READER COMMENTS ON
"'Daily Voting News' For December 08, 2006"
(12 Responses so far...)
COMMENT #1 [Permalink]
...
Dredd
said on 12/9/2006 @ 5:57 am PT...
"You got gangsters in power and lawbreakers making rules" (Bob Dylan).
COMMENT #2 [Permalink]
...
phil
said on 12/9/2006 @ 6:12 am PT...
I hope the unvalidatable diebold scanners go too!
Otherwise someone missed the cluetrain.
COMMENT #3 [Permalink]
...
Mar
said on 12/9/2006 @ 7:02 am PT...
There's no way any honest, caring person who wants true democracy and who is in possession of even half a brain could be an advocate for ANY kind of electonic voting system.
Those machines are nothing but pieces of rubbish and should be scrapped immediately.
Or, better still, donate them to high schools so that the students can learn from them while having fun hacking them and conducting mock elections.
At least that way the students, who are your future voters, will realize that the only way to go for honest transparent elections is.........
PAPER BALLOTS, HAND COUNTED...!!
COMMENT #4 [Permalink]
...
camp
said on 12/9/2006 @ 12:13 pm PT...
I cannot believe that a Congressperson, (a person who drafts laws) does not know about Blacks Law Dictionary. When I negotiated contracts for teachers,(and I am a lowly teacher) I always looked up words in Blacks so that I knew how an arbitrator would interpret a clause in the contract. To have a Congressman (worse,, his/her staff) draft a law without referring to Blacks is beyond belief.
This is legal language 101. No wonder we cannot develop an authentic voting system that is upheld in courts.
camp
COMMENT #5 [Permalink]
...
James Brewer
said on 12/9/2006 @ 3:31 pm PT...
COMMENT #6 [Permalink]
...
James Brewer
said on 12/9/2006 @ 3:32 pm PT...
I am going to the protest about the stolen 2006 election.
COMMENT #7 [Permalink]
...
James Brewer
said on 12/9/2006 @ 3:33 pm PT...
I was wondering if Mark Foley is going to make any comments about this past election?
COMMENT #8 [Permalink]
...
James Brewer
said on 12/9/2006 @ 3:33 pm PT...
I was wondering if Jan Schneider will show up?
COMMENT #9 [Permalink]
...
czaragorn
said on 12/10/2006 @ 7:23 am PT...
Why can't most people seem to grasp that when someone sells you a piece of junk you can return it and get your money back? What is wrong with this picture? Instead of moaning and groaning about how much money we've spent, we should be demanding full refunds, with interest, on these demonstrably unsecured and unreliable products, and then spending a fraction of the refunds on paper (hemp, of course) ballots and pencils, and citizens' hands and minds and eyes to do the counting. No need to outsource the vote counting for enormous bucks - we'll come up with plenty of volunteers to do it for nothing. But first of all, We Want Our Money Back! What part of that is so hard to understand???
COMMENT #10 [Permalink]
...
Dredd
said on 12/10/2006 @ 10:58 am PT...
Czaragorn #9 ("What part of that is so hard to understand?").
It is easy to understand ... except that the electronic voting machines are purchased from honesty-challenged used car salesmen types.
"As is where is".
And since the election warlords are using "OPM" (other people's money), and are evidently retired used car salesmen types too, they see this as business as usual.
And as pointed out in post number one, since gansters are in power and lawbreakers have been making the rules, they don't see any problem.
COMMENT #11 [Permalink]
...
oldturk
said on 12/10/2006 @ 2:45 pm PT...
Where is the Papantonio/Kennedy qui tam lawsuit? This will focus the spotlight on the breach of contractual promise/agreements - expectations of delivery of performance standards based upon fraudulent premises by the electronic voting machine vendors. If this case is proven - a refund for this faulty equipment seems to be the next recourse for the taxpayer. Can some meaningful headway be made on this case before 2008 - this could be the catalyst for corrective actions and change - to restore integrity to our voting process.
Why has this issue gone silent ?
COMMENT #12 [Permalink]
...
Larry Bergan
said on 12/10/2006 @ 3:44 pm PT...
I was going to go see Robert F. Kennedy Jr. give a speech at a local venue here, but found out you had to pay to get in. All tickets had been sold out a week before I found out. The speech was pretty extensively covered in the press as covering environmental issues, but I doubt they would have covered any Diebold lawsuit discussion.
Of course, any real newspaper serving the people of Utah would have been dying to find out about a lawsuit that would affect it's citizenry so intensely, but consider the fact that this week, the editor of the second largest newspaper in Utah hired the brother of congressman Chris Cannon to be it's new editorial chief, despite the fact that he has no experience in the field. He says he'll be unbiased.
The top newspaper in Utah was controversially sold to Dean Singleton, a newspaper baron with no ties to Utah as the former owners had, who forced his staff to endorse "president" Bush in 2004.