{"id":9371,"date":"2012-06-25T10:01:26","date_gmt":"2012-06-25T17:01:26","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.bradblog.com\/?p=9371"},"modified":"2012-06-25T10:00:08","modified_gmt":"2012-06-25T17:00:08","slug":"us-supreme-court-slaps-down-montana-supreme-court-challenge-to-citizens-united","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/bradblog.com\/?p=9371","title":{"rendered":"U.S. Supreme Court Slaps Down Montana Supreme Court Challenge to &#8216;Citizens United&#8217;"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><img decoding=\"async\" src=\"https:\/\/BradBlog.com\/Images\/SeeAmerica_WelcomeToMontana_SCOTUSinsert.jpg\" hspace=\"6\" vspace=\"3\" border=\"0\" align=\"right\"><a href=\"http:\/\/livewire.talkingpointsmemo.com\/entries\/supreme-court-knocks-out-montanas-challenge-to-citizens?m=1\">So much for states&#8217; rights<\/a> from the so-called &#8220;conservative&#8221; U.S. Supreme Court &#8212; as if 2000&#8217;s <i>Bush v. Gore<\/i> didn&#8217;t already tell you that they, like other &#8220;small government Conservatives&#8221;, were largely full of shit when making that pretend claim&#8230;only when convenient to their policy goals, of course&#8230;<\/p>\n<div class=\"media\">The Supreme Court reversed a decision by a Montana court supporting a state anti-corruption law passed in 1912 that prohibited corporate influence in state elections, reaffiriming that their <em>Citizens United<\/em> decision invalidates such restrictions. Montana, supported by 22 states and Sens. John McCain (R-AZ) and Sheldon Whitehouse (D-RI), had argued that their law should be allowed to stand because of the state&#8217;s <a href=\"http:\/\/2012.talkingpointsmemo.com\/2012\/06\/montana-case-could-give-supreme-court-a-second-look-at-citizens-united.php?ref=fpblg\">unique history of corruption<\/a> around its mining industry, which led to its passage by referendum. The court ruled against them 5-4, the same majority that determined <em>Citizens United<\/em>.<\/div>\n<p>You can read more about the courageous decision earlier this year by the Montana Supreme Court &#8212; the decision struck down today by SCOTUS &#8212; in <a href=\"https:\/\/bradblog.com\/?p=9040\">Ernie Canning&#8217;s coverage from January<\/a>.  In that case, even the <i>dissenting<\/i> MT Justice found the U.S. Supreme Court&#8217;s &#8220;entire concept&#8221; of corporate personhood to be &#8220;offensive.&#8221;<\/p>\n<p>&#8220;Corporations are not persons. Human beings are persons, and it is an affront to the inviolable dignity of our species that courts have created a legal fiction which forces people &#8212; human beings &#8212; to share fundamental, natural rights with soulless creations of government. &#8230; Indeed, it is truly ironic that the death penalty and hell are reserved only to natural persons,&#8221; wrote the <i>dissenting<\/i> Justice James C. Nelson who, clearly, disagreed with <i>Citizens United<\/i>, but dissented in the MT case because he believed &#8212; as SCOTUS affirmed today &#8212; that they, not states, can decide how campaign finance will or won&#8217;t work for every state in the entire nation.<\/p>\n<p>The 5-4 <i>Citizens United<\/i> majority has essentially told Montana &#8212; and every other state in the union &#8212; that they may not run their own elections as they wish. Even though Justice Anthony Kennedy had written for the majority in that case that &#8220;independent expenditures, including those made by corporations, do not give rise to corruption or the appearance of corruption,&#8221; the high court today decided not to review the record of corruption &#8212; essentially, mining companies buying up the entire state legislature in MT back at the turn of the 20th century &#8212; which gave rise to the now-dead Montana law.<\/p>\n<p>In Justice Stephen Breyer&#8217;s dissenting opinion of today&#8217;s summary reversal (made without even hearing oral arguments), he writes: &#8220;[E]ven if I were to accept <i>Citizens United<\/i>, this Court&#8217;s legal conclusion should not bar the Montana Supreme Court&#8217;s finding, made on the record before it, that independent expenditures by corporations did in fact lead to corruption or the appearance of corruption in Montana.&#8221;<\/p>\n<p>&#8220;Given the history and political landscape in Montana, that court concluded that the State had a compelling interest in limiting independent expenditures by corporations,&#8221; Breyer wrote in the dissent (joined by Justices Ginsburg, Sotomayor and Kagan). &#8220;Thus, Montana&#8217;s experience, like considerable experience elsewhere since the Court&#8217;s decision in <i>Citizens United<\/i>, casts grave doubt on the Court&#8217;s supposition that independent expenditures do not corrupt or appear to do so.&#8221;<\/p>\n<p>The court&#8217;s one paragraph summary reversal and Breyer&#8217;s full dissent can <a href=\"http:\/\/www.supremecourt.gov\/opinions\/11pdf\/11-1179h9j3.pdf\">both be read here [PDF]<\/a>.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>So much for states&#8217; rights from the so-called &#8220;conservative&#8221; U.S. Supreme Court &#8212; as if 2000&#8217;s Bush v. Gore didn&#8217;t already tell you that they, like other &#8220;small government Conservatives&#8221;, were largely full of shit when making that pretend claim&#8230;only when convenient to their policy goals, of course&#8230; The Supreme Court reversed a decision by [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":3,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"ep_exclude_from_search":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[405,28,183,313],"tags":[],"coauthors":[],"class_list":["post-9371","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-bush-legacy","category-election-reform","category-montana","category-us-supreme-court","bb-type-bradblog"],"acf":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/bradblog.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/9371","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/bradblog.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/bradblog.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/bradblog.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/3"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/bradblog.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=9371"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/bradblog.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/9371\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/bradblog.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=9371"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/bradblog.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=9371"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/bradblog.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=9371"},{"taxonomy":"author","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/bradblog.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcoauthors&post=9371"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}