Lame Turducken

Share article:

A “turducken” is defined by Wikipedia as “a dish consisting of a de-boned chicken stuffed into a de-boned duck, which itself is stuffed into a de-boned turkey.” Sounds pretty close to what we’ve just witnessed in the closing hours of the 111th Congress.

Conventional wisdom, at least that flogged by the MSM over the last 24 hours or so, has it that somehow Democrats shocked the nation by finally stepping up their game and doing the extraordinary in the lame duck session by passing an unprecedented number of their hard-fought initiatives, many thought to have been otherwise dead (or waiting for reconsideration in the next, more heavily Republican-weighted Congress).

Not to be a contrarian here, or even a Christmas curmudgeon, but while the Democrats deserve credit for hanging in there on a number of important initiatives, rather than tossing up their hands and walking away in the face of unprecedented, historic obstructionism by the GOP, it’s a fact that the major legislation finally passed can hardly be seen as any sort of “progressive,” or even “liberal,” victory. It all may well represent a Democratic victory, if a short-lived one, but that only demonstrates how successful Republicans have been in pushing Dems far to the right, and how willing Democrats are these days to celebrate the passage of center and center-right (and even hard-right) legislation, almost all of which was depressingly low-hanging holiday fruit to begin with…

The top legislative accomplishments in the lame duck phase of Congress this year include:

  • The Tax “Deal” – In which virtually every concession the GOP sought was granted to them, in exchange, apparently, for an extension of unemployment benefits (which they’ve granted time and again in the past, and likely would have again, once the wrath of the American people was brought down on them), and a few other crumbs such as tax credits, many of which Republicans had already gone on record as being willing to support previously.
  • New START – A rather non-controversial, updated version of Ronald Reagan’s nuclear arms treaty with Russia, supported by generations of both D & R senior statesmen, which the GOP has always supported in the past anyway, and most certainly would have again had pressure been applied, even without the reported promises by Democrats for funding of updates to our existing nuclear arsenal and further investments in “Star Wars” missile defense systems. The original START was ratified 93-6 by the Senate in 1992. New START mustered just 71 votes, only 13 of them Republican.
  • Food Safety Bill – An immensely popular, non-controversial, long overdue (by 70 years) modernization of federal safety standards and monitoring of the national food supply in the wake of recent massive food recalls over salmonella and other similar concerns.
  • The Zadroga Bill – No-brainer healthcare funding for 9/11 first responders dying from cancer and other respiratory illnesses tied to cleanup at “Ground Zero” — another non-controversial issue, embarrassingly stalled by the GOP and reduced from its initially proposed $11 billion dollars down to just over $4 billion in order to receive approval from Senate Republicans. And even that likely would not have come about had it not been for Jon Stewart’s heroic “Hail Mary” on his final show of The Daily Show season last week.
  • Repeal of “Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell” – Arguably the most difficult piece of legislation to pass, despite the fact that some 70% of Americans have now long supported doing away with the original Clinton-era Democratic compromise to allow discrimination in our armed forces.

All of those bills (save the bulk of the Tax “Deal,” the passage of which some have credited with making the others possible at all) are all well and good, but, with the exception of the popular repeal of DADT, it’s difficult to describe any of them as particularly “progressive” or even controversial in any way.

That Democrats are willing to settle for passage of the above, and take a huge victory lap for them in the bargain, illustrates just how far off the rails Democrats have gone in their supposed fight for peace and justice, against poverty, and in support of working families. If anything, Republicans ought to be taking the victory lap if that’s the best Democrats can do — pass a bunch of initiatives that Republican rank and file generally support anyway — even as the passage would appear to be in contradiction of the GOP’s ill-considered agenda of simply denying Democrats and President Obama any legislative victory they can, simply in the hopes of making them appear to be ineffective and unable to govern.

Largely cowardly (chicken) legislation, passed in a lame duck Congress, by a bunch of turkeys. A lame turducken. Emphasis on lame.

This is not to take away from several noteworthy accomplishments by the Democratic Congress in the 111th prior to the lame duck session (Greg Sargent details several here), but there were an equal number of non-progressive legislative “compromises” (healthcare insurance reform comes to mind), out and out legislative failures (DREAM Act, Climate and clean energy), and even inexcusable anti-progressivism (legislation, during the lame duck, by the way, forbidding closure of Guantanamo and the movement of its detainees onto domestic soil, for example)

In the bargain, we saw a lurch to the Right at a time when the country had cast its ballot for a move away from the very Right-leaning policies that had gotten the nation into this fine mess in the first place. As much as Obama, Democrats and their supporters are desperate to take victories where they can find ’em, it’s difficult for clear-eyed, independent observers to avoid acknowledging the obvious setbacks to hopes of progressive ideals.

