"The problem with polls is that they are unable to foresee events that will occur in the future that will change the way people think,"

That's true for any campaign is it not? The same is also true when talking about Trumps support with the crazies. He could end up doing something that trashes their opinion of him. I agree that the future is unreadable and anything is possible. But all you're doing is stating the obvious. Trump has a much greater chance of being brought done than either democratic candidate. The minute he's placed next to a sane democratic candidate Trump's insanity will be emphasized that much more. In the literary world that's know as a "foil".

I have a much greater fear that someone will attempt to hack the election than I do of some random event bringing down a democratic candidate.

Don't sell the GOP short ... they plan to stop him themselves because their people forgot how to vote (Doomer Tuesday).

Thanks for the shout out, Brad

I'm a bigtime Bernie-supporter, and I see Hillary as unacceptably corporatist-neoliberal.
I am not a fan. But I am realistic.
She might win.

Still, I don't see Hillary being as vulnerable against Trump as Robinson does.
She has been through 2 bruising Presidential campaigns with Bill, right there in the thick of things, through every attack, every appearance around the country, etc etc.
Also, anyone who watched her at the Benghazi hearings last October saw Hillary at her pinnacle best, powerfully, sometimes almost effortlessly, fending off an entire GOP attack team, and she did it for 11 continuous hours.I watched at least 5-6 of those hours, and I have to sheepishly admit, I was impressed. Her deep, almost masculine laugh at the question "Were you alone all night?" was priceless (imagine mis-phrasing a serious question to a Clinton, with all of Bill's history, in that way-That poor little GOP Congresswoman-Yikes!).

Trump's debate style could, just possibly, play right into the hands of a knowledgable, super-smart debater with a "judo" approach (using an opponent's force & energy against him). Hillary may be able to manage that, or perhaps not. But she might, IMO. When Trump is asked for policy details, he's got nothing. That works for some folks, but not nearly all. That is his potential weakness, which has yet to be properly exploited.

I agree with the opinion that Bernie would make a stronger candidate against Trump than Hillary.
But I have yet to be convinced she would fold against The Bloviator. Maybe. But maybe not.
As Robinson said, nobody really knows, it's all a guess at this point.
But if, disappointingly, Bernie comes in 2nd, it might be a great idea at the convention for Hillary to defy Party elders and invite Bernie onto the ticket as VP.
With Bernie as running mate, most millenials would be likely to stay involved, which gives the Democrats a big edge Hillary lacks by herself.
The Dems would OWN the minority vote. Progressives would show up too, IMO.

The agreement could be for Bernie to continue his revolution in the VP's office by being in charge of several big policies, which could be negotiated at the convention.
Bernie as VP, although disappointing, would still be a consolation prize I could live with, as I feel it would be difficult to "kick him upstairs" and keep him quiet, with the recent history of powerful, involved VPs.

IMO, if Hillary does take the nomination, she'd be a fool not to offer the VP spot to Bernie.

And she should pray he'd take it.

Thanks, Don. Responded to your comment (and others on this interview) on today's BradCast!

OMG...nino had to die before clarence would ask a question? what was the question,do tell. it might another ten years before we hear another.