Today on The BradCast, as voters finally head to the caucuses to cast the very first votes of the 2016 Presidential election year, we examine how the mainstream corporate media have decided for themselves which candidates are and are not acceptable for American voters.
Jim Naureckas of Fairness and Accuracy in Reporting joins us to discuss the marginalization of Bernie Sanders and his very popular policies by mainstream corporate media outlets such as the New York Times and the Chicago Tribune.
Somehow, despite more than 30 years as an elected official, Sanders, according to the Times over the weekend, is an “outsider” representing the “fringe” of the Democratic Party base. He does not, as the Tribune recently warned, represent the “broad, sensible center.” Ya know, exactly the way Donald Trump is a fringe outsider threatening the “broad, sensible center” of the Republican Party because, as we all know by now, everything is always “fair and balanced” in Mainstream Corporate Media World.
“Much of the corporate media are really trying to maintain the idea that there are acceptable candidates within the circle of acceptable ideas, and candidates who are beyond the pale, who decent voters should turn their back on,” Naureckas tells me. “They should listen to the New York Times and vote for one of the approved candidates.”
Those “approved candidates,” Naureckas wryly explains, are the ones who are “part of the club.” Never mind that, unlike Trump’s extremist positions, Sanders’ policy positions are actually wildly popular — not just among Democrats, but among the American electorate as a whole. Nonetheless, if follow mainstream print media, the long-serving Vermont Senator is an “outsider” offering “fringe” policies that are far beyond what is acceptable to the “sensible center.”
“The way that corporate media use the word ‘center’ is not the way that ordinary people use it. You’d think that it means the policies that are embraced by a majority of the people are ‘centrist’ policies. That’s not what they mean in the media. They mean policies that are embraced by the establishment. And that can be policies that are quite unpopular — like cutting Social Security to reduce the deficit is a ‘centrist’ idea that is wildly unpopular. It’s really kind of a shell game on the part of the media to try to present these ideas, that have very little popular support, as the ideas of the ‘middle’.”
Also on today’s program: The DNC appears to be ready to finally add more debates to the schedule, including a new one this week in advance of next Tuesday’s New Hampshire primary; Former CIA head and four-star general David Petraeus will face no more penalties (and not a single day in jail) for leaking tons of highly classified information to his mistress/biographer. (Take that, Edward Snowden!); And the very not conservative Donald Trump makes a faux pas while pretending to be an evangelical Christian in Iowa…
YES
WE
DID
IT
IOWA!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
It’s a lovely day in the neighborhood….can you say, “President Sanders?”….i knew you could…
…and btw, don’t tell ME your vote doesn’t matter!….bunches of us went door-knocking across Davenport / Bettendorf (Scott Co.)over the weekend, talking with people on their front steps….as of last count, Brother Bernie is winning by 100 or so hands COUNTYWIDE….
VOTE VOTE VOTE VOTE VOTE VOTE VOTE VOTE VOTE
(and feel what it’s like to fucking make a difference in your world…)
The self-styled “mainstream” press has enormous power. And now they are determining which candidates get to participate in debates. Moreover, between certain journalists and certain politicians, there seems to be a competition over who can be the most obnoxious.
The “sensible center” is the corporate-owned mainstream media’s form of Orwellian newspeak for a kindler, gentler form of oligarchy.
Excellent interview, Brad