On today’s BradCast, more good news for Dems, more bad news for Republicans, and more disturbing news for all Americans — and the world. [Audio link to show follows below.]
We start today with the encouraging news for Democrats, as a 26-year old lesbian candidate for state Senate in deep “red” Oklahoma has unseated yet another Republican in a special election this week. It’s the third time a state Senate seat has been flipped by Dems in OK since a 24-year old woman became the youngest chair of a state Democratic Party last year.
Speaking of trouble for Republicans, we’ve also got the latest on the Roy Moore mess in Alabama, as President Trump, also accused of sexual assault by multiple women before his own election last year, has frustrated fellow Republicans by failing to speak out in the matter, following bombshell allegations that Moore assaulted a number of teenagers, as young as 14 years old, while serving as a 32-year old prosecutor. But Moore and his supporters are fighting back today, as is his wildly embarassing attorney. A robocall falsely claiming to be from a reporter at the Washington Post (which originally broke the initial allegations against Moore last week) has reportedly been circulating in Alabama, in advance of the December 12 election, claiming to be offering money in exchange for new allegations against the far Rightwing GOP nominee for US Senate. And, far Rightwing radio propagandist Rush Limbaugh has come up with a very novel defense for the accused GOP child molester at the same time.
Also today, more news on the mass shooting at and near an elementary school in Northern California that killed 5 and wounded 10 others on Tuesday. Many new questions have surfaced about why the shooter, a local man with a criminal record and anger management issues, was able to purchase and then retain semi-automatic weapons even after recent encounters with police including domestic violence complaints and being charged with stabbing a neighbor. But, at least the mass killer wasn’t Muslim, so NRA-bribed Republicans can begin ignoring yet another domestic mass shooting immediately.
Then, as concerns continue to grow worldwide over Donald Trump’s saber rattling with North Korea and his access to nuclear weapons, the U.S. Senate held a hearing this week to discuss Presidential authority to wage war and launch nuclear weapons without anyone having the ability to prevent him from doing so, if he chooses.
Longtime nuclear weapons policy analyst STEPHEN SCHWARTZ of the Middlebury Institute of International Studies joins us to discuss what, if anything, was accomplished at the Senate hearing, the first on the topic since 1976, and what, if anything, can (or should) be done to restore a more sane use-of-nukes policy in the only nuclear-armed nation in the world which rests sole decision-making power on whether to use such weapons with one single person. That person, currently being Donald J. Trump, has raised many worries from Democrats and Republicans in Congress alike. Whether they’re willing or able to do anything about it, however, is a different matter, as we also discuss today.
“The reality of the situation is that you’re putting enormous power in the hands of one person,” Schwartz, tells me, detailing how, short of “mass insubordination” by military leadership, even they would be unable to prevent such an event if Trump ordered it. And, he explains, even objections on legal or Constitutional grounds by military leadership might be insufficient to prevent disaster in the “at most 15 minutes, perhaps, as little as five or ten” during which a President would have to make a decision about how to respond in the event of an apparent incoming attack.
You’ll want to tune in for this conversation, if only to hear the explanation of how the nuclear “football”, at all times within reach of any American President since the Cold War, actually works. Schwartz, the former longtime Executive Director and Publisher of the Bulletin of Atomic Scientists (keepers of the infamous “Doomsday Clock”) also suggests several ways in which we could improve (or, help Trump-proof) the current dangerous system to help avoid “what could be a life-ending, a world-ending decision”…
(Comments are now closed.)