It's now been one full year since Donald Trump entered the race --- and since we accurately predicted the precise effect he would have on the GOP's 2016 Presidential Primary.

I remember when Brad said that. Last summer, when I told Ted Cruz supporters that Trump was no laughing matter, they would just throw their poo at me.

Jim Spriggs @1:

Like!

Who knew?

Source: June 17th "Redacted Tonight" Stanford study.

Larry Bergan @ 3:

I did. And that graphic means next to nothing. Yes, Clinton did better in places with no "paper trail". Well, the places with no "paper trail" are the places that use 100% unverifiable touch-screen systems. The places that use such systems happen to be the larger and/or more urban jurisdictions. Larger and/or more urban jurisdictions have more minority voters. Clinton does better than Sanders among African-Americans and Hispanics,etc, so it's little surprise she'd also do better in such jurisdictions... with no "paper trail".

Someone, at some point, may come up with proof that it was "stolen". But that "evidence", like most of the allegations I've seen to date this year, is pretty weak tea.

BTW, for anybody who believes CA was "stolen", we do have a law out here that allows any voter to demand a hand-count in any jurisdiction, county or precinct that they like.

Using available tools for finding out how people actually voted, rather than using circumstantial guesswork, conjecture and unsupported allegations, would be a much smarter way of finding out who actually won or lost. Though finding that out may not actually be of interest to many of the folks making those allegations.

Well Brad,

I don't know how anybody could demand a hand count in places that don't have any paper trail, like the ones Clinton supposedly won, so we're left with Clinton saying she won and the rest of us saying the man who filled up stadiums most likely won on the blue, um, "democratic" side.

In other words, I guess I'd say the Stanford paper has as much validity as anything else.

Elections in the 21st century.