A study in contrasts across two different U.S. wars in the Persian Gulf, and shadows of accountability emerge into view on today’s BradCast. [Audio link to full show follows below this summary.]
FIRST UP… It has arguably taken far too long, but this week it became final. John Eastman, the sleazy attorney who helped conjure up much of Donald Trump‘s bonkers “legal” argument for stealing the 2020 electoral college vote in Congress on January 6, 2021, no longer has a license to practice law in his home state of California. He is officially disbarred after the state Supreme Court declined to hear his appeal this week. The disgraced former lawyer, a speaker at Trump’s insurrectionist rally in front of the White House on January 6, now vows to challenge the California State Bar’s final ruling to the U.S. Supreme Court. Good luck with that, John.
Also today, hints of somewhat more timely accountability in Minnesota, as an ICE agent is charged with assault under state law for pointing a gun at motorists from his unmarked car during Trump’s so-called Operation Metro Surge immigration offensive in Minneapolis. The case will be a test of whether state charges may be brought against federal agents by state officials. Prosecutors say they are still investigating at least 18 more related cases in the Twin Cities region following the ICE shooting deaths of U.S. citizens Renee Nicole Good and Alex Pretti earlier this year.
NEXT… We’re joined today by former U.S. Army Captain, former lifelong Republican and attorney KEITH BARBER, who now writes frequently at the progressive Daily Kos website as “KeithDB”.
More than 30 years ago, Barber penned a 39-page article for the Fall, 1994 volume of the Military Law Review (pp. 235-274), examining evidence behind allegations of war crimes then made by former U.S. Attorney General Ramsey Clark against the U.S. during the first Gulf War under President George HW Bush.
Barber, at the time, found that Clark’s evidence of widespread war crimes failed to hold up to legal scrutiny. Last week, with few changes to International Law over the past three decades in regard to such crimes, he compared similar allegations regarding the lawfulness of Donald Trump’s war in Iran.
His original article for the Military Law Review was titled “No Fire This Time: False Accusations of American War Crimes In The Persian Gulf.” His follow-up last week: “The Real Fire This Time: American War Crimes In the Iran War”.
The two headlines tell the tale, but we walk through — as Barber does in his recent piece — the central allegations of whether the two different offensives were considered lawful under International Law, and whether the conduct of each meets established legal principles of discrimination and proportionality. (Don’t worry, we explain what all of that means.)
Also of note during our conversation, Barber’s thoughts on whether the change in his personal political leanings may have colored his findings, either then or now, and about whether the Military Law Review would have published his findings had they come to a different conclusion 30 years ago. Tune in for some revealing answers in a sobering discussion today on those points and more.
FINALLY… Desi Doyen is in da house for our latest Green News Report as Big Oil continues to reap billions from Trump’s war in Iran; Extreme weather slams U.S. slands in the western Pacific; and fossil-fuel loving candidates are ousted by voters from the nation’s largest public utility board in Arizona, in favor of pro-renewable energy candidates, thanks, ironically enough, to the rightwing Turning Point outfit!…
When “then” is capitalized THEN is the result (War, Forever and a Day).
Whodat @ #1:
“Conjoined in his person [Trump] is the perfect amalgam of America’s imperial history of aggressive aggrandizement and the ubermensch cruelty that history has instilled in the American psyche.” (from da link)