"The way to honor 9/11 victims would have been to rebuild the towers as they were. " would have been to fully investigate the crime and do all interviews under oath.

Highly Credible People Question 9/11
The following people question the government's version of 9/11, or the government's openness in providing information about the September 11 attacks.

http://www.911summary.com/index.php

WTC 7: Sound Evidence for Explosions

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ERhoNYj9_fg

@ Mick

Respectfully disagree...they were inhuman, arrogant in scale, uncomfortable to work in...

Better: trees, water, grass, a gathering-place of remembrance and fellowship

Best regards

fusion

Fusion ,sorry the ""The way to honor 9/11 victims would have been to rebuild the towers as they were. " was a "cut'n'paste" error, my bad.
Meant to say "Spend this weekend looking at the inconstancy of the "Official 91 1 Conspiracy Theory ". Is that much to give? Some gave their life.
Follow this link and just read. Check the calibre of the people and regard their expert opinions honestly. The ultimate respect for the victims of 9 1 1 is to insist on the truth, show respect by getting informed for them. It’s not to late to undo the damage."

http://www.911summary.com/index.php

"Those who hate us" means the CIA and Mossad I'm guessing.

They should both be destroyed, post haste, if we want the beautiful future we deserve.

-

At the National Press Club, in Sept. 9 'Events' list, this item:

1000 Architects & Engineers Present Explosive Evidence at World Trade Center on 9/11

September 9, 2010 2:00 PM - News conferences
Location: Holeman lounge

Richard Gage, AIA, presents hard evidence for explosive demolition at the World Trade Center on 9/11. Mock debate immediately following - moderated be former Senator Mike Gravel (D-AK).

Prof Lance deHaven-Smith will also speak - former President of the Florida Political Science Association, coined the term State Crimes Against Democracy (SCAD).

In which laboratory analysis confirms the scientific fact that explosives residue (of thermite) is readily found in WTC dust. Chemical analysis findings being published and peer reviewed in accredited journal of physics, establishes the fact the WTC buildings were demolished by preset explosives.

Therefor, we don't know who dunnit. Maybe Arabs planted the explosives, maybe someone else planted the explosives. All that the scientists have proved is that explosives were in the buildings because explosives residue is in the dust and debris.

Questions and investigation should follow-up to find the culprits who exploded the WTC.

The scientists presented the proof at the Nat'l Press Club, (in a manner to Colin Powell waving a vial of white powder in the U.N.), and NO mainstream media carried the news item.

While I have been spreading the news in conversations, and seeing people's realization dawn in mind of the fact that explosives blew down the Towers, a strange 'disappointment' comes over them in their affect as if they feel a sense of loss in not having 'Arabs' or 'Muslims' as an object of their hate, and blame.

And people are left with their hate and no one at which to aim it.

An object of hate is so convenient to have in mind. Once identified, then the hater stops thinking about the rationality or reasonableness of the visceral prejudice. Taking away the hated object leaves the hater with work to do, effort to make, thinking things through (in the Nine-Eleven Op instance) to find and focus conviction on the true culprit(s) of the mass murder.

Anyway, there is some brain-busting work to do because scientists (by highly refined analysis) have proven there were explosives in the Towers and preset demolition --- not plane crashes --- cause the destructions on 9/11.

All Americans: Back to square 1 concerning Nine-Eleven Op: who dunnit?

-

"camusrebel said on 9/11/2010 @ 10:50 pm PT...

"Those who hate us" means the CIA and Mossad I'm guessing.

They should both be destroyed, post haste, if we want the beautiful future we deserve.
"

Never a truer word....

Meremark Huffingtonpost which says its a liberal/progressive news media site bans the mention of Architects & Engineers...another "gatekeeper" site ...I was banned today after 5 years of posting ...and no explanation was given...so much for liberal/progressive news media

Meremark "Taking away the hated object leaves the hater with work to do, effort to make, thinking things through (in the Nine-Eleven Op instance) to find and focus conviction on the true culprit(s) of the mass murder." That sums up the main problem ,the "hated object" was planted on the very morning of 911 and not by accident ."Game Theory" would require a "hated object" as the focus of attention of blame.

