{"id":9038,"date":"2012-01-03T23:15:21","date_gmt":"2012-01-04T07:15:21","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.bradblog.com\/?p=9038"},"modified":"2012-01-05T03:55:33","modified_gmt":"2012-01-05T11:55:33","slug":"santorum-wins-iowa-everyone-else-doesnt","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/bradblog.com\/?p=9038","title":{"rendered":"Santorum &#8216;Wins&#8217; Iowa, Everyone Else Doesn&#8217;t"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><center><img decoding=\"async\" border=\"0\" src=\"https:\/\/BradBlog.com\/Images\/RickSantorum_IowaVictory_010312.jpg\"><\/center><\/p><p style=\"margin-block-start: 0.9rem; margin-block-end: 0.9rem;\">[<b><i>UPDATED 1\/4\/12, 10:30am<\/i><\/b>]<\/p><p>The music has stopped, and the long game of musical chairs &#8212; otherwise known as the 2011 Republican Iowa Caucuses &#8212; has finally ended. Mostly.<\/p>\n<p>Twitterer <a href=\"http:\/\/twitter.com\/steveking_\/statuses\/154408356356964352\">Steve King may have put it best<\/a> when he said on Tuesday as the results we&#8217;re coming in: &#8220;By tomorrow morning Santorum will be on the lips of every American.&#8221; And it&#8217;s true. If you don&#8217;t believe him, just <a href=\"https:\/\/www.google.com\/#hl=en&#038;cp=5&#038;gs_id=k&#038;xhr=t&#038;q=santorum&#038;tok=jHJ2Ni7D25HWVAIFQ-Xjjw&#038;pf=p&#038;sclient=psy-ab&#038;site=&#038;source=hp&#038;pbx=1&#038;oq=santo&#038;aq=0&#038;aqi=g4&#038;aql=&#038;gs_sm=&#038;gs_upl=&#038;bav=on.2,or.r_gc.r_pw.,cf.osb&#038;fp=890a274ff6b690bf&#038;biw=1366&#038;bih=621\">Google it<\/a>.<\/p>\n<p>With 100% of the results now <a href=\"http:\/\/core.talkingpointsmemo.com\/election\/results\/iowa-caucuses-r\">reported<\/a>, Mitt Romney is said to have defeated Rick Santorum, a late comer, but one who finally surged from behind, by just 8 votes. <i>8 votes<\/i>.<\/p>\n<p>With his &#8220;victory,&#8221; however, Romney seems to have failed to even reach his own 2008 Iowa numbers. Then, when he came in second, he had 30,021 votes. Last night &#8212; a full four years and who-knows-how-many millions of dollars later &#8212; Romney&#8217;s total was almost identical, at 30,015. He fell by a total of 6 votes from four years ago. <i>6 votes<\/i>.<\/p>\n<p>While we&#8217;ve been told &#8212; largely by Fox &#8220;News&#8221; and the Republican candidates &#8212; how invigorated the Republican electorate is and how they&#8217;re chomping at the bit to defeat President Barack Obama, the turnout on Tuesday night doesn&#8217;t seem to suggest as much. Turnout was approximately 122,000 voters &#8212; just about 3,000 more than <a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Iowa_Republican_caucuses,_2008#Results_of_the_January_2008_caucuses\">in 2008<\/a>.  The lackluster turnout and the lack of a decisive winner resulted in commentary on Fox last night which resembled a funeral procession, as opposed to their usually (overly) upbeat coverage.<\/p>\n<p>In the meantime, Santorum <a href=\"http:\/\/2012.talkingpointsmemo.com\/2012\/01\/and-the-iowa-republican-presidential-winner-is.php\">reportedly<\/a> &#8220;spent only $120,000 on direct mail and advertising in Iowa versus <a href=\"http:\/\/tpmmuckraker.talkingpointsmemo.com\/2012\/01\/just_the_beginning_flood_of_super_pac_money_into_iowa_offers_2012_preview.php\">over $4.5 million<\/a> by outside groups backing Romney alone.&#8221;  Former RNC Deputy Research Director <a href=\"https:\/\/twitter.com\/#!\/alaskan\/status\/154597047444578304\">Matt Moon reports<\/a> that, when SuperPAC money is included, Romney will have paid $140 per Iowa caucus vote, while Santorum got a steal at just $21 a pop. Without SuperPAC money included, <a href=\"https:\/\/twitter.com\/#!\/alaskan\/status\/154597326088966144\">reports Moon<\/a>, Romney paid $49\/vote in Iowa, Santorum spent just $0.73. Some businessman that Romney is.<\/p>\n<p>But once again, with the reported results as close as they are, we&#8217;re reminded again that every single vote counts. Or at least it should. While every vote was <a href=\"https:\/\/bradblog.com\/?p=9023\">cast on a hand-marked paper ballot<\/a> at the GOP Iowa Caucuses (with <a href=\"https:\/\/bradblog.com\/?p=9016\">Republicans requiring no Photo ID to vote<\/a>), and those ballots supposedly counted <i>publicly by hand<\/i> at each caucus site where results were supposedly announced then and there before being phoned into Republican HQ, <a href=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/groups\/123218561114298\/159494607486693\/\">Bev Harris of BlackBoxVoting.org reports<\/a> that at least one large caucus in Des Moines was unwilling to release their results to CNN before phoning them in to the GOP.