{"id":791,"date":"2004-10-20T14:59:39","date_gmt":"2004-10-20T18:59:39","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.test.bradblog.com\/?p=791"},"modified":"2004-10-20T14:59:39","modified_gmt":"2004-10-20T18:59:39","slug":"if-you-call-this-a-liberal-media","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/bradblog.com\/?p=791","title":{"rendered":"If You Call This a &#8216;Liberal&#8217; Media&#8230;"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><img decoding=\"async\" src=\"https:\/\/BradBlog.com\/Images\/CNNBus.jpg\" hspace=\"6\" vspace=\"3\" border=\"0\" align=\"left\">Still in search of that &#8220;Liberal&#8221; media. Yesterday &#8220;the paper of record&#8221; <i>NY Times<\/i> headlined &#8220;<a href=\"http:\/\/www.nytimes.com\/2004\/10\/19\/politics\/campaign\/19catholic.html?ex=1098936000&#038;en=80007b54f251547f&#038;ei=5006&#038;partner=ALTAVISTA1\" target=\"_blank\">Letter Supports Anti-Kerry Bid Over Abortion<\/a>&#8221; which was, of course, then widely reported in the rest of the mainstream U.S. Media.<\/p>\n<p>Today, however, less reported is this: &#8220;<a href=\"http:\/\/reuters.myway.com\/article\/20041020\/2004-10-20T151709Z_01_L20123025_RTRIDST_0_NEWS-CAMPAIGN-KERRY-VATICAN-DC.html\" target=\"_blank\">Vatican Says Anti-Kerry Lawyer Hoodwinked Them<\/a>&#8220;<\/p>\n<p>Mission accomplished.<\/p>\n<p>I spend <i>far<\/i> too much time here discussing the obvious bias of Fox News. All but those without a shred of intellectual honesty understand FNC&#8217;s total hard-right bias. The more insidious deceptions are those at the less-than-obvious places like CNN, MSNBC and the Broadcast News Outlets.<\/p>\n<p>CNN has spent much air-time recently in several egregious misleads that are demonstrative of the way they bend towards the will of the Right. On Monday, as <a href=\"http:\/\/mediamatters.org\/items\/200410180010\" target=\"_blank\">documented<\/a> by <i>Media Matters<\/i>, Judy Woodruff and Bill Schneider blatantly mislead Americans with very selective polling data:<\/p>\n<div class=\"media\"> &#8230;on <i>News from CNN<\/i>, on-screen text falsely suggested that President George W. Bush&#8217;s favorable rating had risen to 55 percent in multiple polls. Later, on CNN&#8217;s <i>Inside Politics<\/i>, host Judy Woodruff selectively cited polls to assert that &#8220;the polls seem to be moving in President Bush&#8217;s favor.&#8221;<\/p>\n<p>The on-screen text, which aired on <i>News from CNN<\/i> during a report by CNN senior political analyst Bill Schneider, read, &#8220;Polls: Bush&#8217;s favorability rating rose from 51% to 55%.&#8221; But only one poll conducted in whole or in part since the conclusion of the debates, the CNN\/USA Today\/Gallup <a href=\"http:\/\/www.usatoday.com\/news\/politicselections\/nation\/polls\/usatodaypolls.htm\" target=\"_blank\" class=\"mlink\">poll<\/a>, shows Bush&#8217;s favorable rating that high. A <i>Washington Post<\/i> <a href=\"http:\/\/www.washingtonpost.com\/ac3\/ContentServer?pagename=polls&#038;nextstep=displayQuestion&#038;interactive=n&#038;pollid=2004286&#038;pripollid=&#038;varname=q6_1&#038;privarname=&#038;questCategoryType=n&#038;questCategory=The+President&#038;keyword=favorable&#038;pollDateRange=3&#038;ctabtype=A&#038;startingRow=1&#038;pollType=National&#038;searchPollId=0&#038;newsearch=http:\/\/www.washingtonpost.com\/ac3\/ContentServer?pagename=polls&#038;interactive=n;http:\/\/www.washingtonpost.com\/wp-srv\/politics\/polls\/polls.htm&#038;static=y\" target=\"_blank\" class=\"mlink\">tracking poll<\/a> conducted October 12-14 gave Bush a 50 percent favorable rating, a <i>TIME<\/i> magazine <a href=\"http:\/\/www.time.com\/time\/election2004\/article\/0,18471,725047,00.html\" target=\"_blank\" class=\"mlink\">poll<\/a> conducted October 14-15 placed Bush&#8217;s favorability at 49 percent, and RealClearPolitics.com <a href=\"http:\/\/www.realclearpolitics.com\/bush_kerry_favorability.html\" target=\"_blank\" class=\"mlink\">reported<\/a> that a <i>Newsweek<\/i> poll conducted October 14-15 rated Bush&#8217;s favorability at 51 percent.<\/div>\n<p>And then, almost &#8220;incomprehensibly&#8221;, as <i>Media Matters<\/i> <a href=\"http:\/\/mediamatters.org\/items\/200410190005\" target=\"_Blank\">describes<\/a> it, CNN did the exact same thing again yesterday when Rush Limbaugh&#8217;s girlfriend, CNN anchor Daryn Kagan, excluded all but the one or two polls that show Bush with an increasing lead in what she described as a &#8220;comprehensive overview&#8221; of the latest polls.<\/p>\n<p>But it didn&#8217;t stop there. Later yesterday, CNN <a href=\"http:\/\/mediamatters.org\/items\/200410190008\" target=\"_blank\">then used a poll<\/a> taken from Sep. 22 to Oct 1 (prior to even the <i>first<\/i> Presidential Debate!) to make their case that Bush was leading by 7 points in Ohio!  At least <i><u>five<\/u> more recent polls<\/i> in Ohio, show either a tie there, Kerry ahead by several points or Bush ahead within the margin of error.<\/p>\n<p>CNN&#8230;Keeping the electorate well disinformed just weeks before they must decide who will lead the &#8220;Free World&#8221; for the next four years. And again, I must ask, what &#8220;Liberal&#8221; Media?<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Still in search of that &#8220;Liberal&#8221; media. Yesterday &#8220;the paper of record&#8221; NY Times headlined &#8220;Letter Supports Anti-Kerry Bid Over Abortion&#8221; which was, of course, then widely reported in the rest of the mainstream U.S. Media. Today, however, less reported is this: &#8220;Vatican Says Anti-Kerry Lawyer Hoodwinked Them&#8220; Mission accomplished. I spend far too much [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":3,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"ep_exclude_from_search":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[1],"tags":[],"coauthors":[],"class_list":["post-791","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-uncategorized","bb-type-bradblog"],"acf":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/bradblog.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/791","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/bradblog.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/bradblog.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/bradblog.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/3"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/bradblog.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=791"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/bradblog.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/791\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/bradblog.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=791"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/bradblog.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=791"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/bradblog.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=791"},{"taxonomy":"author","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/bradblog.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcoauthors&post=791"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}