Dr. Alan Sabrosky Traitors in our Government Allegiance to Israel 3-15-2010

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rpdg-WDOPVA

Mick - if u could go easy on the spamming of this thread it'd be greatly appreciated. Thanks.

This graphic could have written so much more.

The silohouette of WTC #7 could have been another 4 sentances at least!

Oh well, at least the Architects and Engineers for 9/11 Truth erected a third lightbeam into the NYC skyline on this 9th anniversary:

http://www.cnbc.com/id/39125074

Free media journalists should not be wasting time on reporting ANYTHING about the mosque or Koran burning.

Focus on the real issues.

This and more:
http://norcaltruth.org/

hard evidence for explosive demolition at the World Trade Center on 9/11........laboratory analysis confirms the scientific fact that explosives residue (of thermite) is readily found in WTC dust. Chemical analysis findings being published and peer reviewed in accredited journal of physics, establishes the fact the WTC buildings were demolished by preset explosives.
----------------

This is a complete misrepresentation.

You are referring to Bentham Open - a highly criticised form of vanity press which charges authors for publication.

The 'journal' is *not* peer-reviewed. The editor resigned over publication of this "science"; she was completely unaware the article was even published.

Further, there are very serious questions about the supposed 'science' behind this report - for example, the chain of evidence is suspect: the dust that was analysed was sent years later by "someone", apparently collected from a bridge in New York. The "theory" of controlled demolition was already widely known - contamination accidental or purposeful is impossible to rule out. And anyway, the actual results do not stand up to the conclusions claimed for them. There are plenty of other methodological issues and interpretation issues - none of which have been addressed and all of which would/should have been picked-up by proper peer-review - which the report was not subjected to.

Don't lie or misrepresent in efforts to accuse people of being liars? That should be obvious.

Truth - pah "the chain of evidence is suspect" is that your best shot ...kinda like "shoot the messenger" don't you think ? N.I.S.T. found it safer not to mention WTC7 at all in their first "findings". The world greatest military power who has spent TRILLIONS of Dollars , beaten by 19 unskilled pilots ,yea ,right ! They even hit your Military Headquarters...is that your best ? Imagine if the Russian attacked ,you'd be speaking Russian by now ,LOL ,you people don't think this thru .

Mick - Truth-pah's responses are nothing like "shooting the messenger". They are direct, substantive and similar to my own concerns in relation to the controlled-demolition/thermite theories proffered.

While I claim no particular expertise in this area --- and share the frustrations of many concerning the failings of the original 9/11 Commission (while welcoming any new or additional investigations) --- I have independently come across many of the very same concerns/questions when doing my own admittedly cursory poking around into these claims.

If you were able to respond to Truth-pah's concerns substantively it would be far more helpful and/or persuasive towards the case you are hoping to make, rather than the dismissive, even insulting, answer you offered instead.

"9/11 2010: Will Hate Bring It All Back?..."
or will the search for truth have a Statute of limitations ?
New information re. controlled demolition .
9/11 Truth - Cutter Charges

http://www.youtube.com/w...l938&feature=related

With respect ,how do you get/explain pools of molten metal more than six weeks after 911 ?

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-F0MnfzkOhM

The chain of evidence is detailed completely in the journal:

http://www.bentham-open....0002/00000001/7TOCPJ.SGM

Spend 30 minutes reading it. Janette McKinley is not "just anyone."

She is a public figure, an artist, lived near Ground Zero, suffers health issues beacause of that fact, and so on.

The red-gray chip matter that can withstand temperatures up to 400 plus degrees celcius is a huge red flag! And it ignites!

http://911research.wtc7....rmitics_made_simple.html

Some good science for Brad, or anyone else who is not sure:

http://www.youtube.com/u...82383CCA91/2/ZjSd9wB55zk

But really, the propaganda is layed on thick for EVERYONE who doesn't look at this and see a anything but a controlled demolition at this point-9 years later:

http://www.youtube.com/w...;feature=player_embedded

What? You want explosion sounds? Here:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_A9X_8flGeM

Lets not drag our feet any longer here!

