bars.

  39. 56)
    Jed S said on 4/11/2006 @ 4:53pm PT: [Permalink]

    Perhaps Ann mistakenly put her mailing address instead of her residence address and is too egotistical to admit error since she’s so used to acting that way on TV. There doesn’t appear to be a motive for deliberate fraud in the matter unless she’s trying to vote in more than one ballot jurisdiction.

  40. 57)
    Nick said on 4/11/2006 @ 4:56pm PT: [Permalink]

    This is silly. So what. She’s not a politician; she hasn’t been elected thus she should be under any scrutiny. Millions of people do the same thing.

    This is the problem people, you BELIEVE in the two party system and see her as some kind of enemy or saviour. Personally, I think her viewpoints are crap but you know what, those viewpoints keep her in the spotlight and you’re hatred of her bought her that house.

    This is like fighting cancer by going shopping; you may feel better for a while but the problem is the two party system that keeps career politicians in and the common man out.

    It’s sad. Personally, I think she had some moments where she looks attractive and other moments where she looks downright scary however that is totally irrelevant as is the comment about a "men’s or women’s prison".

    You want to see the problem it’s not Ann’s property records. The problem is in the mirror.

    Enjoy the bread and circus sucker.

  41. 58)
    BillyJack said on 4/11/2006 @ 5:06pm PT: [Permalink]

    I don’t beleive in the two party system. We should scrap the whole lot and start something that works. But short of a revolution what can we honestly do? In any case Ann Coulter would still be an evil C*NT.

  42. 60)
    Smith said on 4/11/2006 @ 5:12pm PT: [Permalink]

    OCL #27:

    Did you register to vote in Florida? Each state has its own requirements. If so, are you accusing Ann Coulter of having a Florida Driver’s License with a fake address?
    Is that a felony, too?

    Bob #21:

    Why forward your mail to your real estate agent? According to OCL #27, to verify your fake address on your voters registration.

  43. 61)
    Andrew Wanielista said on 4/11/2006 @ 5:29pm PT: [Permalink]

    Brad,
    It’s not just the color of the page it is a combinition of the colors and the font. Not that all are bad however try changing any one of the three.

  44. 62)
    Expose the traitors said on 4/11/2006 @ 5:54pm PT: [Permalink]

    Traitors were involved in the orchestration of our "new Pearl Harbor" and we are talking about Ann Coulter’s voting card? These controlled leftist sites seem to be nothing but controlled opposition. Correct me if I am wrong, but shouldn’t we all be talking more and more about WHAT we are going to do to bring all the evidence about what happened on 911 and what is CURRENTLY happening to our country out for the world to see and bring this country back to the way it should be?
    I am beginning to see a pattern in http://www.crooksandliars.com this site and most of the partisan sites on the net that have a reputation for getting to "the truth." When it comes to very controversial matters that show that both democrats and republicans are involved in the ruination of this country, that is almost never discussed. But when one or the other gets in hot water then it is feeding time for one or the other.

    People, this is NOT a democratic or republican issue. Hillary supports the war and the Patriot Act and has never ONCE come out and brought the new information about 911 to light that shows that it was an inside job, just like it always is. Next time, why don’t you write an article about the Project for a New American Century (PNAC) calling for a "Pearl Harbor style attack on America to galvanize the American people behind an expansionist military" when they wrote the white-paper "Rebuilding America’s Defenses" published on September 17th, 2000? That was signed by almost all of the rabid neocons currently operating within our nation now. Cheney, Libby, Rabbi Zakheim, Wolfowitz, Jeb Bush, Rumsfeld, Doug Feint, etc.

    REAL NEWS REAL ISSUES

    http://www.prisonplanet.com
    http://www.whatreallyhappened.com
    http://www.st911.org

  45. 63)
    agent99 said on 4/11/2006 @ 6:04pm PT: [Permalink]

    #62… They ARE exposed, and yet they’re still IN the White House. Sy Hersh just pulled their pants down around their ankles, and I guess it hasn’t sunk in yet that THERE IS A NUCLEAR HOLOCAUST TO PREVENT right now, because I don’t think we’d be at our computers right now if it had. I think we’d each be on our way to DC to yank the scum out of our house if we were able to strip off all our opinions and other coping mechanisms to fathom the truth, but give us a few days, will ya?

  46. 64)
    Bluebear2 said on 4/11/2006 @ 6:12pm PT: [Permalink]

    bvac #55

    I went to your video link but couldn’t find the article. Then I remembered the F3 key on a web page brings up a text search tool. I found it then. There were already about 8 articles about the various Bush & Co. scandals revealed just today in front of it.

    How much longer is this going to go on?