Adam Sewer makes a simlar observation at WaPo today:

The Obama administration’s agenda, by and large, reflected a liberalism chastened by past failures and willing to endorse more market-based solutions to problems. Rather than simply dismissing conservative criticism, liberals internalized it — and modified, narrowed and adjusted their goals accordingly. Where conservatives said liberals were too ambitious, liberals sought more focused solutions. Where conservatives said the market would work better than government, liberals tried to find a market-based path to the same goal. When conservatives pointed out that judicial decrees, even in matters of civil rights, are no substitute for the legitimacy conferred by legislative action, liberals took it to heart.

Of course, as liberals moved right or recognized conservative criticism as legitimate, conservatives mostly leveled the same tired epithets at everything liberals tried to do.

It should be noted, in the above, that Sewer does his own bit of “internalizing” by framing the discussion as one of “conservatism” versus “liberalism” when, in fact, the modern Republican Party has shown itself to be anything but conservative, and the bullk of the elected Democratic Party representatives in D.C. can hardly be described as liberal. But setting that aside, Sewer’s point is certainly on the money.

Brian Beutler offered a similar sentiment this morning, questioning the knee-jerk MSMisms since yesterday that “Obama’s got his mojo back”:

Let’s face it, Obama and the Democratic Congress got four headline-making things done in lame duck: a very popular tax cut plan, a very popular international arms treaty, a very popular civil rights advancement, and a very popular bill to make sure sick 9/11 heroes get health care now. What you’ll notice about all four of those things is that they’re very popular — more popular than the somewhat popular immigration bill and unpopular spending bill, both of which failed during lame duck. That they didn’t pass before November says much more about the GOP’s pre-election political strategy, and the dysfunction of the Senate, than it does about Obama’s mojo.

Don’t confuse this for the new normal. The new normal will be tons of Republicans, and a bare minimum of common ground. Democratic elected officials seem to understand this, but based on the coverage yesterday, it’s not clear that the media, and therefore Obama supporters, really do.

Later in the day, Beutler went on to offer one more thought for jubilant Democrats (and gullible MSM gum-flappers):

Republicans must at some level have understood that some of these things weren’t going away. DADT would’ve stayed on the agenda. 9/11 responders would have stayed on the agenda. DREAM will stay on the agenda. And I’m guessing they made the simple calculation that it would be easier and wiser to give Dems these victories now, rather than fight it out with them publicly next [year] after the GOP takes over the House with a caucus that’s divided over these things.

Now the issues are off the table, and that creates more space for them to set the agenda.

Right. Virtually all of the initiatives passed were likely to pass anyway (exception, perhaps, being DADT, though had it not been legislated by Congress, the federal courts were likely on track to have taken care of that unconstitutionality for them.) Better to let Democrats have the easy ones now and let them feel, momentarily, as they’ve had victories, even if what they were victorious in finally seeing passed were ideas that almost every Republican, elected or rank and file, was ultimately fine with seeing passed anyway.

Some victory. But ya take ’em where ya can get ’em if you’re a Democrat these days, I guess. Enjoy your Christmas turducken. It’s not likely to get much better than this for a while.

Share article:

--- COMMENTS follow below Ad Content ---

Reader Comments on

Lame Turducken

11 Comments

(Comments are now closed.)


11 Responses

  1. 3)
    bilythompson said on 12/23/2010 @ 11:09pm PT: [Permalink]

    I have posted this already here before You guys should stop complaining because, one the health care we have now isnt as good as it was supposed to be. also the law has just been signed so give it some time. so if u want to say u have the right to choose tell that to ur congress men or state official. If you do not have insurance and need one You can find full medical coverage at the lowest price check search online for “Wise Health Insurance” If you have health insurance and do not care about cost just be happy about it and believe me you are not going to loose anything!

  2. 4)
    Carlyle Moulton said on 12/24/2010 @ 2:32am PT: [Permalink]

    The fact is that the US does not have any political party capable of having candidates elected who serve the interest of the majority of US citizens.