<\/p>\n<p>As we were watching reported results on Yahoo&#8217;s news site very late last night, the number of &#8220;reported&#8221; suddenly went backwards from 99.86% &#8220;REPORTING&#8221; back to 99.45%. It doesn&#8217;t look like numbers changed all that much in the bargain at the time. Santorum was still on top, but only by a handful of votes. Shortly afterwards the reported percentage became 100%, and Romney was announced the &#8220;winning&#8221; by just 8 votes.<\/p><p style=\"margin-block-start: 0.9rem; margin-block-end: 0.9rem;\">[<em>NOTE: Harris will be my guest on my <a href=\"http:\/\/kpfk.org\">KPFK<\/a>\/Pacifica Radio show today at 3:30p PT to discuss these matters, and concerns about next week&#8217;s &#8220;First-in-the-Nation&#8221; primary in NH. If you&#8217;re not in the Southern California area, you can <a href=\"http:\/\/kpfk.org\/listen-live.html\">listen live online right here<\/a>. &#8211; BF<\/em>]<\/p><p>We&#8217;re trying to learn more about the issues mentioned above, and a few other related concerns about the late-night announcement of final results at this wee hour of the morning. And its worth a reminder here that, as ever, problems at the &#8220;polls&#8221; (or caucuses in this case) or concerns about reported elections results don&#8217;t always emerge until days, weeks or sometimes even months later.<\/p>\n<p>But for now, no matter who is ultimately determined to be the winner of the 2012 Iowa Republican Caucuses, Santorum&#8217;s &#8220;victory&#8221; in the Hawkeye State is no small thing. Just ask <a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Iowa_Republican_caucuses,_2008#Results_of_the_January_2008_caucuses\">President Huckabee<\/a>.<\/p>\n<p><center><i><b>* * *<\/b><\/i><\/center><!--BB-DONATEPITCH-START--><\/p>\n<div style=\"background:#f5f0e0; border:2px solid #6b5a2e; border-radius:6px; padding:10px 14px; text-align:center; font-family:Georgia,serif;\"><span style=\"display:block; margin:0 0 8px 0; color:#3a2e0e; font-size:0.95em; line-height:1.5;\"><a href=\"http:\/\/www.BradBlog.com\">The BRAD BLOG<\/a> covers your electoral system, fiercely and independently, like no other media outlet in the nation. Please support our work with <a href=\"https:\/\/BradBlog.com\/Donate\">a donation<\/a> to help us keep going.<\/span><a href=\"https:\/\/bradblog.com\/Donate\" style=\"display:inline-block; background:#6b5a2e; color:#ffffff; padding:6px 18px; border-radius:4px; font-weight:bold; text-decoration:none; font-family:Georgia,serif; font-size:0.9em;\">Please CLICK HERE to help support our work today!<\/a><\/div>\n<p><!--BB-DONATEPITCH-END--><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>[UPDATED 1\/4\/12, 10:30am]The music has stopped, and the long game of musical chairs &#8212; otherwise known as the 2011 Republican Iowa Caucuses &#8212; has finally ended. Mostly. Twitterer Steve King may have put it best when he said on Tuesday as the results we&#8217;re coming in: &#8220;By tomorrow morning Santorum will be on the lips [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":3,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"ep_exclude_from_search":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[400,6,74,281,300,518],"tags":[],"coauthors":[],"class_list":["post-9038","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-election-2012","category-election-irregularities","category-iowa","category-mitt-romney","category-republicans","category-rick-santorum","bb-type-bradblog"],"acf":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/bradblog.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/9038","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/bradblog.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/bradblog.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/bradblog.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/3"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/bradblog.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=9038"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/bradblog.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/9038\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/bradblog.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=9038"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/bradblog.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=9038"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/bradblog.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=9038"},{"taxonomy":"author","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/bradblog.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcoauthors&post=9038"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}