{"id":8153,"date":"2010-10-27T14:28:26","date_gmt":"2010-10-27T21:28:26","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.bradblog.com\/?p=8153"},"modified":"2010-10-28T09:50:07","modified_gmt":"2010-10-28T16:50:07","slug":"judge-rules-for-ak-dems-gop-against-state-election-div-in-us-senate-write-in-controversy","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/bradblog.com\/?p=8153","title":{"rendered":"Judge Rules for AK Dems, GOP, Against State Election Div. in U.S. Senate Write-In Controversy"},"content":{"rendered":"[<em>The AK Supreme Court has put a stay on the Superior Court Judge&#8217;s order. For now. See important update at bottom of article.<\/em>]\n<p><img decoding=\"async\" src=\"https:\/\/BradBlog.com\/Images\/Murkowski_McAdams_Miller_TwoManRace.jpg\" hspace=\"6\" vspace=\"3\" border=\"0\" align=\"right\">As we&#8217;ve been suggesting in our two previous articles on the issue, the Alaska Division of Election&#8217;s unprecedented move to supply printed lists of write-in candidates to polling places, purportedly to &#8220;assist&#8221; voters seeking help, violates state election procedures.<\/p>\n<p>A judge today ruled in favor of the Alaska Democratic Party (ADP), as well as the state Republicans who joined the suit, by issuing a temporary restraining order finding the DoE&#8217;s practice a &#8220;clear violation of Alaska administrative regulation.&#8221;<\/p>\n<p>We <a href=\"https:\/\/bradblog.com\/?p=8142\">covered the issue over the weekend<\/a> when it first came up, as letters went back and forth between the ADP, who charged the procedure amounted to &#8220;electioneering&#8221; inside the polling place, and the DoE, who claimed they were required by state and federal law to provide such assistance to voters.<\/p>\n<p>We <a href=\"https:\/\/bradblog.com\/?p=8151\">covered it again last night<\/a>, when the DoE responded to our public records request for previous lists of printed write-in candidates by denying the request, since, as DoE Director Gail Fenumiai wrote, &#8220;The requested records do not exist.&#8221;<\/p>\n<p>State Superior Court Judge Frank Pfiffner agreed that the state&#8217;s argument &#8220;rings hollow&#8221;, noting, &#8220;If it were important &#8216;assistance&#8217; for the division to provide voters with lists of write-in candidates, then the division has been asleep at the switch for the past 50 years. The division first developed the need for a write-in candidate list 12 days ago.&#8221;<\/p>\n<p>The ruling comes as a blow to incumbent Republican Sen. Lisa Murkowski, who tossed her hat into the ring as a write-in candidate after her primary loss to the GOP&#8217;s Joe Miller. Along with Democratic nominee Scott McAdams, a fierce three-way battle has ensued for the open U.S. Senate seat from Alaska. Although it&#8217;s unclear what leg they have to stand on, the state has said they will appeal Pfiffner&#8217;s decision ordering the immediate removal of the printed list of &#8220;certified&#8221; write-in candidates from polling places across the state.  The judge also ruled that pollworkers may not mention Murkowski&#8217;s, or any write-in candidate&#8217;s name, to voters.<\/p>\n<p>As reported by Erika Bolstad in <a href=\"http:\/\/www.adn.com\/2010\/10\/27\/1521270\/judge-blocks-distribution-of-write.html\">today&#8217;s <i>Anchorage Daily News<\/i><\/a>&#8230;<\/p>\n<p><!--more--><\/p>\n<div class=\"media\">Calling it a &#8220;clear violation of Alaska administrative regulation,&#8221; a judge today ordered the state Division of Elections to remove a list of certified write-in candidates from polling places statewide.<\/p>\n<p>State Superior Court Judge Frank Pfiffner&#8217;s order not only keeps the state from providing the list but also forbids poll workers from providing to voters the names of any write-in candidates.<\/p>\n<p>The state said it will appeal the decision to the Alaska Supreme Court.<\/p>\n<p>The Division of Elections has been providing early voters who ask for assistance a list of all write-in candidates, and in one case actually posted the list at an early-voting location in Homer. The division had argued that it drew up the list because it anticipated an unusual number of questions about Sen. Lisa Murkowski&#8217;s write-in bid. The Alaska Democratic Party sued the state, asking it to drop the list at polling places, and the Alaska Republican Party joined the suit.<\/p>\n<p>Both political parties said the lists, which have been distributed to polling places statewide, are a considerable change from the state&#8217;s previous write-in practices. It directly violated a state regulation that forbids allowing any information about write-in candidates at the polling place or within 200 feet of its entrance, the judge noted.