  47. 66)
    agent99 said on 4/11/2006 @ 7:00pm PT: [Permalink]

    I just got my notice from the County Registrar that we’ll be voting on Diebold machines next time, AND, for those of us paper freaks who vote permenant absentee, our votes will be counted with a Diebold counting machine. &%$*, #@&%, and %*#&, cubed!

  48. 68)
    obiwan said on 4/11/2006 @ 8:52pm PT: [Permalink]

    I think the BIGGEST felony is that she gets to put "female" on her driver’s license.
    (You know, the one she lied about her birthdate on.)

    "It’s a MAN, baby!" 🙂

  49. 69)
    Larry Bergan said on 4/12/2006 @ 11:37pm PT: [Permalink]

    I like the color scheme myself. It IS easier on the eyes and has kind of a dangerous quality.

  50. 70)
    Fred Farkle said on 4/12/2006 @ 12:58am PT: [Permalink]

    If Ann is convicted would she serve time in a men’s or women’s prison?

    She’ll be sent to a prison for eunuchs and androgynites.

  51. 71)
    Arlene Montemarano said on 4/12/2006 @ 1:06am PT: [Permalink]

    I have gotten into the habit of copying your page into my email program to read it without eyestrain.

    Very easy to do for those who have a problem with the colors.

  52. 72)
    Pete Bogs said on 4/12/2006 @ 1:29am PT: [Permalink]

    I am counting the minutes until Coulter and her supporters come out and say this is all a liberal smear campaign… you see, consternatives never do anything immoral or illegal, it’s always a liberal plot to bring decent, patriotic Americans down (e.g. Tom DeLay)…

    book ‘er, Dan-O!

  53. 74)
    barryg said on 4/12/2006 @ 2:00am PT: [Permalink]

    I copy and paste the page and email it to my friends with dialup because it takes so long to load on dialup it frequently times out. Of course this gives them an edited version of the page since they do not see the latest updates.

  54. 75)
    chuck said on 4/12/2006 @ 2:19am PT: [Permalink]

    cheney got 24 hours to report a shooting…coulter gets 30 days to explain voter fraud…you or i would be in jail already…rove really is getting predictable…in the words of "W"…you can fool some of the people some of the time….uh..uh…duh…uh…but you won`t fool me again…

  55. 77)
    jeff said on 4/12/2006 @ 2:58am PT: [Permalink]

    ALL MUCH ADO ABOUT NOTHING. Haven’t you got anything better to do than try to make an issue out of nothing? Please refer to voter guides:

    What does it mean, "a legal resident?"

    In practice, your residence for voting purposes is wherever you say it is, but you may have only one place of legal residence at any given time. If you are in the military or otherwise out of State for an extended period of time and will not be maintaining a home here, you may still keep your voter registration here, so that you have a place where you can vote. In that case, you are eligible to vote absentee and only in countywide, state and federal elections.

    http://elections.alachua.fl.us/...istration.html

    SURE LOOKS LIKE FITZ SCREWED UP TODAY! THAT IS THE REAL NEWS; NOT ANN COULTER.

  56. 79)
    Shannon Williford said on 4/12/2006 @ 3:08am PT: [Permalink]

    Is Ann a man?
    Hmmm….
    Why don’t some of y’all enterprising net hounds find photos of her in school? Maybe get one of her hairs for a DNA test…
    That would be too funny…

    shw

  57. 80)
    gator said on 4/12/2006 @ 3:35am PT: [Permalink]

    Brad you are such a loser. Don’t you have anything better to do. get a life you moron

  58. 82)
    Charlene said on 4/12/2006 @ 4:39am PT: [Permalink]

    Since Coulter makes a living out of running her mouth, she’s fair game.
    By choosing bodacious bad behavior, she sets herself up for a fall.
    It would be fun to hire a private investigator & dig up all the dirt on her.
    I can tell you, she didn’t become vicious & arrogant from living the life of a saint.
    What goes around, comes around…

  59. 83)
    KestrelBrighteyes said on 4/12/2006 @ 5:22am PT: [Permalink]

    Jeff re: #77 – Protocol dictates that if you make a baseless accusation on a blog (ie, "Fitgerald screwed up"), that you provide the link to let people know what the hell you’re talking about. Since you didn’t…

    This is all I could find regarding "Fitzgerald" and "today" – but you mispoke. I think what you SHOULD have said is "LIBBY is really screwed now!"

    Fitzgerald Corrects Filing

    At least you recognize that it’s news – that’s a start.

    Re: Coulter – Thanks for taking the time to come here to comment that the issue isn’t important enough to comment about.

    Coulter broke the law. She swore that she lived where she didn’t live, and then she voted there. She signed an oath that said she understood that lying about any of the information she gave was a felony.

    I realize nobody got a blowjob out of this deal so that makes it unimportant to a lot of people, but ya know, some of us still cheer when the bad guys get caught.