Brad,

Thanks for being honest with you curiosity.

Obviously the Commission was a whitewash in my perspective, maybe it had failures in your's.

Cool. Please keep your head open on the subject.

Just as a kind of pop quiz ,how many of you have seen the following video ...it relates to JFK's murder ... I'm not spamming but I am curious as to ho many people have seen the video...The Secret Service sure seem to have a lot of "Secrets" ...

JFK assassination_ Secret Service Standdown.flv

http://www.youtube.com/w...;feature=player_embedded

And then we have Andy Cards actions at Brooker ...

Brad, I'm afraid you've been love bombed by the 9/11 truth-haters club. Whatever you do, don't risk your guest hosting spots.

Truth-Pah, strange how the nano-thermite shows up in all the samples. Strange how Giuliani tried to ship everything out (to China if he could). By the way, that's molten iron pouring from the building in those photos (a result of the thermite reaction); and that was thermite burning for ages at ground zero. Don't let the facts bother you.

Wilson - Not sure if you're being sarcasting re: "don't risk your guest hosting spots", but I assure you, they are not in jeopardy. Certainly not for anything to do with 9/11, particularly as the folks I tend to guest host for (most frequently Mike Malloy) are far more convinced of an "inside job" than I am.

I speak truth to power. I report what interests me, and what I can independently verify. My positions are solely my own, and have nothing to do with the way anybody else might perceive them. Don't know how long you've been reading The BRAD BLOG, but most regular readers have come to realize that long ago. Hope that helps to clarify your concern.

oom-Pah, Ms. Mckinley's dust sample is only one of five that have certified chain of custody by sworn affidavit.

All five samples test positive for nano-thermite.

One can only speculate as to your motivation to flail about into such absurd contortions of illogic in pursuit of an impossible defense of the official fairy tale. On one level it is comic. On another it is a "tell". After nine years and millions of innocents murdered, thousands of innocents tortured based on the official fairy tale....your desperate grasping at straws is grotesque.

So, oom-pah-pah....lets try to follow your slapstick "logic". Ms. McKinley and the other four independent sample collectors what.................pop into Walgreen's and pick up some Advil, maybe a pack of gum and...a liter of nano-thermite.

"...contamination accidental or purposeful..."

whoops, you got your peanut butter in my nano-thermite. freakin hilarious, what are you like seven?

So how does Janette and the other four acquire the good stuff? From whom? Alfonzo in the alley? This shit is only found at high security United States Department of Defense Labs.

Like weapons grade anthrax. Are you seeing a pattern?

Or are you somehow saying the US gov. contaminated the five samples on purpose? By accident?

Did you really think your bullshit through AT ALL before posting or just regurgitate your Cass Sunstein talking points.

The editor, a one Ms. Marie Paule Pileni is an odd bird. First, the editor never saw the article until after printing? Then she resigns in protest?

She claims she does not have the expertise to critique the science involved but a quick review of her CV includes "powders and explosives, and nano-materials"

So...clearly she could not find a thing wrong with the science and resigned as a desperate attempt to cast some doubt on the paper.

The souls of the millions murdered are crying out for justice. And justice they shall have. My suggestion to all naysayers and fence sitters is to get on the right side of history. Now.

"pop into Walgreen's and pick up some Advil, maybe a pack of gum and...a liter of nano-thermite." LOL

Its not over ,till its over !

Brad, I don't doubt your sincerity at all.

Truth-bah, on the other hand . . . He's simply parroting the current party line. I used to think his crowd was getting blast faxes from Rove, or maybe logged in to a members-only website every day to coordinate their nonsense, or as part of the Borg collective somehow communicated automatically (maybe joined at the roots like Libby and Miller), or . . .

Good thing he's not being paid or he could be tried someday as a accessory after the fact to mass murder and treason. Cass Sunstein certainly will, because we, the Patriots, are going to win.

But first America will be tried overseas. Niels Harritt, a man of pure heart, has an arrow drawn on the truth. The evidence is unassailable.

Brad,

Out of curiosity, what do you think of Building 7?

Surely that is a big red flag?

However I understand if you don't want to elaborate.

Thanks