By John Gideon on 1/6/2007, 4:41pm PT  

Guest Blogged by John Gideon of

The EAC seems to be hiding a lot with regard to their not giving interim accreditation to Ciber for testing voting systems. One commissioner says there is no report that led to the lack of accreditation by the EAC. Part of that interim accreditation is an inspection of the lab's facilities and procedures. An advisor hired by the EAC did that inspection. How can there not be a report? Maybe it's not the final report. Maybe it's an interim report. No matter what it is called there must be a report. The government does not run without reams of paper. Why is the EAC obfuscating? What are they not telling us and why?...

  • NAtional: Testing Lab Failure Leads To Obfuscation By The Election Assistance Commission LINK
  • NAtional: Experts say changes in e-voting likely to come LINK
  • CA: State officials say testing proved machines accurate LINK
  • FL: Voting system tester barred LINK
  • FL: FL-13 - House Democrats continue challenge of Florida congressman's legitimacy LINK
  • FL: FL-13 - Dem objects to state ruling on District 13: Letter expresses concern... LINK
  • FL: FL-13 - House committee unlikely to rush District 13 voting inquiry LINK
  • FL: Sarasota County - Bennett proposes 'no vote' option LINK
  • MS: Lafayette County could become early voting pilot project LINK
  • OH: Butler County - Absentee voting strains board LINK
  • **"Daily Voting News" is meant as a comprehensive listing of reports each day concerning issues related to election and voting news around the country regardless of quality or political slant. Therefore, items listed in "Daily Voting News" may not reflect the opinions of VotersUnite.Org or BradBlog.Com**