    But let’s hear your logic behind the comments – explain to us why you think Ann Coulter should not be held to the same legal standards as any other American citizen.

    Anyone else you want to add to this list of "privileged" criminals? (Besides George Bush and Dick Cheney, I mean)

  60. 84)
    JUDGE OF JUDGES said on 4/12/2006 @ 5:41am PT: [Permalink]

    I just heard Brad discuss this story on the GREAT Stephanie Miller Show "The Girl Howard Stern" !!!

  61. 85)
    czaragorn said on 4/12/2006 @ 5:42am PT: [Permalink]

    Back in the 50s, when I was in elementary school, they switched to green "black"boards and yellow chalk, claiming that it was better for everyone’s eyes. I liked it then, and I like it now. As for the Coulter thang, she should have to be subject to the same laws the rest of us are, and she should be held accountable when she signs a mendacious document under oath. As for the prison she’s assigned to, I really don’t care if she’s Squeaky Fromm’s cellmate of KKKarl Rove’s. Good riddance to bad garbage in either case, although I kinda like Squeaky…

  62. 87)
    Shannon Williford said on 4/12/2006 @ 6:44am PT: [Permalink]

    I like getting all of us fired up about a comparitavely small story! It’s entertaining and fun.

    I gotta confess that for the ten years I’ve lived in my city, through 4 address changes, I never changed my voter registration and kept voting in the same place. I always told the sweet little lady working the precinct that no, it wasn’t my current address, and yes, I still lived in the neighborhood; and she always let me vote. I woulda been voting at the next precinct over for a year or so if I’d given my correct address, but now I’m living in the house I bought, and voting from that precinct, with the correct address, courtesy of a lost wallet that caused me to get a new license, voter reg. card, etc.

    My point is – there’s a lotta folks who may be (innocently or lazily) guilty of this. It is curious that she doesn’t just ‘fess up to it and be done with it…

    And green and yellow is fine with me.

  63. 89)
    aaronk said on 4/12/2006 @ 7:11am PT: [Permalink]

    You know if she is convicted of this ms coulter is going to go on every garden varitety consvervative talk show shawn hannity, rush limbaugh, bill o reily say that its the liberal media setting her up like they did with tom de lay and dick cheney with the hunting accident, show the liberal media bias oh boo f&*(ing hoo you prissy stuck up bitch.
    you over charging at least 25,000 dollars for 30 mintue speaking enagement so you can live nicely by just just slandering liberals and democrats, coming off as hoiler than thou how every liberal is "baby killer" and what about ms coulter you never raised kids or don’t know how hard it is for normal working people to make ends meet no you just some stuck up bitch like a cross between paris hilton and maryln manson so there your down fall is your skinny ass.

  64. 90)
    michael said on 4/12/2006 @ 7:48am PT: [Permalink]

    what’s with the circle around shis neck? what does that prove?

    i call coulter colder. because that’s what it is. you guys should pack up and realize that all politicians are crooks. spend your time helping the poor and needy. let’s pack up this republocrat system of govt. that caters to the rich. democracy is like makeup on an old ugly whore. the same rich scumbags run things in the end. but the truly pathetic are we who blog and waste time talking about the scumbags. ignore them and they will go away and be replaced by a military dictatorship.

    then we will have something to complain about!

  65. 91)
    GWN said on 4/12/2006 @ 8:02am PT: [Permalink]

    #81 Robert Lockwood Mills "Glad Ann Coulter is in trouble. Sorry we’re making such a big deal out of it. " I ‘m with you on that RLM.
    90 comments on Ann and the rest of the important news averages 17-18 comments. Sad

  66. 93)
    Joan said on 4/12/2006 @ 8:09am PT: [Permalink]

    "…90 comments on Ann and the rest of the important news averages 17-18 comments. Sad"

    Nah. It’s comic relief.

  67. 94)
    wayne said on 4/12/2006 @ 8:09am PT: [Permalink]

    Brad. Only a a dickhead would waste all that time and effort to uncover someones voter registration card. Why don’t you check her trash. Maybe she is not seperating her paper from her plastic.

  68. 95)
    JUDGE OF JUDGES said on 4/12/2006 @ 8:34am PT: [Permalink]

    It is a shame that so much attention is paid ann coulter as well as other freque shows, dog condoms, etc .. .. ..

    It is what it is and we are all here .. .. .. .. .. It’s Human ? ? ?

  69. 98)
    bluebear 2 said on 4/12/2006 @ 9:13am PT: [Permalink]

    As Joan #93 said, this is indeed comic relief.

    But I must also agree with the others who see the lack of attention to things that really matter.

    Perhaps it’s time for an open blog to discuss these headlines currently up at Raw Story.

