2 Responses

1. 

   1)

   Hoosey Whatsis said on 7/19/2015 @ 9:50am PT: [Permalink]

   O/T but any time I come across something about election fraud, I immediately think BradBlog.

   In the hope of NOT wasting your time, I searched here for the statistician’s name but it came up zip.

   “Statistician: Data Point to ‘Multiple Agents’ Manipulating Election”

   “Beth Clarkson, a Wichita State University professor, has conducted years of independent research on elections and recently laid out some of her findings in a piece for Significance, a statistics magazine.

   “My statistical analysis shows patterns indicative of vote manipulation in machines. The manipulation is relatively small, compared with the inherent variability of election results, but it is consistent. These results form a pattern that goes across the nation and back a number of election cycles. I’ve downloaded data and verified the results from several states for myself. Furthermore, the manipulation is not limited to a single powerful operator. My assessment is that the data reveals multiple (at least two) agents working independently to successfully alter voting results.”

   “‘Voting machine manipulation,’ she writes, ‘is, in my opinion, the most likely explanation for these patterns.'”

   (Note: per her bio, Ms. Clarkson is “an ASQ-certified quality engineer, with a PhD in statistics.”)

   Here’s the link to the WhoWhatWhy article (the oldest comment mentions “a new post election audit system that is claimed to be irrefutable [called] Retro-Vva”)

   http://whowhatwhy.org/2015/06/2...ting-election/

   And here’s the link to Clarkson’s article at Significance:

   http://www.statslife.org.uk/sig...tems-in-the-us

2. 

   2)

   Dredd said on 7/20/2015 @ 4:11am PT: [Permalink]

   Thanks Hoosey Whatsis.