    There is an extreme right wing party called “The Democratic Party” and an insane and even more right wing party called “the Republican Party”. It may be that there are some liberals and progressives among the Democratic Party voter base and the party grass roots, but the elite of the party who get into elective offices are extremely right wing. Like the Republicans they are loyal servants of the kleptoplutocratic oligarchy if not full members of it. These people’s idea of what the word “centrist” means is related to the fact that they would like to espouse policies to the right of what they actually espouse because they feel limited by their voter base and nearer to the most extreme right wing of Republican talking points.

    Obama, Biden, Rahm Emmanuel and Robert Gibbs are all extreme right wingers, considerably to the right of Richard Nixon and even Ronald Reagan. When they insult the Democratic Party voter and supporter base, their sentiments are sincere, they wish that poor people, worker and Blacks would stay home at election time and not vote Democrat. If they would only do this the Democratic party would lose the stigma that sees them assumed to put the interests of the ruling class as less important than those of the people who vote for them. After a few lost elections the Democratic Party could ditch all pretense of caring about nonplutocratic Americans and win government by attracting better quality voters away from the Republican Party.

  3. 5)
    weep for my country said on 12/24/2010 @ 6:25am PT: [Permalink]

    There was no actual repeal of DADT.

    Brad is spreading more war lies.

    And he has the audacity to claim he is fighting war lies.

    Why anyone comes here for information, I don’t know.

    Even when he jumps on the bandwagon about something important (i.e. vote fraud), it is really just self-promotion based on the hard work of others.

    The hypocracy of promoting some lies about war (i.e. bogus showboating that will not actually allow gays any meaningful rights in military) while claiming to fight them is too much.

    Shame on you.

  4. 6)
    notexactlyhuman said on 12/24/2010 @ 12:23pm PT: [Permalink]

    You give us all your people’s money and nuclear proliferation, we give you gays for military. Capiche? Everyone happy. Much to celebrate, no?

  5. Avatar photo
    7)
    Brad Friedman said on 12/24/2010 @ 3:08pm PT: [Permalink]

    “Weep” said:

    There was no actual repeal of DADT.

    Brad is spreading more war lies.

    And he has the audacity to claim he is fighting war lies.

    Sigh. Okay, I’ll bite. How was there “no actual repeal of DADT” such that I am “spreading more war lies”?

    As to your continued, silly attacks on me, I might suggest they tend to only make YOU look silly. But if you’d rather do that, as opposed to substantive critique, of course, that’s up to you.

  6. 8)
    Richard Averett said on 12/25/2010 @ 7:11pm PT: [Permalink]

    Thanks for saying what to seems so transparent to all, but is unspoken by the talking heads and newspapers: That these ‘victories’ were so easy that it’s amazing the Dems couldn’t get them earlier.
    One request I have of progressives – let’s stop using the terms ‘left’, ‘right’ and ‘far right’. They confuse people into thinking they tag the politician as socially liberal or conservative. What we have are degrees of corporate toadism.

  7. 9)
    betterthannosn said on 12/26/2010 @ 7:13am PT: [Permalink]

    Great marketing, call it a Turd. People that name these hybrids have no imagination at all.
    Wouldn’t it have been simpler and more apt to name it a : Chiche/Duck/Turkey = Chuckey?
    Just sayin…

  8. 10)
    lottakatz said on 12/27/2010 @ 7:26am PT: [Permalink]

    What ‘Weep’ may be getting at is that currently gays in the military are not free to disclose their sexual preference at this time and won’t be for some time in the future. The next step is for military formulation of regulations to actually implement the repeal of DADT based on the recommendations of the panel report released last month and then the implementation of those regulations will take effect 60 days after approval.

    from the Army Times:

    http://www.armytimes.com/news/2..._source=ap_rss
    Who approves, I don’t know, maybe Sec. Def. and Prez. I haven’t read that bit of procedure anywhere but regulations are always approved by someone higher up in the chain of command.

    This could throw a significant monkey wrench into the repeal because who knows what some of those wacky military leaders will come up with or how long it will take to come up with something, suppose they come up with ‘gay soldiers MUST disclose…’ reg? That’s something all gay military personnel may not want to do. That probably wouldn’t pass muster but if the Marines wanted to delay the process a debate on some off-the-wall, proposed regulations could do that.

  9. 11)
    Lora said on 12/31/2010 @ 2:00pm PT: [Permalink]

    Brad sez:

    Largely cowardly (chicken) legislation, passed in a lame duck Congress, by a bunch of turkeys. A lame turducken. Emphasis on lame.

    My sentiments exactly, beautifully described.