    WHITE HOUSE DEMANDS MEDIA APOLOGIZE
    FOR COVERING FALSE BUSH BIOLAB CLAIMS

    Judy Miller questioned tale in 2003 – Dean: Declassify intel

    Powell speaks out: ‘I never believed’ Niger uranium claim

    Exclusive: Former DeLay aide paid policy nonprofit, got kickback, positive editorial

    US News: DeLay suggested to take over budget office…

    US: Iran could make nuke in 16 days

    Protest drives military recruiters off campus

    Scalia: Cheney verdict ‘proudest’ moment

  70. 99)
    Savantster said on 4/12/2006 @ 9:57am PT: [Permalink]

    "My guess is she was using the RE Agents address to establish legal residency for tax reasons."

    Sorry, using someone elses house is "not a legal residence", you have to LIVE there, for tax purposes.

    As far as this thread, and the trolls/idiots/inciters who keep calling brad names and saying he’s wasting time, why the hell have I not seen you posting on REAL NEWS then? you say this is a waste, but you sure make a point to post on it, but never post on the plethera of "news" talked about here?

    And for this issue in general.. If she’s voting in FL, has a DL in FL, and a house in FL (and only that house)… she is saying "she lives in FL". Using someone elses address and voting in a different district is problematic because of the electoral college. If we had a straight vote, it wouldn’t matter at all because it would be 1 vote per person.. in the college, she can help swing a district/pricint (in theory) to give the electoral vote to the Pug instead of the Dem. Her vote in her own pricint might not have mattered if it’s loaded with Pugs. I guess, the "reason" this is important is, districts are made for a REASON.. if they didn’t matter, we’d not have all the illegal jerrymandering (sp) of districts, duh?

    And this should be nit-picked just to shed some Karma on this hodag bitch from hell 😀

  71. 100)
    barryg said on 4/12/2006 @ 9:59am PT: [Permalink]

    If Coulter claims homestead exemption without living in the home it is felony fraud. If her place of residence is her realators address she has commited a felony tax evasion if it is not she has commited a felony voter fraud. Either way she has commited a felony and should be prosecuited as any crackhead convicted of holding a $ 5.00 rock and do the time.

  72. 101)
    bluebear 2 said on 4/12/2006 @ 10:16am PT: [Permalink]

    Savantster #99

    I can’t find it right now, but I saw an article on the web just the other day regarding groups of evengenicals going to towns and staying at others houses long enough to register to vote in order to swing elections then moving on. I wish I could find it again.

    If we did have a straight vote it wouldn’t make a difference on a national or state level, but in local elections it could have a large effect.

  73. 102)
    Bush Master said on 4/12/2006 @ 10:34am PT: [Permalink]

    I see most all of you still like to suck down the 2 party, business as usual bull that got us in this mess to start with. Forget the pugs and demons, all of them are criminals and conmen who would sell their own mothers to satan if the price was right. One thing you can do, vow to never, ever vote for a pug or demon again. Read the Constitution, the Declaration of Independence and educate yourselves.

  74. 103)
    Savantster said on 4/12/2006 @ 11:34am PT: [Permalink]

    "If we did have a straight vote it wouldn’t make a difference on a national or state level, but in local elections it could have a large effect."

    Cept, the 2000 election showed Gore winning the popular vote, the electoral college "vote" was given to Shrubby (iirc)..

    I think it would make a huge difference in all elections if we stopped "adjusting" votes. Gerrymandering would go away because "state wide" elections would be "state totals", not "adjusted district totals".

    Seems to me that "direct vote counting" instead of "electoral college" would have a large impact -everywhere-.. but that’s just me 🙂

  75. 104)
    bluebear 2 said on 4/12/2006 @ 11:55am PT: [Permalink]

    Savantster said"

    "Seems to me that "direct vote counting" instead of "electoral college" would have a large impact -everywhere-.. but that’s just me :)"

    Me too!

  76. 105)
    Matt Giwer said on 4/12/2006 @ 11:58am PT: [Permalink]

    Owning a property does not make it your residence. You have to show she has made it her primary residence. If she has not filed to take it as a homestead exemption for property tax purposes then you can’t show she lives there. It can be a winter home, vacation home or investment property. Contrary to another post Florida has no income tax.

  77. 107)
    World Facts said on 4/12/2006 @ 12:47pm PT: [Permalink]

    Ann Coulter broke the law, that is the bottom line.

    Lets forget anything else and staple that point everywhere- she broke the law and voted in another location, she doesn’t live.

    Which was more than an entire CITY away from where she lives, in fact, it was even all the way in new york.

