{"id":9434,"date":"2012-07-27T06:35:47","date_gmt":"2012-07-27T13:35:47","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.bradblog.com\/?p=9434"},"modified":"2012-07-27T09:35:37","modified_gmt":"2012-07-27T16:35:37","slug":"why-theyre-worried-about-warren","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/bradblog.com\/?p=9434","title":{"rendered":"Why They&#8217;re Worried About Warren"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><img decoding=\"async\" src=\"https:\/\/BradBlog.com\/Images\/ScottBrown_ElizabethWarren.jpg\" hspace=\"6\" vspace=\"3\" border=\"0\" align=\"right\"><i>Guest editorial by D.R. Tucker<\/i><\/p>\n<p>If you want to see pure madness in action, ask a Republican friend about Democratic Senate candidate Elizabeth Warren, the creator of the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau, who will face US Senator Scott Brown (R-MA) in one of the most high-profile races of the year.<\/p>\n<p>Chances are, your Fox &#8220;News&#8221;-watching friend will turn beet-red within a half-second, swearing and sputtering about her supposed socialism and attacking her as the mascot of the Occupy movement. There&#8217;s just something about Warren that sends the right into &#8216;roid rage. Is it something she said &#8212; or just something she represents?&#8230;<\/p>\n<p><!--more--><\/p>\n<p><strong>Warrenphobia<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>The right&#8217;s antipathy towards Warren has no logical basis. They&#8217;ve never presented any proof that Warren, <a href=\"http:\/\/thehill.com\/blogs\/blog-briefing-room\/news\/189657--liberal-favorite-elizabeth-warren-admits-she-was-a-republican\">a former Republican (!)<\/a>, is an &#8220;ultra-liberal.&#8221; She&#8217;s center-left at best policy-wise, closer to Clinton than Castro.<\/p>\n<p>The right is still angry at Warren&#8217;s <a href=http:\/\/www.youtube.com\/watch?v=htX2usfqMEs>famous &#8220;social contract&#8221; speech<\/a>, but there&#8217;s nothing in the speech that should set off any partisan alarms. All she says, in essence, is that capitalism is not perfect.<\/p>\n<p>Of course, that&#8217;s the problem. She believes capitalism is not perfect. To the rational mind, that&#8217;s basic common sense. To the irrational mind, that&#8217;s treason.<\/p>\n<p>Today&#8217;s Republican Party hates Warren because she embodies the worldview of those who believe capitalism needs regulations, safeguards, rules of engagement. This is a view that the right has tried to destroy for decades.  If Warren wins, it will represent a psychological loss for the capitalism-is-infallible crowd.<\/p>\n<p>Not for nothing does Brown suggest that Warren hates capitalism. Brown knows who his base is. Even the &#8220;bluest&#8221; state in the union, if that&#8217;s what Massachusetts is, has its share of what author Naomi Oreskes once called &#8220;free-market fundamentalists,&#8221; folks who think that the Community Reinvestment Act actually caused the 2008 financial meltdown &#8212; <a href=\"http:\/\/www.youtube.com\/watch?v=fWNQza4CMwI&#038;feature=related\">even though the late free-marketeer Rep. Jack Kemp (R) said that was a lie<\/a>.<\/p>\n<p>Brown&#8217;s backers are scared to death of a Warren win, which is why they have <a href=\"http:\/\/www.washingtonmonthly.com\/political-animal-a\/2012_05\/the_smearing_of_elizabeth_warr037062.php\">aggressively promoted the notion<\/a> that Warren exploited affirmative action to advance her Harvard Law School career. Their hypocrisy is hilarious. The same folks who turned a blind eye to the blatantly race-based promotion of such GOP figures as Michael Steele and Herman Cain are now claiming that Warren didn&#8217;t rise to the top based on merit. Really.<\/p>\n<p>Right-wing Warrenphobia has also motivated a <a href=\"http:\/\/thephoenix.com\/boston\/news\/140921-massachusetts-voters-are-about-to-get-an-up-close-\/\">new effort to label her an academic crook<\/a>. These attacks &#8212; <a href=\"http:\/\/www.youtube.com\/watch?v=OCmv1X2lqlI\">and Brown&#8217;s constant references<\/a> to his Democratic opponent as &#8220;Professor Warren&#8221; &#8212; suggest that Brown has lost faith in his ability to beat Warren on policy grounds. He&#8217;s probably right.<\/p>\n<p><b>Acknowledging reality<\/b><\/p>\n<p>Warren and Brown both signed a so-called &#8220;<a href=\"http:\/\/www.npr.org\/2012\/01\/24\/145688522\/mass-senate-race-to-block-third-party-political-ads\">People&#8217;s Pledge<\/a>&#8221; intended to discourage third-party negative ads in their race. Warren obviously agreed to this pledge to keep over-the-top attack ads from American Crossroads and Americans for Prosperity off the Bay State airwaves. However, Brown had an equally transparent motivation.  <\/p>\n<p>Last year, after his bizarre <a href=\"http:\/\/bluemassgroup.com\/2011\/04\/brown-votes-to-end-epa-ability-to-regulate-ghg\/\">decision to vote for an amendment<\/a> to strip the EPA of its Supreme Court-recognized authority to regulate greenhouse gas emissions, the League of Women Voters ran a <a href=\"http:\/\/www.youtube.com\/watch?v=7vTd9nmSpbI\">series<\/a> of <a href=\"http:\/\/www.youtube.com\/watch?v=7K6OAgdUqLM\">tough ads<\/a> pointing to the link between greenhouse gases and increasing rates of ozone pollution, which worsens asthma. Brown, who in 2010 <a href=\"http:\/\/thehill.com\/homenews\/senate\/103633-obama-invites-sen-brown-potential-energy-swing-vote-to-shoot-hoops\">refused to countenance the idea<\/a> of pricing carbon to reduce emissions, <a href=\"http:\/\/www.youtube.com\/watch?v=QVA_yKwYVs4&#038;feature=related\">threw a fit over the ads<\/a> as <a href=\"http:\/\/thinkprogress.org\/climate\/2011\/05\/19\/208138\/scott-brown-carbon-pollution-asthma-sick-children\/\">environmentalists noted<\/a> that Brown&#8217;s protests were simply not based on science.