    OT: Been dealing with serious family health issues of late and so have scarcely had the chance to visit here. Missed you guys. Hope to be around more often now. —Lora

(Comments are now closed.)


--- Ad Content ---

BB SIDEBAR NOTICE

Thanks to you, The BRAD BLOG has been trouble-making and muckraking for … 22 YEARS!!!

Please help The BRAD BLOG, BradCast and Green News Report remain independent and 100% reader and listener supported in our 23rd YEAR!!!

ONE TIME
any amount...

MONTHLY
any amount...

OR VIA SNAIL MAIL
Make check out to...
Brad Friedman / BRAD BLOG
7095 Hollywood Blvd., #594
Los Angeles, CA 90028

RECENT POSTS

‘Green News Report’ – June 9, 2026

With Brad Friedman and Desi Doyen

‘Crooked or Stupid’: Trump Rails Against ‘Rigged’ CA Elections, Offers No Evidence, Storms off Interview: ‘BradCast’ 6/8/2026

Counting continues in CA; Critical ME primary tomorrow; Also: Callers ring in, some who have fallen for phony rightwing 'voter fraud' claims...

Sunday ‘Tick Tick Tick Tick’ Toons

THIS WEEK: Breaking News at CBS ... On the Money ... Iran and Iran We Go ...

‘I’m not a Victim. I was a Criminal’: J6er Says ‘No’ to Trump’s ‘Weaponization’ Slush Fund Money: ‘BradCast’ 6/4/2026

Guest: Convicted MAGA rioter Jason Riddle; Also: Pelley charges new CBS execs pushing 'falsehoods', 'bias' into '60 Minutes'...

‘Green News Report’ – June 4, 2026

With Brad Friedman and Desi Doyen

Trump’s Favorite Election Fraud Criminal Now Runs Free: ‘BradCast’ 6/2/2026

Also: Not so 'hot' after all, as data finds international tourism to U.S. plummeted in 2025...

‘Green News Report’ – June 2, 2026

With Brad Friedman and Desi Doyen

One Failure After Another: ‘BradCast’ 6/1/2026

We are in an historic moment, as the Trump Presidency begins its collapse; Also: Callers ring in on tomorrow's wild California Gubernatorial primary...

Did Trump and His Attorneys Conspire to Defraud the United States?

The court-ordered reopening of Trump's lawsuit against the IRS could have impacts well beyond blocking access to a $1.8 billion slush fund...

UPDATE, Midday 6/1/26: Trump announces plan to drop 'Weaponization Fund'...

Sunday ‘Slush Fun!’ Toons

THIS WEEK: Dirty Money ... Trump Kennedy Center ... Let's Get Physical ... Forever (and Ever) War ...

Idle Hands…

Time off, and an update on the BRAD BLOG update...

Sunday ‘Have You Considered Treason?’ Toons

THIS WEEK: The Unstoppable Steal ... The Colbert Canary ... The Paxton Primer ...

Republicans Are Revolting: ‘BradCast’ 5/21/2026

Guests: Heather Digby Parton of Salon, 'Driftglass' of 'Pro Left Podcast' on the primaries, the ballroom, the slush fund, the wars, the media, Stephen Colbert, and much more...

‘Green News Report’ – May 21, 2026

With Brad Friedman and Desi Doyen

About Brad Friedman...

Brad is an independent investigative journalist, blogger and broadcaster. Full Bio & Testimonials… Media Appearance Archive… Articles & Editorials Elsewhere… Contact…

He has contributed chapters to these books…
…And is featured in these documentary films…

BRAD BLOG ON THE AIR!

THE BRADCAST on KPFK/Pacifica Radio Network (90.7FM Los Angeles, 98.7FM Santa Barbara, 93.7FM N. San Diego and nationally syndicated, Monday-Thursday, on many other affiliate stations! ALSO VIA PODCAST: RSS/XML feed | Pandora | TuneIn | Apple Podcasts/iTunes | iHeart | Amazon Music
GREEN NEWS REPORT, nationally syndicated, with new episodes on Tuesday and Thursday. ALSO VIA PODCAST: RSS/XML feed | Pandora | TuneIn | Apple Podcasts/iTunes | iHeart | Amazon Music
Media Appearance Archives…

--- Ad Content ---

ADDITIONAL STUFF

Brad Friedman/
The BRAD BLOG Named...

Buzz Flash's 'Wings of Justice' Honoree
Project Censored 2010 Award Recipient
The 2008 Weblog Awards