    That’s called BREAKING the law so book her- get the shit over with and lets clean out the neocon traitors in BOTH parties quickly

  78. 108)
    tantan said on 4/12/2006 @ 1:31pm PT: [Permalink]

    I don’t care if Ann Coulter bounces a check for $1 at the Piggly Wiggly, that bitch should be put out of our misery!. How do idiots like her become famous? Because they keep saying stupid shit, and we keep writing about it. We keep her in business. The funny part is that there is no way she could possibly believe her own crap! Not unless she was the biggest retard on the planet; and I know she’s not because our president already has thye position. Ignore Ann Coulter and Michelle Matlin and they’ll go away!

  79. 109)
    Lou said on 4/12/2006 @ 5:23pm PT: [Permalink]

    So, the big news is that the Neo-Con-Artist Ann-Hole-Coulter is a lying, no good for nothing, lousy, rich, elitist, ex- college porn queen, freaking hypocritical, two faced, scum sucking bitch, alias – pie girl in Canada.

    Oh wow, is that all ?

    And how is she any different than the likes of Rush Blowbag or Savage or any other GOP mouthpiece. As far as I can tell they are all a bunch of cloned assholes.

  80. 112)
    big dan said on 4/13/2006 @ 3:50am PT: [Permalink]

    Brandon Paul Thomas just wrote the funniest comment ever on Brad Blog. Brandon, do you work for Jon Stewart show, or Steven Colbert show???

    THAT’S GREAT STUFF!!! …hope to see it soon on the Daily Show.

  81. 113)
    big dan said on 4/13/2006 @ 3:51am PT: [Permalink]

    We are not liberals, by the way. People like YOU, call truthseekers like US "liberal".

  82. 114)
    big dan said on 4/13/2006 @ 3:53am PT: [Permalink]

    WE are unbiased truthseekers…YOU are a dipstick rightwing nutjob. Did you hear, Brandon, Bush found WMD’s in the mobile labs in Iraq…keep listening to Rush Lame-Boob, Brandon.

  83. 115)
    JUDGE OF JUDGES said on 4/13/2006 @ 4:34am PT: [Permalink]

    Why does coulter generate so many hits ? ? ?

    ONE reason maybe . . . It’s Safer . . . Less Risk . . . You put Less on the Line .. .. .. .. .. ..

  84. 116)
    Robert Lockwood Mills said on 4/13/2006 @ 5:15am PT: [Permalink]

    Uh, Brandon…can we talk? Nobody here hates you, first of all. And nobody here is guiltless, either.

    But that isn’t the point about Ann Coulter. Speaking only for myself, I;d like to see everyone (liberals, conservatives, and uncommitted) ignore her completely. She makes liberals mad, but not for the reason you cite…that she tells the truth. On the contrary, most of her bloviations are about liberals, not about issues that liberals are concerned with.

    Do you know what "ad hominem attack" means, Brandon? Literally, it means "go after the man." That’s what Ann Coulter does; she doesn’t discuss issues in an effort to persuade people, she goes before sympathetic right-wing audiences and energizes them by spewing bile at liberals, who become the "hominem" part of "ad hominem."
    Liberals don’t hate her for telling the truth, because her message isn’t one of truth (or falsity either, for that matter). She simply hates liberals, who (in my view) over-react to everything she says.

  85. 117)
    Joan said on 4/13/2006 @ 5:53am PT: [Permalink]

    BRAD,
    (or whoever’s minding the store)
    Comment 96 SHOULD BE DELETED. Please. It’s really creepy & probably posted by some rightwing nutjob wanting to make it seem that "liberals are full of hate".

  86. 118)
    Savantster said on 4/13/2006 @ 6:16am PT: [Permalink]

    Brandon Paul Thomas, you must be on crack.. Ann doesn’t speak "truth", nor does she champion anything worth while in the world. SHE is the one that’s filled with hate for others, and YOU put her on the best seller’s list because she drums up that hate in you. Like the typical dysfunctional stooge, you thrive on that hate, it seems.

    Guiltless? no.. we’re not. But then, we don’t make a living bitching about "those ignorant liberals who can’t figure out how to vote", then fuck up our own attempt at voting… get it? She LIED about "where she lived", period. That’s illegal, and for that, she should be punished. Guiltless? No.. guilty of comitting a felony when there IS NO GOOD REASON TO DO SO? nope, none of that either.. but, Ann is [guilty of comitting a felony for no good reason].

    Ann is a hate-monger, not a truth teller. If you’re too deluded to see that, then your position has as much validity as Ann’s. That is, to anyone with an IQ over 40, NO validity..

    In the words of one of our new trolls, "Have a nice day!"

  87. 119)
    Connie said on 4/13/2006 @ 9:02am PT: [Permalink]

    Please, please, in the name of the revenge gods and everyone who has enough of a conscious to still be revolted by the nasty racist, anti semitic homophonbic slag-ass bitch, don’t give her a trial; throw her in prison with a bunch of very very angry butch lesbians armed with spiked strap-ons, throw away the key and don’t open it as her asshole is being ripped open.