<\/p>\n<p>The ad campaign clearly wounded Brown, since it reminded Bay Staters of <a href=\"http:\/\/thinkprogress.org\/climate\/2010\/01\/16\/205358\/ma-senate-candidate-scott-brown-pushes-anti-science-nonsense-rejects-bipartisan-clean-energy-jobs-bill\/\">Brown&#8217;s reversals on environmental and climate issues<\/a> from his days as a state legislator and made those viewers wonder: what if Brown&#8217;s daughters had asthma? (It also didn&#8217;t help his cause that the ads aired just weeks after <a href=\"http:\/\/www.youtube.com\/watch?v=Gnkipn-gJK4\">Brown&#8217;s political panhandling in front of corporate libertarian and climate-change denier David Koch<\/a>.)<\/p>\n<p><span class=\"pullquote pqRight\"><!--I supported Brown in his 2010 fight. At the time, I hoped that Brown would lead a revival of Northeastern centrist Republicanism...That dream has been deferred for life.--><\/span><a href=\"http:\/\/www.redmassgroup.com\/diary\/6879\/did-you-realize-that-you-were-a-champion-in-their-eyes\">I supported Brown in his 2010 fight<\/a> against Martha Coakley to fill the late Ted Kennedy&#8217;s Senate seat. At the time, I hoped that Brown would lead a revival of Northeastern centrist Republicanism, the sort that valued logic, reason, facts and non-partisanship. That dream has been deferred for life: while Brown is not as repulsive as the James Inhofe\/Jim DeMint crowd, he has failed to fully distance himself from them.<\/p>\n<p>While Warren hasn&#8217;t said much yet about the threat of climate change, I agree 100 percent with <a href=\"http:\/\/blog.thephoenix.com\/BLOGS\/talkingpolitics\/archive\/2012\/06\/07\/the-old-man-and-the-sea-change.aspx\">Bill McKibben&#8217;s observation<\/a> that Warren will likely be a better ally for climate activists &#8212; and anyone who doesn&#8217;t worship ExxonMobil CEO Rex Tillerson as a deity &#8212; than Brown. Reducing the risk of catastrophic climate change is the ultimate form of consumer protection, and it will be nice to see &#8220;Professor&#8221; Warren instructing the ignorant that climate change is not a hoax.<\/p>\n<p>I&#8217;m confident that Warren will win &#8212; but not overconfident. In addition to wooing every free-market fundamentalist he can find in the Bay State, Brown is also pandering to older right-wing Democrats. Late last year, Brown released <a href=\"http:\/\/www.youtube.com\/watch?v=x3hv2PkvjXo\">a commercial<\/a> in advance of the anticipated run against Warren. It showed him chatting up several culturally conservative Democrats, including the anti-abortion, anti-same-sex-marriage former mayor of Boston, Raymond Flynn. The subtext of the commercial: &#8220;Vote for me, not that moonbat elitist!&#8221;<\/p>\n<p>I&#8217;m disappointed by Brown, but I don&#8217;t hate him. His message was more compelling the last time around. Warren&#8217;s message is more compelling now. The terms and conditions of the American social contract have indeed been violated. One candidate doesn&#8217;t acknowledge that reality. The other does.<\/p>\n<p><center><b>* * *<\/b><\/center><\/p>\n<p><img decoding=\"async\" src=\"https:\/\/BradBlog.com\/Images\/DRTucker_biohead.jpg\" hspace=\"6\" vspace=\"3\" border=\"0\" align=\"left\"><i>D.R. Tucker is a Massachusetts-based freelance writer. He has been a contributor to the Huffington Post, the <\/I>Boston Herald<I>, Human Events Online, FrumForum.com, the Ripon Forum, Truth-Out.org, TheNextRight.com, and BookerRising.com. In addition, he also hosted a Blog Talk Radio program, <a href=\"http:\/\/www.blogtalkradio.com\/drtucker\">The Notes<\/a>, from August 2009 to June, 2010. You can follow him on Twitter here: <a href=\"http:\/\/twitter.com\/DRTucker\">@DRTucker<\/a>.<\/i><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Guest editorial by D.R. Tucker If you want to see pure madness in action, ask a Republican friend about Democratic Senate candidate Elizabeth Warren, the creator of the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau, who will face US Senator Scott Brown (R-MA) in one of the most high-profile races of the year. Chances are, your Fox &#8220;News&#8221;-watching [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":130,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"ep_exclude_from_search":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[390,400,495,200,125,233],"tags":[],"coauthors":[],"class_list":["post-9434","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-economy","category-election-2012","category-elizabeth-warren","category-environment","category-massachusetts","category-us-senate","bb-type-bradblog"],"acf":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/bradblog.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/9434","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/bradblog.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/bradblog.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/bradblog.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/130"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/bradblog.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=9434"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/bradblog.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/9434\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/bradblog.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=9434"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/bradblog.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=9434"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/bradblog.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=9434"},{"taxonomy":"author","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/bradblog.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcoauthors&post=9434"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}