11 Responses

1. 

   1)

   Dredd said on 11/26/2005 @ 8:43am PT: [Permalink]

   Gives new meaning to "mission accomplished" …

2. 

   2)

   ruhani said on 11/26/2005 @ 9:30am PT: [Permalink]

   Cartoonist Steve Bell captures W’s inner self perfectly. 😀

3. 

   3)

   ruhani said on 11/26/2005 @ 9:31am PT: [Permalink]

   Cartoonist Steve Bell captures W’s inner self perfectly. 😀

4. 

   4)

   Robert Lockwood Mills said on 11/26/2005 @ 10:22am PT: [Permalink]

   Was this before or after he walked out on the National Guard?

5. 

   5)

   tomz said on 11/26/2005 @ 10:39am PT: [Permalink]

   the memo please….give us the memo….

   cartoon very apropo

6. 

   6)

   STOP_George said on 11/26/2005 @ 7:59pm PT: [Permalink]

   .
   .
   .

   .
   .
   .

7. 

   7)

   big dan said on 11/27/2005 @ 4:37am PT: [Permalink]

   Does anyone realize how Hitler-like it is, to bomb a news outlet??? This alone should be enough to change a lot of hardcore conservatives minds about Bush. He’d bomb the NYTimes, if it wasn’t in America!

8. 

   8)

   big time said on 11/27/2005 @ 4:40am PT: [Permalink]

   Doesn’t this prove that the Bush administration is like Goebbels ministry of propoganda? I mean, bombing a news outlet is like bombing dissenting opinion.

   They did it to the NYTimes, but used guerilla warfare with Judith Miller. The NYTimes stinks!

9. 

   9)

   Cuthbert Calculus said on 11/27/2005 @ 8:58am PT: [Permalink]

   Big Dan – I wouldn’t be so sure it’s going to change anyone’s mind. Those who believe that launching an invasion of a foreign country was a sensible way to fight terrorism also seem to be of the opinion that Al Jazeera aids and abets terrorists, and that this makes it a legitimate military target.

   I can actually buy that argument, to a point. It’s not unlike the argument that the civilian contractors in Iraq are legitimate military targets, because they perform tasks that aid the US military. The problem, to my mind, is that EVEN IF Al Jazeera has been guilty of aiding the "insurgency" (and I haven’t seen any evidence that they have), attacking a media outlet is not exactly a good way to win "the hearts and minds" of the people. Just like the whole invasion idea, it’s incredibly shortsighted.

10. 

    10)

    dantastic said on 11/27/2005 @ 10:38am PT: [Permalink]

    I don’t believe it. I think this is a Bullsh-t story. Al Jazeera is a tool of the same people who carried out 911– the carlyle group type people. people within our own gov’t. They want it to look like there is a conflict between Al Jazeera and Bush to maintain Al-Jazeera’s cover. Al Jazeera promotes the same us vs. terrorists paradigm that our media promotes, which is exactly the paradigm they want the rest of the world to believe in.

    educate yourselves about 911

11. 

    11)

    niko said on 12/5/2005 @ 6:49am PT: [Permalink]

    video de sexe amateur
    annuaire sexe amateur
    couple amateur sexe
    videos sexe amateur
    de sexe amateur gratuit
    site amateur de sexe
    sexe amateur gratuite
    site de sexe amateur
    webcam sexe amateur
    two sexe amateur