<\/p><\/div>\n<p>Whether the state is successful on appeal or not, the election itself could well become a nightmare of legal wrangling for the good folks of Alaska, as they wrestle with the state&#8217;s oft-failed, unreliable Diebold optical-scan system, and what seems to be a lack of specific rules about what constitutes a legal write-in vote, as <a href=\"https:\/\/bradblog.com\/?p=8078\">The BRAD BLOG detailed in August<\/a> after Murkowski announced her intentions.<\/p>\n<p>Between the lousy electronic scanners, and the lack of clear rules <i>prior<\/i> to the beginning of counting, it all sounds like a recipe for disaster to us.<\/p>\n<p>As we told Shannyn Moore, blogger and radio host on KUDO up there at the end of our on-air conversation about today&#8217;s ruling, &#8220;Good luck, Alaska!&#8221;  Have a feeling they&#8217;re gonna need it.<\/p>\n<p><center><i><b>* * *<\/b><\/i><\/center><\/p>\n<p><i><b>UPDATE 10\/28\/10:<\/b><\/i> Late last night, rather incredibly, actually, the AK Supremes have temporarily stayed the Superior Court&#8217;s order until they decide on a full, likely expedited, hearing on the issue. <a href=\"http:\/\/www.alaskadispatch.com\/blogs\/political-animal\/7305-alaska-supreme-court-issues-order-allowing-write-in-lists-for-now\">According to the <i>Alaska Dispatch<\/i>&#8230;<\/a><\/p>\n<div class=\"media\">The Alaska Supreme Court has stayed a temporary restraining order that would have stopped the Division of Elections from providing voters with a list of the write-in candidates.<\/p>\n<p>The <a href=\"http:\/\/www.alaskadispatch.com\/images\/media\/files\/news\/politics\/write-in-order-10-27-10.pdf\">Supreme Court&#8217;s order (PDF)<\/a> does say that the list cannot include the candidate&#8217;s party affiliation or any other information, however, and also calls for the segregation of all ballots cast by voters provided with the list of write-in candidates.<br \/>\n&#8230;<br \/>\nThe plaintiffs have until 3 p.m. Thursday to file a brief on whether the Alaska Supreme Court should take up the suit.<\/div>\n<p><center><i><b>* * *<\/b><\/i><\/center><!--BB-DONATEPITCH-START--><\/p>\n<div style=\"background:#f5f0e0; border:2px solid #6b5a2e; border-radius:6px; padding:10px 14px; text-align:center; font-family:Georgia,serif;\"><span style=\"display:block; margin:0 0 8px 0; color:#3a2e0e; font-size:0.95em; line-height:1.5;\"><a href=\"http:\/\/www.BradBlog.com\">The BRAD BLOG<\/a> covers your electoral system, fiercely and independently, like no other media outlet in the nation. Please support our work with <a href=\"https:\/\/BradBlog.com\/Donate\">a donation<\/a> to help us keep going.<\/span><a href=\"https:\/\/bradblog.com\/Donate\" style=\"display:inline-block; background:#6b5a2e; color:#ffffff; padding:6px 18px; border-radius:4px; font-weight:bold; text-decoration:none; font-family:Georgia,serif; font-size:0.9em;\">Please CLICK HERE to help support our work today!<\/a><\/div>\n<p><!--BB-DONATEPITCH-END--><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>[The AK Supreme Court has put a stay on the Superior Court Judge&#8217;s order. For now. See important update at bottom of article.] As we&#8217;ve been suggesting in our two previous articles on the issue, the Alaska Division of Election&#8217;s unprecedented move to supply printed lists of write-in candidates to polling places, purportedly to &#8220;assist&#8221; [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":3,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"ep_exclude_from_search":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[101,3,420,6,457,458,459,233],"tags":[],"coauthors":[],"class_list":["post-8153","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-alaska","category-dieboldpremier","category-election-2010","category-election-irregularities","category-joe-miller","category-lisa-murkowski","category-scott-mcadams","category-us-senate","bb-type-bradblog"],"acf":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/bradblog.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/8153","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/bradblog.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/bradblog.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/bradblog.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/3"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/bradblog.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=8153"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/bradblog.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/8153\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/bradblog.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=8153"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/bradblog.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=8153"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/bradblog.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=8153"},{"taxonomy":"author","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/bradblog.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcoauthors&post=8153"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}