  88. 120)
    texaslady said on 4/13/2006 @ 9:07am PT: [Permalink]

    Brandon – check out Coulter’s latest site comment about Halliburton losing money serving meals to our military. Would you agree that she is speaking truth after reading how much Halliburton is OVER CHARGING on everything. How about charging our government for truck shipments that ARE NOT carrying anything? This is from our government reports.

    The thing is when someone starts lying it is hard to believe anything they say, case in point, George W. Bush.

    Perhaps you have been too busy to do the research on how much lying is done everyday by this administration and their minions.

  89. 121)
    Brandon Paul Thomas said on 4/13/2006 @ 9:07am PT: [Permalink]

    You souless, hateful LIBERALS.
    What gives you the right to judge others like this.
    Are you perfect? Are you so guilttless that you never made a mistake? I doubt it.
    Ann is right when she says you liberals are full of hate. Which is why we keep putting her on the best seller list! She tells the truth and that makes LIBERALS MAD as hatters!

  90. 124)
    Charlene said on 4/13/2006 @ 9:27am PT: [Permalink]

    Comment #120 Connie

    Jeez.

    Sounds like Coulter isn’t the only one who’s pretty nasty.

  91. 125)
    Charlene said on 4/13/2006 @ 9:28am PT: [Permalink]

    Comment #120 Connie

    Jeez.

    Sounds like Coulter isn’t the only one who’s pretty nasty.

  92. 126)
    Charlene said on 4/13/2006 @ 9:40am PT: [Permalink]

    #96 Joe

    Thank you for moderating your comment by indicating you would like to use a "razor sharp machete" on Coulter.
    A dull one would have been just mean.

  93. 127)
    JUDGE OF JUDGES said on 4/13/2006 @ 11:26am PT: [Permalink]

    #120 Connie – That the kind of "Turn The Other Cheek" the neocons typically practice. . . . . .

  94. 128)
    Joan said on 4/13/2006 @ 12:29pm PT: [Permalink]

    Brad,
    While you’re scrubbing #96 could you please get #120 also?

    Joe & Connie: Please up your meds!!! GAD. Creepy.

  95. 129)
    B said on 4/14/2006 @ 2:26pm PT: [Permalink]

    She was confused; there was "M" for Male, "F" for female but there was no "C". And trust me, EVERYONE knows what that stands for….

  96. 130)
    Jesmelinit said on 4/15/2006 @ 2:09am PT: [Permalink]

    What a sad bunch of petulant excuses for humanity you people are. I have never observed such spunk spewed about an intelligent although controversial person in my life. Just because she is so wity and to the point about her beliefs is no reason for a bunch of pinko hard up asses the likes of all of you to be making sexist and defamatory remarks about her. At least she has a life. You all probably only get excitement in your by putting your hand in your own back pocket and giving a good squeeze. 😛

  97. 131)
    Scott said on 4/15/2006 @ 3:12am PT: [Permalink]

    Does any record show that she voted in any other state other than Florida where she actually owns property? This is such a hatchet job that only goes to prove what extent liberals will go to attack a person that they feel threatened by. Ann Coulter has the right to say anything she wants whether you liberals like it or not. She is not paid by the Republican Party so if she wants to say what she wants she can because she has no ties to Party.

  98. 132)
    Sundown said on 4/15/2006 @ 5:07am PT: [Permalink]

    No, Scott. Speech which endangers the public is not protected by the first ammendment (i.e. falsely shouting "fire" in a crowded theater). Advocating in favor of terrorist attacks against newspaper publishers falls under this category.

  99. 133)
    mrs panstreppon said on 4/16/2006 @ 5:52am PT: [Permalink]

    Ann H Coulter’s NYC address is 300 E. 77 St., 10A, NYC, 10021.

    In March 2005, she took out a $1 million mortgage with JP Chase Morgan in NYC. On the same day, she borrowed $250k under a home equity loan from JP Chase Morgan in Lousiana.

  100. 134)
    Mike J. said on 4/18/2006 @ 9:49am PT: [Permalink]

    #133, typo alert, typo alert.
    Please check your post for misspelled words.

    Where do you find the info about her loans? Are you a loan officer at her bank?? Are you using your authorized access to her personal bank records to use against her in a political fashion?

    You could be prosecuted for that. Then again, it happened to a Republican candidate in Maryland and nothing happened to he who did it….

    If you are using your access for personal political use, then you are no better than your enemies. You have become the enemy you hate.

    Bye!

