As The NY Times finally did yesterday, Newsweek follows in-step today by covering the problems with E-Voting and it’s lack of paper audit trails, etc.
It’s encouraging for the much-needed election reform movement that such articles are finally making their way into the Corporate Media. Yet I find it still somewhat beguiling that these organizations are finally willing to report on the lack of verifiability at the root of our country’s democracy, how easy it may be to tamper with the results and how the end result is a lack of confidence in the outcome — Yet with all of those acknowledged problems, the same Corporate Media still proves wholly unwilling to actually investigate the enormous body of data recently gathered via such troubling means a mere three weeks ago!
In other words, they acknowledge that possible trouble exists with the technology, but they are seemingly unwilling to expend any resources to determine if such trouble did exist in the November 2nd election! Newsweek even goes so far as to title their piece “Four More Years to Finally Get It Right”. As if to say, nothing to see last November 2nd, but let’s look ahead to ’08.
In any case, here’s a few key grafs from Steven Levy’s Newsweek piece.
On those of us who have been dubious about what went on in Election 2004 and our refusal to take the questionable results lying down…
To the contrary, their curmudgeonry serves an important purpose. The nature of the ATM-style voting terminals used by a third of the country in 2004—and set to increase over the next few cycles—doesn’t merely invite controversy. It makes doubt a permanent part of the process. The problem is that the new devices have no way of proving to the voter that his or her choice is reported in the final tally. Researchers have demonstrated that the machines themselves are not foolproof—and, worse, are potentially susceptible to vote-stealing schemes.
Really? Glad you’ve admitted that, but wouldn’t you do even better by investigating if that may have actually happened?!
And then Levy closes by pointing to the concerns that those of us pushing for Election Reform have been pointing out for a while. He aptly mentions that the concerns are not only with E-Voting itself and finishes (ironically enough) by spanking those who don’t yet seem to get it…
After the 2000 debacle, one might have expected that our leaders would move mountains to make the next election an exemplary one. The fact that we cannot convince the doubters proves otherwise. Don’t call them paranoid, but recognize their passion for fairly run, accurately tabulated elections. If only their zeal were more contagious.
The sentiment is much appreciated. But what Levy fails to point out here is that the “2000 debacle” is what put these “leaders” in power in the first place! It’s small wonder then that they’d wish to tamper with that easily-gamed system.
Levy quickly mentions “legislation that would have mandated such protections in 2004 was bottled up in Congress,” but he conveniently or lazily doesn’t mention that the “bottled up” legislation was “bottled up” by the Republican leadership in both the House and Senate (specifically by Hastert and Delay) who wouldn’t allow these bills to even come up for a vote!
But let’s not hold any actual feet to any actual fires. We wouldn’t want to piss off our well-earned sources now would we?
Both this piece and the Times piece I pointed out yesterday are indeed encouraging and bode well (hopefully) for reform in ’06 and/or ’08 to a certain extent. But one would have thought the even more-obviously outrageous 2000 election would have kept us from being where we are today at all.
So while the emerging willingness of these Corporate Media outlets to finally acknowledge that these issues even exist, they would be far better off investigating whether any of the items they warn about actually occurred in this go-round. There’s certainly ample evidence to look into if they decide to actually leave their offices and look into it!
Without attention and hard news reporting on the matter from such outlets, I see no reason why Election ’04 will offer any greater incentive to force lawmakers to reform the system. If the well-reported-upon debacle of 2000 didn’t do the trick, why would the picture the media has now succeeded in painting of a “relatively trouble-free” 2004 election encourage anybody to change anything?!…Especially with even more of those lawmakers — the ones who were able to gain from the dubious system — now entrenching themselves in the same halls of power that decided not to correct the problems last time?!
CONTACTS…(Please be polite!)
Steven Levy, Newsweek Columnist: steven.levy@newsweek.com
Mark Whitaker, Newsweek Editor: mark.whitaker@newsweek.com
…Or, Email both at the same time with a BCC to me so I can track numbers!
thanks, and right on, dad. steph miller, keith, everyone else that thinks the us story is a little bit more significant than the kiev ukraine one. ha ha
thanks, and right on, dad. steph miller, keith, everyone else that thinks the us story is a little bit more significant than the kiev ukraine one. ha ha
thanks, and right on, dad. steph miller, keith, everyone else that thinks the us story is a little bit more significant than the kiev ukraine one. ha ha
Your site is difficult to read. It needs a design overhaul.
Please, put dark print on light background.
The health of our democracy is now fully threatened, yet the people (the press) tasked with keeping our politicians honest are busy maintaining their ‘access’, too frightened to do any research.
with the republican controll of the house, senate,
presidency & the supreme court, it’s game set and match. We’ll never have an honest election again!
Not only Game, Set, Match, but all future games, sets, matches, because the FCC is controlled by the government and the MSM is controlled by the FCC.
Sort of.
The truth is that this control has been in the planning and execution stages across America for the last 40 years. We wake up one day to it as a supposed surprise because we were led away from seeing it, in the first place, intentionally.
Until the ignorant wake up to the realization that they too are whipped in this, we have no chance.
We need active voices, willing to risk everything, and we need them now. I keep trying, as do many of us. Will our efforts be enough? Hold your bets.
It is no surprise that every imminent terror attack "Alert" status called in the last three years just happens to also coincide with anything harmful to the Bush Party. We are all victims, willingly or not, to the "psy-ops" over us.
😀 Yay Brad for posting this! I just sent my letters and words of encouragement to the media links you posted. The media is on the chopping block here every bit as much as our ridiculous voting system.
$4 billion dollars for voting machines that malfunction and are wide open to sabotage?!
We are not that dumb. It’s just that nobody knew it was THAT bad. But it is.
Get the word out, Brad.
If you could just take it one step further. If you have the guts to print some of the facts about the republican fixed so-called-election, wont other media sources do the same for the sake of ratings and sales.
Oh yeah, I forgot, rednecks dont read!