{"id":9842,"date":"2013-01-30T07:05:04","date_gmt":"2013-01-30T15:05:04","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.bradblog.com\/?p=9842"},"modified":"2013-01-30T13:25:30","modified_gmt":"2013-01-30T21:25:30","slug":"brad-skypes-into-the-david-pakman-show-to-discuss-the-latest-gop-election-rigging-schemes","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/bradblog.com\/?p=9842","title":{"rendered":"Brad Skypes Into &#8216;The David Pakman Show&#8217; to Discuss the Latest GOP Election Rigging Schemes"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>Yesterday, a <a href=\"http:\/\/hamptonroads.com\/2013\/01\/virginia-panel-kills-plan-redistribute-electoral-votes\">Virginia State Senate committee killed<\/a> a GOP plan to completely revamp the state&#8217;s &#8220;winner-take-all&#8221; electoral vote system despite a last minute change to the bill by its sponsor in hopes of making it more palatable. The original scheme would have awarded electoral votes by Congressional district instead of &#8220;winner-take-all&#8221;. Had that plan been in place in 2012, Mitt Romney would have been awarded 9 electoral votes to Obama&#8217;s 4, despite the President winning the popular vote in the state by some 150,000 votes and being awarded all 13 of the VA&#8217;s electoral votes.<\/p>\n<p>The bill&#8217;s author, Republican Sen. Charles W. &#8220;Bill&#8221; Carrico, tweaked the bill at the last minute, so that electoral votes would be awarded proportionally, based on the popular vote, rather than by Congressional district. It didn&#8217;t help. The scheme was defeated in committee by a bi-partisan vote of 11 to 4.<\/p>\n<p>Before that scheme was killed in the VA Senate on Tuesday, I appeared on <a href=\"http:\/\/davidpakman.com\"><i>The David Pakman Show<\/i><\/a>, via Skype, to discuss that and related issues, including the impending U.S. Supreme Court threat to the <i>very<\/i> important Section 5 of the Voting Rights Act&#8230;<\/p>\n<p><center><iframe width=\"420\" height=\"236\" src=\"http:\/\/www.youtube.com\/embed\/qKT6-XrnSow\" frameborder=\"0\" allowfullscreen><\/iframe><\/center><\/p>\n<p><center><i><b>* * *<\/b><\/i><\/center><!--BB-DONATEPITCH-START--><\/p>\n<div style=\"background:#f5f0e0; border:2px solid #6b5a2e; border-radius:6px; padding:10px 14px; text-align:center; font-family:Georgia,serif;\"><span style=\"display:block; margin:0 0 8px 0; color:#3a2e0e; font-size:0.95em; line-height:1.5;\"><a href=\"http:\/\/www.BradBlog.com\">The BRAD BLOG<\/a> covers your electoral system, fiercely and independently, like no other media outlet in the nation. Please support our work with <a href=\"https:\/\/BradBlog.com\/Donate\">a donation<\/a> to help us keep going.<\/span><a href=\"https:\/\/bradblog.com\/Donate\" style=\"display:inline-block; background:#6b5a2e; color:#ffffff; padding:6px 18px; border-radius:4px; font-weight:bold; text-decoration:none; font-family:Georgia,serif; font-size:0.9em;\">Please CLICK HERE to help support our work today!<\/a><\/div>\n<p><!--BB-DONATEPITCH-END--><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Yesterday, a Virginia State Senate committee killed a GOP plan to completely revamp the state&#8217;s &#8220;winner-take-all&#8221; electoral vote system despite a last minute change to the bill by its sponsor in hopes of making it more palatable. The original scheme would have awarded electoral votes by Congressional district instead of &#8220;winner-take-all&#8221;. Had that plan been [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":3,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"ep_exclude_from_search":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[89,400,28,300,105,517,143],"tags":[],"coauthors":[],"class_list":["post-9842","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-media-appearance","category-election-2012","category-election-reform","category-republicans","category-virginia","category-voting-rights-act","category-wisconsin","bb-type-bradblog"],"acf":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/bradblog.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/9842","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/bradblog.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/bradblog.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/bradblog.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/3"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/bradblog.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=9842"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/bradblog.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/9842\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/bradblog.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=9842"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/bradblog.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=9842"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/bradblog.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=9842"},{"taxonomy":"author","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/bradblog.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcoauthors&post=9842"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}