As climate change fraud is fully exposed it will be painful for some.

I saw Lord Christopher Monckton did some nice math debunking that I have yet to see anyone here respond to.

Lord Christopher Monckton
http://www.lordmoncktonfoundation.com/home

this the video in question with the math formula errors being exposed. Gonna have to dig if you want the papers he holds in his hand. But from an electronics standpoint this thing looks bad for the people asking me to buy into climate change and give all my rights up

www.youtube.com/watch?v=58MEotH79rg

Very Kind thanks be to you if you already have responded to issue, might put up the link back up to said response since I don't SEE it.

Until then, I say there is a problem with the foundation of this "settled science", when both sides of an equal sign are not equal.

so Lord Christopher Monckton found SEVERAL algebraic equation errors in the Climate Science Math. This pretty much goes hand in hand with the problem that what they expected has not happened actually out in the field in real life. I can see running this past the senate with some crunching down to 8th grade level and boom this will be going away like a squash plant after first frost leaving an goopy brown husk.

I have yet to see anyone speak on this here

These are errors on the root of the math equations of the CLIMATE SCIENCE and based on my knowledge in math alone I agree.

I welcome a show on it, debunk it.

Till then,
I will be boycotting anyone that supports such criminal fraud, and that's going to be a big list, maybe you could help explain how big of a list we are talking about? Really it would be cool to just know who supports the fraud math? I am not judging, it's strictly the way I am going forward. Those that believe in fraud math vs those who do not. not a hard choice there.

Broken Spell, your anti-science arguments are hilariously outdated and were debunked years ago. We don't waste time with climate science deniers anymore because it's boring. You guys bring up the same retread arguments over and over and over again.

It is clear that you are the one who believes in 'fraud math' because you place more credibility on the ravings of a non-scientist, non-mathemetician rather than the peer-reviewed studies of tens of thousands of scientists over the last 150 years.

Boycott whomever you like. No one is fooled by your transparent attempt to peddle disinformation. If you have any interest in real science, educate yourself at SkepticalScience.com.

BROKENSPELL @ #1 says:

Really it would be cool to just know who supports the fraud math? I am not judging, it's strictly the way I am going forward. Those that believe in fraud math vs those who do not. not a hard choice there.

Well, when you put it that way, how can I say I believe in "fraud math?" I proclaim the argument is hereby resolved!

But seriously, in the world of climatology, "Lord" Monckton is widely regarded as a pseudo-scientific buffoon. A fraud. Throwing in with the likes of Monckton tells me you aren't interested in science at all. You're only looking for some nefarious political machination, the puppeteers behind climate science.

Yes, Christopher Monckton is a fraud, liar, misrepresenter, a snake oil salesman posing as a learned intellectual. I refer to him as global warming's answer to Bill Krystal, the chief architect of neoconservatism. And like Bill Krystal, Monckton's 99% wrong about everything. Am I clear? Yes, you hitching your wagon to Monckton tells me you can't help yourself--there's a conspiracy under every rock. "It's there, I just know it!"

Let's discover the amazingly error-riddled and dishonest world of "Lord" Monckton:

Check out this PDF of Monckton quotes versus the scientists who in their own words explain how Monckton misrepresents their research.

For a comprehensive rebuttal of many of Christopher Monckton's arguments, check out this presentation by Professor John Abraham.

Favourite climate myths by Christopher Monckton

Lord Monckton’s Rap Sheet

The Church of Monckton

Over on Lord Monckton’s Rap Sheet, I showed quite clearly that Christopher Monckton is not the most… reliable source of information. Usually he would be the kind of person one would politely ignore, but I decided to publicly document his antics because he is constantly being touted as an expert on (what’s wrong with) climate science by some very powerful politicians and media personalities, foundations, and even by a few scientists (who almost invariably are not climate specialists.) The purpose of this page is to document who the politicians, media personalities, foundations, and scientists are, who have treated Monckton as if he were a credible source of information about climate science.

Christopher Monckton is a fraud and he's good at getting people like you, people who can't see what's in front of their eyes, people who prefer to look for the ulterior motive in the most unlikely of places.

What Desi and Jim said.

BrokenSpell has chosen his trances carelessly (Choose Your Trances Carefully).

As a member of Oil-Qaeda, his attitude endangers robust seaports, which are economically unreproducible organs of commerce (The Extinction of Robust Sea Ports - 9).

The smoke and fumes clogging Oil-Qaeda's heart and mind (Smoke & Fumes).

BrokenSpell,

You are anti-military (Military On Climate Change).

NPR and other commercial media are reporting extensively on the earthquakes and devastation on both the north and south islands of New Zealand. However, there is never a mention of the vast amount of fracking in this immediate area that has been ongoing for 30 years. This is the perfect laboratory for discussion of the connection between fracking and earthquakes, but there is never a report - maybe Green News could amend that.