As we noted yesterday, the press conference held by the NRA’s Con-Man-In-Chief did not go well. But, of course, as we’ve been told by many an NRA-stooge commenter long taken in by the NRA racket, we’re just “anti-gun nuts”, right?
While it’s not entirely surprising to see the New York Times editorial board deride LaPierre’s proposal yesterday, writing unambiguously that they “we were stunned by Mr. LaPierre’s mendacious, delusional, almost deranged rant,” how about those “anti-gun nuts” over at Rupert Murdoch’s New York Post today?…
And, just for good measure, here’s the review from the not-nearly-as-Rightwing New York Daily News…
So, uh, apparently it’s not just us. (For a pleasant change.)
And, by the way, while we have been describing the NRA as a “racket” for some time, even George W. Bush’s former White House ethics attorney (yes, they had one!) is calling them the very same thing now, and in the New York Times!
Perhaps Rupert Murdoch has his own reasons for wanting gun control, i.e. fear for his old bones.
Whatever happened to the “well regulated militia” part of the second amendment?
Give everyone rubber bands to shoot at each other instead of using them for this…
Is this what libs say by having a meaningful conversation about gun laws? Name calling?
Richard K –
By “libs” do you mean Rupert Murdoch?! Owner of the NY Post? Really? First day on Planet Earth, amigo?