{"id":7949,"date":"2010-07-16T11:06:15","date_gmt":"2010-07-16T18:06:15","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.bradblog.com\/?p=7949"},"modified":"2010-07-19T08:50:31","modified_gmt":"2010-07-19T15:50:31","slug":"us-chamber-of-commerce-ads-attacking-sestak-pulled-off-the-air-for-inaccuracy","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/bradblog.com\/?p=7949","title":{"rendered":"U.S. Chamber of Commerce Ads Against Sestak Pulled off Air for Inaccuracy | UPDATED: Ads Restored!"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><img decoding=\"async\" src=\"https:\/\/BradBlog.com\/Images\/JoeSestak_ChamberOfCommerce.jpg\" hspace=\"6\" vspace=\"3\" border=\"0\" align=\"right\">Good for Sinclair Broadcasting, <a href=\"http:\/\/www.pittsburghlive.com\/x\/pittsburghtrib\/news\/pittsburgh\/s_690585.html\">in this case<\/a>, pulling an inaccurate commercial off the air that was being run by the despicable corporate <a href=\"http:\/\/StopTheChamber.com\">money-launderers of the U.S. Chamber of Commerce<\/a>, attacking Democratic U.S. Senatorial candidate Joe Sestak in Pennsylvania.<\/p>\n<p>Of course, the ad was run on television <i>before<\/i> it was pulled. The fact-checking was <i>not<\/i> done in advance, so lies such as health insurance reform being &#8220;a government takeover of healthcare&#8221; were allowed to be aired as if they were legitimate claims.<\/p>\n<p>Naturally, the campaign of Sestak&#8217;s Republican opponent, Pat Toomey, backed up the Chamber&#8217;s ads, even as they are not <i>supposed<\/i> to be coordinating with such groups, according to the law. But what do quaint old notions like &#8220;the rule of law&#8221; really mean anymore in these United States anyway?<\/p>\n<p>What is underscored again here, is that corporate lobbyists and criminals like those at the U.S. Chamber of Commerce are now free to wield millions &#8212; even billions &#8212; of dollars for or against candidates they don&#8217;t like, or who may not meet with their corporate approval for any reason.<\/p>\n<p>That&#8217;s what the <a href=\"https:\/\/bradblog.com\/?p=7709\">U.S. Supreme Court has recently deemed<\/a> &#8220;free speech&#8221;. And you, dear private citizen of the United States of America, can do nothing about it &#8212; unless you happen to have a few hundred million extra dollars sitting around the house and want to exercise <i>your<\/i> &#8220;free speech&#8221; in producing and airing TV commercials in opposition. Good luck with that.<\/p>\n[<i>Please see, and support, VelvetRevolution.us&#8217; <a href=\"http:\/\/StopTheChamber.com\">StopTheChamber.com<\/a> campaign to help push back against the anti-American, anti-citizen Goliath that is the U.S. Chamber. Disclosure: <a href=\"http:\/\/www.BradBlog.com\">The BRAD BLOG<\/a> is a co-founder of VR.<\/i>]\n<p>* * *<\/p>\n<p><em><strong>UPDATE 4:04pm:<\/strong><\/em> Looks like the Rightwing corporate bosses at Sinclair may have come down on the local stations. <a href=\"http:\/\/www.huffingtonpost.com\/2010\/07\/16\/pittsburgh-television-sta_n_649471.html\">AP is now reporting<\/a> the Chamber says the ads are being restored:<\/p>\n<div class=\"media\">Two Pittsburgh-area TV stations are reversing a decision to pull a commercial attacking Democratic policies and the voting record of U.S. Senate candidate Joe Sestak.<\/p>\n<p>The U.S. Chamber of Commerce said Friday that the stations are restoring the ad that the business advocacy group sponsored.<\/p>\n<p>An official for sister stations WPGH and WPMY declined to comment.<\/p><\/div>\n[<em>Hat-tip <a href=\"https:\/\/bradblog.com\/?p=7949&#038;preview=true#comment-426592\">BRAD BLOG commenter Philip Shropshire<\/a>.<\/em>]\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Good for Sinclair Broadcasting, in this case, pulling an inaccurate commercial off the air that was being run by the despicable corporate money-launderers of the U.S. Chamber of Commerce, attacking Democratic U.S. Senatorial candidate Joe Sestak in Pennsylvania. Of course, the ad was run on television before it was pulled. The fact-checking was not done [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":3,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"ep_exclude_from_search":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[192,405,420,48,233,313],"tags":[],"coauthors":[],"class_list":["post-7949","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-accountability","category-bush-legacy","category-election-2010","category-pennsylvania","category-us-senate","category-us-supreme-court"],"acf":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/bradblog.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/7949","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/bradblog.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/bradblog.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/bradblog.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/3"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/bradblog.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=7949"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/bradblog.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/7949\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/bradblog.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=7949"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/bradblog.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=7949"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/bradblog.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=7949"},{"taxonomy":"author","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/bradblog.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcoauthors&post=7949"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}