  101. 137)
    Skip said on 4/24/2006 @ 4:20pm PT: [Permalink]

    Put that "thing" in prison for a few months, and we’ll all find out if it has the balls it seems to eschew. The men would spit on it, then walk disgustedly away, and the women would beat the living hell out of it. When I first saw the repulsive thing on Fox "Naus," a few years back, I thought it might be Todd Rundgren with blonde hair on a bad day. But then I remembered that Rundgren has talent, and a pair of cojones. "It" Coulter is reviling to the nth degree. Maybe "It" should take a shower with the asshole O’Reilly on a Fox propaganda special, then we’d all get the lowdown on both of these Morphs!

  102. 138)
    Skip said on 4/24/2006 @ 4:20pm PT: [Permalink]

    Put that "thing" in prison for a few months, and we’ll all find out if it has the balls it seems to eschew. The men would spit on it, then walk disgustedly away, and the women would beat the living hell out of it. When I first saw the repulsive thing on Fox "Naus," a few years back, I thought it might be Todd Rundgren with blonde hair on a bad day. But then I remembered that Rundgren has talent, and a pair of cojones. "It" Coulter is reviling to the nth degree. Maybe "It" should take a shower with the asshole O’Reilly on a Fox propaganda special, then we’d all get the lowdown on both of these Morphs!

  103. 139)
    Skip said on 4/24/2006 @ 4:20pm PT: [Permalink]

    Put that "thing" in prison for a few months, and we’ll all find out if it has the balls it seems to eschew. The men would spit on it, then walk disgustedly away, and the women would beat the living hell out of it. When I first saw the repulsive thing on Fox "Naus," a few years back, I thought it might be Todd Rundgren with blonde hair on a bad day. But then I remembered that Rundgren has talent, and a pair of cojones. "It" Coulter is reviling to the nth degree. Maybe "It" should take a shower with the asshole O’Reilly on a Fox propaganda special, then we’d all get the lowdown on both of these Morphs!

  104. 140)
    ellie said on 5/7/2006 @ 2:40am PT: [Permalink]

    I have to say I’m a little disturbed at the number of comments targeted at Ms. Coulter here and in other arenas that deal with her gender and her sexuality. It’s irrelevant, folks. A jerk’s a jerk regardless. Nobody’s making comments about Rove’s or Rumselfeld’s or O’Reilly’s being in pornography… well, maybe O’Reilly but that’s because of his own lewd actions.

    We’re the liberals, remember? We treat women better than that. We deal with them as equals and don’t reduce them to their mere physical parts the way so many neo-cons do nor do we accuse outspoken women of being men or "dykes" just because they have opinions no matter how stupid or hateful those opinions may be.

  105. 144)
    Liberty0 said on 8/26/2006 @ 11:15pm PT: [Permalink]

    It doesn’t matter what the value of any house is. As long as you only choose ONE address to be your address for voting, it’s not fraud. (Think of how the homeless accomplish this. They also provide an address where they don’t live, just so they can have materials mailed to them.)

    I work in two cities (often several) for my employer, but I can have only one office. I’m registered to vote at ONE address. So far so good. Legally only one of those addresses is my official home for tax purposes. But this gives me grief from my employer who wants to know why my official address is far away from my single office. Problems arise when government agencies, employers and such assume you only live in one place. It does become a hassle, especially when rules of law interfere with what should otherwise be normal business, or in some cases cause conflicts with multiple laws. Just because I choose to live an unusual lifestyle, why should I suffer legally? (A concept Democrats should understand and sympathize with.)

  106. 145)
    Jihav said on 11/3/2006 @ 5:47pm PT: [Permalink]

    I love Republicans.

    Your defense is, “Who HASN’T committed felony tax fraud?”

    Um…..you might want to widen your circle of friends. Believe it or not, there are actually many people who think it’s important to obey the law. Weird but true.

  107. 146)
    Mary said on 11/8/2006 @ 10:36am PT: [Permalink]

    So did Ann Coulter vote on November 7, 2006? Seems like she should have SOMETHING to say regarding the election returns last night.

  108. 147)
    Arena said on 11/10/2006 @ 4:53pm PT: [Permalink]

    How interesting that Ann’s hypocrisy in voting fraud is the best we can come up with to challenge. I laugh with many of you at her duplicity, as I have when the shadows of Rush and Newt reared their ugly heads.

    But please people, let us save at least some of our resources for the more important work of debunking arguments of and bringing to justice those at the highest level of our government.

    Dick Cheney in 2000, a Texan, ran on the Republican ticket as Vice President alongside you-know-who, another Texan. U.S. of A. law prohibits both the Presidential and Vice Presidential candidates being from the same state.

    Federal courts upheld Cheney’s claim that he was actually a resident of Colorado, based on the fact that he spent a pittance of his Halliburton gains on an expensive house there before the campaign.

    Rumsfeld, Gonzales, Tenet, and a number of Administration and US military officials are now being prosecuted or subpoenaed by allied nations Germany, Italy, and Spain.

    That, surely would never happen here, as the bush Administration has always excluded the US from international agreements regarding war crime prosecution because they did not include immunity for US officials.

    The Geneva Convention etc. well, “they are soo pre 9/11″, and we need to imitate the methods of our enemies in order to prevail against them during our short tenure on earth.

    “God is on our side”.

    “Might is Right”.

    “¦but what is the difference?

    Arena

(Comments are now closed.)


Thanks to you, The BRAD BLOG has been trouble-making and muckraking for … 22 YEARS!!!

Please help The BRAD BLOG, BradCast and Green News Report remain independent and 100% reader and listener supported in our 23rd YEAR!!!

ONE TIME
any amount...

MONTHLY
any amount...

OR VIA SNAIL MAIL
Make check out to...
Brad Friedman / BRAD BLOG
7095 Hollywood Blvd., #594
Los Angeles, CA 90028

RECENT POSTS

The BRAD BLOG Reborn…

And it only took 20 years or so...

Corrupt SCOTUS Undermines U.S. Constitution, Guts Last Remaining Protections of Voting Rights Act: ‘BradCast’ 4/29/2026

Guest: Redistricting expert Dan Vicuña of Common Cause; Also: Comey's dumb new indictment; E. Jean Carroll wins again; More new lows for Trump approval...

Trump’s Activist Rightwing ‘Originalist’ Judges Strike Again in Texas: ‘BradCast’ 4/28/2026

Guest: Jay Willis of Balls and Strikes; Also: Dem takes polling lead for U.S. Senate in TX as Repubs brace for 'sour, ugly, bad, bleak' midterm elections...

‘Green News Report’ – April 28, 2026

With Brad Friedman and Desi Doyen

Trump, Repubs Exploit Failed Assassination Plot to Advance Ballroom Blitz: ‘BradCast’ 4/27/2026

What we know about the alleged shooter, Trump's opportunist response, corrupt contracting for the ballroom, fury at being described as a 'pedophile'; Also: Callers ring in!...

Sunday ‘So Much Winning’ Toons

THIS WEEK: Punch Drunk ... Kash Poor ... Forever War ... The Shadow Docket Knows! ...

So Much Losing: ‘BradCast’ 4/23/2026

In Iran, in public opinion, at the ballot box, in the courtroom...

‘Green News Report’ – April 23, 2026

With Brad Friedman & Desi Doyen...

‘A Scammer’s Treasure Trove’: DOGE Bros Stole Your Social Security Data: ‘BradCast’ 4/22/2026

Guest: Nancy Altman of Social Security Works; Also: 'Yes', Virginia, there is a new U.S. House map! (For now)...

Insiders Making a Killing Betting on Trump’s War: ‘BradCast’ 4/21/2026

Guest: Craig Holman of Public Citizen; Also: Judge blocks Admin scheme to prevent wind, solar development; Another TACO Tuesday for Iran...

‘Green News Report’ – April 21, 2026

With Brad Friedman & Desi Doyen...

Week 8: Iran War Lies Continue from Sundowning Gaslighter-in-Chief: ‘BradCast’ 4/20/2026

Also: Approval rating plummets; More Dem overperformance in NJ; VA voters voting; CA primary election chaos; Callers ring in...

Sunday ‘WWJD?’ Toons

THIS WEEK: Paging Dr. Jesus ... Strait Outta Hormuz ... It's What's for Dinner ...

U.S. Middle Eastern ‘War Crimes’ Then and Now: ‘BradCast’ 4/16/2026

Guest: Attorney, former U.S. Army Captain Keith Barber; Also: Eastman disbarred; ICE official charged in MN...

‘Green News Report’ – April 16, 2026

With Brad Friedman & Desi Doyen...

About Brad Friedman...

Brad is an independent investigative journalist, blogger and broadcaster. Full Bio & Testimonials… Media Appearance Archive… Articles & Editorials Elsewhere… Contact…

He has contributed chapters to these books…
…And is featured in these documentary films…

BRAD BLOG ON THE AIR!

THE BRADCAST on KPFK/Pacifica Radio Network (90.7FM Los Angeles, 98.7FM Santa Barbara, 93.7FM N. San Diego and nationally on many other affiliate stations! ALSO VIA PODCAST: RSS/XML feed | Pandora | TuneInApple Podcasts/iTunesiHeartAmazon Music

GREEN NEWS REPORT, nationally syndicated, with new episodes on Tuesday and Thursday. ALSO VIA PODCAST: RSS/XML feed | Pandora | TuneInApple Podcasts/iTunesiHeartAmazon Music

Media Appearance Archives…

AD
CONTENT

ADDITIONAL STUFF

Brad Friedman/
The BRAD BLOG Named...

Buzz Flash's 'Wings of Justice' Honoree
Project Censored 2010 Award Recipient
The 2008 Weblog Awards